First, it is said that there was a state of Oneness. This "whole" was "full," and because there was no time, the past, present, and future did not exist, and it was therefore immutable at all times (since there was no time).
It was also "consciousness" itself. Even now, the deep consciousness of humans is this Oneness. It is a peaceful consciousness, peaceful, and without conflict.
Then, this consciousness of Oneness "wanted to know" itself, which was also Oneness. It didn't understand itself very well. Initially, it was simply in a state of drowsiness. If it remained that way, understanding would not progress.
Therefore, it divided itself into two, so that they could see each other. By looking at itself from the outside, it became easier to see than before, but it still didn't understand very well. Therefore, it further divided and fixed things in a hierarchical manner. As it separated and fixed things, it gradually became more material.
When it was Oneness, it was infinitely more subtle than anything material. It was something that was not material; that was Oneness. Eventually, it became coarser and more material. It was a fluid substance. Eventually, not only fluid substances but also fixed substances came into being. And over a long period of time, the universe as we know it today was created. Galaxies, stars, and planets were created.
One of them is the Earth, where we live.
In this way, the current universe exists as a result of being divided into many parts from an initial "desire to know."
Initially, it was simply a desire to know, but as it separated, various illusions (maya) were also created. Maya is something that does not actually exist, but feels as if it does. In addition to not understanding itself very well, the sense of connection was lost due to being separated, and emotions such as anxiety and fear were born. Many illusions (maya) were created. On the other hand, there was also love, which is about supporting and understanding each other. It is a limited love. When it was Oneness, it was simply filled and unchanging, a peaceful consciousness. It was the materialization that brought about change.
In spirituality, oneness is often described as being all-knowing and all-powerful. While it is true that ultimate oneness is all-knowing and all-powerful, and exists independently of the time axis, this universe, while being extremely close to oneness, is not oneness itself. The expression that the universe is oneness is a metaphor that is correct when viewed from the perspective of a single human being. Therefore, while there are aspects of oneness in the universe as described in spirituality, the universe initially did not know things, and the universe began with the desire to know. However, it seems that it is acceptable to broadly refer to the universe as oneness. This is because, due to the difference between human cognition and the time axis, one is forced to say so. However, if one were to say that the oneness of the universe itself is not all-knowing and all-powerful because it has a desire for "knowledge" and "understanding," that would be a misrepresentation. The oneness of the universe itself is also growing, and there are new pieces of knowledge that exist in addition to everything it already knows. The universe is, in a sense, oneness, but it is not the ultimate totality of oneness, so it can learn. Although it has acquired quite a bit of knowledge now, and it may seem perfect from the perspective of humans, it was once in a state of not knowing much. Even now, it is not literally perfect, and the activity of understanding will continue forever. The universe transcends space and time, so it is not strictly an eternal time axis. However, there is a time axis of evolution for the entire universe that exists outside of human perception of time, which can also be called a higher dimension. The entire universe is engaged in this activity of seeking understanding, which seems to last forever. That is a mystery.
... This story, although it has been said for a long time, seems to have had various interpretations.
Because the original purpose is "understanding," the laws of the world ultimately tend towards that "understanding." That is why there is an environment called Earth. Without it, understanding cannot progress. Therefore, basically, any act that destroys the Earth is not permissible. Basically, there is a non-interference law in the universe, and the freedom of planets is guaranteed. The inhabitants of each planet can freely do things on their planet. However, if there is a situation where the inhabitants of a planet are likely to destroy the planet, interference from the universe is permitted.
In this way, the universe has a deep understanding that allows it to watch until the very end, allowing us to learn. Even when humans on Earth do foolish things like wars and environmental destruction, the people of the universe are essentially just watching. If they were to help, it would prevent "understanding" from occurring. It is important that we, ourselves, watch, listen, and understand what we have done, rather than being told what to do by others (in this case, aliens) and blindly obeying.
Currently, many rules and laws are based on the principle of "not causing trouble to others." However, I believe that laws should ideally be based on the fundamental principle of "understanding."
In conflicts, people often argue that they are "causing trouble to others," which perpetuates the conflict. Whether it's personal matters, or conflicts between countries or ethnicities, each side claims the right to retaliate against those who have caused them trouble, leading to endless conflict.
I believe that even such conflicts can be resolved by considering them in accordance with this fundamental principle of "understanding."
It is natural that understanding cannot progress if emotions obscure the truth. Anger and hatred prevent us from reaching understanding, and thus, conflicts continue. However, even in conflict, if "understanding" is achieved, the conflict will end.
This is a relatively simple story, but in this world, the logic of "not causing trouble to others" is often at the root. This applies not only to politicians and rulers, but also to people who claim to be "lightworkers." They invoke metaphysics and other old arguments to reinforce this logic, claiming that "exercising power over others is not violence, but a righteous act," thereby justifying conflicts in the world. This seems to be the current state of the world.
The world does not think like Japan, which emphasizes "understanding each other."
Things should be relatively simple if we use "understanding" as a standard, but in the world, complex arguments are often made, and this complexity reinforces the ego. For example, stories like "not causing trouble to others" are often spoken of as if they are the ultimate guidelines. However, these are merely preconditions for creating an environment for understanding, not the ultimate guidelines themselves. When people mistakenly believe that these preconditions are the ultimate guidelines, they end up constructing strange theories. And then, they believe that they are superior because they understand these complex arguments, and that their own violence is justified because it is an exercise of power.
For example, if you remove the concept of "understanding," you end up with a binary interpretation of "don't cause trouble to others," which becomes an absolute rule. As a result, you might genuinely believe something like, "Since you shouldn't harm others, you shouldn't just watch fights; you must stop them. If someone harms you, they are wrong. Since harming someone is bad, it's okay to retaliate against bad people. Retaliating is not violence but an exercise of power and a righteous act." This kind of reasoning is what's causing conflicts around the world. In ordinary society, the binary thinking of "we are right and just, and they are wrong" is deeply ingrained. This isn't just in ordinary society, but also among self-proclaimed "light workers." Even if they claim to be saving the world, they are essentially operating on the same level. Sometimes, the activities of self-proclaimed light workers are spontaneous, and they may believe they are contributing to the world. However, this sense of contribution is based on a binary framework, and it's only one side of the relative good and evil. Both sides believe they are acting righteously, and with this kind of binary thinking, peace will never come to the world.
If you focus on "understanding," you can interpret things very differently. "Don't cause trouble to others because it confuses their minds and hinders understanding. Don't harm others because others are essentially extensions of yourself; they exist to allow you to see yourself from the outside. If those extensions disappear, understanding becomes impossible. Therefore, you shouldn't hurt or try to eliminate others. When you see people fighting, you need to understand what they are learning from it. It's not always best to immediately stop a fight, because often conflict hinders understanding, so it's better to stop it quickly. Even if someone harms you, don't immediately assume they are evil; consider that you may lack understanding. To help them progress in understanding, first stop the fighting, and then try to make them understand. Understanding itself is a righteous act. Ignorance is the root of evil." In reality, there are differences in cognitive abilities, and there are people who simply cannot understand. For example, if someone has a distorted perception of others, it can be difficult for others to understand them. Similarly, if there's a significant difference in intelligence, someone with a much higher IQ may not understand what someone else is saying. Therefore, the idea of being able to fully understand each other is not always possible, and people who focus on "understanding" recognize this. They understand that it's a relative concept, and that there are many things in the world that they don't yet understand, and many things that they are still far from understanding.
On the other hand, people who fall into such dualistic thinking often define the ultimate logic of the world as something like "causing trouble for others," and they extend this to establish basic principles. However, the resulting guidelines ultimately lead to statements like "Justice is justice, and evil is evil, therefore, evil can and should be destroyed." This justifies conflicts in the world. These self-proclaimed "light workers" are essentially in the realm of cults or religions, and the background of religious conflicts in the world is based on such dualistic logic.
The creation of the world does not necessarily mean it ends when it is created; it also includes the possibility of starting over if it fails. When starting over, it doesn't always involve a "major disaster" as imagined by the public; it simply freezes the timeline and temporarily stops it. It's similar to waking up from a dream, where the dream suddenly ends. In this case, the space is preserved and frozen in a state where it can be resumed. The freezing of the timeline is done within the range of influence of the administrator who manages it, and for example, the administrator of the Earth would perform such actions on the Earth's timeline. Major disasters occur when partially restarting, while if the overall situation is not good, it is frozen. When frozen, it may go back a little and restart, or it may shift interest to another timeline.
This is done on the unit of "Earth administrator," so the will of individual humans does not enter into it. However, for some reason, there are self-proclaimed "light workers" on Earth who claim to be "maintaining this world." These people not only say that "maintenance is justice," but also claim that "destruction is evil." And for some reason, they also emphasize "beauty" and promote "maintenance and beauty." I think this is because, while destruction and creation lead to something new, clinging to maintenance causes things to become old and zombie-like, and "beauty" is used to cover up this fact, and it is also covered up with convoluted logic. Maintenance can only exist after creation, and destruction always comes after maintenance. However, these "light workers" consider "maintenance" to be the highest good and consider "destruction" to be evil. They also say that it is okay to use force against evil, and that the use of force against the evil of destruction is not violence, thereby justifying their own violent actions. It is because such people exist that conflicts do not disappear from the world.
Such people, due to their lack of understanding of concepts like "maintenance" and "beauty," seem to be thinking in that way in order to understand them, but in any case, there is no difference in the fact that they claim to be lightworkers while justifying their violence as justice.
This is a very arrogant attitude. The world is beautiful because it has the three elements of "creation, maintenance, and destruction." If it specializes in "maintenance," the balance will be disrupted, and the beauty of the world will gradually disappear. It's a very simple matter. Moreover, "maintenance" as "oneness" is a different story. In this physical dimension, a cycle of creation, maintenance, and destruction occurs. On the other hand, the fundamental oneness always has only "maintenance." In fact, dimensions overlap. In this Earth, what appears as creation is maintenance from the perspective of oneness, what appears as maintenance on this Earth is also maintenance in oneness, and even what appears as destruction on this Earth is maintenance from the perspective of oneness. This "maintenance" as oneness is not something that humans strive for; it has always been and will always be, which is why oneness is eternal. However, for some reason, self-proclaimed lightworkers claim that maintenance cannot be achieved through human effort. This is because they do not understand the concept of "maintenance" in oneness, and they are likely misunderstanding and acting based on ignorance. In any case, there are people who, while claiming to be lightworkers, are self-satisfied and engaged in "maintenance" activities.
There is "maintenance" of oneness that far surpasses the efforts of such humans, and it is not something that can be achieved through human work, but self-proclaimed lightworkers often do not understand this.
Without talking about "understanding," it may feel like a vague story that sounds impressive, and people may believe it. If these are lightworkers who have some power and can use techniques, the damage caused by their misunderstanding, lack of understanding, and ignorance can be severe. When people with some influence put forward strange arguments and claim justice, it results in a situation where each side argues that they are right and the other side is wrong, and the conflicts in the world will never end.
The original creation of the world starts with dividing it into two, and since the purpose is "understanding," it will not be a situation where all people in the world can understand each other. If that were the case, the universe would have achieved its purpose and ended. The fact that this world exists means that there are parts that cannot be understood, and that is because the consciousness that was originally one is divided into existence as an act of understanding oneself.
Therefore, self-proclaimed lightworkers who come up with some kind of logic and say, "If you can make others understand this, and if they adopt this way of thinking, the world will become peaceful," are getting closer to the answer, but it is not the ultimate understanding.
Or, it may be a completely different understanding. For example, other self-proclaimed lightworkers in cult groups who say, "Don't cause trouble to others," also explain various things such as "Don't harm others" in a parallel or inclusive manner, which seems understandable but is not, and the underlying principle is probably "separation." "Don't cause trouble to others (because it's better to be separated)," or "Don't harm others (because it's better to be separated)," or "It's okay to offer your service to evil. Evil should be destroyed (because it's better to be separated)," and furthermore, these self-proclaimed lightworkers seem to belittle the concept of "oneness" by saying, "That's not true. There is good and evil in this world. Oneness is a recent and strange idea." Or, they are somehow afraid of oneness. They draw a line between the realm of oneness, saying, "The realm of oneness is dangerous because it contains both good and evil." And, despite claiming to be lightworkers, they somehow base their activities on "separation," and they claim that their activities maintain the world. In this way, they twist their logic to convince themselves, and they disguise the separation by changing the words to "good" and "evil," but because they are fundamentally based on separation, there is endless conflict in terms of ideology and action. Such self-proclaimed lightworkers claim to be engaged in peaceful activities for "maintenance," but in reality, they are creating or supporting the conflicts in the world.
In addition to these activities, self-proclaimed lightworkers can also be said to be immature in terms of their spirit. A relevant and insightful anecdote from yoga is that people often experience fear as a common experience before reaching oneness. This is because oneness means the disappearance of the self, so the ego resists and feels fear before reaching oneness. Self-proclaimed lightworkers come up with strange logic such as, "Oneness includes everything (both good and evil), so it can create anything, which is dangerous. The stage before oneness is good (which is maintenance) and justice," which may seem true at first glance, but it is actually wrong. In reality, oneness means that everything is creation, maintenance, and destruction, but somehow, self-proclaimed lightworkers present this strange story, defining maintenance as good and destruction as evil. This is simply the ego's resistance, creating convenient logic to prevent reaching oneness, which is a fantasy created by the ego as a barrier to reaching oneness. However, many experienced yogis or meditators overcome this fear and reach oneness, and once they reach oneness, the ego's resistance stops and they reach a peaceful state. Before reaching this peaceful state of oneness, they twist their logic, reject oneness, and justify their actions as "good" for "maintenance," and they consider those who hinder this "maintenance" as "evil," and they justify their violence as "not violence, but service of power for maintenance," thereby supporting the ideological basis of conflicts in this world, and wars and conflicts continue endlessly in terms of both emotion and ideology. In this way, if you define "maintenance" as justice before oneness, the conflict will never end. On the other hand, if you base it on "understanding," the conflict can be brought to an end. The fact that we divided it into two for "understanding" means that there was no understanding in the first place. If we are divided into two and understand each other, and if the original "self" that was oneness exists in order to deepen understanding, then it is necessary to stop fighting and conflicts and deepen understanding. If this understanding spreads, the world will become peaceful.
In order to understand this contrast, for example, the famous saying of Ramana Maharshi is helpful in understanding oneness. "The fear and trembling that occur when trying to enter samadhi are due to the fact that a small amount of ego still remains. But when the ego completely dies and leaves no trace, a person remains only in a space of pure consciousness where only bliss expands. And the trembling disappears." (From "As You Are: The Teachings of Ramana Maharshi") On the other hand, if the ego remains, one feels fear, avoids oneness, and uses sophistry to belittle oneself, avoiding seeing the conflict that is the source of internal strife, and justifies violence against others as an exercise of power or with some other sophistry. The difference is clear. When one reaches oneness, one loses interest in exercising power, whereas before reaching oneness, exercising power is of interest, so one may be interested in studying techniques to increase influence over others, such as magic. However, the person does not realize that this is a great detour, and the ego becomes larger due to the power gained through rituals, becoming a troublesome and evil entity.
I think that the fact that the fundamental nature of self-proclaimed lightworkers is actually "separation" is something that is intuitively and socially recognized. However, many people may feel that they somehow understand this, but they do not grasp it at the root. I myself, until recently, felt that self-proclaimed lightworkers were clearly separated, but I also felt a sense of unease, and I could not say that I had made much progress in "understanding" the root of this. And when I clearly understood again that what I intuitively felt was "separation" was at the core, I finally reached a state of understanding. In order to understand what this "separation" is, self-proclaimed lightworkers appeared around me, helping to promote my understanding.
This world exists for the sake of understanding, so there must be divisions in understanding, and situations where people cannot understand each other. This should be a fundamental premise. Gathering people with the same ideas or forming countries can lead to a situation where understanding stagnates. In such a situation, the managers of the Earth shake things up to disrupt the stability. By becoming unstable, social interaction occurs, and understanding progresses. In this process, self-proclaimed lightworkers may seem to be effective in seeking "stability" locally, but overall, they are often making wasted efforts. However, the transformative activities of the managers of the Earth do not pay attention to such ignorant self-proclaimed lightworkers, and they proceed steadily. This is because those who do not understand are the ones who should be shaken.
In this way, since the goal is mutual understanding, the social system should also be based on the premise that people cannot understand each other, while still aiming for understanding. If that is the case, the idea of upholding one's own sense of justice and punishing evil should disappear, and people should arrive at the idea of what should be done for the sake of understanding. Only then will the world finally become peaceful. At that time, self-proclaimed "light workers" will lose their purpose and either disband or lose their power.
Indeed, there will be a transitional period in this process of change, and if people with vastly different levels of intelligence live nearby, it will cause problems. Therefore, a certain framework of "countries" will likely be necessary for quite some time, perhaps for hundreds of years. So, while a nation that protects its citizens may be better off continuing for a while, as understanding progresses, the intellectual level of the Earth will become more uniform, and eventually, conflicts will disappear through the advancement of understanding.
It is also prophesied that there will be an intervention to forcibly stop conflicts at some point before that. However, even so, intervention is only a temporary treatment. Therefore, until mutual understanding progresses, this Earth will continue to be divided, and eventually, peace will come to the Earth.
Peace and harmony are actually a superficial understanding.
The purpose of the universe's creation is "understanding," so harmony is merely a means to create an environment for that. Therefore, even if people advocate for peace and harmony, it often doesn't resonate at a fundamental level.
In reality, this isn't just an issue on Earth; some extraterrestrial beings, such as those from Pleiades, seem to have similar tendencies. Within my group soul, there are souls who once lived on Pleiades in a spaceship and have now returned to the group soul. Tracing their memories, it seems that Pleiades isolates and separates criminals.
I don't remember the exact criteria, but those who disrupt harmony or harm others were likely confined to a certain planet, where they would live out the rest of their lives. It seems that there was an environment where males and females did not interact, and it was not possible to have children. This was a measure to prevent criminals from having offspring and to avoid increasing the population of people similar to criminals.
Some Pleiades people believe that Earth should do the same, and the idea of separating criminals and preventing them from having offspring has been occasionally conveyed to Earth contactees.
Some people who blindly believe in extraterrestrials might take this as something said by "god-like" beings, but it may not be very persuasive if said by someone like me, an Earthling. However, this view is a flawed aspect of Pleiades.
The fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding." If criminals are separated and prevented from having offspring, it hinders the progress of that fundamental purpose. This is a serious matter for the universe's administrators.
Pleiades beings, despite being extraterrestrial, are not beings who have evolved and grown to the point of being without physical bodies. They are incomplete and are in the process of learning. In fact, this universe itself is divided into two or more parts for the purpose of learning, so there are no perfect beings. They are constantly evolving through learning. By isolating others who they deem as criminals based on their own judgment, they maintain a seemingly peaceful state, but this lack of "understanding" leads to pent-up dissatisfaction.
The Orion War, for example, seems to have started with such subtle and minor dissatisfactions. It began with unsolicited and intrusive advice to other civilizations, such as "Why are you doing it that way? You should do it this way." They judged others without understanding the nuances and differences, and that led to division. The root cause was that they neglected the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe, which led them to deny civilizations with different ways of thinking, ultimately causing a major war in the universe.
The underlying principle seems to be "do not cause harm to others." This is the principle that caused the Orion War and continues to cause conflicts on Earth. Although this principle has various derivations and different arguments, the fundamental principle remains the same: the inability to contemplate the fact that "understanding" was the reason for the universe's creation leads to a premature conclusion, creating a dualistic logic of good and evil, justifying the use of power, and perpetuating conflict.
This is not a call to refrain from resisting those who initiate conflict. Self-defense is justifiable. However, using concepts of "good" and "evil" to justify the use of force in a given situation is a superficial understanding that perpetuates the cycle of conflict. From the perspective that self-defense is meant to create an environment for understanding, the extent to which self-defense is appropriate becomes clear depending on the situation.
There are differences in intellectual level and prior knowledge, so understanding may not always appear immediately. Nevertheless, it is necessary to take actions in advance that will allow for understanding later.
Therefore, it is also a superficial understanding to say that self-defense is for the sake of harmony or peace. Harmony and peace do not necessarily lead to understanding. Harmony and peace make it easier for understanding to emerge, but peace is not the ultimate goal. Some people may view peace and harmony as a state where "one does not cause harm to others (so everyone can do as they please)," so it is clear that peace and harmony do not always lead to understanding.
In such cases, if harmony and peace themselves become the ultimate goals, it can lead to a situation where "understanding" is not achieved, and one is simply used by people with different goals. Of course, peace and harmony can also lead to understanding, but the current reality is that this is not always the case. There have been repeated instances where, even though both sides believe that peace and harmony are the ultimate goals, they eventually realize that they are gathering people with different ultimate goals, leading to a split.
On the other hand, if "understanding" is established as the goal from the beginning, harmony and peace become intermediate processes or preconditions, and understanding itself is the result. Therefore, harmony and peace naturally emerge as a result. Forced harmony and peace without understanding can lead to division and discord, creating new conflicts, while aiming for understanding gradually eliminates such divisions and conflicts.
This requires effort from both sides, and true peace and harmony are achieved only when both parties try to understand each other.
This may seem like a minor difference at first glance. However, this point is actually crucial, as even minor misunderstandings can trigger wars in the universe, and wars and conflicts on Earth often occur due to similar trivial matters.
In reality, this isn't just an issue on Earth; some extraterrestrial beings, such as those from Pleiades, seem to have similar tendencies. Within my group soul, there are souls who once lived on Pleiades in a spaceship and have now returned to the group soul. Tracing their memories, it seems that Pleiades isolates and separates criminals.
I don't remember the exact criteria, but those who disrupt harmony or harm others were likely confined to a certain planet, where they would live out the rest of their lives. It seems that there was an environment where males and females did not interact, and it was not possible to have children. This was a measure to prevent criminals from having offspring and to avoid increasing the population of people similar to criminals.
Some Pleiades people believe that Earth should do the same, and the idea of separating criminals and preventing them from having offspring has been occasionally conveyed to Earth contactees.
Some people who blindly believe in extraterrestrials might take this as something said by "god-like" beings, but it may not be very persuasive if said by someone like me, an Earthling. However, this view is a flawed aspect of Pleiades.
The fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding." If criminals are separated and prevented from having offspring, it hinders the progress of that fundamental purpose. This is a serious matter for the universe's administrators.
Pleiades beings, despite being extraterrestrial, are not beings who have evolved and grown to the point of being without physical bodies. They are incomplete and are in the process of learning. In fact, this universe itself is divided into two or more parts for the purpose of learning, so there are no perfect beings. They are constantly evolving through learning. By isolating others who they deem as criminals based on their own judgment, they maintain a seemingly peaceful state, but this lack of "understanding" leads to pent-up dissatisfaction.
The Orion War, for example, seems to have started with such subtle and minor dissatisfactions. It began with unsolicited and intrusive advice to other civilizations, such as "Why are you doing it that way? You should do it this way." They judged others without understanding the nuances and differences, and that led to division. The root cause was that they neglected the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe, which led them to deny civilizations with different ways of thinking, ultimately causing a major war in the universe.
The underlying principle seems to be "do not cause harm to others." This is the principle that caused the Orion War and continues to cause conflicts on Earth. Although this principle has various derivations and different arguments, the fundamental principle remains the same: the inability to contemplate the fact that "understanding" was the reason for the universe's creation leads to a premature conclusion, creating a dualistic logic of good and evil, justifying the use of power, and perpetuating conflict.
This is not a call to refrain from resisting those who initiate conflict. Self-defense is justifiable. However, using concepts of "good" and "evil" to justify the use of force in a given situation is a superficial understanding that perpetuates the cycle of conflict. From the perspective that self-defense is meant to create an environment for understanding, the extent to which self-defense is appropriate becomes clear depending on the situation.
There are differences in intellectual level and prior knowledge, so understanding may not always appear immediately. Nevertheless, it is necessary to take actions in advance that will allow for understanding later.
Therefore, it is also a superficial understanding to say that self-defense is for the sake of harmony or peace. Harmony and peace do not necessarily lead to understanding. Harmony and peace make it easier for understanding to emerge, but peace is not the ultimate goal. Some people may view peace and harmony as a state where "one does not cause harm to others (so everyone can do as they please)," so it is clear that peace and harmony do not always lead to understanding.
In such cases, if harmony and peace themselves become the ultimate goals, it can lead to a situation where "understanding" is not achieved, and one is simply used by people with different goals. Of course, peace and harmony can also lead to understanding, but the current reality is that this is not always the case. There have been repeated instances where, even though both sides believe that peace and harmony are the ultimate goals, they eventually realize that they are gathering people with different ultimate goals, leading to a split.
On the other hand, if "understanding" is established as the goal from the beginning, harmony and peace become intermediate processes or preconditions, and understanding itself is the result. Therefore, harmony and peace naturally emerge as a result. Forced harmony and peace without understanding can lead to division and discord, creating new conflicts, while aiming for understanding gradually eliminates such divisions and conflicts.
This requires effort from both sides, and true peace and harmony are achieved only when both parties try to understand each other.
This may seem like a minor difference at first glance. However, this point is actually crucial, as even minor misunderstandings can trigger wars in the universe, and wars and conflicts on Earth often occur due to similar trivial matters.
The feeling of discomfort with "everyone is different and everyone is good."
Regarding the word related to "understanding" mentioned earlier, there is this phrase. Every time I hear this phrase in public, I often feel that there is a "controlling others" intention behind it.
I think that many people generally feel that this phrase is a good one, but as I mentioned earlier, if we interpret it based on the two principles of "understanding" and "not causing trouble to others," this phrase can be interpreted in two ways.
First, if we take "understanding" as the fundamental principle, it is natural that everyone is different because the universe has been divided into more than two. As for the part that says "everyone is good," it was originally a state of oneness, and both are part of oneself, so the word "good" may not be appropriate, but it can be said that it is not a completely wrong word.
On the other hand, if we interpret it with the nuance of "not causing trouble to others," it becomes a story of "everyone is different, so everyone should be free," and "everyone has their own ego, so everyone should do what they like." Therefore, deliberately telling others something in a roundabout way like that implies a strong intention of "don't interfere with me," of not involving others, and of forcefully imposing one's own way. In order to hide this in euphemisms, it is expressed as "everyone is different and everyone is good," and it is often spoken by pleasant celebrities or advertised through songs with beautiful melodies.
In reality, the people who sing or promote it may have the purpose of "understanding" or "harmony," but there is someone behind them who is making them say it, and by interpreting when and to whom they say it, and what is happening in society, and why they repeatedly repeat this and try to change the topic and erase it, I often feel the unpleasant intentions of those people behind them, even though the celebrities themselves may not be at fault or may not be thinking that much. I don't feel anything bad about the celebrities themselves, but I feel a sense of discomfort with the intentions of the people who are planning it.
This phrase is interpreted in the context of "understanding" and "harmony" in Japan, but I think that if the same thing is said in a foreign country, it may be interpreted in the context of "everyone is different, so everyone should do what they want." What do you think? In Japan as well, self-proclaimed lightworkers often act based on the principle of "not causing trouble to others," and it is often interpreted in a similar context.
Perhaps it also differs by generation, and what was understood in the context of "harmony" and "understanding" by one generation may be interpreted as "freedom" and "independence" by a different generation. It seems to be a subtle word like that. It might be interesting to hear from people of different generations about this.
I think that many people generally feel that this phrase is a good one, but as I mentioned earlier, if we interpret it based on the two principles of "understanding" and "not causing trouble to others," this phrase can be interpreted in two ways.
First, if we take "understanding" as the fundamental principle, it is natural that everyone is different because the universe has been divided into more than two. As for the part that says "everyone is good," it was originally a state of oneness, and both are part of oneself, so the word "good" may not be appropriate, but it can be said that it is not a completely wrong word.
On the other hand, if we interpret it with the nuance of "not causing trouble to others," it becomes a story of "everyone is different, so everyone should be free," and "everyone has their own ego, so everyone should do what they like." Therefore, deliberately telling others something in a roundabout way like that implies a strong intention of "don't interfere with me," of not involving others, and of forcefully imposing one's own way. In order to hide this in euphemisms, it is expressed as "everyone is different and everyone is good," and it is often spoken by pleasant celebrities or advertised through songs with beautiful melodies.
In reality, the people who sing or promote it may have the purpose of "understanding" or "harmony," but there is someone behind them who is making them say it, and by interpreting when and to whom they say it, and what is happening in society, and why they repeatedly repeat this and try to change the topic and erase it, I often feel the unpleasant intentions of those people behind them, even though the celebrities themselves may not be at fault or may not be thinking that much. I don't feel anything bad about the celebrities themselves, but I feel a sense of discomfort with the intentions of the people who are planning it.
This phrase is interpreted in the context of "understanding" and "harmony" in Japan, but I think that if the same thing is said in a foreign country, it may be interpreted in the context of "everyone is different, so everyone should do what they want." What do you think? In Japan as well, self-proclaimed lightworkers often act based on the principle of "not causing trouble to others," and it is often interpreted in a similar context.
Perhaps it also differs by generation, and what was understood in the context of "harmony" and "understanding" by one generation may be interpreted as "freedom" and "independence" by a different generation. It seems to be a subtle word like that. It might be interesting to hear from people of different generations about this.
Living in a world with physical limitations can accelerate learning.
"Understanding" is the key, and from that perspective, the physical world of this Earth is a more conducive environment for learning than higher dimensions. There's an implicit or assumed agreement that spirituality involves ascending to higher dimensions and achieving freedom, and anything that doesn't align with this is often considered unspiritual. However, higher dimensions are so free that everything is instantly manifested, making it difficult to understand what's happening, and both harmony and disharmony are realized.
Generally, there are stories about the afterlife having multiple layers, with hell and heaven, but this is, in a sense, a metaphor. Hell has its own low and high dimensions, and heaven also has its low and high dimensions. Therefore, being in a low dimension doesn't necessarily mean being in hell, and being in heaven doesn't necessarily mean being in a high dimension.
However, it's important to learn about the unrestricted world of higher dimensions, as we all come from there. Knowing where we came from and where we're going is essential. The meaning of being here is to slowly realize what our own consciousness is by experiencing the harsh and crude material world, which is a place where reality is gradually manifested from a reality that was initially created unconsciously. This is the meaning of accelerated learning on Earth.
It's a reality that even if you've completed your spiritual journey, you may still have to stay in this physical world, which can be frustrating. However, the idea is that you've graduated and are moving on. If this physical dimension disappears and only higher dimensions remain, those who haven't finished learning would lose their place to learn, which could lead to dissatisfaction. Learning is a joyful process, and it can be rephrased as a form of play. Living in this limited physical world means learning and enjoying while playing. As long as you continue to understand things while playing, you are acting in accordance with the intention of the creator of the universe.
Money, in particular, restricts people's actions. However, if there are no restrictions on actions, people would simply lie down and do nothing, which would reduce learning. Is that really a fulfilling life? If someone thinks it is, they are considered to be an entity that doesn't align with the intention of the creator of the universe, and they will be nudged to take action. They will be forced into situations where they have to act. People may arbitrarily say that it's a constraint or a compulsion, but the fundamental principle is "understanding." Those who live for "understanding," even if it's a form of play, will have their lives secured because it aligns with the will of the universe.
Therefore, using spiritual techniques to easily earn money or using the law of attraction to live a life of one's desires is of little interest to the laws of the universe. It may be possible to achieve such things through techniques, but if the result is simply living a peaceful life without learning, the universe will nudge them and force them out of that situation. In other words, even though people are actually being driven to act because of the "learning" principle of the universe, some people don't recognize this and instead imagine and create arbitrary reasons, such as "dominant forces," "deep state," and "conspiracy theories," and feel dissatisfied with the unknown reality, wasting their time and engaging in meaningless activities.
The reason why there is money is that, in another timeline, there was a world where money was almost unnecessary. However, in that world, people started to "get angry," and even though they continued to work out of obligation, something felt wrong. Therefore, in this timeline, money has been introduced to make it seem like money has a strong influence. Even in rural areas of Japan today, there are strange landlords and influential people who are arrogant and troublesome. In a world without money, this would be multiplied many times over, and if someone became an influential person in that area, their position would be passed down through generations, and people born into such families would often cause great distress to those around them. This is far beyond the situation of the people in rural areas today. In the current society, anyone can be provided with food by anyone if they have money, but if they lose money, all the restaurants and shops will be run by the goodwill of someone, and it will become common to be hungry and deeply grateful to the owner of the shop. While there are good people, there are also people with strange personalities, and in the current world, such people cannot earn money and will close their shops, so there are fewer such people in society. However, in a society where money is almost unnecessary, such people would continue to exist in the market. It is a distorted world with little turnover. Therefore, a world without restrictions is not always a good thing, and it is the strong restriction of money that allows people to learn.
Generally, there are stories about the afterlife having multiple layers, with hell and heaven, but this is, in a sense, a metaphor. Hell has its own low and high dimensions, and heaven also has its low and high dimensions. Therefore, being in a low dimension doesn't necessarily mean being in hell, and being in heaven doesn't necessarily mean being in a high dimension.
However, it's important to learn about the unrestricted world of higher dimensions, as we all come from there. Knowing where we came from and where we're going is essential. The meaning of being here is to slowly realize what our own consciousness is by experiencing the harsh and crude material world, which is a place where reality is gradually manifested from a reality that was initially created unconsciously. This is the meaning of accelerated learning on Earth.
It's a reality that even if you've completed your spiritual journey, you may still have to stay in this physical world, which can be frustrating. However, the idea is that you've graduated and are moving on. If this physical dimension disappears and only higher dimensions remain, those who haven't finished learning would lose their place to learn, which could lead to dissatisfaction. Learning is a joyful process, and it can be rephrased as a form of play. Living in this limited physical world means learning and enjoying while playing. As long as you continue to understand things while playing, you are acting in accordance with the intention of the creator of the universe.
Money, in particular, restricts people's actions. However, if there are no restrictions on actions, people would simply lie down and do nothing, which would reduce learning. Is that really a fulfilling life? If someone thinks it is, they are considered to be an entity that doesn't align with the intention of the creator of the universe, and they will be nudged to take action. They will be forced into situations where they have to act. People may arbitrarily say that it's a constraint or a compulsion, but the fundamental principle is "understanding." Those who live for "understanding," even if it's a form of play, will have their lives secured because it aligns with the will of the universe.
Therefore, using spiritual techniques to easily earn money or using the law of attraction to live a life of one's desires is of little interest to the laws of the universe. It may be possible to achieve such things through techniques, but if the result is simply living a peaceful life without learning, the universe will nudge them and force them out of that situation. In other words, even though people are actually being driven to act because of the "learning" principle of the universe, some people don't recognize this and instead imagine and create arbitrary reasons, such as "dominant forces," "deep state," and "conspiracy theories," and feel dissatisfied with the unknown reality, wasting their time and engaging in meaningless activities.
The reason why there is money is that, in another timeline, there was a world where money was almost unnecessary. However, in that world, people started to "get angry," and even though they continued to work out of obligation, something felt wrong. Therefore, in this timeline, money has been introduced to make it seem like money has a strong influence. Even in rural areas of Japan today, there are strange landlords and influential people who are arrogant and troublesome. In a world without money, this would be multiplied many times over, and if someone became an influential person in that area, their position would be passed down through generations, and people born into such families would often cause great distress to those around them. This is far beyond the situation of the people in rural areas today. In the current society, anyone can be provided with food by anyone if they have money, but if they lose money, all the restaurants and shops will be run by the goodwill of someone, and it will become common to be hungry and deeply grateful to the owner of the shop. While there are good people, there are also people with strange personalities, and in the current world, such people cannot earn money and will close their shops, so there are fewer such people in society. However, in a society where money is almost unnecessary, such people would continue to exist in the market. It is a distorted world with little turnover. Therefore, a world without restrictions is not always a good thing, and it is the strong restriction of money that allows people to learn.
Manipulating or coercing others hinders understanding.
If the fundamental principle of the universe is "understanding," then anything that hinders it is undesirable.
Restricting someone else is generally considered undesirable because it hinders understanding. However, there are situations where restricting others may lead to greater understanding. For example, if someone is extremely violent and refuses to listen, it may be necessary for the police to intervene and restrict their behavior. Except in cases of crime, manipulating others in everyday life hinders their free thinking and actions, which is a fundamental motivation of the universe, "understanding."
It may be confused with this, but the fact that we live in a physical society itself imposes physical limitations, which can be beneficial for learning. However, forcing others hinders learning.
This is a different context from the "freedom" that is often talked about in general terms as a "basic human right." While the basic human right of freedom is indeed correct, the underlying principle differs depending on whether it prioritizes "understanding" or "not causing trouble to others." For example, if "understanding" is the underlying principle, then freedom is a means to promote understanding. On the other hand, if "not causing trouble to others" is the underlying principle, then freedom allows individuals to do what they want without interacting with others, which hinders understanding.
This does not necessarily mean that it is always better to be together, or that it is always better to live separately. It depends on the circumstances. If being together promotes learning, then it is better to be together. Conversely, if living separately promotes understanding, or if individuals have different interests and want to deepen their understanding, then it may be better to live separately.
In particular, if groups with different levels of intelligence live close together, conflicts may arise due to differences in lifestyle, and it may become difficult for them to understand each other due to differences in thinking. Therefore, it is generally better for groups with similar levels of intelligence to live together. In terms of understanding, it is possible to gradually understand each other even when living apart, but when it comes to daily interactions, even if understanding is possible, it may be difficult to live close together.
Regarding "equality," there is a risk of misinterpreting "not causing trouble to others" and falling into a communist-like ideology that believes "if everyone is completely the same, they will not cause trouble to others." People naturally resist this, but if a powerful state forces this ideology, people may be forced to live the same life, and by living the same life every day, people lose their ability to think and live, and fall into a situation where "understanding" does not progress. Forcing everyone to be equal hinders people's actions and, as a result, hinders "understanding." Individuals are unable to do what they want, they lose their freedom, and a state of hindered understanding can occur.
However, everything other than the fundamental principle of "understanding" changes depending on the situation, so this is just an example, and it depends on the circumstances.
Restricting someone else is generally considered undesirable because it hinders understanding. However, there are situations where restricting others may lead to greater understanding. For example, if someone is extremely violent and refuses to listen, it may be necessary for the police to intervene and restrict their behavior. Except in cases of crime, manipulating others in everyday life hinders their free thinking and actions, which is a fundamental motivation of the universe, "understanding."
It may be confused with this, but the fact that we live in a physical society itself imposes physical limitations, which can be beneficial for learning. However, forcing others hinders learning.
This is a different context from the "freedom" that is often talked about in general terms as a "basic human right." While the basic human right of freedom is indeed correct, the underlying principle differs depending on whether it prioritizes "understanding" or "not causing trouble to others." For example, if "understanding" is the underlying principle, then freedom is a means to promote understanding. On the other hand, if "not causing trouble to others" is the underlying principle, then freedom allows individuals to do what they want without interacting with others, which hinders understanding.
This does not necessarily mean that it is always better to be together, or that it is always better to live separately. It depends on the circumstances. If being together promotes learning, then it is better to be together. Conversely, if living separately promotes understanding, or if individuals have different interests and want to deepen their understanding, then it may be better to live separately.
In particular, if groups with different levels of intelligence live close together, conflicts may arise due to differences in lifestyle, and it may become difficult for them to understand each other due to differences in thinking. Therefore, it is generally better for groups with similar levels of intelligence to live together. In terms of understanding, it is possible to gradually understand each other even when living apart, but when it comes to daily interactions, even if understanding is possible, it may be difficult to live close together.
Regarding "equality," there is a risk of misinterpreting "not causing trouble to others" and falling into a communist-like ideology that believes "if everyone is completely the same, they will not cause trouble to others." People naturally resist this, but if a powerful state forces this ideology, people may be forced to live the same life, and by living the same life every day, people lose their ability to think and live, and fall into a situation where "understanding" does not progress. Forcing everyone to be equal hinders people's actions and, as a result, hinders "understanding." Individuals are unable to do what they want, they lose their freedom, and a state of hindered understanding can occur.
However, everything other than the fundamental principle of "understanding" changes depending on the situation, so this is just an example, and it depends on the circumstances.
"A certain understanding" itself is not necessarily the truth.
The idea that "understanding" is the key to truth or freedom, often mentioned in spiritual contexts, touches upon the core of the matter when the word "understanding" is used, but it is not necessarily the truth itself.
In reality, there are many people who know the logic of truth but are trapped in the illusions of this world and cannot see the truth. People who claim to "know the truth" through something, such as studying religious studies at university or learning the logic of a particular school of thought, are not necessarily truly understanding it. Sometimes, people who have studied religious studies will use phrases like "you can understand this without doing that" to show off their knowledge, and in such cases, even if someone has gained knowledge and understanding through a university or similar institution, they may not truly understand the truth.
When I say these things, some people who want to know the answer immediately will ask, "So, what is the answer?" (sometimes with a hint of frustration). The fact that they are looking for an answer suggests that they have misunderstood the purpose. The answer is not something "out there," but rather the attitude of seeking something, which can also be described as the attitude of seeking understanding. While the attitude itself is not the answer, the continuous exploration of seemingly endless answers is what constitutes "understanding." However, people often tend to think they "know the truth" simply by hearing and understanding something.
In a relatively well-known story from yoga or Hinduism, gods and demons both hear the truth about this world from a sage. The demon simply understood the sage's words and thought, "So, I am the true self. I understand. This is the truth," and became complacent, failing to reach the true truth. The god, on the other hand, reflected on the sage's words, wondering, "Is this really the truth? Can I truly understand this? Is this really the truth?" and continued to explore, eventually discovering the true truth. Only those who continue to explore can attain true liberation and truth.
This is a common story in the world.
People who immediately think, "I understand," after hearing something end there and do not reach true understanding. On the other hand, by recognizing their own situation, such as thinking, "I think I understand, but I still haven't truly reached that level," and continuing to practice or explore, one can reach the truth.
This is particularly evident in spiritual matters, where understanding may come quickly, but it often takes years to truly embody that state. Some people become impatient with this time-consuming process and pay tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for quick methods, rituals, or initiations, only to end up wasting money without seeing much effect. There are people who are easily swayed by marketing strategies that claim that spirituality can lead to rapid growth, and this tarnishes the image of spirituality.
Advertisements that claim things like "you can grow simply by understanding" or "your aura will multiply simply by participating in a ritual" are often targeted at beginners in spirituality, and those who fall for such claims often have a bad experience, either becoming completely averse to spirituality or continuing to spend money until they run out. In some cases, people become instructors themselves and continue, but most of the time, the perceived effects are often due to the placebo effect, where people believe in something even if it is not effective.
While there are some people who can achieve results, it is often because of their innate qualities rather than the rituals they have learned. Therefore, it is better to assume that even if you study at a spiritual school, it will take time. Moreover, the idea that "understanding is all you need" is true in certain contexts, but generally, simply hearing that and believing it without further effort will not lead to true understanding.
In reality, even when a certain level of truth is achieved, there is always a deeper level beyond that, and it is unlikely that humans can reach the ultimate level within their short lifetime. Therefore, it might be best to approach it with the intention of continuing to explore for a lifetime.
In reality, there are many people who know the logic of truth but are trapped in the illusions of this world and cannot see the truth. People who claim to "know the truth" through something, such as studying religious studies at university or learning the logic of a particular school of thought, are not necessarily truly understanding it. Sometimes, people who have studied religious studies will use phrases like "you can understand this without doing that" to show off their knowledge, and in such cases, even if someone has gained knowledge and understanding through a university or similar institution, they may not truly understand the truth.
When I say these things, some people who want to know the answer immediately will ask, "So, what is the answer?" (sometimes with a hint of frustration). The fact that they are looking for an answer suggests that they have misunderstood the purpose. The answer is not something "out there," but rather the attitude of seeking something, which can also be described as the attitude of seeking understanding. While the attitude itself is not the answer, the continuous exploration of seemingly endless answers is what constitutes "understanding." However, people often tend to think they "know the truth" simply by hearing and understanding something.
In a relatively well-known story from yoga or Hinduism, gods and demons both hear the truth about this world from a sage. The demon simply understood the sage's words and thought, "So, I am the true self. I understand. This is the truth," and became complacent, failing to reach the true truth. The god, on the other hand, reflected on the sage's words, wondering, "Is this really the truth? Can I truly understand this? Is this really the truth?" and continued to explore, eventually discovering the true truth. Only those who continue to explore can attain true liberation and truth.
This is a common story in the world.
People who immediately think, "I understand," after hearing something end there and do not reach true understanding. On the other hand, by recognizing their own situation, such as thinking, "I think I understand, but I still haven't truly reached that level," and continuing to practice or explore, one can reach the truth.
This is particularly evident in spiritual matters, where understanding may come quickly, but it often takes years to truly embody that state. Some people become impatient with this time-consuming process and pay tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for quick methods, rituals, or initiations, only to end up wasting money without seeing much effect. There are people who are easily swayed by marketing strategies that claim that spirituality can lead to rapid growth, and this tarnishes the image of spirituality.
Advertisements that claim things like "you can grow simply by understanding" or "your aura will multiply simply by participating in a ritual" are often targeted at beginners in spirituality, and those who fall for such claims often have a bad experience, either becoming completely averse to spirituality or continuing to spend money until they run out. In some cases, people become instructors themselves and continue, but most of the time, the perceived effects are often due to the placebo effect, where people believe in something even if it is not effective.
While there are some people who can achieve results, it is often because of their innate qualities rather than the rituals they have learned. Therefore, it is better to assume that even if you study at a spiritual school, it will take time. Moreover, the idea that "understanding is all you need" is true in certain contexts, but generally, simply hearing that and believing it without further effort will not lead to true understanding.
In reality, even when a certain level of truth is achieved, there is always a deeper level beyond that, and it is unlikely that humans can reach the ultimate level within their short lifetime. Therefore, it might be best to approach it with the intention of continuing to explore for a lifetime.
Do you have a new "understanding" of a peaceful life where you are not lacking in food, clothing, and shelter?
It is positively viewed when a certain condition exists (such as an interest in a particular subject) that facilitates understanding. Conversely, it is negatively viewed when this condition merely leads to a degenerate lifestyle without fostering new understanding.
The criterion for this judgment is based on the fundamental reason for the universe's existence, which is "understanding." By considering this principle, one can determine whether a situation is favorable or requires improvement. Therefore, the evaluation varies depending on the circumstances, and whether or not basic necessities are met is not always a determining factor.
A positive view aligns with the universe's fundamental principles, and its continuation is supported by the universe. Individuals with a genuine interest in something have their basic needs met as a prerequisite. However, those who are lazy and seek to avoid hardship without engaging in meaningful activities are considered to be in conflict with the universe's fundamental principle of "understanding." Such situations, lacking meaning from a cosmic perspective, are subject to disruption and are unsustainable. These individuals are then thrust into situations where they are forced to understand.
Therefore, individuals who simply seek to earn money and live a life free from hardship will find that their situation is not sustainable for long. If such a life of ease is the sole purpose, they will eventually become bored, and even if they achieve it, they will likely experience dissatisfaction. True happiness lies in exploration, but if one lives a peaceful life without seeking new understanding, the universe will not consider them valuable and will subject them to disruption.
Therefore, even if one engages in spiritual practices, such as the law of attraction or happiness seminars, it may not have a significant impact from a cosmic perspective. The temporary effects that create a sense of reality may be mere placebo effects, although some may genuinely be effective. However, if this lifestyle simply leads to a peaceful existence without fostering new understanding, it is considered a violation of cosmic principles and will be subject to disruption and change. There is a high likelihood of reverting to the previous state.
In reality, this world has repeatedly experienced situations where the timeline is disrupted and ends. In one timeline that spread from the Pacific coast, centered around Japan, there was a prosperous society where basic necessities were met. However, the vitality of society was lost, and new understanding was difficult to achieve. This society, which was seen by some as a "demonic Europe," failed to understand the white society, even while observing it from a distance. From the perspective of the "administrators" of the Earth, this situation was deemed unfavorable because "they were not trying to understand, they were merely observing from a distance, and they were not making any efforts to improve the situation." As a result, that timeline was frozen. The "administrators" provided an answer: "It is not enough to simply maintain the peaceful situation of the prosperous society (by, for example, guiding slaves to the prosperous society). It is necessary to actively engage with the European nations, understand their difficult circumstances, and work to change societies that still use slavery. That was what was needed in that timeline." Therefore, by learning from this lesson and applying it to the current timeline, it is necessary to move beyond simply criticizing and judging those who are engaged in terrible acts, and instead actively work to change them. The goal is not simply to change things, but to foster understanding, which is the fundamental principle. Understanding leads to change, and change is ultimately the goal. If a society merely criticizes from the outside without fostering understanding, it may be reset by the "administrators" of the Earth. This is also true for the current society (timeline).
This context also applies to situations where one should not turn a blind eye to those who are doing terrible things. Those who are doing terrible things lack understanding. Similarly, those who are observing these actions also lack understanding. While this is often discussed in terms of morality and justice, the common narrative is that "evil must be punished." However, this is not the case. Punishing someone without understanding only hinders understanding, which is a violation of cosmic law. The same evil will continue to appear if it is not understood. Therefore, if evil is punished without understanding, it becomes a futile cycle.
In particular, self-proclaimed "lightworkers" often invoke this discussion of good and evil and argue that those who are doing terrible things must be punished and eliminated. However, this is a violation of cosmic law. If one does this, they are considered to be lacking understanding, and a powerful "evil" (as perceived by the self-proclaimed lightworker) will come to them, and they may be eliminated. The fundamental law of this universe is "understanding." Those who do not try to understand and simply use superficial notions of "good" and "evil" to punish "evil" based on a simplistic logic of "maintenance is good, destruction is evil" will inevitably face consequences from the cosmic law. They may feel self-satisfied, believing that they are fighting evil, but they are engaged in a futile effort. If they simply understood, the problem would be resolved. However, understanding takes time, so some degree of self-defense is necessary, and the strength required for that is also necessary. Instead of justifying violence as a means of achieving an end, as self-proclaimed lightworkers often do, it is necessary to use strength to create opportunities for understanding. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often use a convenient logic such as "violence is justified because it is a means of fighting evil, and it is not violence," and they perpetuate conflicts in the world by resorting to violence against those they deem evil.
When people live a peaceful life without difficulty in food, clothing, and shelter, there are many people who turn a blind eye to inconveniences. At that time, the interpretation of what that "turning a blind eye" means differs. Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe (mistakenly) that they must fight against evil and punish it, and that punishing is enough, with understanding being secondary. On the other hand, the laws of the universe push the situation towards deepening understanding.
Even in the timeline of the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere," people along the Pacific coast evaluated Europe as "a demonic Europe, a Europe that uses slaves and discards them, a greedy Europe." And they were ignoring it. According to the judgment criteria of today's self-proclaimed lightworkers, this "evil Europe" should have been punished. However, the laws of the universe say, "In order to understand, enter the hellish interior of Europe. Reincarnate there and understand from within." However, without doing that, they only helped a few people from afar and gossiped from a distance, saying, "Europe is terrible." As a result, such a society that does not try to understand was deemed unnecessary, and that timeline was reset. That is the intention of the Earth's administrators.
The answer is clear: if understanding progresses, the Earth's administrators will approve, whether it is war or anything else. Because that is the law of the universe. On the other hand, if the situation does not lead to understanding, it is denied, and a shake-up or a timeline reset occurs.
Considering this, for example, the conflict in the Middle East is a situation where understanding does not progress, so the Earth's administrators view it negatively. Also, AI is viewed negatively if it hinders human understanding (even if it achieves excellent results). Human understanding is a part of the universe's consciousness, and AI is a machine, so it does not have consciousness. Therefore, no matter how much results it achieves, it is not contributing to the universe's "understanding." However, using AI for humans to gain further understanding is positive, so AI is not necessarily bad. The focus is on whether, in total, understanding progresses.
In conflicts, the total result of whether understanding progresses is viewed positively. Basically, conflicts are negative, but the use of force is not necessarily bad. The use of force to stop the conflict and promote understanding is viewed positively. This is irrelevant to superficial logic like "good" and "evil." In fact, everything is "me" as part of oneness, so "good" and "evil" are almost irrelevant. It is possible to say that what promotes understanding is "good" and what hinders understanding is "evil" as a metaphor, but it is not like the "good is maintaining, and evil is destroying" definition of "good" and "evil" that self-proclaimed lightworkers have.
Conflicts, in a sense, occur because people care about their own affairs but are ignorant of others, which leads to conflicts. This may sound like a natural thing in general, but if we consider the laws of the universe to be aimed at "understanding," then it can be said that "ignorance," which is the opposite of understanding, causes conflicts. Even if it is generally considered to be true, if we take into account that the basic law of the universe is "understanding," this can be understood more thoroughly.
The criterion for this judgment is based on the fundamental reason for the universe's existence, which is "understanding." By considering this principle, one can determine whether a situation is favorable or requires improvement. Therefore, the evaluation varies depending on the circumstances, and whether or not basic necessities are met is not always a determining factor.
A positive view aligns with the universe's fundamental principles, and its continuation is supported by the universe. Individuals with a genuine interest in something have their basic needs met as a prerequisite. However, those who are lazy and seek to avoid hardship without engaging in meaningful activities are considered to be in conflict with the universe's fundamental principle of "understanding." Such situations, lacking meaning from a cosmic perspective, are subject to disruption and are unsustainable. These individuals are then thrust into situations where they are forced to understand.
Therefore, individuals who simply seek to earn money and live a life free from hardship will find that their situation is not sustainable for long. If such a life of ease is the sole purpose, they will eventually become bored, and even if they achieve it, they will likely experience dissatisfaction. True happiness lies in exploration, but if one lives a peaceful life without seeking new understanding, the universe will not consider them valuable and will subject them to disruption.
Therefore, even if one engages in spiritual practices, such as the law of attraction or happiness seminars, it may not have a significant impact from a cosmic perspective. The temporary effects that create a sense of reality may be mere placebo effects, although some may genuinely be effective. However, if this lifestyle simply leads to a peaceful existence without fostering new understanding, it is considered a violation of cosmic principles and will be subject to disruption and change. There is a high likelihood of reverting to the previous state.
In reality, this world has repeatedly experienced situations where the timeline is disrupted and ends. In one timeline that spread from the Pacific coast, centered around Japan, there was a prosperous society where basic necessities were met. However, the vitality of society was lost, and new understanding was difficult to achieve. This society, which was seen by some as a "demonic Europe," failed to understand the white society, even while observing it from a distance. From the perspective of the "administrators" of the Earth, this situation was deemed unfavorable because "they were not trying to understand, they were merely observing from a distance, and they were not making any efforts to improve the situation." As a result, that timeline was frozen. The "administrators" provided an answer: "It is not enough to simply maintain the peaceful situation of the prosperous society (by, for example, guiding slaves to the prosperous society). It is necessary to actively engage with the European nations, understand their difficult circumstances, and work to change societies that still use slavery. That was what was needed in that timeline." Therefore, by learning from this lesson and applying it to the current timeline, it is necessary to move beyond simply criticizing and judging those who are engaged in terrible acts, and instead actively work to change them. The goal is not simply to change things, but to foster understanding, which is the fundamental principle. Understanding leads to change, and change is ultimately the goal. If a society merely criticizes from the outside without fostering understanding, it may be reset by the "administrators" of the Earth. This is also true for the current society (timeline).
This context also applies to situations where one should not turn a blind eye to those who are doing terrible things. Those who are doing terrible things lack understanding. Similarly, those who are observing these actions also lack understanding. While this is often discussed in terms of morality and justice, the common narrative is that "evil must be punished." However, this is not the case. Punishing someone without understanding only hinders understanding, which is a violation of cosmic law. The same evil will continue to appear if it is not understood. Therefore, if evil is punished without understanding, it becomes a futile cycle.
In particular, self-proclaimed "lightworkers" often invoke this discussion of good and evil and argue that those who are doing terrible things must be punished and eliminated. However, this is a violation of cosmic law. If one does this, they are considered to be lacking understanding, and a powerful "evil" (as perceived by the self-proclaimed lightworker) will come to them, and they may be eliminated. The fundamental law of this universe is "understanding." Those who do not try to understand and simply use superficial notions of "good" and "evil" to punish "evil" based on a simplistic logic of "maintenance is good, destruction is evil" will inevitably face consequences from the cosmic law. They may feel self-satisfied, believing that they are fighting evil, but they are engaged in a futile effort. If they simply understood, the problem would be resolved. However, understanding takes time, so some degree of self-defense is necessary, and the strength required for that is also necessary. Instead of justifying violence as a means of achieving an end, as self-proclaimed lightworkers often do, it is necessary to use strength to create opportunities for understanding. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often use a convenient logic such as "violence is justified because it is a means of fighting evil, and it is not violence," and they perpetuate conflicts in the world by resorting to violence against those they deem evil.
When people live a peaceful life without difficulty in food, clothing, and shelter, there are many people who turn a blind eye to inconveniences. At that time, the interpretation of what that "turning a blind eye" means differs. Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe (mistakenly) that they must fight against evil and punish it, and that punishing is enough, with understanding being secondary. On the other hand, the laws of the universe push the situation towards deepening understanding.
Even in the timeline of the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere," people along the Pacific coast evaluated Europe as "a demonic Europe, a Europe that uses slaves and discards them, a greedy Europe." And they were ignoring it. According to the judgment criteria of today's self-proclaimed lightworkers, this "evil Europe" should have been punished. However, the laws of the universe say, "In order to understand, enter the hellish interior of Europe. Reincarnate there and understand from within." However, without doing that, they only helped a few people from afar and gossiped from a distance, saying, "Europe is terrible." As a result, such a society that does not try to understand was deemed unnecessary, and that timeline was reset. That is the intention of the Earth's administrators.
The answer is clear: if understanding progresses, the Earth's administrators will approve, whether it is war or anything else. Because that is the law of the universe. On the other hand, if the situation does not lead to understanding, it is denied, and a shake-up or a timeline reset occurs.
Considering this, for example, the conflict in the Middle East is a situation where understanding does not progress, so the Earth's administrators view it negatively. Also, AI is viewed negatively if it hinders human understanding (even if it achieves excellent results). Human understanding is a part of the universe's consciousness, and AI is a machine, so it does not have consciousness. Therefore, no matter how much results it achieves, it is not contributing to the universe's "understanding." However, using AI for humans to gain further understanding is positive, so AI is not necessarily bad. The focus is on whether, in total, understanding progresses.
In conflicts, the total result of whether understanding progresses is viewed positively. Basically, conflicts are negative, but the use of force is not necessarily bad. The use of force to stop the conflict and promote understanding is viewed positively. This is irrelevant to superficial logic like "good" and "evil." In fact, everything is "me" as part of oneness, so "good" and "evil" are almost irrelevant. It is possible to say that what promotes understanding is "good" and what hinders understanding is "evil" as a metaphor, but it is not like the "good is maintaining, and evil is destroying" definition of "good" and "evil" that self-proclaimed lightworkers have.
Conflicts, in a sense, occur because people care about their own affairs but are ignorant of others, which leads to conflicts. This may sound like a natural thing in general, but if we consider the laws of the universe to be aimed at "understanding," then it can be said that "ignorance," which is the opposite of understanding, causes conflicts. Even if it is generally considered to be true, if we take into account that the basic law of the universe is "understanding," this can be understood more thoroughly.
Energy work-induced transformation can sometimes hinder "understanding."
Self-proclaimed lightworkers are promoting transformation under the guise of healing. This is supposedly "energy work," where energy is imposed from the outside to force transformation. However, it's often a placebo effect or simply the power of self-suggestion. For the sake of this explanation, let's assume they believe they are doing this.
Even if such a transformation is possible, if it doesn't involve "understanding," it goes against the laws of the universe. While the person performing the work might claim that "energy work leads to faster changes," that's not the core issue. Even if the person is in a difficult situation, if they don't gain understanding of that situation, any transformation achieved through energy work will be counter to the laws of the universe, and a backlash is inevitable. They will either quickly revert to their previous state or be forced into an even more challenging situation.
Instead of such futile efforts, understanding and resolution often arise naturally when things are left alone. However, there are spiritual businesses that exploit this by offering "energy work" that superficially appears to solve problems, while charging exorbitant prices.
It's as if those who create situations that lead to understanding are then sabotaged by self-proclaimed lightworkers who disrupt the process with their "healing." While the recipient might feel satisfied, it's often unnecessary.
Healing essentially acts as a trigger to activate a person's self-healing abilities. The influx of energy activates vitality. This happens even in normal human interaction, and there's no need to call it "healing." It can even occur simply by being near someone.
While healing can be effective in activating self-healing abilities, caution is needed when dealing with energy, as certain types of energy work that simply remove a person's problems can hinder understanding. This can create a homogenized, uncritical population, increasing the risk of a slave-like mentality.
In response to this, self-proclaimed lightworkers and healers, having witnessed the solidification of this slave mentality, often ignore the fact that their actions are hindering the person's understanding. They might say things like, "Even with healing, people just return to their old lives as slaves and feel powerless," and then insist that "teaching theory is necessary." However, this "theory" is often a uniform, cult-like doctrine, not general or universal knowledge. It often involves stories of "good versus evil" or philosophical concepts from ancient Greece or Egypt, which, while interesting, are not particularly meaningful in terms of the laws of the universe when they are simply being indoctrinated.
The "understanding" that aligns with the laws of the universe involves seeking and acquiring new knowledge. While these interesting and unusual concepts might spark curiosity, simply being immersed in a doctrine doesn't align with the laws of the universe. Exploring this vast world is what truly aligns with those laws.
Therefore, even if a situation seems foolish, interventions that hinder a person's understanding should be avoided. This applies not only to individuals but also to planets. Even when foolish wars and conflicts occur on Earth, the universe generally observes, except in cases where the planet is in danger of destruction. This is partly due to the principle of non-interference, but more fundamentally, the universe doesn't interfere because its fundamental principle is understanding. If the universe intervened, it would rob the inhabitants of the planet of the opportunity to observe and understand.
The same applies to human relationships. When people have problems or conflicts, self-proclaimed lightworkers often try to "solve" them by removing the negative energy, which hinders the person's understanding.
This leads to a situation where the person's understanding is impaired, their vitality decreases, their ability to understand diminishes, and they become more compliant, while the self-proclaimed lightworker's ego expands. This creates a hierarchy between the healer and the person being healed, which explains the strange hierarchies that exist in cult organizations.
And, the person who knows the doctrines taught by the cult is considered to be right and just, and they are the ones who punish evil. As part of this, unnecessary efforts and misunderstandings that claim to fight evil through healing and energy work can be said to be the characteristics of self-proclaimed lightworkers.
However, the law of the universe is "understanding," and evil should be transformed through "understanding." Evil is ignorance, and it changes when it is understood. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers misunderstand that they are punishing evil in the battle between good and evil, and in reality, they claim that evil does not exist, and that good is knowledge and understanding.
Therefore, energy work can be considered evil if it hinders understanding. However, energy work that promotes understanding can also be considered good. Here, knowledge refers not to the cult's strange doctrines, but to general knowledge about situations and others. In other words, it is important for each person to understand their own situation in their environment, and even when facing ugly situations, instead of avoiding them, they should confront them and deal with them.
The story of good and evil is not related to "understanding." It is different from the dualistic dimension where good destroys evil.
What is always necessary as a result of action is "knowledge and understanding." Even if self-proclaimed lightworkers perform work, and even if the result is a feeling of refreshment or relief, if it leads to an understanding of one's own situation, it can be said to be in accordance with the laws of the universe, but otherwise, it is useless.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers often say, "If there is conflicting energy, you should remove it." However, that conflict is actually a preliminary stage to understanding. By "removing" such conflicts, they ultimately create a situation where understanding does not progress.
The beauty of the aura is indeed a characteristic that exists, but from the perspective of the laws of the universe, it is not important. There are various aura states in the process of understanding, and the aura may even become dirty. However, what is important is "understanding," and whether it is produced as a result of action.
In other words, true lightwork is to cultivate the ability to stand on one's own feet, and it is important to emphasize understanding in order to achieve that.
Even if such a transformation is possible, if it doesn't involve "understanding," it goes against the laws of the universe. While the person performing the work might claim that "energy work leads to faster changes," that's not the core issue. Even if the person is in a difficult situation, if they don't gain understanding of that situation, any transformation achieved through energy work will be counter to the laws of the universe, and a backlash is inevitable. They will either quickly revert to their previous state or be forced into an even more challenging situation.
Instead of such futile efforts, understanding and resolution often arise naturally when things are left alone. However, there are spiritual businesses that exploit this by offering "energy work" that superficially appears to solve problems, while charging exorbitant prices.
It's as if those who create situations that lead to understanding are then sabotaged by self-proclaimed lightworkers who disrupt the process with their "healing." While the recipient might feel satisfied, it's often unnecessary.
Healing essentially acts as a trigger to activate a person's self-healing abilities. The influx of energy activates vitality. This happens even in normal human interaction, and there's no need to call it "healing." It can even occur simply by being near someone.
While healing can be effective in activating self-healing abilities, caution is needed when dealing with energy, as certain types of energy work that simply remove a person's problems can hinder understanding. This can create a homogenized, uncritical population, increasing the risk of a slave-like mentality.
In response to this, self-proclaimed lightworkers and healers, having witnessed the solidification of this slave mentality, often ignore the fact that their actions are hindering the person's understanding. They might say things like, "Even with healing, people just return to their old lives as slaves and feel powerless," and then insist that "teaching theory is necessary." However, this "theory" is often a uniform, cult-like doctrine, not general or universal knowledge. It often involves stories of "good versus evil" or philosophical concepts from ancient Greece or Egypt, which, while interesting, are not particularly meaningful in terms of the laws of the universe when they are simply being indoctrinated.
The "understanding" that aligns with the laws of the universe involves seeking and acquiring new knowledge. While these interesting and unusual concepts might spark curiosity, simply being immersed in a doctrine doesn't align with the laws of the universe. Exploring this vast world is what truly aligns with those laws.
Therefore, even if a situation seems foolish, interventions that hinder a person's understanding should be avoided. This applies not only to individuals but also to planets. Even when foolish wars and conflicts occur on Earth, the universe generally observes, except in cases where the planet is in danger of destruction. This is partly due to the principle of non-interference, but more fundamentally, the universe doesn't interfere because its fundamental principle is understanding. If the universe intervened, it would rob the inhabitants of the planet of the opportunity to observe and understand.
The same applies to human relationships. When people have problems or conflicts, self-proclaimed lightworkers often try to "solve" them by removing the negative energy, which hinders the person's understanding.
This leads to a situation where the person's understanding is impaired, their vitality decreases, their ability to understand diminishes, and they become more compliant, while the self-proclaimed lightworker's ego expands. This creates a hierarchy between the healer and the person being healed, which explains the strange hierarchies that exist in cult organizations.
And, the person who knows the doctrines taught by the cult is considered to be right and just, and they are the ones who punish evil. As part of this, unnecessary efforts and misunderstandings that claim to fight evil through healing and energy work can be said to be the characteristics of self-proclaimed lightworkers.
However, the law of the universe is "understanding," and evil should be transformed through "understanding." Evil is ignorance, and it changes when it is understood. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers misunderstand that they are punishing evil in the battle between good and evil, and in reality, they claim that evil does not exist, and that good is knowledge and understanding.
Therefore, energy work can be considered evil if it hinders understanding. However, energy work that promotes understanding can also be considered good. Here, knowledge refers not to the cult's strange doctrines, but to general knowledge about situations and others. In other words, it is important for each person to understand their own situation in their environment, and even when facing ugly situations, instead of avoiding them, they should confront them and deal with them.
The story of good and evil is not related to "understanding." It is different from the dualistic dimension where good destroys evil.
What is always necessary as a result of action is "knowledge and understanding." Even if self-proclaimed lightworkers perform work, and even if the result is a feeling of refreshment or relief, if it leads to an understanding of one's own situation, it can be said to be in accordance with the laws of the universe, but otherwise, it is useless.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers often say, "If there is conflicting energy, you should remove it." However, that conflict is actually a preliminary stage to understanding. By "removing" such conflicts, they ultimately create a situation where understanding does not progress.
The beauty of the aura is indeed a characteristic that exists, but from the perspective of the laws of the universe, it is not important. There are various aura states in the process of understanding, and the aura may even become dirty. However, what is important is "understanding," and whether it is produced as a result of action.
In other words, true lightwork is to cultivate the ability to stand on one's own feet, and it is important to emphasize understanding in order to achieve that.
The world has been reset repeatedly, and the intentions of the Earth's administrator have not been understood.
Many people act with good intentions, but for the administrators of the Earth, that may not be enough. For example, they may not pay attention to issues such as slavery in neighboring countries, and are satisfied with the peaceful lives in their own countries. Such actions are seen as indifference, and because results are important, they are judged to be detrimental to the future of the Earth if left unattended.
Self-satisfaction and good deeds alone are not enough for the administrators of the Earth. Even if a slave liberation movement is carried out, if its impact is insufficient to affect the entire world, it is considered invalid. Similar situations have occurred in the past timeline, resulting in a transition to a new timeline due to countries that were left unattended.
Currently, a similar situation may be reproduced, but it can be said that the world still has a chance to continue. For that, "understanding" is necessary, and it is not about "goodness must win in the battle between good and evil," but about pursuing truth and deepening mutual understanding.
People who desire a peaceful century often argue that many people need to take action to achieve it. However, the underlying problem is the lack of "understanding." What peace means may be different for each person, but it is not the ultimate goal; it is a prerequisite that can be obtained through understanding.
In the absence of understanding, people are recommended not to interact with each other, but this goes against the laws of the universe. Therefore, things will be shaken in a direction that promotes "understanding." This does not necessarily lead to war or conflict, but the larger the lack of it, the greater the problem it becomes.
Ultimately, what is required is to deepen "understanding" while interacting with each other.
Self-satisfaction and good deeds alone are not enough for the administrators of the Earth. Even if a slave liberation movement is carried out, if its impact is insufficient to affect the entire world, it is considered invalid. Similar situations have occurred in the past timeline, resulting in a transition to a new timeline due to countries that were left unattended.
Currently, a similar situation may be reproduced, but it can be said that the world still has a chance to continue. For that, "understanding" is necessary, and it is not about "goodness must win in the battle between good and evil," but about pursuing truth and deepening mutual understanding.
People who desire a peaceful century often argue that many people need to take action to achieve it. However, the underlying problem is the lack of "understanding." What peace means may be different for each person, but it is not the ultimate goal; it is a prerequisite that can be obtained through understanding.
In the absence of understanding, people are recommended not to interact with each other, but this goes against the laws of the universe. Therefore, things will be shaken in a direction that promotes "understanding." This does not necessarily lead to war or conflict, but the larger the lack of it, the greater the problem it becomes.
Ultimately, what is required is to deepen "understanding" while interacting with each other.
Peace that is maintained based on a unified perspective and identical ways of thinking will not last long.
Sometimes, I hear stories suggesting that if the world were unified in thought, it would bring peace. This idea proposes that if religions, ideologies, or even self-proclaimed "lightworkers" adopt a unified perspective, the world would achieve ideological unity.
However, such attempts at unified theories ultimately fail because they hinder the "understanding" of this universe. The fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding," which is originally about "knowing oneself." Therefore, any single ideology or theory, even if it claims to be ultimate, cannot compare to this simple principle of "understanding" that governs the universe.
While it might be misleading to say that the universe doesn't yet "know" itself, the ultimate oneness of the entire universe is infinite. This infinity implies an eternal expansion... although it's misleading to say that, the principle is that infinity neither expands nor contracts. However, due to its infinity, from the perspective of human consciousness, which is limited by time, the "understanding" of the future universe, compared to the current "understanding" of the universe, can be seen as the universe "growing."
Therefore, it can be expressed that the "understanding" of the future universe is more advanced than the current "understanding."
Based on this premise, attempts to unify the world under a single ideology are unsustainable and create ideological frustration, inevitably leading to new ideas and divisions.
Therefore, it is better to design this world based on the micro-level principle that society is a division that has emerged from oneness to "know" itself.
Whether it's a group or a nation, it is a division that has emerged to "know" each other. Each entity appears to be a separate existence, but they are living as distinct entities. Although they were originally one, they became separate in order to "know" each other. Similarly, separate groups and nations have tendencies towards homogeneity within themselves, while also having the role of "knowing" each other from the outside.
Therefore, the idea that unifying all countries and ideologies in the world would bring peace is contrary to the process by which the universe emerged from a state of oneness and division. Such attempts are unlikely to succeed. While there may be a time, perhaps billions of years from now, when the universe returns to a state of oneness, that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
Based on this premise, what humans should do is adopt an attitude of "understanding" each other, while acknowledging that we are fundamentally different entities. Having separated from the state of oneness, both entities are "oneself," and they are separated to "know" the "other" self.
Furthermore, it is important to allow for freedom of thought. While there may be strange and unusual ideas among the diverse range of perspectives, the universe is full of diversity. By interacting with each other, these unusual ideas will be eliminated, and progress will be made towards a correct understanding.
The key point is not to learn and understand a "correct understanding" created by someone else, but to adopt an attitude of "understanding" not only oneself but also one's neighbors and other countries in one's own environment. While studying is important, it is more important to have an attitude of "understanding" in one's own situation. This is not about achieving peace through a unified ideology.
Simply understanding the fundamental principle of how the universe was created, and understanding that the reason the universe was created is "to gain understanding of oneself," will naturally lead to the cessation of conflict. Because it is a fundamental principle, each individual and each country should consider it based on their own circumstances. If "understanding" of others is a prerequisite, there will be fewer problems. Even if there are problems, they will be corrected through interactions with others.
On the contrary, attempts to unify the world with an "unchangeable" "unified theory" are more dangerous. For example, if the world were unified by metaphysics, the ideological diversity of the world would be lost, which is contrary to the laws of the universe and is not sustainable. While some groups, such as cults, may introduce such unusual theories, this contributes to the overall diversity of the universe, which is desirable from a cosmic perspective. However, attempting to unify under a single ideology is contrary to the laws of the universe. Extreme ideologies are only considered by a few people, and that is why they are desirable from a cosmic perspective. However, if such an ideology spreads, it becomes contrary to the laws of the universe and can lead to catastrophic consequences.
Instead of unifying ideologies, it's important to acknowledge that everyone is exploring their own perspectives. Maintaining a certain distance while striving for mutual understanding within reasonable boundaries is a fairly ordinary moral principle, and it also happens to be a universal law of the cosmos. If such a simple concept becomes commonplace, peace will naturally prevail in the world. In essence, peace is that simple.
However, peace is disrupted by extreme ideologies, such as metaphysics, and by those who adhere to dualistic thinking. Attempting to unify the world through the logic of power, where good defeats evil, is bound to fail. This is because it goes against the universal law of "understanding."
However, such attempts at unified theories ultimately fail because they hinder the "understanding" of this universe. The fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding," which is originally about "knowing oneself." Therefore, any single ideology or theory, even if it claims to be ultimate, cannot compare to this simple principle of "understanding" that governs the universe.
While it might be misleading to say that the universe doesn't yet "know" itself, the ultimate oneness of the entire universe is infinite. This infinity implies an eternal expansion... although it's misleading to say that, the principle is that infinity neither expands nor contracts. However, due to its infinity, from the perspective of human consciousness, which is limited by time, the "understanding" of the future universe, compared to the current "understanding" of the universe, can be seen as the universe "growing."
Therefore, it can be expressed that the "understanding" of the future universe is more advanced than the current "understanding."
Based on this premise, attempts to unify the world under a single ideology are unsustainable and create ideological frustration, inevitably leading to new ideas and divisions.
Therefore, it is better to design this world based on the micro-level principle that society is a division that has emerged from oneness to "know" itself.
Whether it's a group or a nation, it is a division that has emerged to "know" each other. Each entity appears to be a separate existence, but they are living as distinct entities. Although they were originally one, they became separate in order to "know" each other. Similarly, separate groups and nations have tendencies towards homogeneity within themselves, while also having the role of "knowing" each other from the outside.
Therefore, the idea that unifying all countries and ideologies in the world would bring peace is contrary to the process by which the universe emerged from a state of oneness and division. Such attempts are unlikely to succeed. While there may be a time, perhaps billions of years from now, when the universe returns to a state of oneness, that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
Based on this premise, what humans should do is adopt an attitude of "understanding" each other, while acknowledging that we are fundamentally different entities. Having separated from the state of oneness, both entities are "oneself," and they are separated to "know" the "other" self.
Furthermore, it is important to allow for freedom of thought. While there may be strange and unusual ideas among the diverse range of perspectives, the universe is full of diversity. By interacting with each other, these unusual ideas will be eliminated, and progress will be made towards a correct understanding.
The key point is not to learn and understand a "correct understanding" created by someone else, but to adopt an attitude of "understanding" not only oneself but also one's neighbors and other countries in one's own environment. While studying is important, it is more important to have an attitude of "understanding" in one's own situation. This is not about achieving peace through a unified ideology.
Simply understanding the fundamental principle of how the universe was created, and understanding that the reason the universe was created is "to gain understanding of oneself," will naturally lead to the cessation of conflict. Because it is a fundamental principle, each individual and each country should consider it based on their own circumstances. If "understanding" of others is a prerequisite, there will be fewer problems. Even if there are problems, they will be corrected through interactions with others.
On the contrary, attempts to unify the world with an "unchangeable" "unified theory" are more dangerous. For example, if the world were unified by metaphysics, the ideological diversity of the world would be lost, which is contrary to the laws of the universe and is not sustainable. While some groups, such as cults, may introduce such unusual theories, this contributes to the overall diversity of the universe, which is desirable from a cosmic perspective. However, attempting to unify under a single ideology is contrary to the laws of the universe. Extreme ideologies are only considered by a few people, and that is why they are desirable from a cosmic perspective. However, if such an ideology spreads, it becomes contrary to the laws of the universe and can lead to catastrophic consequences.
Instead of unifying ideologies, it's important to acknowledge that everyone is exploring their own perspectives. Maintaining a certain distance while striving for mutual understanding within reasonable boundaries is a fairly ordinary moral principle, and it also happens to be a universal law of the cosmos. If such a simple concept becomes commonplace, peace will naturally prevail in the world. In essence, peace is that simple.
However, peace is disrupted by extreme ideologies, such as metaphysics, and by those who adhere to dualistic thinking. Attempting to unify the world through the logic of power, where good defeats evil, is bound to fail. This is because it goes against the universal law of "understanding."
Self-proclaimed healers who, under the guise of healing, deprive others of opportunities to learn.
The concept of "aura" is something that others can interfere with and remove, or supplement with energy, and people who claim to be healers do this. However, there are various types, and some of them seem to be harmful.
And, if the method is incorrect, it is said that the healer themselves accumulate karma. This is karma for taking away the freedom of others. And the result that is brought about is the restriction on one's own life in the future. In a sense, those who claim to be healers and engage in activities are, as a result, providing their own freedom, and sometimes providing their own karma to someone else.
This is because, while karma is different for each person, the karma that a certain person is supposed to experience is also a form of learning. However, if someone's karma is removed, it deprives them of the opportunity to learn. Therefore, they accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.
This is particularly evident in people who use healing techniques and say things like, "Energy should be transformed. Energy transformation is faster than counseling." While the person may feel grateful and good at the time, they gradually accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.
And, as a result of depriving many people of the opportunity to learn, a sudden backlash occurs. Or, a demonic and cunning entity, without appearing to be a demon, finds someone who wants to become a healer and provides energy assistance to create a self-proclaimed healer. And the purpose of such demons is to have someone accumulate a lot of karma, resulting in a state where their own karma is taken away by others, and to use that person for their own purposes. The demons sow seeds and wait for the fruit to ripen, and when the time comes, self-proclaimed healers suddenly have to pay a price. That price is the loss of freedom of action for someone. And the recipient of that price is a demon, which is a cunning entity that appears normal but wants to take away the freedom of others and use them. It is ironic that someone who thinks they are serving others by claiming to be a healer ends up being used by a demon for the sin of depriving others of their freedom and learning.
This world has a harsh side where foolish people are treated accordingly. Some self-proclaimed healers say, "I don't know, but if I do what I'm told, the results come out. So this healing is effective." But that is very dangerous. There are people who engage in healing activities without knowing what kind of energy they are using. And they are greatly praised, but eventually, they will have to pay the price for continuing to deprive others of their freedom and learning. The person may think they are "fighting demons," but ordinary people don't imagine demons or such things. The fact that someone has demons in their mind means that they are often being manipulated by demons. This is a keyword, and even if someone intellectually understands that they are not, if they see things as they are, they are possessed by demons. The appearance of the keyword "demon" means that a demon is nearby, and even if someone claims to be a lightworker fighting against evil, they may actually be being manipulated by demons from the beginning.
The law of this universe is "learning." The priority of "learning" is higher than conflict or suffering. Those who misunderstand and think that "energy should be resolved" and disregard "learning" will be easily manipulated by demons. Demons are much more intelligent than ordinary humans.
And, if the method is incorrect, it is said that the healer themselves accumulate karma. This is karma for taking away the freedom of others. And the result that is brought about is the restriction on one's own life in the future. In a sense, those who claim to be healers and engage in activities are, as a result, providing their own freedom, and sometimes providing their own karma to someone else.
This is because, while karma is different for each person, the karma that a certain person is supposed to experience is also a form of learning. However, if someone's karma is removed, it deprives them of the opportunity to learn. Therefore, they accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.
This is particularly evident in people who use healing techniques and say things like, "Energy should be transformed. Energy transformation is faster than counseling." While the person may feel grateful and good at the time, they gradually accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.
And, as a result of depriving many people of the opportunity to learn, a sudden backlash occurs. Or, a demonic and cunning entity, without appearing to be a demon, finds someone who wants to become a healer and provides energy assistance to create a self-proclaimed healer. And the purpose of such demons is to have someone accumulate a lot of karma, resulting in a state where their own karma is taken away by others, and to use that person for their own purposes. The demons sow seeds and wait for the fruit to ripen, and when the time comes, self-proclaimed healers suddenly have to pay a price. That price is the loss of freedom of action for someone. And the recipient of that price is a demon, which is a cunning entity that appears normal but wants to take away the freedom of others and use them. It is ironic that someone who thinks they are serving others by claiming to be a healer ends up being used by a demon for the sin of depriving others of their freedom and learning.
This world has a harsh side where foolish people are treated accordingly. Some self-proclaimed healers say, "I don't know, but if I do what I'm told, the results come out. So this healing is effective." But that is very dangerous. There are people who engage in healing activities without knowing what kind of energy they are using. And they are greatly praised, but eventually, they will have to pay the price for continuing to deprive others of their freedom and learning. The person may think they are "fighting demons," but ordinary people don't imagine demons or such things. The fact that someone has demons in their mind means that they are often being manipulated by demons. This is a keyword, and even if someone intellectually understands that they are not, if they see things as they are, they are possessed by demons. The appearance of the keyword "demon" means that a demon is nearby, and even if someone claims to be a lightworker fighting against evil, they may actually be being manipulated by demons from the beginning.
The law of this universe is "learning." The priority of "learning" is higher than conflict or suffering. Those who misunderstand and think that "energy should be resolved" and disregard "learning" will be easily manipulated by demons. Demons are much more intelligent than ordinary humans.
The "Excel environment old man's" planned economy will not save the world.
About thirty years ago, there was an uncle who said that "Excel calculations, not emotions, would solve environmental problems." He had quite a communist-leaning ideology, and he argued that "only a planned economy can save the environment," although he didn't explicitly say he was a communist, but his ideas seemed to be along those lines. He probably avoided using the word "communism" because it would have caused resentment among people working on environmental issues, so he hinted at those ideas instead. Looking back, he was a clever person.
While some people were emotionally involved in environmental issues, this uncle advocated for a top-down approach to controlling the economy, which is a characteristic of totalitarian ideology.
Now, how does such totalitarianism relate to the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe? The key question is whether totalitarianism generates understanding. Does the overall understanding produced by a totalitarian system outweigh that produced by an individualistic system? This determines whether totalitarianism can be justified.
The "understanding" that is the fundamental principle of the universe is not simply about peace or emotions. If that were the case, the most desirable state would be one where nothing changes, which is not conducive to new understanding. Active interaction between living beings is necessary for new understanding to emerge. It's not enough to be emotionally stable and at peace; if that doesn't lead to understanding, it's inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe and would be rejected by it.
Therefore, emotions alone do not lead to understanding, and it's unclear whether totalitarianism alone leads to understanding. Whether totalitarianism is better than individualism cannot be determined in isolation; it must be considered in conjunction with other factors. The focus is on how much understanding the overall system generates, depending on the circumstances. A system, whether totalitarian or individualistic, can be considered good if it generates a lot of understanding. Currently, totalitarianism is often associated with oppression, which is why individualism tends to generate more understanding. While incorporating elements of totalitarianism and a planned economy, as the "Excel uncle" did, might protect the environment, it could also restrict people's freedom, hinder social interaction, and limit the understanding that emerges in that society, which would be inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe.
There are always some clever people who, like the "Excel environmental uncle," use environmental issues or other causes as a smokescreen to achieve their own goals. Such "evil children" can deceive many people and, when they rise to positions of power, often create a homogenized and stagnant society.
When such "evil children" are in power, society becomes chaotic. This is already happening in politics, as well as in environmental issues. There are people who support these "evil children" without realizing their true nature, driven by simple good intentions. This creates a situation where "evil children" deceive many people, and "good" people protect the "evil children." As a result, the "evil children" create a homogenized and seemingly peaceful totalitarian system, which is often maintained through violence and sometimes even massacres. This society, while appearing peaceful on the surface, lacks freedom, and understanding does not emerge there. People simply live a seemingly peaceful life, similar to the homogenized and impoverished lives that many people experience in communist countries. While there may be a certain degree of peace, new understanding is not easily generated. This is the extent to which the "evil children" desire things to be. However, when such "evil children" gain power, it becomes difficult for society to generate understanding.
When the goal is placed on something like "the environment" or "peace," people can be misled by "evil children" like the one mentioned above.
Society does not exist solely based on ideologies. Therefore, there may be times when a totalitarian system generates more understanding. However, ideologies do not directly connect to the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe. Therefore, the question of whether individualism or totalitarianism is better is not easily answered in terms of "understanding." To avoid being misled and to stay true to one's principles, it's important to determine whether the focus is on "understanding," whether understanding expands outward, or whether understanding stagnates in a homogenized society. This will help determine whether an ideological stance is heading in the right direction.
While some people were emotionally involved in environmental issues, this uncle advocated for a top-down approach to controlling the economy, which is a characteristic of totalitarian ideology.
Now, how does such totalitarianism relate to the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe? The key question is whether totalitarianism generates understanding. Does the overall understanding produced by a totalitarian system outweigh that produced by an individualistic system? This determines whether totalitarianism can be justified.
The "understanding" that is the fundamental principle of the universe is not simply about peace or emotions. If that were the case, the most desirable state would be one where nothing changes, which is not conducive to new understanding. Active interaction between living beings is necessary for new understanding to emerge. It's not enough to be emotionally stable and at peace; if that doesn't lead to understanding, it's inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe and would be rejected by it.
Therefore, emotions alone do not lead to understanding, and it's unclear whether totalitarianism alone leads to understanding. Whether totalitarianism is better than individualism cannot be determined in isolation; it must be considered in conjunction with other factors. The focus is on how much understanding the overall system generates, depending on the circumstances. A system, whether totalitarian or individualistic, can be considered good if it generates a lot of understanding. Currently, totalitarianism is often associated with oppression, which is why individualism tends to generate more understanding. While incorporating elements of totalitarianism and a planned economy, as the "Excel uncle" did, might protect the environment, it could also restrict people's freedom, hinder social interaction, and limit the understanding that emerges in that society, which would be inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe.
There are always some clever people who, like the "Excel environmental uncle," use environmental issues or other causes as a smokescreen to achieve their own goals. Such "evil children" can deceive many people and, when they rise to positions of power, often create a homogenized and stagnant society.
When such "evil children" are in power, society becomes chaotic. This is already happening in politics, as well as in environmental issues. There are people who support these "evil children" without realizing their true nature, driven by simple good intentions. This creates a situation where "evil children" deceive many people, and "good" people protect the "evil children." As a result, the "evil children" create a homogenized and seemingly peaceful totalitarian system, which is often maintained through violence and sometimes even massacres. This society, while appearing peaceful on the surface, lacks freedom, and understanding does not emerge there. People simply live a seemingly peaceful life, similar to the homogenized and impoverished lives that many people experience in communist countries. While there may be a certain degree of peace, new understanding is not easily generated. This is the extent to which the "evil children" desire things to be. However, when such "evil children" gain power, it becomes difficult for society to generate understanding.
When the goal is placed on something like "the environment" or "peace," people can be misled by "evil children" like the one mentioned above.
Society does not exist solely based on ideologies. Therefore, there may be times when a totalitarian system generates more understanding. However, ideologies do not directly connect to the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe. Therefore, the question of whether individualism or totalitarianism is better is not easily answered in terms of "understanding." To avoid being misled and to stay true to one's principles, it's important to determine whether the focus is on "understanding," whether understanding expands outward, or whether understanding stagnates in a homogenized society. This will help determine whether an ideological stance is heading in the right direction.
Understanding is not "something" to understand, but understanding itself.
It is often misunderstood that it is not about "understanding this" but that understanding itself is the essence.
For example, metaphysics or religious doctrines, these are helpful in the beginning, but they are not the goal. If you think they are the goal, your growth will stop, or you will become arrogant. It is fundamentally wrong to think that you have already achieved something because you know something.
A common scene I have seen in the past is that people who study religious studies and learn about the origins of religion mistakenly believe that "they already know." Sometimes, people who study yoga, Indian philosophy, or Buddhism at university say things like, "I already know," or "I don't need to do that to understand." The premise of this is that they "already know" something, which is a specific religious theory or doctrine, and they think that knowing it means they "already understand."
It seems that this tendency is more common in people whose parents were religious or who studied at universities, and they get stuck in the thinking pattern of "I know" because they have spent a certain amount of time learning.
For example, a child of parents who were in religions similar to Soka Gakkai might say, "I studied religion at university because my parents were very devoted to religion, so I thought about what religion is." They might say that they don't have faith and that they have become disillusioned with religion. However, in families that are religious or in environments like religious universities, the conversation is always about "learning and understanding something," which is a specific subject.
Even though the word "understanding" comes up, it is about understanding a story that someone has summarized, but it is not about the fundamental principle of "understanding" itself. People mistakenly think that they have achieved something by understanding something without reaching the fundamental principle.
In order to understand something, you need an object, but these people are characterized by thinking that understanding something with a clear object is enough.
Indeed, understanding something requires an object, and relativization is a prerequisite. Therefore, an object always appears when reaching understanding, but what I am saying here is that the fundamental principle of the universe is beyond what can be understood.
Even if you understand something up to a certain point, you will reach a point where you cannot understand, and you will "drift" there. Then, you will objectify what is "drifting" and understand it over time.
Therefore, there is a huge difference between understanding something with a clear object and objectifying something that is initially "drifting" and understanding it. However, most people think that understanding something with a clear object is sufficient, but understanding the laws of the universe includes not only that, but also the latter approach.
The reason why something is not understood is because it has not been objectified. It is relatively easy to reach a certain level of understanding that someone has already achieved, but true understanding is about objectifying something that cannot be put into words and understanding it. This process continues endlessly until you reach the oneness of the universe. Therefore, understanding has no end, and you cannot say that you have "already achieved" it.
What can be said is that "understanding" itself is the fundamental principle of the universe, and although it is a misunderstood statement, it does point to a certain principle.
For example, metaphysics or religious doctrines, these are helpful in the beginning, but they are not the goal. If you think they are the goal, your growth will stop, or you will become arrogant. It is fundamentally wrong to think that you have already achieved something because you know something.
A common scene I have seen in the past is that people who study religious studies and learn about the origins of religion mistakenly believe that "they already know." Sometimes, people who study yoga, Indian philosophy, or Buddhism at university say things like, "I already know," or "I don't need to do that to understand." The premise of this is that they "already know" something, which is a specific religious theory or doctrine, and they think that knowing it means they "already understand."
It seems that this tendency is more common in people whose parents were religious or who studied at universities, and they get stuck in the thinking pattern of "I know" because they have spent a certain amount of time learning.
For example, a child of parents who were in religions similar to Soka Gakkai might say, "I studied religion at university because my parents were very devoted to religion, so I thought about what religion is." They might say that they don't have faith and that they have become disillusioned with religion. However, in families that are religious or in environments like religious universities, the conversation is always about "learning and understanding something," which is a specific subject.
Even though the word "understanding" comes up, it is about understanding a story that someone has summarized, but it is not about the fundamental principle of "understanding" itself. People mistakenly think that they have achieved something by understanding something without reaching the fundamental principle.
In order to understand something, you need an object, but these people are characterized by thinking that understanding something with a clear object is enough.
Indeed, understanding something requires an object, and relativization is a prerequisite. Therefore, an object always appears when reaching understanding, but what I am saying here is that the fundamental principle of the universe is beyond what can be understood.
Even if you understand something up to a certain point, you will reach a point where you cannot understand, and you will "drift" there. Then, you will objectify what is "drifting" and understand it over time.
Therefore, there is a huge difference between understanding something with a clear object and objectifying something that is initially "drifting" and understanding it. However, most people think that understanding something with a clear object is sufficient, but understanding the laws of the universe includes not only that, but also the latter approach.
The reason why something is not understood is because it has not been objectified. It is relatively easy to reach a certain level of understanding that someone has already achieved, but true understanding is about objectifying something that cannot be put into words and understanding it. This process continues endlessly until you reach the oneness of the universe. Therefore, understanding has no end, and you cannot say that you have "already achieved" it.
What can be said is that "understanding" itself is the fundamental principle of the universe, and although it is a misunderstood statement, it does point to a certain principle.
Oneness understands "understanding" as a fundamental principle.
The ultimate oneness will not be achieved until the universe completes its cycle and converges into one. However, the concept and fundamental logic of oneness are universally valid even in the present.
Sometimes, there are schools of thought or cults that deny oneness. Indeed, the word "oneness" itself is one, so it can be said that it does not exist until the end of the universe. However, even if that is the case, this universe was originally oneness. Therefore, even if the universe goes through a process of separation, becoming two, multiple, it is as if it is doing so, but in reality, only oneness exists. What appears to be real in this world is an illusion, and it cannot be said to truly exist. If oneness is the true existence, then the apparent forms that do not belong to it do not exist. This is similar to what is called "maya" in Indian philosophy.
If this world is perceived as "maya," which appears to exist, then oneness is truly what exists.
The time when "maya" disappears and converges into complete oneness is the end of the universe. However, it is not very useful to think too much about such a long time, and in the current time axis in which we are living, the ultimate oneness will not be achieved. The ultimate state of oneness to which "maya" converges is far in the future. Therefore, "maya," which appears to exist, and oneness, which exists in reality, already exist. "Maya" appears to exist, and oneness exists as reality.
And, originally, it is oneness, and in reality, it is still oneness. This is in the sense of reality. Oneness is a consciousness that does not change, is constant, and is full. It is full and unchanging in the time axis.
On the other hand, "maya" is matter, which appears to exist, and matter goes through the processes of creation, maintenance, and destruction.
Therefore, the consciousness of oneness, which does not change, always exists. And "maya," which appears to exist, repeatedly divides itself in order to know itself and continues to learn.
In this world, there is consciousness, which is oneness, and "maya," which appears to exist as matter. The reason why "maya" exists is that it was born from the desire of oneness, which is consciousness, to "know." If that is the case, then the fundamental principle of the universe is "understanding," and continuing to explore and pursue that understanding is what people should be doing.
Sometimes, there are schools of thought or cults that deny oneness. Indeed, the word "oneness" itself is one, so it can be said that it does not exist until the end of the universe. However, even if that is the case, this universe was originally oneness. Therefore, even if the universe goes through a process of separation, becoming two, multiple, it is as if it is doing so, but in reality, only oneness exists. What appears to be real in this world is an illusion, and it cannot be said to truly exist. If oneness is the true existence, then the apparent forms that do not belong to it do not exist. This is similar to what is called "maya" in Indian philosophy.
If this world is perceived as "maya," which appears to exist, then oneness is truly what exists.
The time when "maya" disappears and converges into complete oneness is the end of the universe. However, it is not very useful to think too much about such a long time, and in the current time axis in which we are living, the ultimate oneness will not be achieved. The ultimate state of oneness to which "maya" converges is far in the future. Therefore, "maya," which appears to exist, and oneness, which exists in reality, already exist. "Maya" appears to exist, and oneness exists as reality.
And, originally, it is oneness, and in reality, it is still oneness. This is in the sense of reality. Oneness is a consciousness that does not change, is constant, and is full. It is full and unchanging in the time axis.
On the other hand, "maya" is matter, which appears to exist, and matter goes through the processes of creation, maintenance, and destruction.
Therefore, the consciousness of oneness, which does not change, always exists. And "maya," which appears to exist, repeatedly divides itself in order to know itself and continues to learn.
In this world, there is consciousness, which is oneness, and "maya," which appears to exist as matter. The reason why "maya" exists is that it was born from the desire of oneness, which is consciousness, to "know." If that is the case, then the fundamental principle of the universe is "understanding," and continuing to explore and pursue that understanding is what people should be doing.
Is money evil?
There are many people who say that money is evil, and even some people in the spiritual world, sometimes self-proclaimed "lightworkers," say things like, "All jobs in the world are slavery. Being a part of the money system means being part of a slave system." Is that really true?
The answer can be found by considering this in light of the universe's fundamental principle of "understanding." Which situation leads to more "understanding": having money or not having money? That's what determines which is better. However, it's not just about having or not having money; it's a complex issue with multiple factors. Spiritual people sometimes say that "there is no money in the universe," but in a universe without money, there are limited opportunities to learn, and both correct and incorrect ideas can persist. The universe allows both correct and incorrect ideas to continue. It's arguably a healthier society on Earth, where financial constraints allow us to learn, even if we are wrong.
Conflicts in the universe are often driven by self-justification, which limits opportunities for self-reflection and learning. Therefore, the "winner" is not necessarily always right, and it can create disharmony. On Earth, economic and material constraints lead to a cycle of renewal. This is arguably a healthier system.
Even in rural areas of Earth, there are powerful landowners and influential figures, some of whom are good, while others are problematic. This is the current reality. If problematic people had less influence due to a lack of money and a decline in their status, their negative impact would persist across generations, leading to stagnation in society. It's arguably a healthier society now, where problematic people are ostracized and economically struggle, leading to their decline.
It's true that without money, one might not have to worry about basic necessities like food and shelter. However, as seen in a different timeline, the importance shifts to factors like one's family background and occupation. Only by being part of a certain family and holding a certain position can one enjoy good meals and stay in luxurious hotels, and the treatment received varies greatly. Without money, people are differentiated by other factors, and the most obvious ones are family background and position. Ordinary people might not be allowed to stay in good hotels or might only be accommodated if there are no other options.
This kind of society, where ordinary people are treated lightly, is what a "world without money" would be like. While nobles and ruling classes might feel secure without the fear of decline, ordinary people would remain ordinary forever.
It's arguably a healthier society now, where one can receive equal service with money. While there are still arbitrary aspects, they are part of a balance, and most services are available for a price, which can be considered healthy. In the future, as money becomes more abundant, society might become more arbitrary, with membership-based services and services only available to certain people. If this goes too far, it could lead to a society where ordinary people are left behind. However, it might be ideal if the arbitrary aspects increase only slightly from the current level.
Currently, there's a social trend that everything should be accessible with money. However, as money becomes more abundant, businesses might start choosing their customers, leading to a situation where there are stores that offer average services for money and others that offer services based on factors other than money, which ordinary people might not even know exist. It's probably best if this doesn't go too far and remains balanced, including a cycle of renewal.
There should be a certain degree of arbitrariness, with membership-based and selective services, but there should also be services that can be accessed normally with money. That's probably the ideal.
Therefore, money is not inherently evil, and the claim that "all jobs in the world are slavery" and that "money is a tool to create slaves" is false. Some people try to manipulate and exploit others by spreading such simplistic ideas to incite social upheaval. If the general public believes that "money is evil" and overthrows the government, the result might be a society where nobles permanently rule, there is no renewal, and ordinary people remain ordinary forever. In such a society, ordinary people would essentially be slaves, and the nobles would be laughing. It seems that some people are being manipulated, and those who call themselves "lightworkers" are part of that group.
Indeed, as some spiritual people say, even though there may not be money in the universe, there is a deep chasm between each living being or consciousness that exists, and this chasm determines whether or not one can connect with something. If that is the case, then there is an absolute information barrier that prevents people from even noticing the existence of a service. However, for many people, the current situation, where there are signs, customer acquisition, and where one can receive a certain level of service if they have money, is actually happier.
The answer can be found by considering this in light of the universe's fundamental principle of "understanding." Which situation leads to more "understanding": having money or not having money? That's what determines which is better. However, it's not just about having or not having money; it's a complex issue with multiple factors. Spiritual people sometimes say that "there is no money in the universe," but in a universe without money, there are limited opportunities to learn, and both correct and incorrect ideas can persist. The universe allows both correct and incorrect ideas to continue. It's arguably a healthier society on Earth, where financial constraints allow us to learn, even if we are wrong.
Conflicts in the universe are often driven by self-justification, which limits opportunities for self-reflection and learning. Therefore, the "winner" is not necessarily always right, and it can create disharmony. On Earth, economic and material constraints lead to a cycle of renewal. This is arguably a healthier system.
Even in rural areas of Earth, there are powerful landowners and influential figures, some of whom are good, while others are problematic. This is the current reality. If problematic people had less influence due to a lack of money and a decline in their status, their negative impact would persist across generations, leading to stagnation in society. It's arguably a healthier society now, where problematic people are ostracized and economically struggle, leading to their decline.
It's true that without money, one might not have to worry about basic necessities like food and shelter. However, as seen in a different timeline, the importance shifts to factors like one's family background and occupation. Only by being part of a certain family and holding a certain position can one enjoy good meals and stay in luxurious hotels, and the treatment received varies greatly. Without money, people are differentiated by other factors, and the most obvious ones are family background and position. Ordinary people might not be allowed to stay in good hotels or might only be accommodated if there are no other options.
This kind of society, where ordinary people are treated lightly, is what a "world without money" would be like. While nobles and ruling classes might feel secure without the fear of decline, ordinary people would remain ordinary forever.
It's arguably a healthier society now, where one can receive equal service with money. While there are still arbitrary aspects, they are part of a balance, and most services are available for a price, which can be considered healthy. In the future, as money becomes more abundant, society might become more arbitrary, with membership-based services and services only available to certain people. If this goes too far, it could lead to a society where ordinary people are left behind. However, it might be ideal if the arbitrary aspects increase only slightly from the current level.
Currently, there's a social trend that everything should be accessible with money. However, as money becomes more abundant, businesses might start choosing their customers, leading to a situation where there are stores that offer average services for money and others that offer services based on factors other than money, which ordinary people might not even know exist. It's probably best if this doesn't go too far and remains balanced, including a cycle of renewal.
There should be a certain degree of arbitrariness, with membership-based and selective services, but there should also be services that can be accessed normally with money. That's probably the ideal.
Therefore, money is not inherently evil, and the claim that "all jobs in the world are slavery" and that "money is a tool to create slaves" is false. Some people try to manipulate and exploit others by spreading such simplistic ideas to incite social upheaval. If the general public believes that "money is evil" and overthrows the government, the result might be a society where nobles permanently rule, there is no renewal, and ordinary people remain ordinary forever. In such a society, ordinary people would essentially be slaves, and the nobles would be laughing. It seems that some people are being manipulated, and those who call themselves "lightworkers" are part of that group.
Indeed, as some spiritual people say, even though there may not be money in the universe, there is a deep chasm between each living being or consciousness that exists, and this chasm determines whether or not one can connect with something. If that is the case, then there is an absolute information barrier that prevents people from even noticing the existence of a service. However, for many people, the current situation, where there are signs, customer acquisition, and where one can receive a certain level of service if they have money, is actually happier.
Self-proclaimed lightworker who lives by the idea of knowing something.
Some self-proclaimed lightworkers seem to harbor cult-like theories that they conceal as a way to boost their self-esteem.
In contrast, healthy activities openly share their principles from the beginning. These principles are both straightforward and profound, often requiring initial superficial understanding followed by a deeper, renewed comprehension.
For example, when you first hear the word "understanding," you might think, "Is that so?" However, when you understand its meaning in conjunction with the fundamental principles of the universe, a new perspective on "understanding" opens up. This is what makes healthy activities so profound.
On the other hand, some self-proclaimed lightworkers might initially talk about things like "not causing harm to others," but this is often incomplete and hides other aspects. This is why self-proclaimed lightworkers tend to keep secrets.
In general society, people who keep secrets are rarely good people. The same applies here; there's something hidden, something dark.
In the past, some religious organizations and ideologies have been suppressed, misunderstood, or even ridiculed. Some groups and ideologies have chosen to remain private for this reason, to avoid hindering their own spiritual growth.
However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often tell only part of the truth, later claiming, "Actually..." This creates a sense of superiority and makes it difficult to have a genuine conversation. They often say things like, "I can't say more," which hides their true intentions.
The self-importance that becomes visible when they say "I can't say" is unpleasant. It's ego, a sense of pride that they alone know the truth. Some self-proclaimed lightworker groups may not be as healthy as they seem.
It's best to avoid getting involved with self-proclaimed lightworkers who try to impress you by hinting at hidden knowledge.
True lightworkers are often found among ordinary, capable people in the world. In contrast, self-proclaimed lightworkers tend to act like they know something special and try to provoke you. The difference is clear.
For example, depending on the school of thought, self-proclaimed lightworkers may have a unique system regarding reincarnation. One example is a system that denies reincarnation altogether, claiming that life happens only once. In this system, there is no past life, and no reincarnation. What appears to be a past life is explained as an "emanation" from a preview taken before birth. Self-proclaimed lightworkers are taught to live as if reincarnation happens only once. This is done to achieve two effects:
- To allow people around those participating in the self-proclaimed lightworker's game to distinguish them.
- To expose the ego of those involved and encourage introspection.
This exposes the ego of those who believe they are superior because they know the "real" truth. Furthermore, this is a kind of unconscious agreement among those participating in a specific game, but the participants are unaware of the true facts and simply believe the false teachings to be "the real truth that only we know." This creates an environment where those self-proclaimed lightworkers can confront the challenges they need to address. This is a game designed for learning on this Earth, or, in other words, a "dream." Even though it's not the truth, the participants are convinced that they know the "real truth," and they reject the opinions of others, continuing their game, saying, "We know the real truth." This creates an isolated environment.
In reality, the truth remains the same, and with sufficient spiritual growth, one will eventually arrive at similar conclusions, regardless of the differences in expression. However, being taught a very unique and strange system and believing that it is "the real truth that only we know" is blind faith. This blind faith allows for a unique form of introspection.
It is through this kind of blind faith that one can introspect on the great challenges that began with Orion. To introspect on memories or karma from the past, it is often easier to mimic the conditions of that time, and a strange interpretation of reincarnation is one such example. The sense of life and death among self-proclaimed lightworkers is a partial reproduction of the teachings of Orion at that time. Therefore, even if they have a strange system, it is a prerequisite for them to learn, so those around them should not interfere, but let them do as they please.
Self-proclaimed "light workers" adopt a secretive attitude, claiming "this should not be taught to others." This is because if they share their ideas with others or have them verified, they would realize that their theories do not align with reality and are nonsensical. The reason for this is that the purpose is to prepare the environment and ideology as a prerequisite for resolving great karma.
It is common for spiritual beginners to get excited about "knowing something," and that is the extent of it. However, even with such a naive belief, the prerequisites for resolving great karma are established.
Therefore, if someone without karma encounters such a strange person, it is best to leave them alone.
In contrast, healthy activities openly share their principles from the beginning. These principles are both straightforward and profound, often requiring initial superficial understanding followed by a deeper, renewed comprehension.
For example, when you first hear the word "understanding," you might think, "Is that so?" However, when you understand its meaning in conjunction with the fundamental principles of the universe, a new perspective on "understanding" opens up. This is what makes healthy activities so profound.
On the other hand, some self-proclaimed lightworkers might initially talk about things like "not causing harm to others," but this is often incomplete and hides other aspects. This is why self-proclaimed lightworkers tend to keep secrets.
In general society, people who keep secrets are rarely good people. The same applies here; there's something hidden, something dark.
In the past, some religious organizations and ideologies have been suppressed, misunderstood, or even ridiculed. Some groups and ideologies have chosen to remain private for this reason, to avoid hindering their own spiritual growth.
However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often tell only part of the truth, later claiming, "Actually..." This creates a sense of superiority and makes it difficult to have a genuine conversation. They often say things like, "I can't say more," which hides their true intentions.
The self-importance that becomes visible when they say "I can't say" is unpleasant. It's ego, a sense of pride that they alone know the truth. Some self-proclaimed lightworker groups may not be as healthy as they seem.
It's best to avoid getting involved with self-proclaimed lightworkers who try to impress you by hinting at hidden knowledge.
True lightworkers are often found among ordinary, capable people in the world. In contrast, self-proclaimed lightworkers tend to act like they know something special and try to provoke you. The difference is clear.
For example, depending on the school of thought, self-proclaimed lightworkers may have a unique system regarding reincarnation. One example is a system that denies reincarnation altogether, claiming that life happens only once. In this system, there is no past life, and no reincarnation. What appears to be a past life is explained as an "emanation" from a preview taken before birth. Self-proclaimed lightworkers are taught to live as if reincarnation happens only once. This is done to achieve two effects:
- To allow people around those participating in the self-proclaimed lightworker's game to distinguish them.
- To expose the ego of those involved and encourage introspection.
This exposes the ego of those who believe they are superior because they know the "real" truth. Furthermore, this is a kind of unconscious agreement among those participating in a specific game, but the participants are unaware of the true facts and simply believe the false teachings to be "the real truth that only we know." This creates an environment where those self-proclaimed lightworkers can confront the challenges they need to address. This is a game designed for learning on this Earth, or, in other words, a "dream." Even though it's not the truth, the participants are convinced that they know the "real truth," and they reject the opinions of others, continuing their game, saying, "We know the real truth." This creates an isolated environment.
In reality, the truth remains the same, and with sufficient spiritual growth, one will eventually arrive at similar conclusions, regardless of the differences in expression. However, being taught a very unique and strange system and believing that it is "the real truth that only we know" is blind faith. This blind faith allows for a unique form of introspection.
It is through this kind of blind faith that one can introspect on the great challenges that began with Orion. To introspect on memories or karma from the past, it is often easier to mimic the conditions of that time, and a strange interpretation of reincarnation is one such example. The sense of life and death among self-proclaimed lightworkers is a partial reproduction of the teachings of Orion at that time. Therefore, even if they have a strange system, it is a prerequisite for them to learn, so those around them should not interfere, but let them do as they please.
Self-proclaimed "light workers" adopt a secretive attitude, claiming "this should not be taught to others." This is because if they share their ideas with others or have them verified, they would realize that their theories do not align with reality and are nonsensical. The reason for this is that the purpose is to prepare the environment and ideology as a prerequisite for resolving great karma.
It is common for spiritual beginners to get excited about "knowing something," and that is the extent of it. However, even with such a naive belief, the prerequisites for resolving great karma are established.
Therefore, if someone without karma encounters such a strange person, it is best to leave them alone.
I do not associate with people who hinder my own understanding.
Whether an action is desirable can be judged by the extent of understanding it generates. The scope of this understanding depends on the range of influence of each action. For individuals, the amount of understanding generated within their personal sphere generally serves as the criterion, and for organizations, the amount of understanding generated within the organization's sphere serves as the criterion.
Therefore, when a person is interested in something, engaged in it, and generating understanding, engaging with others can reduce the time dedicated to that interest, thereby reducing the amount of understanding generated. In such cases, interactions with others are considered an obstacle.
In Buddhism, it is simply said, "Do not associate with immoral people." This is partly correct, but there are cases where people with similar ideologies can learn from each other's immoral actions. There is no simple criterion of whether something is moral or immoral; rather, the universe seems to justify actions based on the amount of understanding they generate. However, immoral actions often cause trouble, so they essentially deceive and manipulate others, hindering their understanding. Therefore, immoral people are harmful to society. This is not a dualistic interpretation of good and evil, but rather a harm because they impede understanding, which is inconsistent with the laws of the universe.
Therefore, while mutual understanding is generally important, it is acceptable not to associate with immoral and untrustworthy people. By doing so, immoral people become isolated and may experience economic hardship.
Some countries and terrorist groups spread lies to conceal their own immorality, beautify their own country, and denigrate other countries. Such immoral countries and groups are inconsistent with the laws of the universe and are destined to collapse in the long term.
Whenever I say these things, there are always people who say, "You're saying not to associate with others, that's a terrible thing to say." But what is terrible about not associating with immoral people? It is natural that immoral people are terrible. In the current state of the world, skillful propaganda can hide the truth and allow one's distorted ideology to prevail. However, the laws of the universe do not allow such distorted and immoral behavior to continue, and a great backlash will occur. This backlash often affects not only the immoral people themselves but also many others, because negative karma has accumulated from not stopping the immoral behavior. In particular, the media that continued to report on something even though they knew it was wrong cannot excuse themselves by saying "we were just reporting," and this is already a fact that is happening.
It is said that the collapse of existing systems will accelerate, and various reasons are given for this. However, the reason for this is that it hinders the "understanding" that is essential according to the laws of the universe.
Therefore, when a person is interested in something, engaged in it, and generating understanding, engaging with others can reduce the time dedicated to that interest, thereby reducing the amount of understanding generated. In such cases, interactions with others are considered an obstacle.
In Buddhism, it is simply said, "Do not associate with immoral people." This is partly correct, but there are cases where people with similar ideologies can learn from each other's immoral actions. There is no simple criterion of whether something is moral or immoral; rather, the universe seems to justify actions based on the amount of understanding they generate. However, immoral actions often cause trouble, so they essentially deceive and manipulate others, hindering their understanding. Therefore, immoral people are harmful to society. This is not a dualistic interpretation of good and evil, but rather a harm because they impede understanding, which is inconsistent with the laws of the universe.
Therefore, while mutual understanding is generally important, it is acceptable not to associate with immoral and untrustworthy people. By doing so, immoral people become isolated and may experience economic hardship.
Some countries and terrorist groups spread lies to conceal their own immorality, beautify their own country, and denigrate other countries. Such immoral countries and groups are inconsistent with the laws of the universe and are destined to collapse in the long term.
Whenever I say these things, there are always people who say, "You're saying not to associate with others, that's a terrible thing to say." But what is terrible about not associating with immoral people? It is natural that immoral people are terrible. In the current state of the world, skillful propaganda can hide the truth and allow one's distorted ideology to prevail. However, the laws of the universe do not allow such distorted and immoral behavior to continue, and a great backlash will occur. This backlash often affects not only the immoral people themselves but also many others, because negative karma has accumulated from not stopping the immoral behavior. In particular, the media that continued to report on something even though they knew it was wrong cannot excuse themselves by saying "we were just reporting," and this is already a fact that is happening.
It is said that the collapse of existing systems will accelerate, and various reasons are given for this. However, the reason for this is that it hinders the "understanding" that is essential according to the laws of the universe.
Oneness is not the same as being homogeneous.
It is often misunderstood that achieving oneness means becoming homogeneous and thinking alike. While being one is indeed true when oneness is achieved, this universe is divided for the purpose of "understanding." Therefore, the individual divisions becoming homogeneous goes against the original purpose of the universe, which is "to know oneself." If that were to happen, everyone would become the same, and it would be impossible to know oneself. Therefore, societies or organizations that aim to be composed of homogeneous people will inevitably collapse. This is because such homogenization does not align with the laws of the universe.
Such homogenization leads to stagnation in society or organizations, creating people who are devoid of purpose, have gloomy expressions, and are stagnant.
On the other hand, a society with diversity brings about transformation and creates people who are vibrant, have bright expressions, and are cheerful.
What appears to be a peaceful and trouble-free society is often mistakenly perceived as oneness. I have a memory in my group soul of being reincarnated on Pleiades, which was very peaceful, but also had a restrictive atmosphere that did not tolerate incorrect values. The Pleiades society had a high proportion of people who behaved politely, and seemingly had a very high level of harmony. However, even people like the Pleiadians failed to realize that such exclusivity creates conflict.
According to the basic thinking of the Pleiades, if everyone is in harmony, there will be no conflict. Therefore, based on this idea, there have been many attempts to help Earth by "stopping conflict through harmony." Even in conflicts in the Middle East, many people have tried the same thing and have become frustrated with its ineffectiveness.
Why is this the case? Because they were trying to change others. Attempts to change others and make them homogeneous will always fail. Even if it starts well, people who realize they are being controlled will show angry behavior. For those who are trying to control, there are often cases where they are doing it with good intentions, and they often cannot understand why people choose to suffer rather than being homogeneous and happy, and cannot understand people's feelings.
This also happened in the interactions between the Pleiades and other societies. The Pleiades believed that other societies should also conform to their ways. And they would find differences in other societies and try to correct them to achieve harmony. This was seen as interference in other societies, and the proposals for harmony were seen as those who disrupt harmony by the other societies.
This has created a history where one civilization wins and is homogenized, as it is said that "the victor is the righteous." As a result, the superiority of the Pleiades and their position as protectors of peace seemed unshakable.
In reality, the sociality of the Pleiadians is like polite white people, who are clear, bright, and articulate, and have similarities to the basic aspects of American society. The United States also repeatedly intervenes in other countries, trying to stop or spread conflicts, and there is a part of it that is similar to the way of the Pleiades. While claiming peace and harmony, the Pleiades and Americans are somewhat similar in their pursuit of a homogeneous society.
And self-proclaimed lightworkers, environmental activists, and thinkers often claim that "conflict can be stopped through harmony." Surprisingly, despite having different positions, they often agree on this point. This seems to be a continuation of the flow of people who have had successful experiences in the past, such as the Pleiades. And people tend to agree with this point. This is the trap.
In the past, there were movements on Pleiades and Orion that outwardly aimed for "harmony" but actually aimed for "homogeneity." While everyone would agree with harmony, there was an unspoken understanding that "it means becoming homogeneous." This was the hidden intention behind the word "harmony," and that was the source of conflict.
Looking at the word itself, "harmony" is just "harmony," and there is no meaning of "homogeneity." However, in the past, there have been many civilizations that, among those who have said "harmony," unconsciously or vaguely thought, "that harmony means becoming homogeneous, and harmony will be achieved if everyone does the same as our society." And one of them was the Pleiades.
Numerous civilizations, including the Pleiades and Orion, interacted, and eventually, they sought harmony. However, this harmony was defined as "becoming the same," which contradicted the "understanding" of the universe's laws, thus manifesting as a powerful force of resistance from the cosmos. This seems to be the fundamental cause of the Orion War.
People thought, "So, they were saying nice things about harmony and peace, but in the end, they were just dominating. We were deceived." They organized resistance movements. On the other hand, the ruling side believed that "those who disrupt the harmony need to be suppressed." They were treated as rebels who disrupt the peaceful society of harmony.
The Pleiades had a harmonious society, and still do, but it was somewhat stagnant. Therefore, they engaged in cosmic activities to help the spiritual growth of other planets. This is also a humanitarian activity, similar to what is represented in Star Trek. However, this activity ultimately led to resistance from some societies because it aimed for a homogenized society.
The concept of "oneness" and harmony advocated by the Pleiades seems to have had a slightly different meaning than it does today. In their context, "oneness" meant homogenization, and they believed that if a society was as harmonious as the Pleiades, peace would prevail. However, this very idea contained the seeds of a major conflict.
In reality, "oneness" refers to the fundamental principle that the universe is separated for the purpose of "understanding," and ultimately, it is one. Furthermore, it is actually "oneness" even in higher dimensions. Therefore, it is not necessary to aim for a homogeneous society just because it is "oneness." Even if they are completely different, they are always "oneness." Even if they are at war, both sides are "oneness." This is because "oneness" is unchanging and immutable. However, there has long been an interpretation that "oneness" means aiming for a homogenized society and way of thinking.
This is often the case in spirituality as well, where the term "oneness" implicitly expects and corrects a homogenized way of thinking and behavior. Those who do not conform are considered to be lacking in harmony. Such situations, where homogenized people are created or where people are led to a homogenized way of thinking, actually contradict the universal law of "understanding."
As a result of acting on such ideas, for example, when trying to resolve conflicts on Earth, it is rejected because it does not align with the fundamental principle of "understanding." Therefore, no matter how much one engages in activities to "lead to peace through harmony," it will be rejected.
Moreover, if one falls into a simple dualism and considers "this side is good, and that side is bad," and punishes one side as evil, there will be no "understanding," and new conflicts will inevitably arise from those people, and the conflict will never end.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers who adhere to dualism often make simplistic statements such as, "Whoever initiates the conflict is at fault." Even in long-lasting conflicts where it is unclear who initiated the conflict, they try to simplify it by saying, "Even in such cases, if you trace it back, the one who initiated it is at fault." They fail to realize that such dualism is creating conflict in society. If one side is considered good and the other is considered evil, the side considered evil will be oppressed as a lower-class citizen. Is there any real salvation in such a hierarchical society? Do these self-proclaimed lightworkers even see the reality of the social division created by such dualism? They are simply trapped in a childish notion of punishing evil based on a simple dualism, and they genuinely believe that peace will come to this society. Such activities, lacking the perspective of "understanding," will inevitably collapse and create conflict.
Instead of aiming for a homogeneous society, we need a society that understands as much as possible, and that assumes there will always be things that cannot be understood. It is necessary to live together within the limits of what can be understood, and to have limited interactions with those who cannot be understood. This is not because they cannot be understood right now, but because we should strive to understand them. There is no need to force it, but we should not assume division, and there is no need to aim for a homogeneous society. If one wants to be homogeneous, they should do so voluntarily, and it should not be imposed by others.
Forced homogenization leads to a lack of understanding and stagnation of society. On the other hand, even if we gradually base ourselves on understanding, we will grow even a little bit, even if it's only a few percent. This is not homogeneity, but there is change. The existence of change means there is some destruction and regeneration. There is a temporary "maintenance" in between.
It seems to me that Pleiades, due to its extreme focus on "maintenance," resulted in homogenization and a loss of metabolism, leading to stagnation in society. Self-proclaimed lightworkers are similar in some ways, as they aim for "maintenance" and seek peace through homogenization and harmony, which seems to be influenced by the Pleiades. For self-proclaimed lightworkers, they believe they are following "universal teachings," and that this will save the Earth. However, the truth is that these universal laws are based on "understanding," and those who do not think for themselves will not find the answers.
It is important to think for oneself, to consider what is good and what is bad, rather than being taught a doctrine by someone else. And to not be satisfied with homogenization, but to find the answer to where one should go. If this is not possible, the Earth will continue to be divided and conflicts will continue.
On the other hand, if one is based on "understanding," peace may come to this Earth surprisingly quickly. It is a simple and clear story that everyone understands, and it suggests that peace may come to this Earth unexpectedly. Once understood, transformation happens quickly.
Then, there is no need to become homogenized, and there is even a spontaneity to try being homogenized, and one can freely try new things. That is where understanding is born. That is the path that the Earth should aim for, and as a result, "harmony" and "peace" will come.
At the root of this is an understanding of oneness, but oneness does not mean homogenization. When people understand that oneness is the fundamental meaning, those who force homogenization will disappear. And then, peace based on the true meaning of oneness will come to the Earth, and society will be led by diversity and understanding.
Such homogenization leads to stagnation in society or organizations, creating people who are devoid of purpose, have gloomy expressions, and are stagnant.
On the other hand, a society with diversity brings about transformation and creates people who are vibrant, have bright expressions, and are cheerful.
What appears to be a peaceful and trouble-free society is often mistakenly perceived as oneness. I have a memory in my group soul of being reincarnated on Pleiades, which was very peaceful, but also had a restrictive atmosphere that did not tolerate incorrect values. The Pleiades society had a high proportion of people who behaved politely, and seemingly had a very high level of harmony. However, even people like the Pleiadians failed to realize that such exclusivity creates conflict.
According to the basic thinking of the Pleiades, if everyone is in harmony, there will be no conflict. Therefore, based on this idea, there have been many attempts to help Earth by "stopping conflict through harmony." Even in conflicts in the Middle East, many people have tried the same thing and have become frustrated with its ineffectiveness.
Why is this the case? Because they were trying to change others. Attempts to change others and make them homogeneous will always fail. Even if it starts well, people who realize they are being controlled will show angry behavior. For those who are trying to control, there are often cases where they are doing it with good intentions, and they often cannot understand why people choose to suffer rather than being homogeneous and happy, and cannot understand people's feelings.
This also happened in the interactions between the Pleiades and other societies. The Pleiades believed that other societies should also conform to their ways. And they would find differences in other societies and try to correct them to achieve harmony. This was seen as interference in other societies, and the proposals for harmony were seen as those who disrupt harmony by the other societies.
This has created a history where one civilization wins and is homogenized, as it is said that "the victor is the righteous." As a result, the superiority of the Pleiades and their position as protectors of peace seemed unshakable.
In reality, the sociality of the Pleiadians is like polite white people, who are clear, bright, and articulate, and have similarities to the basic aspects of American society. The United States also repeatedly intervenes in other countries, trying to stop or spread conflicts, and there is a part of it that is similar to the way of the Pleiades. While claiming peace and harmony, the Pleiades and Americans are somewhat similar in their pursuit of a homogeneous society.
And self-proclaimed lightworkers, environmental activists, and thinkers often claim that "conflict can be stopped through harmony." Surprisingly, despite having different positions, they often agree on this point. This seems to be a continuation of the flow of people who have had successful experiences in the past, such as the Pleiades. And people tend to agree with this point. This is the trap.
In the past, there were movements on Pleiades and Orion that outwardly aimed for "harmony" but actually aimed for "homogeneity." While everyone would agree with harmony, there was an unspoken understanding that "it means becoming homogeneous." This was the hidden intention behind the word "harmony," and that was the source of conflict.
Looking at the word itself, "harmony" is just "harmony," and there is no meaning of "homogeneity." However, in the past, there have been many civilizations that, among those who have said "harmony," unconsciously or vaguely thought, "that harmony means becoming homogeneous, and harmony will be achieved if everyone does the same as our society." And one of them was the Pleiades.
Numerous civilizations, including the Pleiades and Orion, interacted, and eventually, they sought harmony. However, this harmony was defined as "becoming the same," which contradicted the "understanding" of the universe's laws, thus manifesting as a powerful force of resistance from the cosmos. This seems to be the fundamental cause of the Orion War.
People thought, "So, they were saying nice things about harmony and peace, but in the end, they were just dominating. We were deceived." They organized resistance movements. On the other hand, the ruling side believed that "those who disrupt the harmony need to be suppressed." They were treated as rebels who disrupt the peaceful society of harmony.
The Pleiades had a harmonious society, and still do, but it was somewhat stagnant. Therefore, they engaged in cosmic activities to help the spiritual growth of other planets. This is also a humanitarian activity, similar to what is represented in Star Trek. However, this activity ultimately led to resistance from some societies because it aimed for a homogenized society.
The concept of "oneness" and harmony advocated by the Pleiades seems to have had a slightly different meaning than it does today. In their context, "oneness" meant homogenization, and they believed that if a society was as harmonious as the Pleiades, peace would prevail. However, this very idea contained the seeds of a major conflict.
In reality, "oneness" refers to the fundamental principle that the universe is separated for the purpose of "understanding," and ultimately, it is one. Furthermore, it is actually "oneness" even in higher dimensions. Therefore, it is not necessary to aim for a homogeneous society just because it is "oneness." Even if they are completely different, they are always "oneness." Even if they are at war, both sides are "oneness." This is because "oneness" is unchanging and immutable. However, there has long been an interpretation that "oneness" means aiming for a homogenized society and way of thinking.
This is often the case in spirituality as well, where the term "oneness" implicitly expects and corrects a homogenized way of thinking and behavior. Those who do not conform are considered to be lacking in harmony. Such situations, where homogenized people are created or where people are led to a homogenized way of thinking, actually contradict the universal law of "understanding."
As a result of acting on such ideas, for example, when trying to resolve conflicts on Earth, it is rejected because it does not align with the fundamental principle of "understanding." Therefore, no matter how much one engages in activities to "lead to peace through harmony," it will be rejected.
Moreover, if one falls into a simple dualism and considers "this side is good, and that side is bad," and punishes one side as evil, there will be no "understanding," and new conflicts will inevitably arise from those people, and the conflict will never end.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers who adhere to dualism often make simplistic statements such as, "Whoever initiates the conflict is at fault." Even in long-lasting conflicts where it is unclear who initiated the conflict, they try to simplify it by saying, "Even in such cases, if you trace it back, the one who initiated it is at fault." They fail to realize that such dualism is creating conflict in society. If one side is considered good and the other is considered evil, the side considered evil will be oppressed as a lower-class citizen. Is there any real salvation in such a hierarchical society? Do these self-proclaimed lightworkers even see the reality of the social division created by such dualism? They are simply trapped in a childish notion of punishing evil based on a simple dualism, and they genuinely believe that peace will come to this society. Such activities, lacking the perspective of "understanding," will inevitably collapse and create conflict.
Instead of aiming for a homogeneous society, we need a society that understands as much as possible, and that assumes there will always be things that cannot be understood. It is necessary to live together within the limits of what can be understood, and to have limited interactions with those who cannot be understood. This is not because they cannot be understood right now, but because we should strive to understand them. There is no need to force it, but we should not assume division, and there is no need to aim for a homogeneous society. If one wants to be homogeneous, they should do so voluntarily, and it should not be imposed by others.
Forced homogenization leads to a lack of understanding and stagnation of society. On the other hand, even if we gradually base ourselves on understanding, we will grow even a little bit, even if it's only a few percent. This is not homogeneity, but there is change. The existence of change means there is some destruction and regeneration. There is a temporary "maintenance" in between.
It seems to me that Pleiades, due to its extreme focus on "maintenance," resulted in homogenization and a loss of metabolism, leading to stagnation in society. Self-proclaimed lightworkers are similar in some ways, as they aim for "maintenance" and seek peace through homogenization and harmony, which seems to be influenced by the Pleiades. For self-proclaimed lightworkers, they believe they are following "universal teachings," and that this will save the Earth. However, the truth is that these universal laws are based on "understanding," and those who do not think for themselves will not find the answers.
It is important to think for oneself, to consider what is good and what is bad, rather than being taught a doctrine by someone else. And to not be satisfied with homogenization, but to find the answer to where one should go. If this is not possible, the Earth will continue to be divided and conflicts will continue.
On the other hand, if one is based on "understanding," peace may come to this Earth surprisingly quickly. It is a simple and clear story that everyone understands, and it suggests that peace may come to this Earth unexpectedly. Once understood, transformation happens quickly.
Then, there is no need to become homogenized, and there is even a spontaneity to try being homogenized, and one can freely try new things. That is where understanding is born. That is the path that the Earth should aim for, and as a result, "harmony" and "peace" will come.
At the root of this is an understanding of oneness, but oneness does not mean homogenization. When people understand that oneness is the fundamental meaning, those who force homogenization will disappear. And then, peace based on the true meaning of oneness will come to the Earth, and society will be led by diversity and understanding.
The remnants of the Orion War are engaging in a self-proclaimed "lightworker" charade on Earth.
During the Orion War, the scale, weaponry, and number of personnel involved were unlike anything on Earth. It was a time when it was unclear whether the "light side" had won or lost, and those memories are being replayed here on Earth.
It's not exactly a "recreation," but people with the karma from that time are doing the same things here on Earth.
They call themselves "lightworkers" or "light warriors," and they use a simplistic, dualistic framework to justify their actions, claiming that violence is "the exercise of power, not violence," and that they are striving for a unified world through justice.
However, this is simply a repetition of the failures of the Orion War. While the people living on Earth today may not be aware of it, they are experiencing the same things to learn why those failures occurred. It's best not to interfere, as they need to learn from their own experiences. It's like a game, although it's very different from the Orion War, which involved armed forces and concrete actions. Now, they are using spiritual rituals, believing they have an effect, to try to save the world. But this is an illusion, a dream world they are living in.
Memories of the Orion War are projected onto their surroundings, creating the illusion of the effectiveness of these rituals. While there may be some minor effects and aura, it's simply a projection of the shattered dream of unity from Orion.
As some spiritual teachings say, the events on Earth are like a "dream," and the true life exists in the universe. On Earth, people are meant to learn from each other under certain limitations, and they are pretending to be lightworkers with very limited tools. Compared to the original Orion era, this is a dreamlike, fragile, and insignificant experience. However, by experiencing this, they can learn about the destructive consequences of their actions as lightworkers.
The dualistic nature of lightwork involves dividing the world into good and evil, with one's own side being good and evil needing to be destroyed. While the relationship may become complex depending on the time and circumstances, the basic structure is simple.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe that if they understand "something fixed," the world will be at peace. The very concept of needing to understand a "fixed object" is a misunderstanding. The story of good and evil and the unification of the world through good cannot stand, but lightworkers are making (essentially) futile efforts to achieve it, just as they did during the Orion War. While it may not have meaning in the context of society, it has some meaning in terms of resolving karma.
This framework is being recreated on Earth, and self-proclaimed lightworkers are engaging in activities that, while seemingly meaningless, are actually a "dream" in which they believe they are contributing to society and saving the world. It's not a waste of time, as the Earth is a learning platform, and without it, they would have to spend much longer organizing and integrating the memories of Orion.
They are playing a lightworker game in a sandbox prepared by a higher power. Occasionally, misunderstandings can lead to cults trying to influence society, resulting in incidents like the subway incident involving O○○, but in most cases, as long as they are quietly playing lightworker games, they are harmless.
Therefore, even though self-proclaimed lightworkers are engaging in lightworker activities, it is important in the context of learning to avoid repeating the Orion War. Learning must continue, or else this galaxy will continue to repeat its divisions.
The answer already exists in the universal law of "understanding," but until they realize this, the lightworker game will continue. Therefore, it is important to observe.
Incidentally, the story of this "dream" is sometimes misunderstood in spiritual teachings, but the situation on Earth is special, a place specially prepared for learning. Who prepared it has been hinted at before, but regardless of who prepared it, people are born here as something "dreamlike" and are deepening their learning under physical limitations.
In the universe, there are far fewer limitations, and even if one's "understanding" is incorrect when compared to the laws of the universe, it can often be justified within the vastness of the universe, allowing for its existence. This is because the universe is so vast, and there is an infinite potential within it. However, this can hinder the integration and "understanding" that the universe seeks, as it can lead to different civilizations clashing, each claiming righteousness and attempting to destroy what they perceive as evil. Such situations may initially appear as victories for the "good," but they often represent a "victor's justice" scenario. Eventually, some people begin to realize that this is not right. This is because even civilizations that appear prosperous, such as the Pleiades, show signs of stagnation.
Those who share this awareness seek to understand the cause of this stagnation and lack of growth, and they deepen their learning through reincarnation on Earth as a "dream."
If the true life exists in the universe, and reincarnation on Earth is a "dream" for the purpose of learning, then the situation is simple. There would be no large-scale conflicts like those in Orion, only small-scale or ritualistic events for self-reflection. Through the repetition of seemingly insignificant spiritual practices, they believe they are doing "lightwork," but in reality, they are reflecting on and deepening their learning by reliving the events of Orion.
These individuals claim to be doing lightwork to save the Earth, but the Earth itself is not in such dire straits. It is the self-proclaimed lightworkers who are struggling, trying to understand the bitter experiences of Orion, but often without realizing it. Instead, many of them are trying to evoke the memories of Orion and believe that this time, the forces of light must triumph. However, this is unlikely to happen on Earth, and there is little reason to worry about such things. These are simply the internal experiences of a particular group of people with unresolved issues.
When one examines the mindset of these self-proclaimed lightworkers, it becomes clear that they are fixated on a dualistic view of "transforming people into a state of peace" and "good (i.e., preservation or angels) winning over evil (i.e., destruction or demons)." Observing this, one can glimpse the nature of the Orion War. For those who were once involved in such things, the memories resurface as karma, while for those who were not involved, the memories can serve as a learning experience.
This is evident when reading auras. The auras of these individuals reveal the biased perspectives held by those who were involved in Orion, and it is necessary for those with Orion karma to learn from this. However, these individuals often do not realize this and believe that they must triumph this time, which is simply a resurgence of Orion's memories. While such conflicts may occur due to Orion karma, this is unlikely to happen on Earth. Even self-proclaimed lightworkers are involved in such conflicts, supporting them ideologically by claiming "good" and attempting to destroy "evil." These individuals are so convinced of their own righteousness that it is often futile to try to reason with them; they must realize it on their own.
This "sandbox" is designed to evoke the memories of Orion and allow people to learn from them without realizing it. The entire Earth is not a sandbox, but rather, God provides a necessary "sandbox" and a corresponding ideology to those who need it, making them believe it is the truth. This is the basic framework of the sandbox ideology.
To populate this stage, individuals are implanted with auras containing "settings" through a process called "initiation," which makes them feel a certain way. With the actors in place, they simply perform their roles.
Therefore, while it may seem strange or even repulsive to observe a cult claiming to be doing lightwork, it is an important learning experience for them. This Earth serves as a platform for diverse learning experiences, so those who are not involved in such things should simply observe and allow them to learn.
Even the activities of these self-proclaimed lightworkers are part of the "learning" and "understanding" process. They are learning how a story of good versus evil and the triumph of good can hinder understanding. This is a "dream" in the sense that it is not a fantasy, but rather a reality within the universe, and the Earth allows for accelerated learning under controlled conditions.
In any case, such activities on Earth are nothing more than a "dream," and they will likely flare up like a momentary flame and then disappear. Sometimes, even if it's a cult, seeing such fleeting dreams as a remnant of the Orion War can be considered one of the "learning" pleasures in this long era.
Furthermore, even those who claim to be lightworkers and are pretending to do lightwork are, from the perspective of the Earth's administrators, objects of salvation. They are trying to break the shackles of Orion and free and liberate people.
The reason for this is that the "sandbox" world in the hearts of these self-proclaimed lightworkers was created by God. Therefore, even if their worldview is different from the truth, it is fine. In that sandbox, there is no reincarnation, and they are set up as lightworkers who are saving the world. And God is using that sandbox to allow people to experience why those who claimed to be "good" in the Orion War failed, and to learn what was truly needed. This attempt takes place in a closed sandbox, but there is interference from those around them, so it is kept secret, and they are made to believe that only they know the truth. They are doing this in order to learn from the failure of the Orion War.
The self-proclaimed lightworkers are having a "dream" like fantasy in the sandbox prepared by God, and they are repeating the so-called lightwork, not to simply reproduce a dualistic worldview of lightworkers destroying evil, but because they need to deepen their learning based on the karma of Orion. The reason why conflicts never cease on this Earth is because of the same fundamental cause, which is the dualistic good versus evil. This sandbox game or lightworker play will continue until people understand that.
It's not exactly a "recreation," but people with the karma from that time are doing the same things here on Earth.
They call themselves "lightworkers" or "light warriors," and they use a simplistic, dualistic framework to justify their actions, claiming that violence is "the exercise of power, not violence," and that they are striving for a unified world through justice.
However, this is simply a repetition of the failures of the Orion War. While the people living on Earth today may not be aware of it, they are experiencing the same things to learn why those failures occurred. It's best not to interfere, as they need to learn from their own experiences. It's like a game, although it's very different from the Orion War, which involved armed forces and concrete actions. Now, they are using spiritual rituals, believing they have an effect, to try to save the world. But this is an illusion, a dream world they are living in.
Memories of the Orion War are projected onto their surroundings, creating the illusion of the effectiveness of these rituals. While there may be some minor effects and aura, it's simply a projection of the shattered dream of unity from Orion.
As some spiritual teachings say, the events on Earth are like a "dream," and the true life exists in the universe. On Earth, people are meant to learn from each other under certain limitations, and they are pretending to be lightworkers with very limited tools. Compared to the original Orion era, this is a dreamlike, fragile, and insignificant experience. However, by experiencing this, they can learn about the destructive consequences of their actions as lightworkers.
The dualistic nature of lightwork involves dividing the world into good and evil, with one's own side being good and evil needing to be destroyed. While the relationship may become complex depending on the time and circumstances, the basic structure is simple.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe that if they understand "something fixed," the world will be at peace. The very concept of needing to understand a "fixed object" is a misunderstanding. The story of good and evil and the unification of the world through good cannot stand, but lightworkers are making (essentially) futile efforts to achieve it, just as they did during the Orion War. While it may not have meaning in the context of society, it has some meaning in terms of resolving karma.
This framework is being recreated on Earth, and self-proclaimed lightworkers are engaging in activities that, while seemingly meaningless, are actually a "dream" in which they believe they are contributing to society and saving the world. It's not a waste of time, as the Earth is a learning platform, and without it, they would have to spend much longer organizing and integrating the memories of Orion.
They are playing a lightworker game in a sandbox prepared by a higher power. Occasionally, misunderstandings can lead to cults trying to influence society, resulting in incidents like the subway incident involving O○○, but in most cases, as long as they are quietly playing lightworker games, they are harmless.
Therefore, even though self-proclaimed lightworkers are engaging in lightworker activities, it is important in the context of learning to avoid repeating the Orion War. Learning must continue, or else this galaxy will continue to repeat its divisions.
The answer already exists in the universal law of "understanding," but until they realize this, the lightworker game will continue. Therefore, it is important to observe.
Incidentally, the story of this "dream" is sometimes misunderstood in spiritual teachings, but the situation on Earth is special, a place specially prepared for learning. Who prepared it has been hinted at before, but regardless of who prepared it, people are born here as something "dreamlike" and are deepening their learning under physical limitations.
In the universe, there are far fewer limitations, and even if one's "understanding" is incorrect when compared to the laws of the universe, it can often be justified within the vastness of the universe, allowing for its existence. This is because the universe is so vast, and there is an infinite potential within it. However, this can hinder the integration and "understanding" that the universe seeks, as it can lead to different civilizations clashing, each claiming righteousness and attempting to destroy what they perceive as evil. Such situations may initially appear as victories for the "good," but they often represent a "victor's justice" scenario. Eventually, some people begin to realize that this is not right. This is because even civilizations that appear prosperous, such as the Pleiades, show signs of stagnation.
Those who share this awareness seek to understand the cause of this stagnation and lack of growth, and they deepen their learning through reincarnation on Earth as a "dream."
If the true life exists in the universe, and reincarnation on Earth is a "dream" for the purpose of learning, then the situation is simple. There would be no large-scale conflicts like those in Orion, only small-scale or ritualistic events for self-reflection. Through the repetition of seemingly insignificant spiritual practices, they believe they are doing "lightwork," but in reality, they are reflecting on and deepening their learning by reliving the events of Orion.
These individuals claim to be doing lightwork to save the Earth, but the Earth itself is not in such dire straits. It is the self-proclaimed lightworkers who are struggling, trying to understand the bitter experiences of Orion, but often without realizing it. Instead, many of them are trying to evoke the memories of Orion and believe that this time, the forces of light must triumph. However, this is unlikely to happen on Earth, and there is little reason to worry about such things. These are simply the internal experiences of a particular group of people with unresolved issues.
When one examines the mindset of these self-proclaimed lightworkers, it becomes clear that they are fixated on a dualistic view of "transforming people into a state of peace" and "good (i.e., preservation or angels) winning over evil (i.e., destruction or demons)." Observing this, one can glimpse the nature of the Orion War. For those who were once involved in such things, the memories resurface as karma, while for those who were not involved, the memories can serve as a learning experience.
This is evident when reading auras. The auras of these individuals reveal the biased perspectives held by those who were involved in Orion, and it is necessary for those with Orion karma to learn from this. However, these individuals often do not realize this and believe that they must triumph this time, which is simply a resurgence of Orion's memories. While such conflicts may occur due to Orion karma, this is unlikely to happen on Earth. Even self-proclaimed lightworkers are involved in such conflicts, supporting them ideologically by claiming "good" and attempting to destroy "evil." These individuals are so convinced of their own righteousness that it is often futile to try to reason with them; they must realize it on their own.
This "sandbox" is designed to evoke the memories of Orion and allow people to learn from them without realizing it. The entire Earth is not a sandbox, but rather, God provides a necessary "sandbox" and a corresponding ideology to those who need it, making them believe it is the truth. This is the basic framework of the sandbox ideology.
To populate this stage, individuals are implanted with auras containing "settings" through a process called "initiation," which makes them feel a certain way. With the actors in place, they simply perform their roles.
Therefore, while it may seem strange or even repulsive to observe a cult claiming to be doing lightwork, it is an important learning experience for them. This Earth serves as a platform for diverse learning experiences, so those who are not involved in such things should simply observe and allow them to learn.
Even the activities of these self-proclaimed lightworkers are part of the "learning" and "understanding" process. They are learning how a story of good versus evil and the triumph of good can hinder understanding. This is a "dream" in the sense that it is not a fantasy, but rather a reality within the universe, and the Earth allows for accelerated learning under controlled conditions.
In any case, such activities on Earth are nothing more than a "dream," and they will likely flare up like a momentary flame and then disappear. Sometimes, even if it's a cult, seeing such fleeting dreams as a remnant of the Orion War can be considered one of the "learning" pleasures in this long era.
Furthermore, even those who claim to be lightworkers and are pretending to do lightwork are, from the perspective of the Earth's administrators, objects of salvation. They are trying to break the shackles of Orion and free and liberate people.
The reason for this is that the "sandbox" world in the hearts of these self-proclaimed lightworkers was created by God. Therefore, even if their worldview is different from the truth, it is fine. In that sandbox, there is no reincarnation, and they are set up as lightworkers who are saving the world. And God is using that sandbox to allow people to experience why those who claimed to be "good" in the Orion War failed, and to learn what was truly needed. This attempt takes place in a closed sandbox, but there is interference from those around them, so it is kept secret, and they are made to believe that only they know the truth. They are doing this in order to learn from the failure of the Orion War.
The self-proclaimed lightworkers are having a "dream" like fantasy in the sandbox prepared by God, and they are repeating the so-called lightwork, not to simply reproduce a dualistic worldview of lightworkers destroying evil, but because they need to deepen their learning based on the karma of Orion. The reason why conflicts never cease on this Earth is because of the same fundamental cause, which is the dualistic good versus evil. This sandbox game or lightworker play will continue until people understand that.
The intention of the Earth's administrators is to prevent the unification of the Earth under a single ideology or "good."
This may appear to be "evil" at first glance. It might seem like a malicious administrator, representing concepts like the deep state and conspiracy theories, with the intention of causing chaos. However, that is not the case.
The law of the universe is "understanding." Therefore, respecting only one side's opinion and attempting to unify the Earth through "good" would lead to the oppression of those on the other side, who would be deemed "evil."
Therefore, the administrators of Earth are preventing the unification of the Earth by only considering one side's opinion as "good." They are aiming for a world without "good" or "evil." This is completely different from the so-called "good" unifying the Earth. There is a wall of understanding here.
It is generally understood in spiritual circles that "a peaceful world without good or evil will be achieved through unification by good." However, if the "good" being referred to is the "good" of one side in a dualistic system, then other values will be ignored and their existence will be lost, leading to a loss of dignity.
In reality, there is a oneness where everything is "self," without the duality of good and evil. The purpose is to understand oneself, and oneself is the oneness itself, including the oneness itself and the divided selves, which are all aspects of oneself. All of these "selves" are separated in order to understand the oneness. It is not only about understanding what oneness is, but also about understanding that everything, including others, the environment, and matter, is the oneness of "myself," and acting accordingly. This means that understanding goes beyond just intellectual comprehension; it requires action that stems from true understanding.
Therefore, there is no such thing as the duality of "good," but attempting to unify the Earth solely through "good" is something that those who claim to be "unifying" and "integrating" are doing. However, this is not the true meaning of integration and unification of oneness, but rather a unification and integration based on the duality of "good." Such a dualistic unification and integration is not permitted by the administrators of Earth.
Even if such a thing is achieved through effort, the administrators of Earth would consider such a society, unified by only one value, to be a failure because it reduces "learning." This can manifest as a freezing of the Earth's timeline and a shift to another timeline, or as a major disaster that partially restarts the process.
Many people misunderstand the intentions of the administrators of Earth, spreading rumors that "we are being controlled by demons," or that "there are controllers" or that "they are trying to enslave us." However, this is a misunderstanding. If the administrators of Earth do not intervene, this world would become a society with only one ideology, which would not tolerate other thoughts, and would become a controlled society with constant ideological control. In the future, as AI and IT management technologies advance, such a society may accelerate. However, if that happens, it would reduce the "learning" opportunities for people, which would contradict the law of the universe, which is "understanding." Therefore, the administrators of Earth would decide that such a society with little learning is unnecessary and would reset it.
Therefore, the administrators of Earth are not trying to control people, but rather they emphasize how much "learning" the people as a whole can increase as a "whole" of Earth. This is not about simply obtaining results, like with AI, but about the "consciousness" of humans, which is also an expression of higher-dimensional consciousness. The key is how much "understanding" that consciousness can achieve. Even if AI produces excellent results, it will not be fed back into the "consciousness" and will not be counted as valuable. However, if humans learn from the results of AI, that learning will be counted as an increase in human consciousness.
When the ruling classes of each country on Earth attempt to unify the Earth, if the result is that it leads to an increase in the overall understanding of the consciousness of the Earth, then that unification will be approved and allowed to continue by the administrators of Earth. On the other hand, if it leads to suppressing the overall understanding of the consciousness of the Earth through ideological oppression or pressure to conform, then that unification will be denied by the administrators of Earth, and that unification will not be achieved, or the Earth will be reset. This is all judged based on whether it aligns with the law of the universe, which is "understanding."
Therefore, even the self-proclaimed "lightworkers" who claim to be saving the Earth by eradicating "evil" and pursuing "good" are, if the "good" they are talking about is a dualistic concept that unifies ideology (for example, metaphysics), and if that results in hindering the overall "understanding" of the people of Earth, then it will be denied by the administrators of Earth. The situation can change in various ways, so even such seemingly strange logic may, in combination with other factors, promote the overall "understanding" of the people of Earth. However, basically, the story of "good" eradicating "evil" is a childish and low-dimensional story. Conflicts in the world occur at that level, and if a conflict continues based on such a simple duality, and if "good" wins and the conflict stops, it would result in a situation where the society is intellectually weak, and such a society would be denied by the administrators of Earth.
Unity and integration can occur after mutual "understanding," and if that is the case, that understanding is natural.
On the other hand, attempts at unity or integration based on a single ideology, such as "goodness," lack mutual understanding and will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. Similarly, attempts to unify the world through metaphysics or philosophy, which may appear to be "universal principles applicable to everyone," are also rejected by the Earth's administrator because they do not increase "understanding." A unified theory may seem to be something that everyone can agree with, but it is not a fundamental change from the current society, which is based on "freedom." It may be novel, but it is only different in its axis.
If, as a result of people increasing their understanding, all of humanity agrees and a natural flow of ideology leads to unity, then such a common understanding is possible. However, if that is imposed as an ideology, it will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. This is because imposed ideologies, in general, do not increase "understanding." Therefore, no matter how noble an ideology may seem, forced and uniform ideological unification goes against the laws of the universe. If such an ideology spreads, and as a whole it increases "understanding" on Earth, then that ideology and unification will be approved by the administrator of the universe. If it does not increase "understanding," then it is in accordance with the laws of the universe.
Currently, as long as such natural unification does not occur, there is no way that the world will be saved by conforming to a specific ideology.
If it is considered as a flexible foundation for increasing understanding, then it will be approved by the Earth's administrator. If this can be defined in words, then the Earth could be unified by an ideology based on "understanding," but it may be difficult to understand because it is a fundamental principle. People tend to gravitate towards easy-to-understand theories, and they tend to avoid the laborious process of increasing "understanding" as a whole. If people settle on something that they think they need to understand, they may be rejected from that place.
The law of the universe is "understanding." Therefore, respecting only one side's opinion and attempting to unify the Earth through "good" would lead to the oppression of those on the other side, who would be deemed "evil."
Therefore, the administrators of Earth are preventing the unification of the Earth by only considering one side's opinion as "good." They are aiming for a world without "good" or "evil." This is completely different from the so-called "good" unifying the Earth. There is a wall of understanding here.
It is generally understood in spiritual circles that "a peaceful world without good or evil will be achieved through unification by good." However, if the "good" being referred to is the "good" of one side in a dualistic system, then other values will be ignored and their existence will be lost, leading to a loss of dignity.
In reality, there is a oneness where everything is "self," without the duality of good and evil. The purpose is to understand oneself, and oneself is the oneness itself, including the oneness itself and the divided selves, which are all aspects of oneself. All of these "selves" are separated in order to understand the oneness. It is not only about understanding what oneness is, but also about understanding that everything, including others, the environment, and matter, is the oneness of "myself," and acting accordingly. This means that understanding goes beyond just intellectual comprehension; it requires action that stems from true understanding.
Therefore, there is no such thing as the duality of "good," but attempting to unify the Earth solely through "good" is something that those who claim to be "unifying" and "integrating" are doing. However, this is not the true meaning of integration and unification of oneness, but rather a unification and integration based on the duality of "good." Such a dualistic unification and integration is not permitted by the administrators of Earth.
Even if such a thing is achieved through effort, the administrators of Earth would consider such a society, unified by only one value, to be a failure because it reduces "learning." This can manifest as a freezing of the Earth's timeline and a shift to another timeline, or as a major disaster that partially restarts the process.
Many people misunderstand the intentions of the administrators of Earth, spreading rumors that "we are being controlled by demons," or that "there are controllers" or that "they are trying to enslave us." However, this is a misunderstanding. If the administrators of Earth do not intervene, this world would become a society with only one ideology, which would not tolerate other thoughts, and would become a controlled society with constant ideological control. In the future, as AI and IT management technologies advance, such a society may accelerate. However, if that happens, it would reduce the "learning" opportunities for people, which would contradict the law of the universe, which is "understanding." Therefore, the administrators of Earth would decide that such a society with little learning is unnecessary and would reset it.
Therefore, the administrators of Earth are not trying to control people, but rather they emphasize how much "learning" the people as a whole can increase as a "whole" of Earth. This is not about simply obtaining results, like with AI, but about the "consciousness" of humans, which is also an expression of higher-dimensional consciousness. The key is how much "understanding" that consciousness can achieve. Even if AI produces excellent results, it will not be fed back into the "consciousness" and will not be counted as valuable. However, if humans learn from the results of AI, that learning will be counted as an increase in human consciousness.
When the ruling classes of each country on Earth attempt to unify the Earth, if the result is that it leads to an increase in the overall understanding of the consciousness of the Earth, then that unification will be approved and allowed to continue by the administrators of Earth. On the other hand, if it leads to suppressing the overall understanding of the consciousness of the Earth through ideological oppression or pressure to conform, then that unification will be denied by the administrators of Earth, and that unification will not be achieved, or the Earth will be reset. This is all judged based on whether it aligns with the law of the universe, which is "understanding."
Therefore, even the self-proclaimed "lightworkers" who claim to be saving the Earth by eradicating "evil" and pursuing "good" are, if the "good" they are talking about is a dualistic concept that unifies ideology (for example, metaphysics), and if that results in hindering the overall "understanding" of the people of Earth, then it will be denied by the administrators of Earth. The situation can change in various ways, so even such seemingly strange logic may, in combination with other factors, promote the overall "understanding" of the people of Earth. However, basically, the story of "good" eradicating "evil" is a childish and low-dimensional story. Conflicts in the world occur at that level, and if a conflict continues based on such a simple duality, and if "good" wins and the conflict stops, it would result in a situation where the society is intellectually weak, and such a society would be denied by the administrators of Earth.
Unity and integration can occur after mutual "understanding," and if that is the case, that understanding is natural.
On the other hand, attempts at unity or integration based on a single ideology, such as "goodness," lack mutual understanding and will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. Similarly, attempts to unify the world through metaphysics or philosophy, which may appear to be "universal principles applicable to everyone," are also rejected by the Earth's administrator because they do not increase "understanding." A unified theory may seem to be something that everyone can agree with, but it is not a fundamental change from the current society, which is based on "freedom." It may be novel, but it is only different in its axis.
If, as a result of people increasing their understanding, all of humanity agrees and a natural flow of ideology leads to unity, then such a common understanding is possible. However, if that is imposed as an ideology, it will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. This is because imposed ideologies, in general, do not increase "understanding." Therefore, no matter how noble an ideology may seem, forced and uniform ideological unification goes against the laws of the universe. If such an ideology spreads, and as a whole it increases "understanding" on Earth, then that ideology and unification will be approved by the administrator of the universe. If it does not increase "understanding," then it is in accordance with the laws of the universe.
Currently, as long as such natural unification does not occur, there is no way that the world will be saved by conforming to a specific ideology.
If it is considered as a flexible foundation for increasing understanding, then it will be approved by the Earth's administrator. If this can be defined in words, then the Earth could be unified by an ideology based on "understanding," but it may be difficult to understand because it is a fundamental principle. People tend to gravitate towards easy-to-understand theories, and they tend to avoid the laborious process of increasing "understanding" as a whole. If people settle on something that they think they need to understand, they may be rejected from that place.
The actions of Chinese emperors, which they intended to be beneficial, often led to outcomes that were far from their original intentions.
As an example, there is a story about a certain god who was reincarnated as a Chinese emperor and tried to reform society. At that time, the gods in the afterlife held a meeting and said, "What should we do? We're troubled. We're troubled. Is there anything we can do?" They were at a loss, unable to come up with a good solution.
The world was in a state of chaos, with poverty, discontent, and constant conflict.
Then, a god who had previously achieved success as a king of a certain European country or as an emperor of the Roman Empire raised his hand and said, "If you want, I'll do it." He volunteered.
And so, he was reborn, but the situation was difficult, and even a god like him struggled.
The eunuchs around the emperor were not very thoughtful, and they simply said, "Yes, that's right," to whatever the emperor said. The emperor began to feel that the situation was not improving. Sometimes, there were people who offered advice in a very aggressive tone and manner, but he couldn't tell which of them was telling the truth.
Then, at one point, he said, "Hmm. In order for people to live happily, they should live in a unified way, like this." He planned something similar to what is now called a planned economy. The emperor thought that if people lived like that, they would be able to live peacefully without fighting over things.
However, the people's reaction was different. They were increasingly dissatisfied with the fact that they would no longer be able to obtain luxury goods or the delicacies they had been eating. The emperor was surprised by this reaction and thought, "Why are they dissatisfied when I thought that if they lived like that, they would be happy?"
Looking back now, the Roman era was a simpler time. People were satisfied if they didn't have to struggle to find food. Therefore, if people were provided with enough food, they were generally satisfied. On the other hand, in China, which was a more advanced era, people's demands were much more diverse.
Not only did he not understand the background of that era, but fundamentally, the very attempt to unify people's lives was an act that contradicted the "understanding" that is the law of the universe.
In reality, the emperor at that time later suffered a large-scale peasant uprising and was killed. After he was killed, the gods said, "Hmm. It seems that even someone like him couldn't do it..." They were disappointed.
The god said, "I didn't understand the people. I think I'll abdicate and be reborn as an ordinary person to live a normal life and learn what people are seeking." And he actually did. He was a serious god.
At first, it was literally about learning about the people. However, eventually, he reached the fundamental principle of the "understanding" that is the law of the universe. "So. I thought that it was important to give people the freedom to do what they want, but that was just a superficial thing. The most important thing is whether people can increase their understanding. Therefore, the role of an emperor or king is to create a society that allows people to deepen their learning." He gained that conviction.
That happened relatively recently.
The fact that the god gained that conviction may foreshadow a major change in the way the country is governed.
The world was in a state of chaos, with poverty, discontent, and constant conflict.
Then, a god who had previously achieved success as a king of a certain European country or as an emperor of the Roman Empire raised his hand and said, "If you want, I'll do it." He volunteered.
And so, he was reborn, but the situation was difficult, and even a god like him struggled.
The eunuchs around the emperor were not very thoughtful, and they simply said, "Yes, that's right," to whatever the emperor said. The emperor began to feel that the situation was not improving. Sometimes, there were people who offered advice in a very aggressive tone and manner, but he couldn't tell which of them was telling the truth.
Then, at one point, he said, "Hmm. In order for people to live happily, they should live in a unified way, like this." He planned something similar to what is now called a planned economy. The emperor thought that if people lived like that, they would be able to live peacefully without fighting over things.
However, the people's reaction was different. They were increasingly dissatisfied with the fact that they would no longer be able to obtain luxury goods or the delicacies they had been eating. The emperor was surprised by this reaction and thought, "Why are they dissatisfied when I thought that if they lived like that, they would be happy?"
Looking back now, the Roman era was a simpler time. People were satisfied if they didn't have to struggle to find food. Therefore, if people were provided with enough food, they were generally satisfied. On the other hand, in China, which was a more advanced era, people's demands were much more diverse.
Not only did he not understand the background of that era, but fundamentally, the very attempt to unify people's lives was an act that contradicted the "understanding" that is the law of the universe.
In reality, the emperor at that time later suffered a large-scale peasant uprising and was killed. After he was killed, the gods said, "Hmm. It seems that even someone like him couldn't do it..." They were disappointed.
The god said, "I didn't understand the people. I think I'll abdicate and be reborn as an ordinary person to live a normal life and learn what people are seeking." And he actually did. He was a serious god.
At first, it was literally about learning about the people. However, eventually, he reached the fundamental principle of the "understanding" that is the law of the universe. "So. I thought that it was important to give people the freedom to do what they want, but that was just a superficial thing. The most important thing is whether people can increase their understanding. Therefore, the role of an emperor or king is to create a society that allows people to deepen their learning." He gained that conviction.
That happened relatively recently.
The fact that the god gained that conviction may foreshadow a major change in the way the country is governed.
The remnants of the Orion War and the dreams they see.
In this way, the remnants of the Orion War are engaging in a "lightworker" charade on Earth, reflecting on the events of that time.
It is often said that this world is a dream. And at that time, spiritual people may arrogantly think, "Since it's a dream, it doesn't really matter, so just enjoy yourself and do whatever you want, and you don't have to save the world." Some people may even promote this idea. Of course, there are various people, and some of them may be right.
However, for the remnants of the Orion War, the "dream" is not about that. Their true intention is, "The real life is far away, and this reality is like a dream, but there is a meaning to learn in this environment. The belief that we must save the world is an illusion, and true salvation is learning how wrong our thoughts and actions have been." This is also about atoning for "original sin," and the suffering that people with original sin experience is a background to the situation where they continue to suffer until they learn from their mistakes.
In spirituality, there is often a debate about whether this world is a place of learning or just a place to play. In reality, both are true, and there are people of both types. There is no point in arguing about it. Some people are here to learn, while others are just here to play. However, there are a certain number of people who were supposed to be here to learn but have forgotten and think they are just here to play. They have lost their purpose.
People who truly came to Earth to play often enjoy life without talking about spirituality. It seems that people who talk about spirituality are often actually here to learn. (This is a personal observation.)
The feeling that we must save the world is often a trauma from the painful memory of not being able to save a star system in the distant past of Orion. While they may try to take actions to save this world, they will either fail or end up in a "pretend" game. The motivation to save the world is separate from the actual act of saving it. Even when they say they are saving the world, the reality has already ended long ago. For those people, saving their own past karma is the first priority.
Therefore, when people who claim to be lightworkers suddenly realize the root of their actions or become aware that their way of thinking has caused conflict, their motivation to "save the world" disappears, and they wake up.
This world is both a dream and a reality. It is a dream in the sense that we are living in the illusion of Orion's memory, in the illusion of our own phantom selves. It is also a dream in the sense that the soul is in the universe or a higher dimension, and this physical life is an illusion. However, in both cases, there is meaning in the "learning" aspect. As a result of learning, we realize that we were living in an illusion (of a dualistic struggle), and we wake up.
Because the karma of Orion is vast, there are people who experience or distribute the memories of Orion to resolve that karma through a process called "initiation," and begin to live a temporary virtual reality (even though they do not originally possess Orion's karma). Sometimes, cooperating with them and experiencing what the dualism of "good and evil" was like can be a little helpful. However, it is not necessary for everyone to do so.
The main participants are people who originally possessed Orion's karma, and they arrange for others to participate in the "initiation," and the actors perform. This is the current situation of the self-proclaimed lightworkers' dualistic "good and evil" battle. Even though they say it's a "pretend" game, they are quite serious, so it's better not to interfere too much. If there is no harm, it is best to leave them alone. They are learning.
When they realize that saving the world was an illusion, they stop seeing that "dream" and leave the activity. As more and more people involved with Orion wake up from the dream, the activities of self-proclaimed lightworkers will naturally disappear.
However, that time is still far away.
Until then, it can be interesting to observe the people who are pretending to be lightworkers. If they can dance without causing offense, it will be a learning experience not only for themselves but also for those around them.
...There are also people who are doing real lightwork, observing the self-proclaimed lightworkers. This is beyond dualism, beyond the battle of good and evil. The true lightworkers are trying to save all people, including the self-proclaimed lightworkers. Therefore, they are also helping the self-proclaimed lightworkers to transcend dualism. True lightworkers enter into all of humanity and change it from within. They do not criticize from the outside or try to destroy evil in a battle of good and evil. True lightworkers deeply infiltrate organizations, countries, or rulers that appear to be evil and change them from within. There may be true lightworkers mixed in with the self-proclaimed lightworkers, who are trying to change things from within. Therefore, self-proclaimed lightworkers need to strive to transcend dualism and move towards true oneness, but self-proclaimed lightworkers often lack the awareness that they are lacking in this regard, and they arrogantly think that they have "already achieved" it. It is difficult for self-proclaimed lightworkers to change. People who contribute to society in a normal way are often more straightforward and easier to grow.
The remnants of the Orion War, appearing in dreams, depict individuals who claim to be "lightworkers" as troublesome entities that are difficult to change. These individuals, who believe that they are "good" and that "if we can transform the rulers with feelings of love and goodness, the world will be saved," engage in activities to "destroy evil." In the real world, this ideology becomes the ideological background of conflicts, and may lead to disastrous consequences like the Orion War. However, these individuals simply believe that destroying evil will save the Earth. This ideology is a result of karma caused by the remnants of the Orion War.
All of this is a "dream," and is not happening in reality. The real conflict happened long ago, and is not happening now. Our true selves are not in the physical body, but in the higher dimensions that hold the memories of the soul. In this sense, the reality of this Earth is a "dream."
The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue their activities until they reach the fundamental principle of "understanding," moving away from the dualism of "good and evil" and "destroying evil." These self-proclaimed lightworkers advocate for "good" and even say that "understanding is meaningless against evil." Because of this attitude, self-proclaimed lightworkers fall into darkness in order to understand evil. They experience what they previously thought was evil, and finally reach an understanding that transcends dualism. Alternatively, if they do not cling to "good," they will not fall into darkness, and will not be concerned with dualism. Simply, they should be based on the fundamental principle of "understanding." Until that time comes, the dualistic "lightworker" activities will continue. They will continue to see a dualistic "dream." The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue to see the "dream" of a world divided into "good and evil."
It is often said that this world is a dream. And at that time, spiritual people may arrogantly think, "Since it's a dream, it doesn't really matter, so just enjoy yourself and do whatever you want, and you don't have to save the world." Some people may even promote this idea. Of course, there are various people, and some of them may be right.
However, for the remnants of the Orion War, the "dream" is not about that. Their true intention is, "The real life is far away, and this reality is like a dream, but there is a meaning to learn in this environment. The belief that we must save the world is an illusion, and true salvation is learning how wrong our thoughts and actions have been." This is also about atoning for "original sin," and the suffering that people with original sin experience is a background to the situation where they continue to suffer until they learn from their mistakes.
In spirituality, there is often a debate about whether this world is a place of learning or just a place to play. In reality, both are true, and there are people of both types. There is no point in arguing about it. Some people are here to learn, while others are just here to play. However, there are a certain number of people who were supposed to be here to learn but have forgotten and think they are just here to play. They have lost their purpose.
People who truly came to Earth to play often enjoy life without talking about spirituality. It seems that people who talk about spirituality are often actually here to learn. (This is a personal observation.)
The feeling that we must save the world is often a trauma from the painful memory of not being able to save a star system in the distant past of Orion. While they may try to take actions to save this world, they will either fail or end up in a "pretend" game. The motivation to save the world is separate from the actual act of saving it. Even when they say they are saving the world, the reality has already ended long ago. For those people, saving their own past karma is the first priority.
Therefore, when people who claim to be lightworkers suddenly realize the root of their actions or become aware that their way of thinking has caused conflict, their motivation to "save the world" disappears, and they wake up.
This world is both a dream and a reality. It is a dream in the sense that we are living in the illusion of Orion's memory, in the illusion of our own phantom selves. It is also a dream in the sense that the soul is in the universe or a higher dimension, and this physical life is an illusion. However, in both cases, there is meaning in the "learning" aspect. As a result of learning, we realize that we were living in an illusion (of a dualistic struggle), and we wake up.
Because the karma of Orion is vast, there are people who experience or distribute the memories of Orion to resolve that karma through a process called "initiation," and begin to live a temporary virtual reality (even though they do not originally possess Orion's karma). Sometimes, cooperating with them and experiencing what the dualism of "good and evil" was like can be a little helpful. However, it is not necessary for everyone to do so.
The main participants are people who originally possessed Orion's karma, and they arrange for others to participate in the "initiation," and the actors perform. This is the current situation of the self-proclaimed lightworkers' dualistic "good and evil" battle. Even though they say it's a "pretend" game, they are quite serious, so it's better not to interfere too much. If there is no harm, it is best to leave them alone. They are learning.
When they realize that saving the world was an illusion, they stop seeing that "dream" and leave the activity. As more and more people involved with Orion wake up from the dream, the activities of self-proclaimed lightworkers will naturally disappear.
However, that time is still far away.
Until then, it can be interesting to observe the people who are pretending to be lightworkers. If they can dance without causing offense, it will be a learning experience not only for themselves but also for those around them.
...There are also people who are doing real lightwork, observing the self-proclaimed lightworkers. This is beyond dualism, beyond the battle of good and evil. The true lightworkers are trying to save all people, including the self-proclaimed lightworkers. Therefore, they are also helping the self-proclaimed lightworkers to transcend dualism. True lightworkers enter into all of humanity and change it from within. They do not criticize from the outside or try to destroy evil in a battle of good and evil. True lightworkers deeply infiltrate organizations, countries, or rulers that appear to be evil and change them from within. There may be true lightworkers mixed in with the self-proclaimed lightworkers, who are trying to change things from within. Therefore, self-proclaimed lightworkers need to strive to transcend dualism and move towards true oneness, but self-proclaimed lightworkers often lack the awareness that they are lacking in this regard, and they arrogantly think that they have "already achieved" it. It is difficult for self-proclaimed lightworkers to change. People who contribute to society in a normal way are often more straightforward and easier to grow.
The remnants of the Orion War, appearing in dreams, depict individuals who claim to be "lightworkers" as troublesome entities that are difficult to change. These individuals, who believe that they are "good" and that "if we can transform the rulers with feelings of love and goodness, the world will be saved," engage in activities to "destroy evil." In the real world, this ideology becomes the ideological background of conflicts, and may lead to disastrous consequences like the Orion War. However, these individuals simply believe that destroying evil will save the Earth. This ideology is a result of karma caused by the remnants of the Orion War.
All of this is a "dream," and is not happening in reality. The real conflict happened long ago, and is not happening now. Our true selves are not in the physical body, but in the higher dimensions that hold the memories of the soul. In this sense, the reality of this Earth is a "dream."
The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue their activities until they reach the fundamental principle of "understanding," moving away from the dualism of "good and evil" and "destroying evil." These self-proclaimed lightworkers advocate for "good" and even say that "understanding is meaningless against evil." Because of this attitude, self-proclaimed lightworkers fall into darkness in order to understand evil. They experience what they previously thought was evil, and finally reach an understanding that transcends dualism. Alternatively, if they do not cling to "good," they will not fall into darkness, and will not be concerned with dualism. Simply, they should be based on the fundamental principle of "understanding." Until that time comes, the dualistic "lightworker" activities will continue. They will continue to see a dualistic "dream." The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue to see the "dream" of a world divided into "good and evil."
Evil was born from misunderstanding and suppression.
Good and evil are often described as contrasting structures. Even when a situation hasn't overcome this duality, the existence of "good" implies the existence of "evil" as a contrast, because we live in a world defined by such dualities. This dualistic world can evolve and transition towards a state of unity and integration. However, before reaching this "oneness," good and evil exist. (This refers to a relative "oneness," a unified consciousness, rather than an ultimate oneness.)
What we consider "good" can be described as "self-awareness and restraint towards oneself and others," and "(unconscious) lack of understanding from oneself towards others" (a lack of awareness of the lack of understanding, not even considering that there is a lack of understanding, or refusing to see it, turning a blind eye).
As a societal example, the society of Pleiades seems appropriate. Pleiades society emphasizes unity, politeness, and moderation. This means that good manners are valued, but those who don't fit in are treated as outsiders. Like Earth, Pleiades has organizations that enforce rules and punish criminals. In such a society, Pleiades residents experience a subtle pressure to conform to unified, polite behavior, far more than people on Earth. This pressure extends beyond Pleiades itself, and arises when interacting with residents of other star systems, leading to pressure and interference with other civilizations. Initially, this interference may have seemed benevolent, but it gradually evolved into a system of pressure and a hierarchy, with Pleiades perceived as superior and other civilizations as inferior. Now, Pleiades is learning and striving to respect the diversity of civilizations and the fact that learning is not uniform. As part of this, the principle of non-interference with planets should be understood, and even though Earth repeats foolish wars, there is no interference from the universe (except in cases of large-scale, catastrophic events).
In the past, when there was pressure to conform to other civilizations, some within those civilizations who had been quietly following Pleiades' guidance began to question, "Are the Pleiades really acting in our best interests, or are they just using us to control us?" This was partly a misunderstanding, but there was indeed pressure to conform, and there was an implicit understanding that Pleiades Prime was the highest authority. This may still be the case.
When people feel pressured in this way, they may mistakenly believe that their behavior and way of life are being controlled. This led the residents of those planets to rebel. From the perspective of Pleiades, this was a "barbaric" act, and "evil." Other planets became "evil" in contrast to the "good" of Pleiades.
This was rooted in a lack of understanding, particularly a lack of understanding from Pleiades towards the residents of other star systems. Pleiades believed that if everyone behaved like them, all star systems would be happy. This was both a lack of understanding and a form of pressure to conform and impose values.
While the emergence of the concepts of good and evil and the spread of dualistic logic in the universe have many backgrounds, and Pleiades is not the sole cause, at least, the situation of a lack of understanding towards others, the pressure to conform, and the institutionalization of this as a "restraint" that people should learn, led to civilizations that rebelled against this one-sided value system.
While there are common elements of restraint and morality in almost all civilizations, the way they manifest varies depending on the level of consciousness. Trying to unify this with a single value system was a mistake. A single value system fixes consciousness at a single level. People with lower levels of consciousness may feel oppressed and suffer, while those with higher levels of consciousness, or those who should have higher levels, may feel stifled and unable to progress.
A lack of understanding towards others means that even those with values that are too low or too high to be understood by the average value system of a civilization. This structure may still exist today.
As a result of a lack of understanding towards others, and a lack of awareness of the existence of that lack of understanding, pressure to conform was applied under the guise of "restraint," which was comfortable for those who shared the same values, but oppressive for those with different levels of consciousness (which includes not only higher or lower, but also different value systems).
Currently, even in the spiritual realm, there is a tendency towards conformity, with pressures to "do this," "this is a good value," and "in spirituality, you should think this way." Those who disagree are even labeled as not being spiritual. This kind of conformity itself is a fundamental problem for some people in the spiritual realm and its source, the universe. In this way, a lack of understanding towards others creates division, generates conformity pressure, and can even lead to conflict.
So, what should we do? Because a lack of understanding will inevitably arise when consciousness levels differ, it is practically impossible to fully understand something. Therefore, it is necessary to "assume that there are things you cannot understand."
In reality, this universe is one, so even if one consciousness doesn't understand something, it's fine if another consciousness does. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with things that are not your own karma. Things related to you will be drawn to you through karma, and if it is your own issue, you should engage with it and understand it. By simply assuming that there will always be a lack of understanding towards others, you will no longer feel the need to impose conformity or demand restraint from others.
Sometimes, there may be situations where resources are scarce, and requests for restraint are made, but that is a different matter. What I am talking about here is from a moral perspective. When there are limits to resources, trade-offs occur, but in discussions about unlimited ideas, each person has the freedom to learn, and respecting that will eliminate conflict.
And that is overcoming the dualism of "good and evil."
By understanding this, people who try to create a stereotypical and violent scenario where "good conquers and integrates evil" based on a lack of understanding, like the classical Orion karma scenario, will likely decrease.
What we consider "good" can be described as "self-awareness and restraint towards oneself and others," and "(unconscious) lack of understanding from oneself towards others" (a lack of awareness of the lack of understanding, not even considering that there is a lack of understanding, or refusing to see it, turning a blind eye).
As a societal example, the society of Pleiades seems appropriate. Pleiades society emphasizes unity, politeness, and moderation. This means that good manners are valued, but those who don't fit in are treated as outsiders. Like Earth, Pleiades has organizations that enforce rules and punish criminals. In such a society, Pleiades residents experience a subtle pressure to conform to unified, polite behavior, far more than people on Earth. This pressure extends beyond Pleiades itself, and arises when interacting with residents of other star systems, leading to pressure and interference with other civilizations. Initially, this interference may have seemed benevolent, but it gradually evolved into a system of pressure and a hierarchy, with Pleiades perceived as superior and other civilizations as inferior. Now, Pleiades is learning and striving to respect the diversity of civilizations and the fact that learning is not uniform. As part of this, the principle of non-interference with planets should be understood, and even though Earth repeats foolish wars, there is no interference from the universe (except in cases of large-scale, catastrophic events).
In the past, when there was pressure to conform to other civilizations, some within those civilizations who had been quietly following Pleiades' guidance began to question, "Are the Pleiades really acting in our best interests, or are they just using us to control us?" This was partly a misunderstanding, but there was indeed pressure to conform, and there was an implicit understanding that Pleiades Prime was the highest authority. This may still be the case.
When people feel pressured in this way, they may mistakenly believe that their behavior and way of life are being controlled. This led the residents of those planets to rebel. From the perspective of Pleiades, this was a "barbaric" act, and "evil." Other planets became "evil" in contrast to the "good" of Pleiades.
This was rooted in a lack of understanding, particularly a lack of understanding from Pleiades towards the residents of other star systems. Pleiades believed that if everyone behaved like them, all star systems would be happy. This was both a lack of understanding and a form of pressure to conform and impose values.
While the emergence of the concepts of good and evil and the spread of dualistic logic in the universe have many backgrounds, and Pleiades is not the sole cause, at least, the situation of a lack of understanding towards others, the pressure to conform, and the institutionalization of this as a "restraint" that people should learn, led to civilizations that rebelled against this one-sided value system.
While there are common elements of restraint and morality in almost all civilizations, the way they manifest varies depending on the level of consciousness. Trying to unify this with a single value system was a mistake. A single value system fixes consciousness at a single level. People with lower levels of consciousness may feel oppressed and suffer, while those with higher levels of consciousness, or those who should have higher levels, may feel stifled and unable to progress.
A lack of understanding towards others means that even those with values that are too low or too high to be understood by the average value system of a civilization. This structure may still exist today.
As a result of a lack of understanding towards others, and a lack of awareness of the existence of that lack of understanding, pressure to conform was applied under the guise of "restraint," which was comfortable for those who shared the same values, but oppressive for those with different levels of consciousness (which includes not only higher or lower, but also different value systems).
Currently, even in the spiritual realm, there is a tendency towards conformity, with pressures to "do this," "this is a good value," and "in spirituality, you should think this way." Those who disagree are even labeled as not being spiritual. This kind of conformity itself is a fundamental problem for some people in the spiritual realm and its source, the universe. In this way, a lack of understanding towards others creates division, generates conformity pressure, and can even lead to conflict.
So, what should we do? Because a lack of understanding will inevitably arise when consciousness levels differ, it is practically impossible to fully understand something. Therefore, it is necessary to "assume that there are things you cannot understand."
In reality, this universe is one, so even if one consciousness doesn't understand something, it's fine if another consciousness does. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with things that are not your own karma. Things related to you will be drawn to you through karma, and if it is your own issue, you should engage with it and understand it. By simply assuming that there will always be a lack of understanding towards others, you will no longer feel the need to impose conformity or demand restraint from others.
Sometimes, there may be situations where resources are scarce, and requests for restraint are made, but that is a different matter. What I am talking about here is from a moral perspective. When there are limits to resources, trade-offs occur, but in discussions about unlimited ideas, each person has the freedom to learn, and respecting that will eliminate conflict.
And that is overcoming the dualism of "good and evil."
By understanding this, people who try to create a stereotypical and violent scenario where "good conquers and integrates evil" based on a lack of understanding, like the classical Orion karma scenario, will likely decrease.
The conflict of duality caused by karma and trauma, and oneness and integration.
There are different approaches and resulting outcomes when dealing with trauma caused by karma: separating duality and engaging in conflict, or integrating into oneness.
* Karma → Action or trauma → Cognitive distortion by the ego → Continuous conflict based on the duality of good and evil.
* Karma → Action or trauma → Cognition by a higher consciousness → Experiencing, sublimating, and integrating into oneness.
While most karma manifests as "actions" that are relatively mild, some types can cause trauma. Karma that has been deeply suppressed from past lives can resurface in this life as trauma, creating painful memories. If this karma is passed on to the next life, it can manifest as unexplained conflicts or trauma.
As a way to deal with the karma that causes trauma, let's first look at the approach of separating duality and engaging in conflict. In this case, separation occurs first. It begins with the recognition that "it is not me," and eventually leads to separation, and in some cases, to the conclusion that "it is evil and must be punished." This leads to a cycle of endless conflict and separation. Sometimes, this conflict is confined to internal struggles, while other times, it is projected onto those around, leading to a self-proclaimed "battle for justice" against perceived evil. This is essentially projection, a psychological phenomenon where one sees their own inner self reflected in others, rather than seeing the other person as they truly are. In this case, seeing evil in others indicates the presence of evil within oneself, and one engages in a conflict against what is not actually evil. One continues to take the position of "good" in the duality of good and evil, believing that evil must be eradicated. Sometimes, people may consciously recognize that they are the "evil" one, but even that is the same thing, as it stems from the separation of duality. The separation creates a duality of good and evil, leading to a continuous conflict.
On the other hand, dealing with karma through integration into oneness involves feeling and experiencing the karma, even if it is not one's own, and then sublimating it. That's it. It's simple.
Why do such different approaches and levels of effort emerge when dealing with trauma and karma? This is primarily due to a lack of knowledge and cognitive limitations.
In terms of knowledge, even without spiritual understanding, psychology teaches about the effects of projection. This makes it clear that what one sees in others is not necessarily what they truly are. However, spiritual individuals often encounter resistance from their ego, which cleverly tries to deceive them. The moment such knowledge is acquired, the ego's defense mechanisms kick in, and the individual may engage in self-deception, claiming, "I understand. Therefore, I can properly see myself and those around me." This is a common trap for spiritual beginners, and it's important to be aware of it.
Regarding cognitive limitations, this refers to a state where trauma and other conflicts obscure the mind like dark clouds, making it impossible to see the truth. Just as one cannot see the sun on a cloudy day, one loses sight of where the truth lies. This is what is meant by cognitive limitations, referred to as "ignorance" in Buddhism and "Avidyā" in India. In such a state, the ego behaves as if it is the true self, triggering defensive reactions when faced with anything that might damage one's pride.
In reality, dealing with karma is a simple matter, but the ego makes it difficult. By projecting these conflicts onto others, a duality of "good" (oneself) and "evil" (the other) is created, leading to a self-proclaimed "lightworker" narrative of "good" eradicating "evil," and the conflict continues.
Eliminating the ego may seem like a spiritual concept, but it actually involves eliminating cognitive distortions. The ego prevents one from seeing the truth as it is, which can hinder not only spiritual growth but also performance in work. Conversely, being able to see the truth leads to success not only in spirituality but also in work. In this way, what may seem like unrelated aspects of spirituality and work actually require similar abilities.
The concept of "oneness" or integration may seem spiritual, but it essentially means seeing the truth, which is actually a necessary attitude in general society.
Higher-level cognition may seem like a purely spiritual concept, but in reality, truly excellent people invariably possess higher-level cognition. Having quick intuition and thinking ability means that higher-level cognition is at work.
In simple terms, people with lower cognitive abilities are the ones who believe in the dualistic notions of good and evil, and the stories of self-proclaimed lightworkers who advocate for good and punish evil. On the other hand, those who realize that life and society cannot be simply divided into good and evil, and who struggle to understand this complex society as it is, and who gradually increase their knowledge and understanding, are the ones who will eventually reach "oneness" or integration. While ultimate "oneness" may be impossible in this short life, one can progress through stages to approach it. Those who are at the stage of dualistic good and evil have abandoned or given up on this potential for growth.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers who are in the realm of good and evil sometimes mock, ridicule, or look down on this approach to "oneness." Their behavior is very childish and simple. And sometimes, they are afraid of confronting their own ego and reveal hostility towards others. They claim to be doing lightwork, and as righteous defenders who are fighting evil, they sometimes even mock those who are not actively fighting evil through lightwork. This kind of thinking is a ideological support for conflicts in the world.
On the other hand, adults who accept the complexity of this world understand that life and society are complex, and they try to understand each other's positions. That is also integration, and in a spiritual sense, it is also "oneness." There is only a difference in whether it is learned through life experiences in general society or through spiritual learning.
* Karma → Action or trauma → Cognitive distortion by the ego → Continuous conflict based on the duality of good and evil.
* Karma → Action or trauma → Cognition by a higher consciousness → Experiencing, sublimating, and integrating into oneness.
While most karma manifests as "actions" that are relatively mild, some types can cause trauma. Karma that has been deeply suppressed from past lives can resurface in this life as trauma, creating painful memories. If this karma is passed on to the next life, it can manifest as unexplained conflicts or trauma.
As a way to deal with the karma that causes trauma, let's first look at the approach of separating duality and engaging in conflict. In this case, separation occurs first. It begins with the recognition that "it is not me," and eventually leads to separation, and in some cases, to the conclusion that "it is evil and must be punished." This leads to a cycle of endless conflict and separation. Sometimes, this conflict is confined to internal struggles, while other times, it is projected onto those around, leading to a self-proclaimed "battle for justice" against perceived evil. This is essentially projection, a psychological phenomenon where one sees their own inner self reflected in others, rather than seeing the other person as they truly are. In this case, seeing evil in others indicates the presence of evil within oneself, and one engages in a conflict against what is not actually evil. One continues to take the position of "good" in the duality of good and evil, believing that evil must be eradicated. Sometimes, people may consciously recognize that they are the "evil" one, but even that is the same thing, as it stems from the separation of duality. The separation creates a duality of good and evil, leading to a continuous conflict.
On the other hand, dealing with karma through integration into oneness involves feeling and experiencing the karma, even if it is not one's own, and then sublimating it. That's it. It's simple.
Why do such different approaches and levels of effort emerge when dealing with trauma and karma? This is primarily due to a lack of knowledge and cognitive limitations.
In terms of knowledge, even without spiritual understanding, psychology teaches about the effects of projection. This makes it clear that what one sees in others is not necessarily what they truly are. However, spiritual individuals often encounter resistance from their ego, which cleverly tries to deceive them. The moment such knowledge is acquired, the ego's defense mechanisms kick in, and the individual may engage in self-deception, claiming, "I understand. Therefore, I can properly see myself and those around me." This is a common trap for spiritual beginners, and it's important to be aware of it.
Regarding cognitive limitations, this refers to a state where trauma and other conflicts obscure the mind like dark clouds, making it impossible to see the truth. Just as one cannot see the sun on a cloudy day, one loses sight of where the truth lies. This is what is meant by cognitive limitations, referred to as "ignorance" in Buddhism and "Avidyā" in India. In such a state, the ego behaves as if it is the true self, triggering defensive reactions when faced with anything that might damage one's pride.
In reality, dealing with karma is a simple matter, but the ego makes it difficult. By projecting these conflicts onto others, a duality of "good" (oneself) and "evil" (the other) is created, leading to a self-proclaimed "lightworker" narrative of "good" eradicating "evil," and the conflict continues.
Eliminating the ego may seem like a spiritual concept, but it actually involves eliminating cognitive distortions. The ego prevents one from seeing the truth as it is, which can hinder not only spiritual growth but also performance in work. Conversely, being able to see the truth leads to success not only in spirituality but also in work. In this way, what may seem like unrelated aspects of spirituality and work actually require similar abilities.
The concept of "oneness" or integration may seem spiritual, but it essentially means seeing the truth, which is actually a necessary attitude in general society.
Higher-level cognition may seem like a purely spiritual concept, but in reality, truly excellent people invariably possess higher-level cognition. Having quick intuition and thinking ability means that higher-level cognition is at work.
In simple terms, people with lower cognitive abilities are the ones who believe in the dualistic notions of good and evil, and the stories of self-proclaimed lightworkers who advocate for good and punish evil. On the other hand, those who realize that life and society cannot be simply divided into good and evil, and who struggle to understand this complex society as it is, and who gradually increase their knowledge and understanding, are the ones who will eventually reach "oneness" or integration. While ultimate "oneness" may be impossible in this short life, one can progress through stages to approach it. Those who are at the stage of dualistic good and evil have abandoned or given up on this potential for growth.
Self-proclaimed lightworkers who are in the realm of good and evil sometimes mock, ridicule, or look down on this approach to "oneness." Their behavior is very childish and simple. And sometimes, they are afraid of confronting their own ego and reveal hostility towards others. They claim to be doing lightwork, and as righteous defenders who are fighting evil, they sometimes even mock those who are not actively fighting evil through lightwork. This kind of thinking is a ideological support for conflicts in the world.
On the other hand, adults who accept the complexity of this world understand that life and society are complex, and they try to understand each other's positions. That is also integration, and in a spiritual sense, it is also "oneness." There is only a difference in whether it is learned through life experiences in general society or through spiritual learning.
Each other has places to learn.
Currently, the viewpoints of these two groups are parallel and have not been integrated. It seems that the actions of those who call themselves "lightworkers" are worthy of emulation. On the other hand, the perspective of understanding and oneness is also desirable. Currently, those who call themselves "lightworkers" lack understanding, and those who advocate oneness lack action. Each is somewhat biased and has not been integrated, which is the current situation.
Now that we understand this, the necessary actions are clear: those who call themselves "lightworkers" should learn oneness and experience it firsthand if they want to become true "lightworkers." And those who have already attained oneness should cultivate action.
As I wrote recently, the fact that this Earth has repeatedly been rejected by the Earth's administrators and ordered to be reset and restarted seems to be the key to obtaining permission to move on to the next stage.
However, it seems that achieving such a situation will be difficult in the near future. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" do not place importance on the "understanding" of oneness. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" believe that learning their own doctrines is "understanding," and they do not seem to try to understand the enemy. And they believe that "understanding is a lukewarm, New Age fantasy, and evil absolutely exists, so evil must be destroyed," and they firmly hold that ideal. On the other hand, the lack of action on the part of those who advocate oneness has not changed from the past to the present.
Now that we understand this, the necessary actions are clear: those who call themselves "lightworkers" should learn oneness and experience it firsthand if they want to become true "lightworkers." And those who have already attained oneness should cultivate action.
As I wrote recently, the fact that this Earth has repeatedly been rejected by the Earth's administrators and ordered to be reset and restarted seems to be the key to obtaining permission to move on to the next stage.
However, it seems that achieving such a situation will be difficult in the near future. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" do not place importance on the "understanding" of oneness. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" believe that learning their own doctrines is "understanding," and they do not seem to try to understand the enemy. And they believe that "understanding is a lukewarm, New Age fantasy, and evil absolutely exists, so evil must be destroyed," and they firmly hold that ideal. On the other hand, the lack of action on the part of those who advocate oneness has not changed from the past to the present.
The difference in interpretation of duality or oneness when a conflict is discovered.
There are different interpretations of conflict when viewed from the perspectives of duality and oneness/integration.
In a state of duality, conflict is seen as inherently bad and something to be separated from. Evil is something to be dealt with. If someone makes a violent statement or has violent thoughts due to trauma or past memories, they are judged as evil.
On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness/integration, even conflict and discord are part of the whole. There is often a misunderstanding that oneness means there is no discord or conflict, or that there are no violent actions. However, oneness encompasses everything, and if this world is one, then the current state is already oneness. Therefore, everything, including creation, maintenance, and destruction, is part of oneness, and even violent statements or thoughts caused by trauma or past memories are part of oneness.
In a dualistic world, a person is judged as good or evil based on the qualities they possess. A person with violent qualities is considered evil, while a person without them is considered good. Even a person who appears to be good can be deemed evil and excluded if they suddenly make a violent statement or have violent thoughts. The definition of good is very narrow, so people who identify as "good" lightworkers are often careful to avoid being seen as evil by others, creating a sense of tension. They try to maintain their sense of goodness by avoiding or suppressing their own conflicts. This constant effort to maintain a state of goodness through separation is the spiritual concept of good and evil in a dualistic world. These people sometimes say things like "the stronger the good, the stronger the evil," but this is because separation is intensifying, and it is a self-inflicted consequence. The laws of the universe seek understanding and integration, but if one tries to remain in a position of goodness through separation, the pressure to integrate with what they perceive as evil increases. This may feel like "evil is getting stronger," but it is simply a reflection of the person's strong sense of separation and imbalance. This kind of consciousness is a trigger for conflict in the world and provides ideological support for the ongoing conflicts in this world. The belief that conflict can be justified and that "evil" can be dealt with is what perpetuates these conflicts.
On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness/integration, things are simpler. Observe, feel the emotions, and integrate. That is all there is to it. Even if one sees conflict or even murderous intent in oneself or others, it is the same. It may be considered evil, but it is not separated by a simple good-evil dichotomy; it is experienced and integrated. However, in practice, immature individuals may be overwhelmed by a strong aura or consciousness. The principle is that one should understand that if there is something one does not understand, it is simply a difference in perspective or interpretation, or perhaps it is simply a different role. One gradually expands their understanding through their own interpretations. Eventually, there will be a day when one understands, but even if that is not possible in this lifetime, that is okay. Instead of a simple good-evil interpretation, one simply interprets it as "I don't understand yet." And one respects the freedom of others. One respects others because everything is one, and all beings are oneself. It is through separation that different understandings can be deepened. Therefore, not understanding someone else is actually a benefit.
Incidentally, when exploring and applying the laws of the universe, the consciousness of the universe has sometimes "thought" of "dispersing and deepening understanding." It then distributed the same question to many consciousnesses. This is still happening. One of these is the "cause of conflict," and therefore, many people have causes of conflict that are not their own. The intention of the universe is to understand this, but many people react negatively to it. Some even separate it and consider it evil. However, since the law of the universe is "understanding," any action that does not lead to understanding is considered a detour. Although one will eventually reach understanding, it is considered a detour. Therefore, separating and interpreting something as good or evil in a dualistic sense is a detour. On the other hand, when experiencing and transcending conflict as oneness, it is quickly resolved because it is in alignment with the direction of understanding.
That being said, the time required may vary depending on the magnitude of the conflict. This is proportional to the strength of the aura, and resolving a strong aura takes time. However, in principle, the process is the same.
In a state of duality, conflict is seen as inherently bad and something to be separated from. Evil is something to be dealt with. If someone makes a violent statement or has violent thoughts due to trauma or past memories, they are judged as evil.
On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness/integration, even conflict and discord are part of the whole. There is often a misunderstanding that oneness means there is no discord or conflict, or that there are no violent actions. However, oneness encompasses everything, and if this world is one, then the current state is already oneness. Therefore, everything, including creation, maintenance, and destruction, is part of oneness, and even violent statements or thoughts caused by trauma or past memories are part of oneness.
In a dualistic world, a person is judged as good or evil based on the qualities they possess. A person with violent qualities is considered evil, while a person without them is considered good. Even a person who appears to be good can be deemed evil and excluded if they suddenly make a violent statement or have violent thoughts. The definition of good is very narrow, so people who identify as "good" lightworkers are often careful to avoid being seen as evil by others, creating a sense of tension. They try to maintain their sense of goodness by avoiding or suppressing their own conflicts. This constant effort to maintain a state of goodness through separation is the spiritual concept of good and evil in a dualistic world. These people sometimes say things like "the stronger the good, the stronger the evil," but this is because separation is intensifying, and it is a self-inflicted consequence. The laws of the universe seek understanding and integration, but if one tries to remain in a position of goodness through separation, the pressure to integrate with what they perceive as evil increases. This may feel like "evil is getting stronger," but it is simply a reflection of the person's strong sense of separation and imbalance. This kind of consciousness is a trigger for conflict in the world and provides ideological support for the ongoing conflicts in this world. The belief that conflict can be justified and that "evil" can be dealt with is what perpetuates these conflicts.
On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness/integration, things are simpler. Observe, feel the emotions, and integrate. That is all there is to it. Even if one sees conflict or even murderous intent in oneself or others, it is the same. It may be considered evil, but it is not separated by a simple good-evil dichotomy; it is experienced and integrated. However, in practice, immature individuals may be overwhelmed by a strong aura or consciousness. The principle is that one should understand that if there is something one does not understand, it is simply a difference in perspective or interpretation, or perhaps it is simply a different role. One gradually expands their understanding through their own interpretations. Eventually, there will be a day when one understands, but even if that is not possible in this lifetime, that is okay. Instead of a simple good-evil interpretation, one simply interprets it as "I don't understand yet." And one respects the freedom of others. One respects others because everything is one, and all beings are oneself. It is through separation that different understandings can be deepened. Therefore, not understanding someone else is actually a benefit.
Incidentally, when exploring and applying the laws of the universe, the consciousness of the universe has sometimes "thought" of "dispersing and deepening understanding." It then distributed the same question to many consciousnesses. This is still happening. One of these is the "cause of conflict," and therefore, many people have causes of conflict that are not their own. The intention of the universe is to understand this, but many people react negatively to it. Some even separate it and consider it evil. However, since the law of the universe is "understanding," any action that does not lead to understanding is considered a detour. Although one will eventually reach understanding, it is considered a detour. Therefore, separating and interpreting something as good or evil in a dualistic sense is a detour. On the other hand, when experiencing and transcending conflict as oneness, it is quickly resolved because it is in alignment with the direction of understanding.
That being said, the time required may vary depending on the magnitude of the conflict. This is proportional to the strength of the aura, and resolving a strong aura takes time. However, in principle, the process is the same.
Hierarchical stages of mental growth and their respective teachers.
▪️Stages of Spiritual Growth
1. Animal, a passive being.
2. The ego is born. Pride, self-esteem.
3. Desires, visible desires, hungry ghosts, demons, conflict.
4. Knowing what is right. Dharma. Justice, good and evil, a world of duality, light and darkness, the dualistic struggle of self-proclaimed "lightworkers" fighting on the side of light, the struggle to destroy darkness as a righteous light, the struggle of darkness, the beauty of destruction, the ideology that destruction is good, the ideology that destruction is justice, a dualistic view where each side believes they are the light and the other is darkness, the illusory world, the world of Maya, which appears to exist. Thoughts, the mind.
5. The world of oneness, transcending good and evil, overcoming duality, overcoming conflict, overcoming the duality of light and darkness, the true world, the true self, the world of reality, actual existence, essential existence, non-material existence, consciousness.
The world is a mirror reflecting one's heart, and the worldview varies from person to person. For an animal, the world is the animal's world. For a hungry ghost, the world may appear as a storage of food or a barren desert. For a demon caught in a cycle of conflict, the world may seem like a chain of struggles. Or, someone who believes they are on the side of light, bringing order, may see the world as a dualistic world of good and evil. And someone who understands oneness sees the world as a single, complete, unchanging consciousness that permeates everything.
People live according to these different values and worldviews, and according to their state of consciousness.
▪️Animal, a passive being
An animal before becoming human. A living being without human consciousness. Because it projects and holds human thoughts, when it is near humans, it may temporarily feel like a human or hold emotions that resemble thoughts. This is a stage before the awakening of self-awareness, and animals live in a state of very weak consciousness. Therefore, there is no "ego" in this state. The animal reflects the aura of human thoughts, so if a violent person is nearby, the animal becomes violent, and if a gentle person is nearby, the animal reflects that person's heart and becomes docile. In this stage, there is no ego, and it lives influenced by the surrounding aura. Also, the range of influence varies depending on the type of animal, but generally, their ability to perceive is often weak. By being near humans, they learn human thoughts and emotions, and eventually, they may be reborn as a being with self-awareness.
▪️Animal with ego = Rudimentary human
When the soul of an animal grows, it becomes a rudimentary human... Although this is a misleading statement, it seems that there are not many such people on this earth. This corresponds to people with intellectual disabilities or significantly low IQs. They lack cognitive abilities, their thoughts and actions are inconsistent, and they cannot think normally.
▪️Human with an inflated ego
When a rudimentary human becomes stable and begins to think, the ego is born. This creates a sense of "self" and also a sense of ownership. All desires originate from there.
▪️Human who recognizes "what should be done" and "what should not be done," a dualistic person
This is like a moral code, creating an order of "what the world should be like." Sometimes, adhering to this order is called "good," and not adhering to it is called "evil." This is a world of duality. They recognize that what they believe is right is right, good, and light, while what is not is wrong, evil, and darkness. They create various arguments to justify this perception, but all of them remain within a dualistic perspective. At this stage, they cannot understand the concept of "oneness." They emphasize one of the three major principles (or two major principles) of the world (creation, maintenance, and destruction), while neglecting or even hostilely viewing the others. For example, they may consider "maintenance" as "good" and "destruction" as "evil." They tend to lean towards one principle, neglect the others, or view them as something undesirable. They believe that the struggle of good to destroy evil is justified. They have not yet overcome the ego. They believe that expanding the side of good is love (although this is a form of love at this stage, it is not the ultimate love). They still have some arrogance.
▪️A person of oneness, a person who has overcome dualism
They understand and recognize that there is a common consciousness among all people. They understand that the nature of the world is a chain of creation, destruction, and maintenance, and that "nothing remains unchanged" when viewed in detail. They do not take a dualistic stance such as good and evil. They know that understanding is important. They do not agree with things like the struggle of good to destroy evil. They know that all beings are divided from the original existence and consciousness that "knows." They know that there is nothing wasted in this universe. They understand that they are still far from the ultimate oneness of the universe. Nevertheless, by achieving a certain degree of oneness, they know that the logic is connected hierarchically to the oneness of the universe.
As you can see, there are different stages. And a teacher is someone who is slightly ahead of you in each of these stages.
- A teacher for beginners is someone who is at the beginner level or beyond.
- A teacher for beginners (self-aware beings) is someone who has expanded their self-awareness or beyond.
- A teacher for self-aware and arrogant people is someone who understands duality or beyond.
- A teacher for people who understand duality is someone who understands oneness.
If what they are saying is too far apart from your understanding, it can hinder your growth. It's best if the teacher and the student can learn from each other. Ideally, the teacher should be someone who is just a little bit ahead of you.
However, it's often difficult because, as soon as self-awareness begins to emerge, people tend to fall into arrogance and think, "I know everything." Therefore, for example, someone who understands duality may not be able to understand oneness, and may even say, "Oneness does not exist," or "It is justified to destroy enemies," and cling to their own ideas. This is the same even for those who claim to be lightworkers and have some knowledge of spirituality. They strengthen their own ideas through study and believe, "A battle against evil for the sake of good is necessary, and evil must be destroyed."
There are things that you can only understand by moving up to the next level. For example, you can only understand oneness by actually becoming one with it. You can explain it logically, but intuition is more powerful than knowledge, and even if you acquire knowledge, it will not be true unless you confirm it with your intuition.
Ideally, the person who is one step ahead should be the teacher, but in reality, it is often the case that someone who has learned earlier within the same level is made a teacher, and they are satisfied with deepening their knowledge together within that level. Therefore, it is understandable that someone who understands duality would not reach oneness even if they learned from a senior who also understands duality.
In this regard, it seems necessary for each individual to learn from someone who is teaching something they don't understand, and instead of simply accepting what they are taught, to verify whether it is correct or not.
1. Animal, a passive being.
2. The ego is born. Pride, self-esteem.
3. Desires, visible desires, hungry ghosts, demons, conflict.
4. Knowing what is right. Dharma. Justice, good and evil, a world of duality, light and darkness, the dualistic struggle of self-proclaimed "lightworkers" fighting on the side of light, the struggle to destroy darkness as a righteous light, the struggle of darkness, the beauty of destruction, the ideology that destruction is good, the ideology that destruction is justice, a dualistic view where each side believes they are the light and the other is darkness, the illusory world, the world of Maya, which appears to exist. Thoughts, the mind.
5. The world of oneness, transcending good and evil, overcoming duality, overcoming conflict, overcoming the duality of light and darkness, the true world, the true self, the world of reality, actual existence, essential existence, non-material existence, consciousness.
The world is a mirror reflecting one's heart, and the worldview varies from person to person. For an animal, the world is the animal's world. For a hungry ghost, the world may appear as a storage of food or a barren desert. For a demon caught in a cycle of conflict, the world may seem like a chain of struggles. Or, someone who believes they are on the side of light, bringing order, may see the world as a dualistic world of good and evil. And someone who understands oneness sees the world as a single, complete, unchanging consciousness that permeates everything.
People live according to these different values and worldviews, and according to their state of consciousness.
▪️Animal, a passive being
An animal before becoming human. A living being without human consciousness. Because it projects and holds human thoughts, when it is near humans, it may temporarily feel like a human or hold emotions that resemble thoughts. This is a stage before the awakening of self-awareness, and animals live in a state of very weak consciousness. Therefore, there is no "ego" in this state. The animal reflects the aura of human thoughts, so if a violent person is nearby, the animal becomes violent, and if a gentle person is nearby, the animal reflects that person's heart and becomes docile. In this stage, there is no ego, and it lives influenced by the surrounding aura. Also, the range of influence varies depending on the type of animal, but generally, their ability to perceive is often weak. By being near humans, they learn human thoughts and emotions, and eventually, they may be reborn as a being with self-awareness.
▪️Animal with ego = Rudimentary human
When the soul of an animal grows, it becomes a rudimentary human... Although this is a misleading statement, it seems that there are not many such people on this earth. This corresponds to people with intellectual disabilities or significantly low IQs. They lack cognitive abilities, their thoughts and actions are inconsistent, and they cannot think normally.
▪️Human with an inflated ego
When a rudimentary human becomes stable and begins to think, the ego is born. This creates a sense of "self" and also a sense of ownership. All desires originate from there.
▪️Human who recognizes "what should be done" and "what should not be done," a dualistic person
This is like a moral code, creating an order of "what the world should be like." Sometimes, adhering to this order is called "good," and not adhering to it is called "evil." This is a world of duality. They recognize that what they believe is right is right, good, and light, while what is not is wrong, evil, and darkness. They create various arguments to justify this perception, but all of them remain within a dualistic perspective. At this stage, they cannot understand the concept of "oneness." They emphasize one of the three major principles (or two major principles) of the world (creation, maintenance, and destruction), while neglecting or even hostilely viewing the others. For example, they may consider "maintenance" as "good" and "destruction" as "evil." They tend to lean towards one principle, neglect the others, or view them as something undesirable. They believe that the struggle of good to destroy evil is justified. They have not yet overcome the ego. They believe that expanding the side of good is love (although this is a form of love at this stage, it is not the ultimate love). They still have some arrogance.
▪️A person of oneness, a person who has overcome dualism
They understand and recognize that there is a common consciousness among all people. They understand that the nature of the world is a chain of creation, destruction, and maintenance, and that "nothing remains unchanged" when viewed in detail. They do not take a dualistic stance such as good and evil. They know that understanding is important. They do not agree with things like the struggle of good to destroy evil. They know that all beings are divided from the original existence and consciousness that "knows." They know that there is nothing wasted in this universe. They understand that they are still far from the ultimate oneness of the universe. Nevertheless, by achieving a certain degree of oneness, they know that the logic is connected hierarchically to the oneness of the universe.
As you can see, there are different stages. And a teacher is someone who is slightly ahead of you in each of these stages.
- A teacher for beginners is someone who is at the beginner level or beyond.
- A teacher for beginners (self-aware beings) is someone who has expanded their self-awareness or beyond.
- A teacher for self-aware and arrogant people is someone who understands duality or beyond.
- A teacher for people who understand duality is someone who understands oneness.
If what they are saying is too far apart from your understanding, it can hinder your growth. It's best if the teacher and the student can learn from each other. Ideally, the teacher should be someone who is just a little bit ahead of you.
However, it's often difficult because, as soon as self-awareness begins to emerge, people tend to fall into arrogance and think, "I know everything." Therefore, for example, someone who understands duality may not be able to understand oneness, and may even say, "Oneness does not exist," or "It is justified to destroy enemies," and cling to their own ideas. This is the same even for those who claim to be lightworkers and have some knowledge of spirituality. They strengthen their own ideas through study and believe, "A battle against evil for the sake of good is necessary, and evil must be destroyed."
There are things that you can only understand by moving up to the next level. For example, you can only understand oneness by actually becoming one with it. You can explain it logically, but intuition is more powerful than knowledge, and even if you acquire knowledge, it will not be true unless you confirm it with your intuition.
Ideally, the person who is one step ahead should be the teacher, but in reality, it is often the case that someone who has learned earlier within the same level is made a teacher, and they are satisfied with deepening their knowledge together within that level. Therefore, it is understandable that someone who understands duality would not reach oneness even if they learned from a senior who also understands duality.
In this regard, it seems necessary for each individual to learn from someone who is teaching something they don't understand, and instead of simply accepting what they are taught, to verify whether it is correct or not.
In the hierarchy of oneness, I feel the fear of the individual (me) disappearing.
Some people call it "evil." They fear oneness. They feel a terror of losing their "self" (I) through oneness. And they project this fear onto others, perceiving "evil" in them. They perceive "evil" in others that doesn't even exist.
And they make extraordinary efforts to avoid oneness, creating a distorted perception that "evil must be destroyed." In reality, this is a projection of their fear of losing their "self" through oneness onto others. They create a fantasy of "evil" in others, and to justify themselves, they construct a convenient logic of "fighting evil for the sake of justice or good, punishing evil, and battling evil."
This is a logical armor to protect the ego (the illusion of self). They twist and rationalize to protect this armor, justifying themselves. They claim to be "lightworkers" fighting evil, while hiding their own ego with logic. They criticize those who don't participate in this "fight," claiming they are saving the Earth. In reality, it's just a convenient logic to hide their own ego.
Eventually, this ego becomes inflated, and they become afraid of being criticized. When criticism or the truth is revealed, or when they fear that it might be discovered, they react with extreme denial, screaming, hysteria, and attacking others. They desperately try to protect their ego, even resorting to bringing up "demons" to justify themselves. They might say something like, "The more light there is, the more darkness there is," a phrase they've heard before. In reality, this is a manifestation of ego resistance. The ego is an illusion, but when people with egos say "light is increasing," they actually mean their ego is becoming stronger. And when they say "darkness is increasing," it's because the ego is afraid of the source of consciousness, the oneness of this world, which is approaching. Because the ego doesn't truly exist, it disappears when oneness is realized. Therefore, the ego is afraid and constructs a convenient logic like "darkness is increasing" to protect itself.
People who talk about light and darkness live in a dualistic world and have not reached oneness. Moreover, these self-proclaimed lightworkers often deny oneness or try to avoid it with strange logic. For example, they might say, "Oneness contains both good and evil, so it's dangerous."
So far, we've glimpsed the relationship between the ego's ironclad defense and oneness. Now, let's explain how to overcome the ego and reach oneness. However, it's both very simple and, for some people, very difficult, precisely because it's simple.
The key is to "jump into oneness." When you do, the ego disappears. The ego will be afraid, but that's only at first. After the ego disappears, a peaceful world awaits. There is no good or evil there. That's all there is to it. And after reaching oneness, you can look at this world and talk about order. The order at that time is different from the order before reaching oneness. Before oneness, the worldview is based on dualistic good and evil, with some people being "right" and others being "wrong." On the other hand, after oneness, there is only harmony. Harmony, which includes both good and evil, becomes the standard. However, there are no punishments in the sense of retribution. There are actions to organize the situation, similar to the "Ōgaki" system. In Western values, which are based on individuality, there is a duality of "some people are right and some people are wrong." On the other hand, in values based on oneness, there is less emphasis on the cause, and while the cause is investigated, the focus is on how to make the future better. Even punishments are forward-looking. There are no arbitrary guarantees, and appropriate actions are required depending on the situation. This can be a tremendous burden for people, but by fulfilling this obligation, they grow as individuals and reach harmony. There is no dualistic good and evil or the value of "evil must be destroyed."
The situation of self-proclaimed lightworkers, cults, and various dualistic religions is that they hide their ego and twist and rationalize to justify the dualistic good and evil.
Reaching oneness is something that the ego (before reaching oneness) fears. And it would be easier if you just jumped in, but the ego keeps resisting. That's all it is, but it's difficult for many people. They can't do something simple. And they escape into the logic of duality, and the battle between good and evil continues. The simple story of eradicating evil is justified by self-proclaimed lightworkers, and oneness is belittled.
As a hierarchy, the following stages are involved:
- Independence as an individual
- Growth of the ego (as if there is a "me," a self)
- Overcoming the ego, the fear of the ego disappearing
- Oneness (each stage)
Oneness is not achieved all at once, but in each stage, the ego is gradually overcome, and there may be feelings of fear, or emotional conflicts, or emotional explosions, or various emotions, and in that way, oneness gradually deepens.
There are people who avoid this natural process, protect their ego, and create a story of self-justification by escaping into the story of light and darkness. When you reach oneness, there is no light or darkness, but an integrated oneness. This deepens through the stages. Then, the story of light defeating darkness will not appear. It is said that oneness transcends both light and darkness, but it is not about controlling light or darkness, nor is it about winning against light or being bought by darkness. The world of duality of light and darkness exists as it is in this world, but oneness that transcends that duality permeates that world of duality. Therefore, even if you have reached oneness, the battle between good and evil in this world does not immediately change, but your understanding of it changes, and you no longer participate in that battle of duality. The battle of duality ultimately results in one side being righteous and the other being evil, and the chain of conflict never ends. There is a oneness that even permeates that duality, and by understanding that oneness and looking at this world of duality, a completely different understanding arises. And that understanding of oneness is the key to peace in this world.
The peace of this world is not achieved by the battle between good and evil based on duality, where good defeats evil. In the world of duality, both good and evil are the same in that the ego is asserting itself, and even if it seems harmonious, as long as there is a perspective of "eradicating evil," lasting peace will not come.
Only oneness is the key to leading this world to peace. And overcoming the resistance of the ego, which feels fear before reaching oneness and makes "evil" appear, is the key to reaching oneness.
And they make extraordinary efforts to avoid oneness, creating a distorted perception that "evil must be destroyed." In reality, this is a projection of their fear of losing their "self" through oneness onto others. They create a fantasy of "evil" in others, and to justify themselves, they construct a convenient logic of "fighting evil for the sake of justice or good, punishing evil, and battling evil."
This is a logical armor to protect the ego (the illusion of self). They twist and rationalize to protect this armor, justifying themselves. They claim to be "lightworkers" fighting evil, while hiding their own ego with logic. They criticize those who don't participate in this "fight," claiming they are saving the Earth. In reality, it's just a convenient logic to hide their own ego.
Eventually, this ego becomes inflated, and they become afraid of being criticized. When criticism or the truth is revealed, or when they fear that it might be discovered, they react with extreme denial, screaming, hysteria, and attacking others. They desperately try to protect their ego, even resorting to bringing up "demons" to justify themselves. They might say something like, "The more light there is, the more darkness there is," a phrase they've heard before. In reality, this is a manifestation of ego resistance. The ego is an illusion, but when people with egos say "light is increasing," they actually mean their ego is becoming stronger. And when they say "darkness is increasing," it's because the ego is afraid of the source of consciousness, the oneness of this world, which is approaching. Because the ego doesn't truly exist, it disappears when oneness is realized. Therefore, the ego is afraid and constructs a convenient logic like "darkness is increasing" to protect itself.
People who talk about light and darkness live in a dualistic world and have not reached oneness. Moreover, these self-proclaimed lightworkers often deny oneness or try to avoid it with strange logic. For example, they might say, "Oneness contains both good and evil, so it's dangerous."
So far, we've glimpsed the relationship between the ego's ironclad defense and oneness. Now, let's explain how to overcome the ego and reach oneness. However, it's both very simple and, for some people, very difficult, precisely because it's simple.
The key is to "jump into oneness." When you do, the ego disappears. The ego will be afraid, but that's only at first. After the ego disappears, a peaceful world awaits. There is no good or evil there. That's all there is to it. And after reaching oneness, you can look at this world and talk about order. The order at that time is different from the order before reaching oneness. Before oneness, the worldview is based on dualistic good and evil, with some people being "right" and others being "wrong." On the other hand, after oneness, there is only harmony. Harmony, which includes both good and evil, becomes the standard. However, there are no punishments in the sense of retribution. There are actions to organize the situation, similar to the "Ōgaki" system. In Western values, which are based on individuality, there is a duality of "some people are right and some people are wrong." On the other hand, in values based on oneness, there is less emphasis on the cause, and while the cause is investigated, the focus is on how to make the future better. Even punishments are forward-looking. There are no arbitrary guarantees, and appropriate actions are required depending on the situation. This can be a tremendous burden for people, but by fulfilling this obligation, they grow as individuals and reach harmony. There is no dualistic good and evil or the value of "evil must be destroyed."
The situation of self-proclaimed lightworkers, cults, and various dualistic religions is that they hide their ego and twist and rationalize to justify the dualistic good and evil.
Reaching oneness is something that the ego (before reaching oneness) fears. And it would be easier if you just jumped in, but the ego keeps resisting. That's all it is, but it's difficult for many people. They can't do something simple. And they escape into the logic of duality, and the battle between good and evil continues. The simple story of eradicating evil is justified by self-proclaimed lightworkers, and oneness is belittled.
As a hierarchy, the following stages are involved:
- Independence as an individual
- Growth of the ego (as if there is a "me," a self)
- Overcoming the ego, the fear of the ego disappearing
- Oneness (each stage)
Oneness is not achieved all at once, but in each stage, the ego is gradually overcome, and there may be feelings of fear, or emotional conflicts, or emotional explosions, or various emotions, and in that way, oneness gradually deepens.
There are people who avoid this natural process, protect their ego, and create a story of self-justification by escaping into the story of light and darkness. When you reach oneness, there is no light or darkness, but an integrated oneness. This deepens through the stages. Then, the story of light defeating darkness will not appear. It is said that oneness transcends both light and darkness, but it is not about controlling light or darkness, nor is it about winning against light or being bought by darkness. The world of duality of light and darkness exists as it is in this world, but oneness that transcends that duality permeates that world of duality. Therefore, even if you have reached oneness, the battle between good and evil in this world does not immediately change, but your understanding of it changes, and you no longer participate in that battle of duality. The battle of duality ultimately results in one side being righteous and the other being evil, and the chain of conflict never ends. There is a oneness that even permeates that duality, and by understanding that oneness and looking at this world of duality, a completely different understanding arises. And that understanding of oneness is the key to peace in this world.
The peace of this world is not achieved by the battle between good and evil based on duality, where good defeats evil. In the world of duality, both good and evil are the same in that the ego is asserting itself, and even if it seems harmonious, as long as there is a perspective of "eradicating evil," lasting peace will not come.
Only oneness is the key to leading this world to peace. And overcoming the resistance of the ego, which feels fear before reaching oneness and makes "evil" appear, is the key to reaching oneness.
Overcoming dualism is not about achieving balance.
This is a common misconception.
For example, some people mistakenly believe that they can overcome duality by achieving a "balance between good and evil" or by finding a "balance with others." Others might misunderstand this and think, "So, I only need to focus on one side?" This is also a flawed interpretation.
Overcoming duality does not mean eliminating duality in the same dimension. It means realizing a higher dimension that transcends duality. This is oneness. Overcoming duality means recognizing that a common, unified essence exists beneath the surface of everything, even in seemingly opposite or imbalanced states. Therefore, it's not about achieving balance. It's about recognizing oneness even in imbalance. It's about recognizing oneness even with just one side. Whether it's what is called "good" or what is called "evil," it is all oneness.
It's not about becoming identical in the same dimension. For example, it's not about trying to mix water and oil to make them the same. It's about realizing that water and oil are the same, even though they don't mix. Water is water, and oil is oil. But they are one. This means that the ratio of water and oil doesn't matter. Whether it's 50% and 50%, or 10% and 90%, it's still oneness. Therefore, even if "good" is 10% and "evil" is 90%, it's still oneness, and vice versa. Oneness exists independently of the "world of appearances" (maya in yoga).
People who are "ignorant" (Avidya in Buddhism) perceive the manifestations of this world as reality and live in a world of duality. On the other hand, enlightened beings or those with knowledge of sacred texts can transcend this duality.
It's important to understand that there is a true oneness and a false oneness.
False oneness often involves talking about the eternal nature of the soul while living in a world of duality. This is an inconsistent understanding and a superficial spirituality that often exists in this world, where people conveniently apply the concept of eternity while still living in a dualistic world. For example, if someone claims to be a "lightworker" and says, "The soul is eternal and does not die," but at the same time lives in a world of duality and talks about "eradicating evil and letting good prevail," this is a contradiction.
True understanding is consistent and involves truly transcending duality. When one truly transcends duality, it becomes oneness and connects with the universal consciousness. However, people who haven't truly transcended duality often talk about the "eternity of the soul" for convenience, even though they don't truly understand it.
This world is an illusion (maya), and duality exists within the realm of maya. It has various dualistic attributes, such as good and evil. This is the world, the material world. Maya, in yoga, has three qualities (sattva, rajas, and tamas), which are in states of activity or inactivity. This refers to the causal body, which is the most subtle body in yoga. Maya is made of matter. The fundamental basis of matter is prakriti (matter) in yoga. The existence of matter is what gives rise to duality.
On the other hand, there is something that exists universally and unchangingly in this universe: that is the Atman or Brahman in yoga, which is consciousness, immutable, and therefore transcends duality. It is this consciousness that transcends duality that makes it eternal, universal, and complete. This is the universal consciousness.
Therefore, when one reaches universal consciousness, it is natural to transcend duality. Living with a dualistic consciousness, such as the consciousness of "good and evil," is a state that is far from universal consciousness. This is quite obvious.
If someone, for example, a self-proclaimed "lightworker," brings up the values of "good and evil" and says something like, "Good will defeat evil," it means that they have not reached universal consciousness. However, even such a person may have learned or read something that tells them that "their true nature is eternal and unchanging, born of nothing and dying into nothing." However, they don't truly understand the meaning of it. If one has truly reached universal consciousness, the dualistic concepts of "good and evil" would instantly disappear. Therefore, even if someone has some knowledge about eternity, if they live in a world of values of "good and evil" and say things like "good will defeat evil," they don't truly understand it.
There are not that many truths. They are truths because they are universal.
In spirituality, it is simple: when you reach cosmic consciousness (so-called oneness), the awareness of duality (which is also ego) disappears.
The awareness of duality, which holds the values of good and evil, does not belong to cosmic consciousness, but to the individual ego (the self, or jiva in yoga). You realize this when you reach cosmic consciousness. It is a universal story, and anyone who achieves it will realize it.
Only those who have not reached cosmic consciousness live by the dualistic values of good and evil. In that stage, they tend to be negative, rely on "techniques" and "knowledge," and rather than directly knowing cosmic consciousness, they repeat various forms of self-satisfaction in terms of logic. This involves covering the ego with logic and raising self-esteem, and they tend to react negatively and hysterically when someone appears who reveals the truth, and they act to protect their ego by shifting the responsibility for their own hysteria to others. In this way, people who live in a dualistic world but believe they have already attained the truth are quite troublesome, and they create a kind of cult-like, mystical, and fantasy-like worldview. They try to change reality using techniques, but their consciousness is limited, and they have not reached the truth. However, many people mistake this appearance for the truth, and they are revered like cult leaders. If someone criticizes their position, they are excluded as heretics. This is a characteristic of people who claim to know the truth in a dualistic world and act like cult leaders.
There is a concept of balance in the dualistic world. In contrast, the true world of oneness only has what should be (not balance). There are no "edges" because there are no limitations, so there is no way to balance things. The concept of balance only exists in the limited world of duality. The world of oneness has order, not disorder, and there is what should be (the so-called dharma, the laws of this world), and those who know it are called true sages.
When you overcome duality and reach cosmic consciousness, wisdom comes with it, depending on the depth of that consciousness. The scope of its influence starts small and gradually expands. What starts as a very limited range of cosmic consciousness eventually expands. It is also likened to a fire spreading across a grassland in autumn. It grows so naturally. However, it takes a corresponding amount of time for consciousness to deepen.
When you are in a dualistic world without achieving oneness, you tend to seek a final conclusion. This may be "good and evil," metaphysics, or a seemingly ultimate "simple" story. One of them is the dualistic concept of "balancing."
In Buddhism, there are stories like the Madhyamakakarika, which talks about "balancing around the central axis," but I personally think that this is also an interpretation within the dualistic world. I don't think the Buddha's consciousness was limited to such duality. Since the Buddha's consciousness is limitless, it is not something like an "intermediate" based on the premise of having "edges," but if the Buddha's heart is a vast and boundless mind, then conceptualizing the Buddha's heart with such a concept of "intermediate" may also be a misunderstanding of the Buddha.
The same goes for the balance of good and evil, or the idea of defeating or destroying evil with good, or the idea of balancing with others. While it may seem that way from the outside, I think the actual interpretation is somewhat off.
For example, some people mistakenly believe that they can overcome duality by achieving a "balance between good and evil" or by finding a "balance with others." Others might misunderstand this and think, "So, I only need to focus on one side?" This is also a flawed interpretation.
Overcoming duality does not mean eliminating duality in the same dimension. It means realizing a higher dimension that transcends duality. This is oneness. Overcoming duality means recognizing that a common, unified essence exists beneath the surface of everything, even in seemingly opposite or imbalanced states. Therefore, it's not about achieving balance. It's about recognizing oneness even in imbalance. It's about recognizing oneness even with just one side. Whether it's what is called "good" or what is called "evil," it is all oneness.
It's not about becoming identical in the same dimension. For example, it's not about trying to mix water and oil to make them the same. It's about realizing that water and oil are the same, even though they don't mix. Water is water, and oil is oil. But they are one. This means that the ratio of water and oil doesn't matter. Whether it's 50% and 50%, or 10% and 90%, it's still oneness. Therefore, even if "good" is 10% and "evil" is 90%, it's still oneness, and vice versa. Oneness exists independently of the "world of appearances" (maya in yoga).
People who are "ignorant" (Avidya in Buddhism) perceive the manifestations of this world as reality and live in a world of duality. On the other hand, enlightened beings or those with knowledge of sacred texts can transcend this duality.
It's important to understand that there is a true oneness and a false oneness.
False oneness often involves talking about the eternal nature of the soul while living in a world of duality. This is an inconsistent understanding and a superficial spirituality that often exists in this world, where people conveniently apply the concept of eternity while still living in a dualistic world. For example, if someone claims to be a "lightworker" and says, "The soul is eternal and does not die," but at the same time lives in a world of duality and talks about "eradicating evil and letting good prevail," this is a contradiction.
True understanding is consistent and involves truly transcending duality. When one truly transcends duality, it becomes oneness and connects with the universal consciousness. However, people who haven't truly transcended duality often talk about the "eternity of the soul" for convenience, even though they don't truly understand it.
This world is an illusion (maya), and duality exists within the realm of maya. It has various dualistic attributes, such as good and evil. This is the world, the material world. Maya, in yoga, has three qualities (sattva, rajas, and tamas), which are in states of activity or inactivity. This refers to the causal body, which is the most subtle body in yoga. Maya is made of matter. The fundamental basis of matter is prakriti (matter) in yoga. The existence of matter is what gives rise to duality.
On the other hand, there is something that exists universally and unchangingly in this universe: that is the Atman or Brahman in yoga, which is consciousness, immutable, and therefore transcends duality. It is this consciousness that transcends duality that makes it eternal, universal, and complete. This is the universal consciousness.
Therefore, when one reaches universal consciousness, it is natural to transcend duality. Living with a dualistic consciousness, such as the consciousness of "good and evil," is a state that is far from universal consciousness. This is quite obvious.
If someone, for example, a self-proclaimed "lightworker," brings up the values of "good and evil" and says something like, "Good will defeat evil," it means that they have not reached universal consciousness. However, even such a person may have learned or read something that tells them that "their true nature is eternal and unchanging, born of nothing and dying into nothing." However, they don't truly understand the meaning of it. If one has truly reached universal consciousness, the dualistic concepts of "good and evil" would instantly disappear. Therefore, even if someone has some knowledge about eternity, if they live in a world of values of "good and evil" and say things like "good will defeat evil," they don't truly understand it.
There are not that many truths. They are truths because they are universal.
In spirituality, it is simple: when you reach cosmic consciousness (so-called oneness), the awareness of duality (which is also ego) disappears.
The awareness of duality, which holds the values of good and evil, does not belong to cosmic consciousness, but to the individual ego (the self, or jiva in yoga). You realize this when you reach cosmic consciousness. It is a universal story, and anyone who achieves it will realize it.
Only those who have not reached cosmic consciousness live by the dualistic values of good and evil. In that stage, they tend to be negative, rely on "techniques" and "knowledge," and rather than directly knowing cosmic consciousness, they repeat various forms of self-satisfaction in terms of logic. This involves covering the ego with logic and raising self-esteem, and they tend to react negatively and hysterically when someone appears who reveals the truth, and they act to protect their ego by shifting the responsibility for their own hysteria to others. In this way, people who live in a dualistic world but believe they have already attained the truth are quite troublesome, and they create a kind of cult-like, mystical, and fantasy-like worldview. They try to change reality using techniques, but their consciousness is limited, and they have not reached the truth. However, many people mistake this appearance for the truth, and they are revered like cult leaders. If someone criticizes their position, they are excluded as heretics. This is a characteristic of people who claim to know the truth in a dualistic world and act like cult leaders.
There is a concept of balance in the dualistic world. In contrast, the true world of oneness only has what should be (not balance). There are no "edges" because there are no limitations, so there is no way to balance things. The concept of balance only exists in the limited world of duality. The world of oneness has order, not disorder, and there is what should be (the so-called dharma, the laws of this world), and those who know it are called true sages.
When you overcome duality and reach cosmic consciousness, wisdom comes with it, depending on the depth of that consciousness. The scope of its influence starts small and gradually expands. What starts as a very limited range of cosmic consciousness eventually expands. It is also likened to a fire spreading across a grassland in autumn. It grows so naturally. However, it takes a corresponding amount of time for consciousness to deepen.
When you are in a dualistic world without achieving oneness, you tend to seek a final conclusion. This may be "good and evil," metaphysics, or a seemingly ultimate "simple" story. One of them is the dualistic concept of "balancing."
In Buddhism, there are stories like the Madhyamakakarika, which talks about "balancing around the central axis," but I personally think that this is also an interpretation within the dualistic world. I don't think the Buddha's consciousness was limited to such duality. Since the Buddha's consciousness is limitless, it is not something like an "intermediate" based on the premise of having "edges," but if the Buddha's heart is a vast and boundless mind, then conceptualizing the Buddha's heart with such a concept of "intermediate" may also be a misunderstanding of the Buddha.
The same goes for the balance of good and evil, or the idea of defeating or destroying evil with good, or the idea of balancing with others. While it may seem that way from the outside, I think the actual interpretation is somewhat off.
Do not objectify and fail to understand oneness.
Occasionally, one encounters scholars or university students who have studied Indian philosophy and similar subjects, and who believe they have intellectually "objectified" and understood concepts like "oneness" or "the whole." These individuals often exhibit certain characteristics, such as occasionally laughing and saying, "You can understand it without doing such things," implying that they possess a comprehensive understanding of Indian philosophy. While their explanations may seem to address the concept of "the whole" and appear coherent, it represents an objectified understanding.
The knowledge of "oneness" or "the whole" that is being discussed is, by definition, "the whole." However, the moment it is objectified, it ceases to be "oneness" or "the whole." Yet, individuals who have studied Indian philosophy in academia claim to have "understood" based on this objectified "whole" knowledge. This is far from the true "understanding" that Indian philosophy aims to achieve. While such knowledge is necessary, objectified understanding is a rudimentary stage, merely the beginning. Nevertheless, scholars and university students often assert their "understanding" and, at times, use laughter to express and impose their perception, claiming that those who cannot understand their understanding are intellectually inferior. If one truly understands, there is no need to impose that understanding on others, yet this laughter is frequently observed among those who have studied in academia. This is likely due to the formation of a collective consciousness among individuals who rely on intellectual understanding in Japanese universities and academic fields. Due to the limited number of experts in these fields, similar attitudes tend to spread.
In contrast, practitioners or religious individuals pursue further exploration after achieving an intellectual understanding, asking, "What does true oneness really mean?" Scholars and university students often stop at this stage or mistakenly believe they have achieved understanding simply through intellectual comprehension. Despite this significant gap in understanding between practitioners and scholars, scholars and researchers often assert their "understanding" and, at times, use laughter to belittle others and look down on practitioners, claiming that "understanding can be achieved without doing such things" and hindering their progress.
Even individuals who have studied in India may exhibit similar behavior. They may have acquired a basic understanding of Indian philosophy, but they often mistakenly believe they have achieved complete understanding. There is a well-known story in ancient Indian narratives about a deva (god) and an asura (demon) who were both taught the truth by a sage. The deva, after understanding, continued to refine his understanding and eventually attained true knowledge. In contrast, the asura believed he had completely understood the knowledge and did not reach the true knowledge.
Given that even those with limited knowledge can be misled, engaging in conversations with researchers, scholars, or half-hearted practitioners without confidence in spiritual practice can be detrimental. It can lead to discouragement and hinder spiritual progress, as they may be told, "You can understand it without doing such things." This applies to yoga, Indian philosophy, or anything else. For this reason, secrecy has often been practiced in spiritual fields. Beginners in spirituality are particularly vulnerable and may succumb to various temptations and obstacles. Therefore, it has been a tradition to avoid discussing one's practices with others or to share them only with trusted mentors. Spiritual practice is a delicate and fragile process. Being laughed at and having one's understanding dismissed by scholars can lead to stagnation for years.
If one truly understands oneness or the whole, they would understand that others are also part of that oneness or whole. The ability to adopt a condescending attitude towards others indicates a lack of awareness of oneness and a mere structural understanding of the concept.
On the other hand, practitioners eventually attain a true awareness of oneness. This awareness is absolute, which is why they engage in meditation and various practices.
There may be a few individuals who truly know oneness and have a shortcut to understanding. However, such individuals are rare. While there may be those who laugh and offer guidance towards the truth, they are few and far between. Most often, they are simply arrogant about their knowledge and mistake it for having attained the truth.
Understanding that, and with the premise that there might be some resistance or misdirection, seeking opinions from others requires a certain level of judgment to avoid being misled. It would be better to seek the opinions of others after making some progress, but without a trustworthy teacher, asking various people might only lead to confusion.
There is a very common misunderstanding of the word "understanding." Generally, what scholars and researchers call "understanding" refers to understanding of a "subject." However, in yoga and Indian philosophy, "understanding" is one aspect of oneness. Therefore, understanding the structure and composition of something means understanding that oneness itself is understanding. It is not just understanding, but also a feeling, and it is a direct and intuitive realization of the quality of consciousness itself. While it can be expressed as "understanding," it is fundamentally different from the relative understanding that scholars and researchers talk about.
There is a way of expressing this as indirect knowledge (jnana, or paroksha-jnana) and direct knowledge (vijnana, aparoksha-jnana). Indirect knowledge is what is learned through academic study, while direct knowledge is knowing the truth directly (i.e., knowing oneness). Generally, scholars and researchers say they have "knowledge" by acquiring indirect knowledge, but what is truly needed is direct knowledge. Indirect knowledge can be objectified, but direct knowledge cannot. Therefore, Western logical thinking and analytical methods often involve objectification, which is based on indirect knowledge and is not well-suited for directly knowing oneness. In many cases, it is better to directly immerse oneself in that knowledge without studying academics.
The consciousness of oneness is itself oneness. It is a consciousness that is full, eternal, and never diminishes. That consciousness itself is understanding. Consciousness is oneness, and oneness is understanding. It is not about objectifying oneness and understanding it. The moment it is objectified, it is no longer oneness. Rather, understanding is one aspect of oneness. However, since it is oneness, even saying that it is one aspect is somewhat misleading. It can be seen as one aspect, but since it is oneness, it is also the whole, and therefore, it can also be said that the whole of oneness is understanding. Since oneness is consciousness, it can also be said that consciousness itself is understanding. These all seem like different things, but they are actually saying the same thing: oneness is the whole, and therefore, it is both consciousness and understanding.
Scholars and researchers tend to think of these things separately and relativize them, which prevents them from understanding the essence. Sometimes, someone might present seemingly profound arguments, and you might think, "This person seems to understand," but their attitude or other aspects might reveal that they don't actually understand. To see through that, you need to know what oneness truly is, otherwise, you might be misled by the eloquent arguments of scholars and researchers.
Oneness cannot be objectified, and it is oneness because it is the whole. It can also be called non-dual consciousness.
In other words, it is unchanging. This is what Buddhism calls impermanence. Consciousness appears and disappears, and there is nothing that does not change, whether it is consciousness or matter. Understanding this is an entry point to oneness.
And the world of oneness is a world without change. This material world has change. On the other hand, the world of oneness is not material. It is the world of consciousness, which is full and unchanging.
Thinking is closer to matter than consciousness, and thoughts disappear, but consciousness is always full. Thinking is like a wave (vritti in Sanskrit), which appears and disappears, but beneath it lies consciousness, which remains unchanged. This consciousness is oneness itself, and it permeates this world. Consciousness permeates space, the world, and the universe. Understanding this is oneness.
Therefore, to put it simply, even knowledge loses its power in the face of oneness. When a scholar says, "You don't need to do that to understand," there is a "knowledge that should be known." However, the knowledge of oneness is something that cannot be objectified. Even when someone who has studied Indian philosophy in India says the same thing, they may not truly understand oneness. Academic understanding is relative knowledge, and direct knowledge is "something that cannot be defined."
Understanding what is "indefinable" is important for understanding oneness. For example, as expressed in Zokuchen's poetry, infinite diversity exists far beyond the framework of this world, which was originally objectified by dualism, and none of it can be contained within the limited concepts and definitions. Therefore, oneness is something that cannot be defined. If one understands this, they should immediately understand that the "knowledge" that scholars claim can be obtained through certain methods is not true knowledge. However, in cases where individuals have strong egos, a self-defense mechanism arises, causing them to believe "we know," and they are unable to accept that they are ignorant. As a result, they may become hysterical or laugh it off, exhibiting a defensive attitude driven by their ego. If one truly possesses the knowledge of oneness, such self-defense is unnecessary.
Academically, since oneness is the whole, it cannot be objectified. Therefore, it should be understood that oneness can only be known directly. However, scholars and intelligent people may understand this sentence as a logical concept, but they do not reach direct knowledge. There is a wall there. And because of their ego, they insist "we know, we understand." Even without insisting, the ego may believe that they know it simply because they have acquired knowledge.
If one stops objectifying and understands directly, oneness is very simple. It is something that does not need to be insisted upon, and once it becomes obvious, it is just that.
The knowledge of "oneness" or "the whole" that is being discussed is, by definition, "the whole." However, the moment it is objectified, it ceases to be "oneness" or "the whole." Yet, individuals who have studied Indian philosophy in academia claim to have "understood" based on this objectified "whole" knowledge. This is far from the true "understanding" that Indian philosophy aims to achieve. While such knowledge is necessary, objectified understanding is a rudimentary stage, merely the beginning. Nevertheless, scholars and university students often assert their "understanding" and, at times, use laughter to express and impose their perception, claiming that those who cannot understand their understanding are intellectually inferior. If one truly understands, there is no need to impose that understanding on others, yet this laughter is frequently observed among those who have studied in academia. This is likely due to the formation of a collective consciousness among individuals who rely on intellectual understanding in Japanese universities and academic fields. Due to the limited number of experts in these fields, similar attitudes tend to spread.
In contrast, practitioners or religious individuals pursue further exploration after achieving an intellectual understanding, asking, "What does true oneness really mean?" Scholars and university students often stop at this stage or mistakenly believe they have achieved understanding simply through intellectual comprehension. Despite this significant gap in understanding between practitioners and scholars, scholars and researchers often assert their "understanding" and, at times, use laughter to belittle others and look down on practitioners, claiming that "understanding can be achieved without doing such things" and hindering their progress.
Even individuals who have studied in India may exhibit similar behavior. They may have acquired a basic understanding of Indian philosophy, but they often mistakenly believe they have achieved complete understanding. There is a well-known story in ancient Indian narratives about a deva (god) and an asura (demon) who were both taught the truth by a sage. The deva, after understanding, continued to refine his understanding and eventually attained true knowledge. In contrast, the asura believed he had completely understood the knowledge and did not reach the true knowledge.
Given that even those with limited knowledge can be misled, engaging in conversations with researchers, scholars, or half-hearted practitioners without confidence in spiritual practice can be detrimental. It can lead to discouragement and hinder spiritual progress, as they may be told, "You can understand it without doing such things." This applies to yoga, Indian philosophy, or anything else. For this reason, secrecy has often been practiced in spiritual fields. Beginners in spirituality are particularly vulnerable and may succumb to various temptations and obstacles. Therefore, it has been a tradition to avoid discussing one's practices with others or to share them only with trusted mentors. Spiritual practice is a delicate and fragile process. Being laughed at and having one's understanding dismissed by scholars can lead to stagnation for years.
If one truly understands oneness or the whole, they would understand that others are also part of that oneness or whole. The ability to adopt a condescending attitude towards others indicates a lack of awareness of oneness and a mere structural understanding of the concept.
On the other hand, practitioners eventually attain a true awareness of oneness. This awareness is absolute, which is why they engage in meditation and various practices.
There may be a few individuals who truly know oneness and have a shortcut to understanding. However, such individuals are rare. While there may be those who laugh and offer guidance towards the truth, they are few and far between. Most often, they are simply arrogant about their knowledge and mistake it for having attained the truth.
Understanding that, and with the premise that there might be some resistance or misdirection, seeking opinions from others requires a certain level of judgment to avoid being misled. It would be better to seek the opinions of others after making some progress, but without a trustworthy teacher, asking various people might only lead to confusion.
There is a very common misunderstanding of the word "understanding." Generally, what scholars and researchers call "understanding" refers to understanding of a "subject." However, in yoga and Indian philosophy, "understanding" is one aspect of oneness. Therefore, understanding the structure and composition of something means understanding that oneness itself is understanding. It is not just understanding, but also a feeling, and it is a direct and intuitive realization of the quality of consciousness itself. While it can be expressed as "understanding," it is fundamentally different from the relative understanding that scholars and researchers talk about.
There is a way of expressing this as indirect knowledge (jnana, or paroksha-jnana) and direct knowledge (vijnana, aparoksha-jnana). Indirect knowledge is what is learned through academic study, while direct knowledge is knowing the truth directly (i.e., knowing oneness). Generally, scholars and researchers say they have "knowledge" by acquiring indirect knowledge, but what is truly needed is direct knowledge. Indirect knowledge can be objectified, but direct knowledge cannot. Therefore, Western logical thinking and analytical methods often involve objectification, which is based on indirect knowledge and is not well-suited for directly knowing oneness. In many cases, it is better to directly immerse oneself in that knowledge without studying academics.
The consciousness of oneness is itself oneness. It is a consciousness that is full, eternal, and never diminishes. That consciousness itself is understanding. Consciousness is oneness, and oneness is understanding. It is not about objectifying oneness and understanding it. The moment it is objectified, it is no longer oneness. Rather, understanding is one aspect of oneness. However, since it is oneness, even saying that it is one aspect is somewhat misleading. It can be seen as one aspect, but since it is oneness, it is also the whole, and therefore, it can also be said that the whole of oneness is understanding. Since oneness is consciousness, it can also be said that consciousness itself is understanding. These all seem like different things, but they are actually saying the same thing: oneness is the whole, and therefore, it is both consciousness and understanding.
Scholars and researchers tend to think of these things separately and relativize them, which prevents them from understanding the essence. Sometimes, someone might present seemingly profound arguments, and you might think, "This person seems to understand," but their attitude or other aspects might reveal that they don't actually understand. To see through that, you need to know what oneness truly is, otherwise, you might be misled by the eloquent arguments of scholars and researchers.
Oneness cannot be objectified, and it is oneness because it is the whole. It can also be called non-dual consciousness.
In other words, it is unchanging. This is what Buddhism calls impermanence. Consciousness appears and disappears, and there is nothing that does not change, whether it is consciousness or matter. Understanding this is an entry point to oneness.
And the world of oneness is a world without change. This material world has change. On the other hand, the world of oneness is not material. It is the world of consciousness, which is full and unchanging.
Thinking is closer to matter than consciousness, and thoughts disappear, but consciousness is always full. Thinking is like a wave (vritti in Sanskrit), which appears and disappears, but beneath it lies consciousness, which remains unchanged. This consciousness is oneness itself, and it permeates this world. Consciousness permeates space, the world, and the universe. Understanding this is oneness.
Therefore, to put it simply, even knowledge loses its power in the face of oneness. When a scholar says, "You don't need to do that to understand," there is a "knowledge that should be known." However, the knowledge of oneness is something that cannot be objectified. Even when someone who has studied Indian philosophy in India says the same thing, they may not truly understand oneness. Academic understanding is relative knowledge, and direct knowledge is "something that cannot be defined."
Understanding what is "indefinable" is important for understanding oneness. For example, as expressed in Zokuchen's poetry, infinite diversity exists far beyond the framework of this world, which was originally objectified by dualism, and none of it can be contained within the limited concepts and definitions. Therefore, oneness is something that cannot be defined. If one understands this, they should immediately understand that the "knowledge" that scholars claim can be obtained through certain methods is not true knowledge. However, in cases where individuals have strong egos, a self-defense mechanism arises, causing them to believe "we know," and they are unable to accept that they are ignorant. As a result, they may become hysterical or laugh it off, exhibiting a defensive attitude driven by their ego. If one truly possesses the knowledge of oneness, such self-defense is unnecessary.
Academically, since oneness is the whole, it cannot be objectified. Therefore, it should be understood that oneness can only be known directly. However, scholars and intelligent people may understand this sentence as a logical concept, but they do not reach direct knowledge. There is a wall there. And because of their ego, they insist "we know, we understand." Even without insisting, the ego may believe that they know it simply because they have acquired knowledge.
If one stops objectifying and understands directly, oneness is very simple. It is something that does not need to be insisted upon, and once it becomes obvious, it is just that.