Many people may simply not want to interact with someone who is full of desires because they cannot understand them.

For ordinary people, it's understandable, but for those who claim to be "lightworkers" and say that their work will bring peace and love to the world, saying "I don't want to get involved" – is that really "love"?

Are they using a convenient framework of "good and evil" to justify attitudes like "not understanding" or "not wanting to interact," which are not expressions of love?

I think animals should live according to their own logic and world, and there's nothing wrong with that. Each has its own world, and there is no need to deny it. The reasons for various behaviors, including self-justification by others, can be explained by Adler's third point, but ultimately, they lead to the cognitive limitations caused by "not knowing." And in their own cognition, they have a certain degree of rationality.

Therefore, as a prescription for lightworkers, it is necessary to abandon the separation based on good and evil. Everyone has their own cognitive limits and what they don't know. Therefore, in areas that you do not know, you can easily become "evil."

This may be a difficult story for those who have been familiar with the framework of "good and evil" all along and take it for granted.

People called lightworkers often readily put things into the frame of "good and evil." They simply say that if evil is destroyed, this world will be at peace. They believe they are absolutely "good."

However, even so, the world will not become peaceful, and conflicts will continue. This is because the framework of "good and evil" itself creates separation. Peace cannot come from separation. The moment you enter an area that you do not know, you may easily be seen as "evil" by others. In that unknown realm, can you confidently say that you are "good"? And when actions you unconsciously perform are perceived as "evil" by others, are you prepared to accept it?

In many cases, they are simply using the framework of good and evil to justify their own values, and there is a possibility that they have never even considered re-examining the framework of good and evil as a universal standard.

There are animals, and animals pursue survival through "survival of the fittest." On the other hand, some people want to live culturally. They simply want different things. Their values are different. There are parts that cannot be understood. Then, isn't it necessary to have wisdom so that both can live without having to interact with each other as much as possible?

Whether lightworkers believe that "peace will come if evil is destroyed" significantly influences how the Earth will change in the future. This is not a matter of whether it is good or bad. Operating the Earth based on such values is one choice available to those who remain on Earth. That is freedom and responsibility.