In this way, since the purpose of the universe's creation is "understanding," harmony is only a means of creating an environment for that. Therefore, even if people advocate for peace and harmony, it doesn't resonate at the fundamental level.

In reality, this is not just a problem on Earth; some extraterrestrials, such as those from Pleiades, also seem to have a similar tendency. Within my group soul, there is a soul that once lived on a Pleiades spacecraft and has now returned to the group soul. Tracing that memory, it seems that in Pleiades, criminals were separated and isolated.

I don't remember the exact criteria, but those who disrupt harmony or harm others were likely confined to a certain planet and lived out the rest of their lives there. Perhaps there was an environment where men and women did not interact, and it was not possible to have children. The intention was to prevent criminals from having offspring and to avoid increasing the number of people with similar characteristics.

Furthermore, many Pleiades people, perhaps even now, believe that Earth should do the same, and the idea of separating criminals and preventing them from having offspring is sometimes conveyed to Earth contactees.

For people who blindly believe in extraterrestrials, this might seem like something said by a god, and they might readily accept it. However, it might not be very persuasive if said by someone like me, an Earthling. Nevertheless, this kind of thinking is a flawed aspect of Pleiades.

In the first place, the fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding." If criminals are separated and prevented from having offspring, it hinders the progress of that fundamental purpose, "understanding." This is a serious matter for the administrators of the universe.

In reality, even though they are called Pleiades people, they are extraterrestrials with physical bodies, and they have not yet evolved or grown to the point of being without physical bodies; they are incomplete and are beings in the process of learning. In other words, this universe itself is divided into two or more parts for the purpose of learning, so there are no perfect beings. They are constantly dividing themselves to continue learning. Isolating others who are deemed criminals based on their own judgment, while seemingly maintaining a peaceful state, is something that, even if it appears peaceful on the surface, lacks "understanding," and therefore, some dissatisfaction accumulates.

Actually, I think that even in something like the Orion War, it seems that the initial trigger was often a subtle and minor dissatisfaction. It started with an arbitrary and imposing attitude towards other planetary civilizations, saying, "Why are you doing it that way? You should do it this way." Without understanding the subtle differences, they judged, "You are wrong," and that eventually created divisions. The root cause is that they were carelessly neglecting the fact that "understanding" is a fundamental principle and motivation in this universe, even though they somewhat understood it, and ended up rejecting civilizations with different ways of thinking. That led to a major war in the universe.

I think the underlying principle is "do not cause trouble to others." This principle, which caused the Orion War and continues to cause conflicts on Earth, seems to be the same. Although this principle is derived in various ways and presented with slightly different arguments, the fundamental principle remains the same. Ultimately, it is because they cannot contemplate the point that "understanding" was the reason the universe was created, so they remain in a half-baked state, create a dualistic logic of good and evil, justify their own actions, and the conflict continues.

This is not saying that you should not resist those who have challenged you. Self-defense is justifiable. However, bringing up concepts of "good" and "evil" to justify the use of force in that situation is a superficial understanding, and it is what creates a chain of conflicts. From the perspective that self-defense is for creating an environment for understanding, it becomes clear to what extent self-defense is appropriate, depending on the situation.

There are differences in intellectual level, and the knowledge and understanding that underlie it also differ, so understanding may not always appear immediately. However, even so, it seems necessary to take actions in advance that will allow understanding to be achieved later.

Therefore, it is also clear that understanding self-defense as being "for harmony" or "for peace" is a superficial understanding. Even if there is harmony or peace, understanding may not necessarily occur. We strive for harmony and peace because it makes it easier for understanding to emerge, not because peace is the ultimate goal. For some people, peace and harmony may create a situation where "do not cause trouble to others (so you can do whatever you want)." Therefore, it is clear that peace and harmony do not always lead to understanding.

In such cases, if harmony and peace themselves become the ultimate goals, it can lead to a situation where "understanding" is not achieved, and one is simply used by people with different goals. Of course, peace and harmony can also lead to understanding, but the current reality is that this is not always the case. There have been repeated instances where, even though both sides believe that peace and harmony are the ultimate goals, they eventually realize that they are gathering people with different ultimate goals, leading to division.

On the other hand, if "understanding" is established as the goal from the beginning, harmony and peace become intermediate processes or preconditions, and understanding itself is the result. Therefore, harmony and peace naturally emerge as a result. Forced harmony and peace without understanding can lead to division and discord, creating new conflicts, while aiming for understanding gradually eliminates such divisions and conflicts.

This requires effort from both sides, and true peace and harmony are achieved only when both parties try to understand each other.

This may seem like a minor difference at first glance. However, this point is actually crucial, as even minor misunderstandings can trigger wars in the universe, and wars and conflicts on Earth often occur due to similar, seemingly insignificant issues.

Regarding the word related to "understanding" that I mentioned earlier, there is this phrase. Every time I hear this phrase in public, I often feel that there is a "controlling others" intention behind it.

I think that many people generally perceive this phrase as a good thing, but as I mentioned earlier, if we interpret this phrase based on the two principles of "understanding" and "not causing trouble to others," it can be interpreted in two ways.

First, if we take "understanding" as the fundamental principle, it is natural that everyone is different because there are more than two universes. Regarding the part that says "everyone is good," it was originally a state of oneness, and both are part of oneself, so the word "good" may not be appropriate, but it can be said that it is not entirely a wrong word.

On the other hand, if we interpret it with the nuance of "not causing trouble to others," it becomes a story of "everyone is different, so everyone should be free," and "everyone has their own ego, so everyone should do what they want." Therefore, deliberately telling others something like that in a roundabout way implies an intention to "don't interfere with me," to exclude others from being involved, and to forcefully impose one's own way of doing things. In order to hide this in a euphemism, it is expressed as "everyone is different and everyone is good," and it is often spoken by attractive celebrities or promoted through songs with beautiful melodies.

In reality, the people who sing or promote it may have the intention of "understanding" or "harmony," but there are people behind them who are making them say it, and by interpreting when and to whom they say it, and what is happening in society, and why they repeatedly repeat this and try to change the topic and erase it, even if the celebrities who are saying it are not at fault, I often feel the unpleasant intentions of the people behind them. Therefore, I don't feel that the celebrities themselves are bad, or that they are thinking that much, but I feel a sense of discomfort with the intentions of the people who are planning it.

In Japan, this phrase is interpreted in the context of "understanding" and "harmony," but I think that if you say the same thing in a foreign country, it may be interpreted in the context of "everyone is different, so everyone should do what they want." What do you think? In Japan as well, self-proclaimed "lightworkers" often act based on the principle of "not causing trouble to others," and it is often interpreted in a similar context.

It is likely that the meaning of the word also differs depending on the generation, and that what was understood in one generation as harmony and understanding is often interpreted in a different generation as freedom and independence. It might be interesting to conduct interviews across generations to explore this.

"Understanding" is the premise, the physical world of this Earth is a world that is easier to learn in than higher-dimensional worlds. There is an implicit or obvious consensus that spirituality should lead to higher dimensions and freedom, and there is even a tendency to consider anything that does not conform to this as not being spiritual. However, in reality, higher dimensions are so free that everything is immediately materialized, making it difficult to understand what is happening, and it is a world where both disharmony and harmony are realized.

Generally, there are stories about the afterlife being divided into multiple layers, with hell and heaven... but that is, in a sense, a metaphor, and there are low and high dimensions within hell, and low and high dimensions within heaven. Therefore, it is not necessarily true that a low dimension is always hell, and it is not necessarily true that heaven is always a high dimension.

That being said, it is important to learn about the unrestricted world of higher dimensions, because we all came from there, and knowing where we came from and where we are going is necessary. On the other hand, the meaning of being here is to slowly materialize and experience the reality that was originally created unconsciously, in the heavy and crude material world, so that we can thoroughly understand what our own consciousness is. This is the meaning of accelerated learning on Earth.

There is a reality that even when you have finished learning spiritually, you still have to be in this physical world, which can be bothersome. However, originally, it is a story of graduating and leaving once you have finished learning. If this physical dimension disappears and only higher dimensions remain, people who have not yet finished learning will lose a place to learn, and dissatisfaction may arise. Learning is what it is, but understanding things is a fun thing, and it can be said that it is also a kind of play. Living in this limited physical world means enjoying and understanding through play, and as long as you continue to understand something while playing, you are acting in accordance with the intention of the creator of the universe.

In particular, money can restrict people's actions, but if there are no restrictions on actions, people will simply lie down and do nothing, which would reduce learning. Is that really a fun life? If there are people who think that is okay, they will be considered as entities that do not conform to the intention of the creator of the universe, and they will be prompted to act. They will be forced into a situation where they have no choice but to act. People may arbitrarily say that it is a restriction or coercion, but the fundamental principle is "understanding," so even if it is a game or anything else, people who are living for "understanding" will have their lives guaranteed, because that is in accordance with the will of the universe.

Therefore, things like using spiritual techniques to easily make money or using the law of attraction to live a life exactly as you want are not of much interest to the laws of the universe. Even if such things are possibly achievable through techniques, if the result is simply living a peaceful life without learning, the universe will shake things up and forcibly push you out of that situation, forcing you to take action.

There are also people who, despite the fact that the laws of the universe are actually driving them to act because of "learning," fail to recognize this and instead imagine arbitrary and nonsensical things like "rulers," "deep state," or "conspiracy theories," and feel dissatisfied with realities that may or may not exist, wasting their time and engaging in meaningless acts of cursing the world.

The reason why money exists is that, in reality, there was once a timeline where money was almost unnecessary. However, in that world, people started to become "angry," and although they continued to work out of obligation, something felt "off," so this timeline was created where money has a strong influence. Even now, in rural areas of Japan, there are strange landlords and influential landowners who are arrogant and troublesome. In a world without money, this is multiplied many times over, and once you become an influential person in that area, that status is passed down through generations. If a troublesome person is born into that family, they will greatly trouble the people around them. This is not comparable to the situation of people in rural areas today; it's a level where you might not be able to get a proper meal if you oppose them. In today's society, if you have money, you can get food from anyone. However, if you lose money, all the restaurants and shops will be run by someone's kindness, and you will constantly have to humbly thank the owner of those shops. While there are good people, there are also people with strange personalities, and in today's world, such people would not be able to earn money and would have to close their shops, so there are fewer such people in society. However, in a society where money is almost unnecessary, bankruptcies are almost non-existent, so even strange people will continue to exist in the market. That is a world with little turnover and is distorted. Therefore, a world without limitations is not always a good thing, and it is because of the strong limitation of money that people can learn.

If the fundamental principle of the universe is "understanding," then anything that hinders it is undesirable.

Restricting someone else is generally considered undesirable because it hinders understanding. However, there are situations where restricting others may lead to greater understanding. For example, if someone is extremely violent and unwilling to listen, it may be necessary for the police to intervene and restrict their actions. Except in cases of crime, manipulating others in everyday life hinders their free thinking and actions, which is a fundamental motivation of the universe, namely "understanding."

This may be confused with the fact that simply living in a physical society inherently imposes limitations (physical limitations), which can be beneficial for learning. However, forcing others hinders learning.

This is a different context from the "freedom" that is commonly talked about as a "basic human right." While the basic human right of freedom is indeed correct, the underlying principle differs depending on whether it prioritizes "understanding" or "not causing trouble to others." For example, if "understanding" is the underlying principle, then freedom is a means to promote understanding. On the other hand, if "not causing trouble to others" is the underlying principle, then freedom allows individuals to do as they please without interfering with others, which can hinder understanding.

This does not necessarily mean that people should always live together, nor does it mean that they should always live separately. It depends on the circumstances. If living together promotes understanding, then it is better to live together. Conversely, if living separately promotes understanding, or if individuals have different interests and want to deepen their understanding, then it may be better to live separately.

In particular, when groups with different levels of intelligence live close together, conflicts can arise due to differences in lifestyle, and it can lead to a situation where they cannot understand each other due to vastly different ways of thinking. Therefore, it is generally better for groups with similar levels of intelligence to live together. In terms of understanding, it is possible to gradually understand each other even when living apart, but when it comes to daily life, there are times when it is difficult to live close together, even if understanding is possible.

Regarding the concept of equality, there is a risk that if "one must not cause trouble to others" is misinterpreted as "if everyone is completely the same, they will not cause trouble to others," it can lead to a communist-like ideology. People naturally resist this, but an authoritarian state may force everyone to live the same way. This can lead to a loss of people's ability to think and live, and a situation where "understanding" does not progress. Forcing everyone to be equal hinders people's actions and, as a result, inhibits "understanding." Individuals are unable to do what they want, they lose freedom, and this can lead to a state where understanding does not progress or is hindered.

However, everything other than the fundamental principle of "understanding" can change depending on the situation, so this is just one example, and it depends on the circumstances. Generally, this is what is meant.

The idea that "understanding" is the key to truth or freedom, often mentioned in spiritual contexts, touches upon the core of the matter when the word "understanding" is used, but it is not necessarily the truth itself.

In reality, there are many people who know the logic of truth but are trapped in the illusions (maya) of this world and cannot see the truth. People who claim to "know the truth" through something, such as studying religious studies at university or learning the logic of a particular school of thought, are not necessarily understanding the truth itself. Sometimes, people who have studied religious studies will use phrases like "you can understand it without doing that" to show off, and in such cases, even if knowledge is acquired and understood through institutions like universities, people often do not understand the truth.

When I say these things, people who want to know the answer immediately often ask, "So, what is the answer?" (sometimes with a hint of frustration). The fact that they are looking for an answer in "something" means they are misunderstanding the purpose. The answer is not in "something" itself, but in the attitude of seeking something. This attitude is also the attitude of seeking understanding. While the attitude itself is not the answer, delving deeper into the seemingly infinite answers is what "understanding" is. However, people often think they know the truth just by hearing something and understanding it.

There is a relatively famous story in yoga or Hinduism about how gods and demons both heard the truth about this world from a sage. At that time, the demon understood the sage's words literally and thought, "So, I am the true self. I understand. This is the truth," and became conceited, failing to reach the truth. The god, on the other hand, thought, "Is this the truth? This is easy to understand. But, do I really understand it? Is this really the truth?" and continued to introspect and explore, eventually discovering the true truth. Only those who continue to explore can attain true liberation and truth.

This is a common story in the world.

People who immediately think, "I understand," after hearing something end there and do not reach true understanding. On the other hand, by recognizing their own situation, such as "I think I understand, but I feel like I haven't truly reached it," and continuing to practice or explore, they can reach the truth.

Especially in the realm of spirituality, the progress is often very slow. While understanding may come quickly, it typically takes years to truly embody that state. Some people, frustrated by this slow pace, resort to shortcuts like rituals or initiations, spending hundreds of thousands of yen or more on methods that promise quick results, only to find that they are ineffective and end up wasting their money. There are people who are easily swayed by marketing strategies that promise rapid growth in spirituality, and this tarnishes the image of spirituality.

Advertisements like "You can grow simply by understanding" or "Your aura will multiply just by participating in a ritual" are traps for beginners in spirituality. In such situations, people either have a bad experience and become completely averse to spirituality, or they continue until their money runs out. In some cases, they become instructors themselves, but most of the time, the perceived effects are often due to the placebo effect.

While some people may achieve results, it is often because of their innate qualities rather than the rituals themselves. Therefore, it is best to expect that even if you study at a spiritual school, it will take time. Moreover, the idea that "understanding is all you need" is true in certain contexts, but generally, simply hearing that doesn't guarantee that it will work.

In reality, even when a certain level of truth is achieved, there are deeper levels beyond that, and it is unlikely that humans can reach the ultimate level within their short lifetime. Therefore, it might be best to approach it with the intention of continuing to explore it for a lifetime.

That is a prerequisite, and if understanding is promoted because of an interest in a certain subject, it is viewed positively. On the other hand, if it is simply a life of decadence and not much new understanding is gained, it is viewed negatively.

The criteria for this judgment are that if the fundamental reason for the universe's creation is "understanding," then considering that, it becomes clear whether the situation is favorable or needs improvement. Therefore, the evaluation changes depending on the situation, and whether or not one has sufficient food, clothing, and shelter is not necessarily a good thing.

Positively, it means that it is in line with the fundamental principles of the universe, and its continuation is supported by the universe. People who are acting out of some interest have their basic needs of food, clothing, and shelter guaranteed. On the other hand, the lazy person who wants to do nothing but struggle with food, clothing, and shelter is contrary to the fundamental principle of the universe, which is "understanding," so such a situation (for the universe) is not very meaningful and is shaken by great power, making it unsustainable. And they are thrown into a situation where they must understand something.

Therefore, people who simply want to earn money and live without struggling with food, clothing, and shelter will not be able to maintain that situation for long. If such a life of ease is the purpose of life, they will eventually become bored, and even if they achieve it, they will eventually have some complaints. True happiness lies in exploration, but if one lives peacefully without exploring and does not create new understanding, the universe will not consider that person useful, and they will be shaken.

Therefore, even if one participates in spiritual activities, the law of attraction, or seminars on how to achieve happiness, it may not be very relevant from a cosmic perspective. The temporary effects of creating reality may be just a placebo, and sometimes there may be things that are truly effective, but if that life is simply peaceful and does not create new understanding, it is contrary to the principles of the universe, so it will be shaken and changes will be forced. Sometimes, things may revert to their original state.

In fact, there have been many times when this world itself has been shaken, and its timeline has ended. In a timeline that existed along the Pacific coast, centered on Japan, where food, clothing, and shelter were guaranteed, the vitality was lost from society, and it became difficult for new understanding to emerge. At that time, the white society, which was being viewed from a distance and compared to "the devil of Europe" by the people of the sphere of influence, was not understood, and from the perspective of the administrator of the Earth, "this situation, where they do not understand, view it from a distance, and do not try to improve it," was not desirable, so that timeline was frozen. The administrator of the Earth told us the answer: "It is not enough to help people (by, for example, guiding slaves to the sphere of influence) in the peaceful situation of the sphere of influence. It is necessary to go into the countries of Europe, understand the difficult situation, and change the society that is still using slaves. That was what was needed in that timeline." Therefore, if we learn that lesson and apply it to the current timeline, it is required to go into and change things, rather than criticizing or criticizing from a distance, the people who are in a situation close to slavery, and that is based on the principle of promoting mutual understanding. The purpose is not to change things themselves, but to promote understanding, and if understanding is the ultimate goal, then it can be said that we change in order to understand, and it can also be said that things change with understanding. If a society simply criticizes from the outside without promoting that understanding, or is only slightly helping and feeling self-satisfied, it may be reset by the administrator of the Earth. This is the same for the current society (timeline).

In the context of "people who are doing terrible things," it is important not to turn a blind eye, and this can also be interpreted by the basic laws of the universe. People who are doing terrible things are often lacking in understanding. Similarly, the people who are witnessing these actions also lack understanding of the people who are doing terrible things. While this is often discussed in terms of morality and the concepts of good and evil, it often leads to statements like "evil must be punished," but that is not the case. Punishing someone without understanding them will not lead to progress, and this goes against the laws of the universe, so similar evil will reappear somewhere else. Until understanding is achieved, it will continue to manifest, so punishing someone without understanding them is like a cat-and-mouse game.

Especially in the spiritual realm, self-proclaimed lightworkers often bring up the concepts of good and evil and talk about the need to not turn a blind eye to evil and to punish it. However, this goes against the laws of the universe. If you do that, you are showing a lack of willingness to understand, and powerful evil (as perceived by the self-proclaimed lightworker) may come to them, and they may be eliminated. The law of the universe is "understanding." Therefore, those who try to punish evil based on superficial concepts of good and evil, using a simple logic like "maintenance is good, destruction is evil," will inevitably face consequences from the laws of the universe. They may feel self-satisfied, believing they are fighting evil, but there are people who are engaged in such futile efforts. If they understood, the problem would be resolved. However, understanding takes time, so some degree of self-defense is necessary, and strength is needed for that. Instead of justifying their violence as an exercise of power, as some self-proclaimed lightworkers do, it is necessary to use strength to create a space for understanding. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often use the logic that "because evil exists, it is permissible to punish it, and the use of force is justified because it is not violence," and they use violence against those they consider evil, prolonging conflicts in the world.

When people are living peaceful lives without difficulty in food, clothing, and shelter, there are many people who turn a blind eye to inconvenient things. The meaning of turning a blind eye in such situations can be interpreted differently. Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe (mistakenly) that they must fight evil and punish it, and that punishment is enough, with understanding being secondary. On the other hand, the laws of the universe push the situation towards deepening understanding.

In the timeline of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, people living along the Pacific coast of the sphere also evaluated "Europe, which is like a demon, Europe that uses and discards slaves, greedy Europe." And they were ignoring it. According to the judgment criteria of modern-day self-proclaimed lightworkers, such a "Europe of evil" should be dealt with. However, the laws of the universe say, "To understand, you must enter the depths of Europe, which is like hell. Reincarnate there and understand from within." And by not doing that, but only helping a few people from afar and gossiping from a distance, saying "Europe is terrible," the society that does not try to understand is deemed unnecessary, and that timeline is reset. That is the intention of the Earth's managers.

The answer is clear: if understanding progresses, the Earth's managers will approve, whether it is war or something else. Because that is the law of the universe. On the other hand, if the situation does not lead to understanding, it is denied, and a shake-up or a timeline reset may occur.

Based on that, for example, the conflict in the Middle East is a situation where understanding does not progress, so the Earth's managers are negatively viewing it. Also, AI is viewed negatively if it hinders human understanding (even if it produces excellent results). Human understanding is a part of the universe's consciousness, and AI is a machine, so it does not have consciousness, and no matter how much results it produces, it is not contributing to the universe's "understanding." However, if AI is used for humans to gain further understanding, that is positive, so AI is not necessarily bad. The focus is on whether understanding progresses in total.

In conflicts, the Earth's managers view the results that lead to overall understanding positively. Basically, conflicts are negative, but the use of force is not necessarily bad, and the use of force to stop the conflict and promote understanding is viewed positively. This is irrelevant to superficial logic like "good" and "evil," because everything is "me" in oneness, so "good" and "evil" are almost irrelevant. It is possible to say that what promotes understanding is "good" and what hinders understanding is "evil" as a metaphor, but it is not like the self-proclaimed lightworkers' definition of "good" as "maintaining" and "evil" as "destroying."

Conflicts, in a sense, occur because people are concerned about their own lives, but they are not understanding of others, which leads to conflicts. This may sound like a natural thing in general, but its essence is that, if we consider the law of the universe to be "understanding," then the lack of understanding, which is the opposite of understanding, causes conflicts. Even if it is generally considered to be true, if we take into account the basic law of the universe, which is "understanding," this can be understood more thoroughly.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers are recommending transformation under the guise of healing. This is what is called energy work, where energy is given from the outside to force transformation. However, it is not actually possible, and it may be a placebo effect, or it may be that the person's own self-healing power is working. In any case, for the purpose of this explanation, let's understand that they are claiming it can be done.

Even if there is a work that brings about transformation, if that transformation does not involve "understanding," it goes against the laws of the universe. The person performing the work may say things like, "Energy work brings about changes faster," but the essence of the problem is not there. Even if the person's situation is difficult, if they do not progress in understanding that situation, then even if they transform their energy and escape from that state, that act goes against the laws of the universe, and a reaction will inevitably occur. They will either quickly return to the original state, or be forced into the same situation with an even greater force.

Instead of making such futile efforts, in most cases, if you simply leave things alone, understanding will progress and the problem will be resolved. However, there is a spiritual business in the world that deliberately makes it seem as if the problem has been solved by calling it "energy work" and charging a high price.

It can also be said that they are creating a situation that leads to understanding. However, for those who created that situation, it is like preparing a stage and placing actors, and then the self-proclaimed lightworkers ruin that stage by calling it "healing" at the moment when understanding is about to progress. The person who received the healing may be satisfied, but in reality, it is not necessarily something that is so essential.

Healing basically functions as a trigger to activate the person's own self-healing power. And, by the introduction of energy, vitality is activated. This also happens when people interact with each other, even without calling it "healing," and it can happen simply by being near someone.

While healing can be effective in activating self-healing power, it is necessary to be careful about the method, because it involves manipulating energy. Energy work that simply removes the person's problems can hinder understanding, and while it may seem energetic at first, it can create a blind, homogenized person and increase the risk of producing people with a slave-like mentality.

In situations like this, self-proclaimed lightworkers and healers, who have become convinced of the other person's "slave mentality," often disregard the fact that their actions are hindering the other person's understanding. They may say things like, "Even if you heal them, they'll just return to their former slave life and feel powerless," or "It's necessary to teach them theory," even though that theory is often a homogenized cult doctrine, not general, universal knowledge. This theory often involves stories of "good versus evil" or a strange, ancient Greek or Egyptian-influenced philosophy, which can be interesting, but teaching the same homogenized knowledge is not particularly meaningful from the perspective of the laws of the universe.

The "understanding" of the laws of the universe involves exploring and seeking new knowledge and understanding. While a cult's interesting and strange logic may sometimes be intriguing, simply being indoctrinated in that doctrine does not align with the laws of the universe. Exploring this seemingly infinite world is what aligns with the laws of the universe.

Therefore, even if a situation seems foolish, interventions that hinder the other person's understanding should not be undertaken. This applies not only to individuals but also to planets. Even if foolish wars and conflicts occur on Earth, the universe generally observes, except in cases where the Earth is about to be destroyed. This is partly due to the principle of non-interference, but at its core, the fundamental principle of the universe is understanding. If the universe intervenes, it would hinder the understanding of the inhabitants of the planet, so it is necessary for them to observe and understand for themselves, except in special cases.

The same applies to relationships between people. Self-proclaimed lightworkers often try to solve problems and conflicts by removing the energy (aura) of conflict, which hinders the other person's understanding.

As a result, the other person's understanding does not progress, their vitality decreases, their understanding diminishes, and they become obedient, while the self-proclaimed lightworker's self-esteem increases (their ego expands), creating a strange situation. A hierarchy is created between the healer and the person being healed. Given this background, it is understandable why strange hierarchies exist in cult organizations.

And, the person who knows the teachings of the cult is considered correct and just, and they are said to punish evil. As part of this, there are relatively useless efforts and misunderstandings, such as those who claim to be fighting evil through healing and energy work, which is what self-proclaimed lightworkers are like.

However, the law of the universe is "understanding." Therefore, you should be able to enter the realm of what seems like evil. And then, you should understand evil. Ultimately, evil is nothing more than ignorance, and it can be transformed if you understand it. Despite this, self-proclaimed lightworkers seem to misunderstand and believe that they are fighting evil and punishing it. It can be said that evil does not exist, but if you say that good does not exist, it can be said that good is knowledge and understanding.

Therefore, energy work that hinders understanding can be called evil. However, energy work is diverse, so what promotes understanding can also be called good. However, the knowledge I am referring to here is not the cult's strange teachings (which the members cherish and call ancient knowledge), but rather general knowledge about situations, others, or the environment. It is not necessary to learn the cult's teachings about good and evil, but rather, it is necessary to understand one's own situation in one's own environment. For example, if there is a very terrible situation around you, instead of turning a blind eye or criticizing and gossiping from a distance, you need to be willing to jump into it. Alternatively, if there is an ugly situation around you, you should not get involved, and if the person involved in the problem is handling it themselves, then others should leave them alone. It is important not to engage in such half-hearted involvement. If you are going to do something, you need to be willing to jump into it.

The story of good and evil is not that related to this "understanding." It is not a story of duality, such as "good will destroy evil."

What is always required as a result of action is "knowledge and understanding." On the other hand, if the result of the work done by self-proclaimed lightworkers is "a feeling of refreshment" or "relief," and if that leads to an understanding of the person's situation (not an understanding of the cult's teachings), then that work is in line with the laws of the universe. However, if the work results in feeling relieved, but understanding does not progress, then that work is not very useful in terms of the laws of the universe. In this way, simply feeling refreshed (as a result of the goal of understanding) does not mean that the work itself has produced results, but rather, what happens next is important. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often say things like, "If there is energy of conflict (aura), it should be removed." However, that conflict is actually a preliminary stage to understanding, but self-proclaimed lightworkers do not think so. Generally, they do not emphasize "understanding," but are more interested in "maintaining a beautiful aura." Therefore, they "remove" the "murkiness" or "conflict" that is just about to lead to understanding, and consider it a solution. That is hindering "understanding." Despite this, they believe that they are doing lightwork. It is a complete misunderstanding.

The beauty of auras certainly exists as a characteristic of each entity in the universe. However, from a very broad perspective and based on the laws of the universe, whether an aura is beautiful or not is not very relevant. Rather, one goes through various aura states in the process of understanding. While auras can become "dirty," the beauty of an aura is not highly valued in the cosmic sense.

That being said, there are differences in auras depending on the entity. Nevertheless, "understanding" according to the laws of the universe is far more important than the beauty of an aura. What is important is whether understanding is produced as a result of one's actions. I repeat, understanding is not about the knowledge or understanding of cult doctrines, but about understanding oneself and the surroundings in the given situation.

And it can be said that cultivating the ability to stand on one's own feet in this way is true lightwork.

Probably, many people think they are doing good things, but it was not to the liking of the Earth's manager. For example, they are engaged in activities to help slaves from neighboring countries, and they are satisfied with that. Or, they live peacefully in their own country without helping the hellish situation in the neighboring country. For the people in that situation, they probably thought that such things were impossible. They probably thought that stopping the slave system in the neighboring country was impossible. Whether it is possible or not, or whether it is difficult or not, the Earth's manager is not concerned with that. What the Earth's manager is concerned with is the result. If there is a country that is severely exploiting slaves, and if that is left unattended, then the world will be reset, regardless of whether it is impossible to help them. Even if you are in a safe place in your own country, and you do a little kindness or good deeds, the Earth's manager will not be satisfied. Even if you are engaged in a movement to liberate slaves, which is a very wonderful good deed from a global perspective, that is not enough to sustain the Earth. That is what happened in the previous timeline. No matter how much you try to satisfy yourself or what excuses you make, the Earth's manager will not accept such arbitrary logic. In the end, the Earth in the previous timeline was discarded and put into a frozen state because the terrible countries were left unattended.

A similar thing may happen again this time, but there is still a chance for the world to continue. At that time, if you mistakenly try to destroy evil countries or organizations with a misguided view such as "good must win over evil" like self-proclaimed lightworkers, that is a wrong effort. What the Earth's manager truly wants is "understanding." Based on that, you will naturally understand what you must do.

It is often said that the problem is the masses who turn a blind eye to the lack of peace in the world. That is generally true, but the underlying problem is the lack of understanding, and yet many people mistakenly believe that peace itself is the problem or the goal. The meaning of peace is different for each person, and the peace that means that oneself or someone else lives peacefully is actually not the ultimate goal. Peace is a prerequisite for understanding, so peace is necessary. However, if there is no understanding, then there is no meaning to that peace, because the lack of understanding and the lack of peace are two sides of the same coin. There are also stories that if you don't interact with each other, you will have peace, but that goes against the laws of the universe, so you will inevitably be shaken and moved in the direction of "understanding." This does not necessarily mean war, but if the lack of understanding is too great, it can lead to war and conflict.

Sometimes, I hear stories like, "If the world were unified with the same ideas, there would be peace." This idea suggests that if religions, ideologies, or even self-proclaimed lightworkers' metaphysics were based on a unified perspective, the world would be ideologically unified.

In reality, these kinds of unified theories hinder the "understanding" of this universe and will inevitably lead to division. The fundamental principle of this universe is "understanding," and it originally started with "knowing oneself," which was a state of oneness. Therefore, even if a single ideology or theory claims to be ultimate, it cannot be considered fundamental compared to this simple principle of "understanding" in the universe.

The fundamental principle of this universe is understanding itself. It might be misleading to say that the universe does not yet know itself, but since the ultimate oneness of the entire universe is infinite, infinity means that it is eternally expanding... although that might be misleading, the principle is that infinity does not expand or contract. However, because it is infinite, from the perspective of human consciousness, which is limited by this time axis, the understanding of the future universe, based on the current understanding of the universe, can be seen as the universe "growing," even though the universe is, in essence, infinite.

Therefore, it can be said that the understanding of the future universe is more advanced than the current understanding of the universe.

Based on this premise, unifying with the same way of thinking will not last long and will create ideological frustration, inevitably leading to new ideas and thoughts, and division.

Therefore, it is better to design this world based on the micro-fundamental principle that society is a division that has split from oneness in order to know itself.

Whether it is a group or a country, it is a division for the purpose of knowing each other. Each seems to be a separate entity, but they are living as separate entities. They were originally one, but they became separate in order to know each other. Similarly, separate groups and countries have tendencies that are similar within themselves, but they also have the role of knowing each other from the outside.

Therefore, the idea that if all countries and ideologies in the world were unified, the world would be at peace, goes against the movement from the original state of oneness to the creation of the universe through division, and such an attempt will not succeed. Perhaps, after billions or even trillions of years, when the universe returns to a state of oneness, such a flow might occur, but that is unlikely to happen for a while.

Based on that premise, what we humans should do is to understand each other while assuming that we are different entities. Taking into account the fact that we separated from a state of oneness, both are "self," and we are separated in order to understand the "other self" from the outside.

And it can be said that ideologies should also be free. Among the diverse ways of thinking, there are strange and unusual ones, but the universe is full of diversity, including such things. By understanding each other, strange ideologies will be eliminated, and we will move towards the direction of correct understanding.

What is important here is not that we should learn and understand the "correct understanding" created by someone, but that each individual should understand not only themselves but also their neighbors and other countries in their own environment. Of course, studying is important, but more importantly, the attitude of always understanding in each individual's situation is important, and that is not about world unity ideology or something like that.

Simply understanding the fundamental principle by which this universe was created, and understanding that the reason the universe was created is "to gain understanding of oneself," will naturally stop conflicts. Because it is a fundamental principle, each individual should think about it based on their own circumstances and countries, and if we assume that understanding others is a prerequisite, then it will not become strange. Even if it is strange, it will be corrected through interactions with others.

Rather, it is more dangerous when the world is unified by a "unified theory" that cannot be corrected. For example, if it were unified by something like metaphysics, the ideological diversity of the world would be lost, and that goes against the laws of the universe, so it is not sustainable. Cults and some other groups bring up such strange theories, which is preferable from the perspective of the universe because it creates diversity. However, unifying everything with one ideology goes against the laws of the universe. Extreme ideologies are considered desirable from a cosmic perspective because they are thought up by some people, but when those ideologies spread, it becomes a violation of the laws of the universe and can lead to catastrophic consequences.

Instead of unifying ideologies, we should proceed on a relatively normal and morally sound path, which is to understand each other while acknowledging that we are exploring, maintaining a certain distance, and promoting mutual understanding as much as possible. If such a simple story is all it takes, then if it becomes commonplace, peace will come to the world. In a sense, peace is that simple.

And, those who disrupt peace are people with extreme ideologies such as metaphysics, who are based on dualism. If they try to unify the world with the logic of power, where justice punishes evil, it will inevitably fail. This is because it goes against the "understanding" law of the universe.

The concept of "aura" is something that others can interfere with and remove, or supplement with energy, and people who claim to do this are called "healers." However, there are various types, and some of them seem to be harmful.

And, if the method is incorrect, it is said that the healer themselves accumulate karma. This is karma for taking away the freedom of others. And the result of this is the restriction of one's own life in the future. In a sense, those who claim to be healers and engage in activities are, as a result, offering their own freedom, and sometimes providing their own karma to someone else.

This is because, while karma is different for each person, the karma that a certain person is supposed to experience is also a form of learning. However, if someone's karma is removed, it deprives them of the opportunity to learn. Therefore, they accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.

This is particularly evident in those who use healing techniques and say things like, "Energy needs to transform. Energy transformation is faster than counseling." While the person may feel grateful and good at the time, they gradually accumulate karma for depriving others of the opportunity to learn.

And, as a result of depriving many people of the opportunity to learn, a sudden backlash occurs. Or, a demonic and cunning entity, without appearing to be a demon, finds someone who wants to become a healer and provides energy assistance to create a self-proclaimed healer. And the purpose of such demons is to have someone accumulate a lot of karma, resulting in a state where their own karma is taken away by others, and to use that person for their own purposes. The demons are sowing seeds, waiting for the fruit to ripen, and when the time comes, self-proclaimed healers suddenly have to pay a price. That price is the loss of freedom of action for someone. And the recipient of that price is a demon, which, although cunning in appearance, is an entity that wants to take away the freedom of others and use them, and that is the demon. It is ironic that someone who is thought to be serving others as a self-proclaimed healer ends up being used by a demon for the sin of depriving others of their freedom and learning.

This world has a harsh side where foolish people are treated accordingly. Some self-proclaimed healers say, "I don't know, but if I do what I'm told, the results come out. So this healing is effective." But that is very dangerous. There are people who engage in healing activities without knowing what kind of energy they are using. And they are greatly praised, but eventually, they will have to pay the price for continuing to deprive others of their learning and freedom. The person may think they are "fighting demons," but ordinary people don't imagine demons. The fact that demons are in one's mind means that the person is often being manipulated by a demon. This is a keyword, and while one may intellectually convince themselves that they are not, seeing things as they are will reveal that they are possessed by a demon. The appearance of the keyword "demon" means that a demon is nearby, and even if someone claims to be a lightworker fighting against evil, they may actually be being manipulated by a demon from the beginning.

The law of this universe is "learning." Therefore, "learning" has a higher priority than conflict or suffering. Those who mistakenly believe that they should "resolve" things energetically and, as a result, disregard "learning" will be manipulated by evil forces. Evil forces are far more intelligent than ordinary humans.

About 30 years ago, there was an uncle who said, "Excel calculations, not emotions, will solve environmental problems." He had quite a communist way of thinking, and he said, "Only a planned economy can save the environment," and although he didn't explicitly say he was a communist, he seemed to advocate something like that. He probably avoided using the word "communism" because it would cause resentment among people working on environmental issues, so he hinted at that idea without explicitly saying it. Now that I think about it, he was a clever person.

While some people were emotionally involved in environmental issues, this uncle, by talking about a planned economy, seemed to believe that controlling the economy from the top down was the only way.

Now, how does such a totalitarianism relate to the fundamental principle of "understanding" in the universe? The key point is whether totalitarianism generates understanding. It's about whether the understanding generated by the totality of that totalitarianism is more or less than the understanding generated by the totality of individualism. This determines whether totalitarianism can be justified.

The "understanding" that is the fundamental principle of the universe is not simply about peace or emotions. If that were the case, then the continuation of the current state, which is peaceful, would be considered the best, but new understanding rarely emerges without active interaction between living beings. It's not enough to be emotionally stable and feel peaceful; if that doesn't generate understanding, it's inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe and would be rejected by that principle.

Therefore, emotions alone do not lead to understanding, and it is unclear whether totalitarianism alone leads to understanding. Thus, whether totalitarianism is good or individualism is good cannot be determined in isolation; it must always be considered in conjunction with other factors. The focus is on how much understanding is generated as a whole, depending on the circumstances. If totalitarianism or individualism generates a lot of understanding, it can be considered a good society. Currently, totalitarianism is often associated with oppression, which is why individualism tends to generate more understanding. If someone like the "Excel uncle" were to incorporate totalitarianism and a planned economy, the environment might be protected, but if it aims for a society that restricts actions and seeks uniformity, it would hinder people's free interaction, reduce the understanding that arises in that society, stagnate differentiation, and be inconsistent with the fundamental principle of the universe.

In Excel environments, there are always some cunning individuals who hide their true intentions behind environmental concerns or other issues, aiming to achieve their own goals. When such "childish evil" individuals deceive many people and rise to positions of power, they often create a stagnant and homogenized society.

When such "childish evil" individuals are in power, society becomes chaotic. This is already happening not only in environmental issues but also in politics. There is a "childish evil" individual at the center, and people who support them are often unaware of the true nature of the situation, supporting them with simple good intentions. This creates a situation where "childish evil" individuals deceive many people, while good people protect the "childish evil" individuals. As a result, the "childish evil" individuals create a homogenized (seemingly) peaceful totalitarian society, which is generally controlled by violence and sometimes even involves massacres. This society, while seemingly peaceful, lacks freedom, and understanding does not emerge there. People simply live their seemingly peaceful lives. This is similar to the situation in communist countries, where many people live a homogenized and impoverished life. While there may be a certain degree of peace, it does not lead to much new understanding. This is the extent to which "childish evil" individuals are satisfied. However, when such small-minded "childish evil" individuals gain power, it becomes difficult for society to generate understanding.

If you place your goals in areas such as "environment" or "peace," you may be misled by "childish evil" individuals.

Society does not exist solely based on ideologies. Sometimes, a totalitarian system may lead to more understanding. However, ideologies do not directly connect to the fundamental principle of the universe, which is "understanding." Therefore, the debate between individualism and collectivism does not have a clear answer when it comes to "understanding." To avoid being swayed and remain steadfast, it is important to determine whether the fundamental principle is "understanding," whether understanding expands towards a goal, or whether understanding stagnates in a homogenized society. By discerning this, you can determine whether the ideological claims are heading in the right direction.

It is often misunderstood that it is not about "understanding this" but that understanding itself is the essence.

For example, metaphysics or religious doctrines; these are helpful initially, but they are not the goal. If you think they are the goal, your growth will stop, or you will become arrogant. Thinking that you have already achieved something because you know something is fundamentally wrong.

A common scene I have seen in the past is that people who study religious studies and learn about the origins of religion mistakenly believe that "they already know." Sometimes, people who study yoga, Indian philosophy, or Buddhism at university say things like, "I already know," or "I can understand without doing that." The underlying premise is that they "already know" something, which is a specific religious theory or doctrine, and they think that knowing it means they "already understand."

It seems that this tendency is more common in people whose parents were religious or who studied at university. They get stuck in the thinking pattern of "knowing" something after studying it for a while.

For example, a child of parents who were in religions similar to Soka Gakkai might say, "I studied religion at university because my parents were very devoted to religion, so I thought about what religion is." They might say that they don't have faith and that they have become disillusioned with religion. However, in families that are religious or in environments like religious universities, the conversation always revolves around "learning and understanding something," which is a specific subject.

Even though the word "understanding" is mentioned, it is about understanding a story that someone has compiled, but it is not about the fundamental principle of "understanding." People mistakenly believe that they have achieved something by understanding something without reaching the fundamental principle.

To understand something, you need an object, but these people are characterized by the fact that they think that understanding something with a clear object is enough.

Indeed, understanding something requires an object, and relativization is a prerequisite. Therefore, an object always appears when reaching understanding, but what I am saying here is that the fundamental principle of the universe is beyond understanding.

Even when you understand something up to a certain point, there comes a point where you reach a place you cannot understand. Then, you objectify what is "drifting" and gradually understand it through time.

Therefore, there is a vast difference between understanding something with a clear target from the beginning and objectifying something that is initially "drifting" and then understanding it. However, many people in the world consider the former to be sufficient "understanding." But understanding the laws of the universe includes the former, but more importantly, it requires the latter approach.

The reason why something is initially unknown is because it has not been objectified. It is relatively easy for someone to reach a certain level of understanding, but true understanding lies elsewhere. It involves objectifying something that cannot be expressed in words and transforming it into a form of understanding. This process does not end with one step; it continues eternally until it reaches the oneness of the universe. Therefore, understanding has no end, and it is impossible to say that something has been "already achieved."

What can be said is that "understanding" itself is a fundamental principle of the universe. This is a story that may be misunderstood, but it does indicate a certain principle.

The ultimate oneness will not be achieved until the universe completes its cycle and converges into one. However, the concept and fundamental logic of oneness are universally valid even in the present.

Sometimes, there are schools of thought or cults that deny oneness. Indeed, the word "oneness" itself is one, so it can be said that it does not exist until the end of the universe. However, even if that is the case, this universe was originally oneness. Therefore, even if the universe goes through a process of separation, becoming two, and then multiple, it is as if that is the case, but in reality, only oneness exists. What appears to be real in this world is an illusion, and it cannot be said to truly exist. If oneness is the true existence, then the apparent forms that appear to exist do not truly exist. This is similar to what is called "maya" in Indian philosophy.

If this world is perceived as "maya," which appears to exist, then oneness is truly what exists.

The end of the universe is when "maya" disappears and everything converges into complete oneness. However, it is not very useful to think too much about such a long period of time. In the current time frame in which we are living, the ultimate oneness will not be achieved. The ultimate state of oneness to which "maya" converges is far in the future. If we exclude that ultimate oneness, then "maya" exists. Therefore, "maya," which appears to exist, and oneness, which exists in reality, both already exist. "Maya" appears to exist, and oneness exists as reality.

And, originally, it was oneness, and in reality, it is still oneness. That is in the sense of reality. Oneness is a consciousness that does not change and is always full. It is full and unchanging in the time axis.

On the other hand, "maya" is a material thing, and it appears to exist. Matter goes through the processes of creation, maintenance, and destruction.

Therefore, the consciousness of oneness, which does not change, always exists. And "maya," which appears to exist, repeatedly divides itself in order to know itself and continues to learn.

In this way, this world is a combination of consciousness, which is oneness, and Maya, which is the substance that appears to exist. Maya exists because consciousness, which is oneness, was born from the desire to "know." If that is the case, then the fundamental principle of the universe is "understanding," and continuing to explore and pursue this understanding is what people should strive for.

There are many people who say that money is bad, and sometimes, even self-proclaimed lightworkers in the spiritual industry say things like, "All jobs in the world are slavery. You are incorporated into the slave system simply by using money." Is that really the case?

If we think about this in terms of the fundamental principle of the universe, "understanding," the answer becomes clear. Which situation creates more "understanding," having money or not having money? That determines which is better. However, in reality, it's not just about the factor of having or not having money; it's a combination of factors, so it cannot be decided solely by whether or not you have money. Some spiritual people say things like, "There is no money in the universe." But in a universe without money, there are no restrictions, so both correct and incorrect ideas can continue, and the opportunities to learn are limited. The universe allows both correct ideas and incorrect, strange ideas to continue. Don't you think that the society on Earth, where even incorrect ideas are constrained by financial limitations and learning is possible, is much healthier?

Conflicts in the universe also occur through such self-justification, but in that case, the opportunities to reflect on oneself and learn are limited. Therefore, the winner is not necessarily correct, and it also creates disharmony. On the other hand, on Earth, economic or material constraints lead to renewal. This is much healthier.

Even on Earth, there are landowners and prominent figures in rural areas who have power, and there are both good and troublesome people. Even in the current state of the Earth, when troublesome people have power, those around them suffer. If there were fewer people who become impoverished and decline due to a lack of money, the influence of troublesome people would continue for generations, causing the society to stagnate. It is healthier to have a society where troublesome people are ostracized and become economically impoverished and decline.

It is true that if you have no money, you will not be troubled by food, clothing, and shelter. However, as seen in a parallel realm of prosperity, the importance shifts to what family you come from and what you do. You can only enjoy good meals and stay in luxurious hotels with your family and position, and your treatment will change significantly. If you have no money, people will differentiate based on other factors, and the most obvious of these are family background and position. Ordinary people who have neither will not be able to stay in good hotels, or they will only be allowed to stay if there are no other rooms available.

In a society where common people are easily dismissed, that is a "world without money," and while nobles and ruling classes may feel secure without the fear of decline, common people will forever remain common in such a "society without money."

However, the current society, where one can receive equal service with money, is more healthy. Although there are still arbitrary aspects, they are a matter of balance, and most services are currently available for money, which can be considered healthy. In the future, as money becomes abundant, society may become more arbitrary, with membership-based services and services only available to acquaintances increasing. If this goes too far, it could lead to a society where common people are left behind, as described above. However, it seems that a state where the arbitrary aspects are only slightly increased from the current level would be ideal.

Currently, there is a social trend that anything can be obtained with money, and that is how it should be. However, in the future, as money becomes abundant, stores may start choosing customers, and as a result, there will be stores that offer average services for money, and services that are completely different and that common people may not even know exist. It seems that stopping at a certain point, including metabolism, is a balanced state.

There should be a certain degree of arbitrary services, such as membership-based services and services that choose customers, and at the same time, there should be services that can be accessed normally with money. That would be ideal.

Therefore, money is not inherently bad, and it is clear that stories like those told by self-proclaimed "light workers," such as "all work in the world is slavery, and money is a tool to create slaves," are false. Ultimately, there are people who try to manipulate and incite the masses with such "simple" stories, and to profit from it by overturning society. If the general public believes that "money is evil" and overthrows the government, the resulting "society without money" is likely to be one where nobles permanently rule, with no metabolism, and common people remain common for life. In such a society, common people would essentially become true slaves. Revolutions for such purposes would only harm common people, and the result would be that nobles would laugh at the deceived common people. In this way, there are people who are being manipulated, and self-proclaimed "light workers" are part of those manipulated people.

Indeed, as some spiritual people say, even though there may not be money in the universe, there is a deep chasm between each life form or consciousness that exists, and this chasm determines whether or not one can connect with something. If that is the case, then there is an absolute information barrier that prevents people from even realizing that a service exists. However, for many people, the current situation, where there are signs, customer acquisition, and where one can receive a certain level of service if they have money, is actually happier.

It seems that some self-proclaimed lightworkers are secretive and hide cult theories that others don't know, using them as a source of self-esteem.

On the other hand, healthy activities openly disclose their guidelines from the beginning. These guidelines are easy to understand, but also have deep aspects, and often, people initially understand them superficially, and then later, they re-understand their meaning.

For example, when you first hear about "understanding," you might think, "Is that so?" But when you understand its content in conjunction with the fundamental principles of the universe, you gain a new perspective on "understanding." In this way, healthy activities include deep theories.

On the other hand, for example, if a self-proclaimed lightworker initially says something like "don't bother others," that doesn't encompass everything, and they are hiding something. In this way, self-proclaimed lightworkers like to hide things.

In general society, people who like to hide things are rarely good people. It's the same with them. There's something hidden, something dark.

Indeed, in the past, some religious organizations and ideologies have been suppressed, misunderstood, and ridiculed out of curiosity. Some organizations and ideologies have stopped publicizing themselves for the reason that it hinders their own spiritual growth.

However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often don't tell the truth and later say things like "actually..." to show off. Therefore, when talking to them, there are often situations where they say things that are not true, but say them as if they were, making it difficult to have a serious conversation. They always seem superficial, but then they say things like "I can't say what's beyond that," so their true feelings are hidden.

And the self-esteem that peeks out when they say "I can't say" is unpleasant. It's ego. It's the arrogance of thinking that only they know the truth that is expressed in such an expression. It seems that there are some organizations that are not very healthy among self-proclaimed lightworkers.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers are best avoided, as they tend to show off as if they know something and try to provoke you.

True lightworkers are often hidden among ordinary, highly competent people in the world. On the other hand, self-proclaimed lightworkers seem to know something and try to provoke you. The difference is clear.

For example, depending on the school of thought, self-proclaimed lightworkers may have a special system regarding the mechanism of reincarnation. For example, as a basic premise, there is a system where reincarnation does not exist, and therefore, it only happens once. In that case, there is no previous life, and no reincarnation. What appears to be a previous life is explained as something that has been created by "emanation" from seeing things beforehand before being born. In this way, self-proclaimed lightworkers are taught to live as if reincarnation happens only once. This is because such a wrong thing, when taught as correct, has two effects.

- People around those who claim to be lightworkers and are participating in a game can tell.
- It exposes the ego of the individuals involved and accelerates introspection.

It has the effect of exposing the ego of those who believe that "only we know the truth, so we are superior." Furthermore, this is actually something that only those participating in specific games are unconsciously taught, but the conscious awareness of the individuals involved does not realize the truth, and they simply believe the incorrect teachings as "the true teachings that only we know." This creates an environment where self-proclaimed lightworkers can face the challenges they should address. This is precisely a game prepared on this Earth for learning, or, in other words, a "dream." Even though it is not the truth, the individuals are convinced that "we know the truth," and they reject the opinions of others, saying "we know the truth," and continue their own game. In this way, they create an isolated environment.

In reality, the truth does not change, so if one's spiritual growth progresses to some extent, they will eventually reach similar conclusions, even if there are slight differences in expression. However, being taught a very special and strange system and believing that it is "the truth that only we know" is blind. It is this blind faith that allows for a special kind of introspection.

It is only by being blindly devoted that one can introspect on the great challenges that have continued since Orion. In order to introspect on memories or what can be called karma from the past, it is easier to imitate the various premises of that time to some extent, and the strange interpretation of reincarnation is one of them. The sense of life and death of self-proclaimed lightworkers is a reproduction of the teachings of Orion at that time. Therefore, even if it seems to have a strange system from the outside, it is a premise for them to learn, so those around them should not interfere, but rather let them do as they please.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers adopt a secretive attitude of "not teaching others," because if they share or verify with others, they would realize that their theories do not match reality. The reason is that the purpose is to create an environment and ideology as a prerequisite for resolving great karma.

Originally, it is common for spiritual beginners to become excited simply by "knowing something," and that is to some extent the case. However, even with that, having such a pure heart and believing in it creates the necessary conditions to resolve great karma.

Therefore, if other people who do not have karma see such a mysterious person, it is best to let them be.

Whether an action is preferable can be judged by the extent of understanding that results from it. The scope of this understanding depends on the range of influence of each action. For individuals, the amount of understanding generated within their personal sphere is the basic criterion, and for organizations, the amount of understanding generated within the organization's sphere is the criterion.

Therefore, when a person is interested in something, engaged in it, and generating understanding, if interacting with others reduces the time spent on that interest and decreases the amount of understanding generated, then those interactions are considered an obstacle.

In Buddhism, it is simply said, "Do not associate with immoral people." This is true to some extent, but there are immoral people and those with similar ideologies. They can learn from each other's immoral actions. There is no simple criterion of whether something is moral or immoral; rather, the universe seems to justify actions based on the amount of understanding they generate. However, immoral actions cause trouble, so they essentially deceive and manipulate others, hindering their understanding. Therefore, immoral people are harmful to society. This is not a dualistic interpretation of good and evil, but rather a harm because they impede understanding, which is inconsistent with the laws of the universe.

Therefore, while mutual understanding is fundamental, it is acceptable not to associate with immoral and untrustworthy people. By doing so, immoral people become isolated and may experience economic hardship.

Some countries and terrorist groups spread lies to conceal their own immorality, beautify their own country, and denigrate other countries. Such immoral countries and groups are inconsistent with the laws of the universe and are destined to collapse in the long term.

Whenever I say these things, there are always people who say, "You're saying not to associate with anyone, how terrible." But what is terrible about not associating with immoral people? It is natural that immoral people are terrible. In the current state of the world, skillful propaganda can hide the truth and allow one's distorted ideology to prevail, but the laws of the universe do not allow such distorted immorality to continue, so a great backlash will occur. This backlash often affects not only the immoral people but also many others, because the karma of not stopping immoral people accumulates. In particular, the media that continued to report even when they knew it was wrong will not be able to use the excuse of "we were just reporting" and are already on the path to collapse.

It is said in the world that the collapse of existing systems will accelerate, and various reasons are cited for this. However, I believe that the reason for this lies in the fact that it hinders the "understanding" of the laws of the universe.

It is often misunderstood that achieving oneness means becoming homogeneous and thinking alike. While being one is indeed true when oneness is achieved, this universe is divided for the purpose of "understanding." Therefore, the individual divisions becoming homogeneous goes against the original purpose of the universe, which is "to know oneself." If that were to happen, everyone would become the same, and it would be impossible to know oneself. Therefore, societies or organizations that aim to be composed of homogeneous people will inevitably collapse. This is because such homogenization does not align with the laws of the universe.

Such homogenization leads to stagnation in society or organizations, creating people who are devoid of purpose, have gloomy expressions, and are stagnant.

On the other hand, a society with diversity brings about transformation and creates people who are vibrant, have bright expressions, and are cheerful.

What appears to be a peaceful and trouble-free society is often mistakenly perceived as oneness. I have a memory in my group soul of being reincarnated on Pleiades, which was very peaceful, but also had a restrictive atmosphere that did not tolerate incorrect values. The Pleiades society had a high proportion of people who behaved politely, and seemingly had a very high level of harmony. However, even people like the Pleiadians failed to realize that such exclusivity creates conflict.

According to the basic thinking of the Pleiades, if everyone is in harmony, there will be no conflict. Therefore, based on this idea, there have been many attempts to help Earth by "stopping conflict through harmony." Even in conflicts in the Middle East, many people have tried the same thing and have become frustrated with its ineffectiveness.

Why is this the case? Because they were trying to change others. Attempts to change others and make them homogeneous will always fail. Even if it starts well, people who realize they are being controlled will show angry behavior. For those who are trying to control, there are often cases where they are doing it with good intentions, and they often cannot understand why people choose to suffer rather than being homogeneous and happy, and cannot understand people's feelings.

This also happened in the interactions between the Pleiades and other societies. The Pleiades believed that other societies should also conform to their ways. And they would find differences in other societies and try to correct them to achieve harmony. This was seen as interference in other societies, and the proposals for harmony were seen as those who disrupt harmony by the other societies.

This has created a history where one civilization wins and is homogenized, as it is said that "the victor is the righteous." As a result, the superiority of the Pleiades and their position as protectors of peace seemed unshakable.

In reality, the sociality of the Pleiadians is like polite white people, who are clear, bright, and articulate, and have similarities to the basic aspects of American society. The United States also repeatedly intervenes in other countries, trying to stop or spread conflicts, and there is a part of it that is similar to the way of the Pleiades. While claiming peace and harmony, the Pleiades and Americans are somewhat similar in their pursuit of a homogeneous society.

And self-proclaimed lightworkers, environmental activists, and thinkers often claim that "conflict can be stopped through harmony." Surprisingly, despite having different positions, they often agree on this point. This seems to be a continuation of the flow of people who have had successful experiences in the past, such as the Pleiades. And people tend to agree with this point. This is the trap.

In the past, there were movements on Pleiades and Orion that outwardly aimed for "harmony" but actually aimed for "homogeneity." While everyone would agree with harmony, there was an unspoken understanding that "it means becoming homogeneous." This was the hidden intention behind the word "harmony," and that was the source of conflict.

Looking at the word itself, "harmony" is just "harmony," and there is no meaning of "homogeneity." However, in the past, there have been many civilizations that, among those who have said "harmony," unconsciously or vaguely thought, "that harmony means becoming homogeneous, and harmony will be achieved if everyone does the same as our society." And one of them was the Pleiades.

Numerous civilizations, including the Pleiades and Orion, interacted, and eventually, they sought harmony. However, this harmony was defined as "becoming the same," which contradicted the "understanding" of the universe's laws, thus manifesting as a powerful force of resistance from the cosmos. This seems to be the fundamental cause of the Orion War.

People thought, "So, they were saying nice things about harmony and peace, but in the end, they were just dominating. We were deceived." They organized resistance movements. On the other hand, the ruling side believed that "those who disrupt the harmony need to be suppressed." They were treated as rebels who disrupt the peaceful society of harmony.

The Pleiades had a harmonious society, and still do, but it was somewhat stagnant. Therefore, they engaged in cosmic activities to help the spiritual growth of other planets. This is also a humanitarian activity, similar to what is represented in Star Trek. However, this activity ultimately led to resistance from some societies because it aimed for a homogenized society.

The concept of "oneness" and harmony advocated by the Pleiades seems to have had a slightly different meaning than it does today. In their context, "oneness" meant homogenization, and they believed that if a society was as harmonious as the Pleiades, peace would prevail. However, this very idea contained the seeds of a major conflict.

In reality, "oneness" refers to the fundamental principle that the universe is separated for the purpose of "understanding," and ultimately, it is one. Furthermore, it is actually "oneness" even in higher dimensions. Therefore, it is not necessary to aim for a homogeneous society just because it is "oneness." Even if they are completely different, they are always "oneness." Even if they are at war, both sides are "oneness." This is because "oneness" is unchanging and immutable. However, there has long been an interpretation that "oneness" means aiming for a homogenized society and way of thinking.

This is often the case in spirituality as well, where the term "oneness" implicitly expects and corrects a homogenized way of thinking and behavior. Those who do not conform are considered to be lacking in harmony. Such situations, where homogenized people are created or where people are led to a homogenized way of thinking, actually contradict the universal law of "understanding."

As a result of acting on such ideas, for example, when trying to resolve conflicts on Earth, it is rejected because it does not align with the fundamental principle of "understanding." Therefore, no matter how much one engages in activities to "lead to peace through harmony," it will be rejected.

Moreover, if one falls into a simple dualism and considers "this side is good, and that side is bad," and punishes one side as evil, there will be no "understanding," and new conflicts will inevitably arise from those people, and the conflict will never end.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers who adhere to dualism often make simplistic statements such as, "Whoever initiates the conflict is at fault." Even in long-lasting conflicts where it is unclear who initiated the conflict, they try to simplify it by saying, "Even in such cases, if you trace it back, the one who initiated it is at fault." They fail to realize that such dualism is creating conflict in society. If one side is considered good and the other is considered evil, the side considered evil will be oppressed as a lower-class citizen. Is there any real salvation in such a hierarchical society? Do these self-proclaimed lightworkers even see the reality of the social division created by such dualism? They are simply trapped in a childish notion of punishing evil based on a simple dualism, and they genuinely believe that peace will come to this society. Such activities, lacking the perspective of "understanding," will inevitably collapse and create conflict.

Instead of aiming for a homogeneous society, we need a society that understands as much as possible, and that assumes there will always be things that cannot be understood. It is necessary to live together within the limits of what can be understood, and to have limited interactions with those who cannot be understood. This is not because they cannot be understood right now, but because we should strive to understand them. There is no need to force it, but we should not assume division, and there is no need to aim for a homogeneous society. If one wants to be homogeneous, they should do so voluntarily, and it should not be imposed by others.

Forced homogenization leads to a lack of understanding and stagnation of society. On the other hand, even if we gradually base ourselves on understanding, we will grow even a little bit, even if it's only a few percent. This is not homogeneity, but there is change. The existence of change means there is some destruction and regeneration. There is a temporary "maintenance" in between.

It seems to me that Pleiades, due to its extreme focus on "maintenance," resulted in homogenization and a loss of metabolism, leading to stagnation in society. Self-proclaimed lightworkers are similar in some ways, as they aim for "maintenance" and seek peace through homogenization and harmony, which seems to be influenced by the Pleiades. For self-proclaimed lightworkers, they believe they are following "universal teachings," and that this will save the Earth. However, the truth is that these universal laws are based on "understanding," and those who do not think for themselves will not find the answers.

It is important to think for oneself, to consider what is good and what is bad, rather than being taught a doctrine by someone else. And to not be satisfied with homogenization, but to find the answer to where one should go. If this is not possible, the Earth will continue to be divided and conflicts will continue.

On the other hand, if one is based on "understanding," peace may come to this Earth surprisingly quickly. It is a simple and clear story that everyone understands, and it suggests that peace may come to this Earth unexpectedly. Once understood, transformation happens quickly.

Then, there is no need to become homogenized, and there is even a spontaneity to try being homogenized, and one can freely try new things. That is where understanding is born. That is the path that the Earth should aim for, and as a result, "harmony" and "peace" will come.

At the root of this is an understanding of oneness, but oneness does not mean homogenization. When people understand that oneness is the fundamental meaning, those who force homogenization will disappear. And then, peace based on the true meaning of oneness will come to the Earth, and society will be led by diversity and understanding.

The weapons, scale, and number of personnel involved in the Orion War were unlike anything on Earth. The memories of that time, when it was unclear whether the "light side" had won or lost, are being replayed here on Earth.

These are people who carry the karma of that time, and they are doing the same things here on Earth.

They call themselves "light workers" or "light warriors," and they are trying to justify their violence as "the exercise of power, not violence," based on a simple dualistic structure of fighting evil, and they are trying to achieve unification through justice on this Earth.

However, this is simply a repetition of the failures of the Orion War. Although the people living on Earth now may not be aware of it, I think they are experiencing the same things on Earth in order to learn why it failed at that time. Therefore, it is better not to interfere with what seems strange from the outside, and the "game" will continue until the people involved become aware of what they are doing and learn from it. Yes, it is a "game" that is very different from the time of the Orion War. Back then, there were armed forces and concrete actions. Now, they are using spiritual rituals that they believe have an effect, without any specific weapons, to try to save the world. However, this is an illusion created for them, a dream world in which they are living.

The memories of the Orion War are projected onto the environment, even for those living on this Earth, creating the illusion of the effects of rituals that do not actually exist. Indeed, there are some effects and influences on the surroundings, but it is nothing more than a projection of the memories of the shattered dream of unification in Orion.

As is sometimes said in spiritual circles, the events on this Earth are a "dream." The true life is in the universe, and on this Earth, we share the purpose of learning from each other under restrictions, and we are pretending to be light workers without even having great weapons. Compared to the original Orion era, this is a dreamlike, fragile, and insignificant thing with almost no influence. However, by experiencing this, one can learn what destructive consequences their "light work" has brought about.

Binary lightwork involves a simple structure where good and evil are divided, and one's own side is considered good, while evil should be destroyed. While the relationship may become complex depending on the time and circumstances, the basic structure is simple.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers believe that if they understand "something" (fixed), the world will become peaceful. The very concept that understanding "a fixed object" is sufficient is a misunderstanding. The story of good and evil, and the unification of the world through good, is based on a single idea, but self-proclaimed lightworkers are (practically) making quite futile efforts to achieve it, just like the Orion War. While it may not have meaning for the state of society, it has some meaning in terms of resolving karma.

This structure is reproduced on Earth, and self-proclaimed lightworkers are engaged in lightwork, which is not very meaningful, but they are living in a "dream" and believe they are contributing to society, and they believe they are saving the Earth. It is not a useless thing, but because there is no learning platform called this Earth, it would have taken a much longer time to organize and integrate the memories of Orion, but learning is accelerated due to the constraints of the physical body.

They are playing lightworker games in a sandbox prepared by God. Sometimes, a misguided cult tries to influence society, and occasionally something like the "subway incident" happens, but in most cases, as long as they are quietly playing lightworker games, it is harmless.

Therefore, even if self-proclaimed lightworkers engage in lightwork games, it is important in the learning process of "not repeating the Orion War." Therefore, learning must continue. Otherwise, this galaxy will repeat the division.

The answer already exists in the universal law of "understanding," but I think lightwork games will continue until they realize it. Therefore, it is important to observe.

By the way, this "dream" story is sometimes misunderstood as a spiritual story, but the situation on this Earth is special, and it is a place specially prepared for learning. As I hinted at before, who prepared it is a matter for another time, but regardless of who prepared it, they are born on this Earth as something as fleeting as a "dream" and are deepening their learning under physical limitations.

In the universe, there are far fewer restrictions, and even if one's "understanding" is incorrect when compared to the laws of the universe, it can still be justified to some extent within the vastness of the universe, and one can exist. This is because the universe is so vast, and there is an infinite potential within it. However, this does not necessarily lead to the integration and "understanding" that the universe aims for. Instead, it can lead to a situation where different civilizations come into contact and become divided, with each side claiming righteousness and goodness, and destroying what they perceive as evil. Such a situation may initially appear as if good has triumphed, but it is actually a situation where "the victor is always right." Eventually, there were people who began to realize that this was wrong. This is because even civilizations that appeared to be thriving, such as the Pleiades, showed signs of stagnation.

And those who share this awareness are exploring the cause of this stagnation and inability to grow, and are deepening their learning through reincarnation on Earth as a "dream."

If the original life exists in the universe, and reincarnation on Earth is a "dream" for the purpose of learning, then things are relatively simple. There would be no large-scale battles like those in Orion, but only small-scale or ritualistic events for self-reflection. In such situations, people may believe that they are doing "lightwork" by repeatedly performing spiritual practices that have little effect, but in reality, they are reflecting on themselves and deepening their learning by reliving the events of Orion.

These individuals claim to be doing lightwork to save the Earth, but the Earth itself is not in such dire straits. The ones who are struggling are the individuals who claim to be doing lightwork, as they are trying to understand the bitter experiences of Orion, but they are often not even aware of it. Instead, many of them believe that they must remember the events of Orion and ensure that this time, the forces of light must triumph. However, since such cults do not have much power on Earth, there is not much to worry about. These are merely things that are happening within the minds of a certain group of people with issues.

When one looks at the mindset of these self-proclaimed lightworkers, they are often fixated on a dualistic view of "transforming people into a feeling of peace" and "goodness (equals maintenance or angels) defeating evil (equals destruction or demons)." When one sees such a situation, one can glimpse what the Orion War was like. For those who were once involved in such things, the memory resurfaces as karma, and for those who were not involved, they can learn from that memory.

It is clear when you read the aura. You can see that people with certain auras are involved, and that the so-called "light workers" who were involved with Orion have biased perspectives. Therefore, people with Orion's karma need to learn. The individuals themselves do not think so, and they believe that they must win this time, but that is simply Orion's memory resurfacing, and such things do not happen on Earth. There is also an aspect where people with Orion's karma are in conflict. Even self-proclaimed light workers are like that, and self-proclaimed light workers are ideologically supporting conflicts in order to "destroy" "evil" while claiming to be "good." Because they absolutely believe that they are good and right, what others say is basically useless, and they must realize it themselves.

This "sandbox" is designed to evoke Orion's memories and allow people to learn about the problems without realizing it. The entire Earth is not a sandbox, but God provides the necessary sandbox and ideology to those who need it, and makes them believe that it is true. That is the basic form of the ideology as a sandbox.

Furthermore, in order to assemble the actors who will perform on that stage, they implant auras with "settings" into others, calling it "initiation," and make them feel that way. With that, the actors are ready. All that remains is for the actors to perform.

Therefore, even if it seems like a cult to those viewing it from the outside, and even if it seems disgusting, for the individuals involved, it is an important learning experience. This Earth is a platform for such diverse learning experiences, so if someone without such karma sees it, it would be best to leave it alone or simply observe, unless there is a specific reason to intervene.

Even the activities of self-proclaimed light workers are (not foolishly) part of "learning" and "understanding." They are learning the whole picture of how the story of being divided into "good" and "evil" and "good" winning hinders understanding. Even though it is a "dream," this Earth is a dream in relation to the real universe, and it is designed to accelerate learning under restricted conditions so that it can be better understood.

In any case, such activities on Earth are only in a "dream," so they will burn brightly and then disappear like a fleeting flame. Sometimes, even if it is a cult, seeing such fleeting dreams as remnants of the Orion War can be one of the "enjoyments" of learning in this long, eternal time.

Furthermore, even those who claim to be lightworkers and are pretending to do lightwork are, from the perspective of the Earth's administrators, objects of salvation. They are trying to resolve the curse from Orion and liberate and free people.

The reason for this is that the "sandbox" world in the hearts of these self-proclaimed lightworkers was created by God. Therefore, even if their worldview is different from the truth, it is acceptable. In that sandbox, there is no reincarnation, and they are set up as lightworkers who are saving the world. God is using this sandbox to allow them to experience why those who claimed to be "good" in the Orion War failed, and to learn what was truly needed. This experiment is being conducted in a closed sandbox, but there is interference from those around them, so it is kept secret, and they are made to believe that only they know the truth. They are learning from the failure of the Orion War in this way.

The self-proclaimed lightworkers are repeating what is called "lightwork" in God's prepared sandbox, seeing a "dream"-like fantasy, because they need to deepen their learning based on the karma of Orion, and it is not simply to reproduce a dualistic worldview of lightworkers defeating evil. The reason why conflicts never cease on this Earth is because of the same fundamental cause, which is the dualistic good versus evil. This sandbox game or lightworker play will continue until they understand this.

This may seem like "evil" at first glance. It may appear to be a malicious administrator, like the Deep State or conspiracy theories, whose purpose is to create chaos. However, that is not the case.

The law of the universe is "understanding." Therefore, respecting only one side's opinion and trying to unify the Earth with "good" will lead to suppressing the side that is not considered "good."

Therefore, the administrator of the Earth is preventing the Earth from being unified by only considering one side's opinion as "good." And it aims for a world where there is neither good nor evil. That is completely different from the so-called "good" unifying the Earth. There is a wall of understanding here.

It seems that generally in spirituality, it is understood that "a peaceful world where there is neither good nor evil will be achieved by being unified by good." However, if the "good" mentioned there is the "good" on one side of duality, then other values will be ignored and treated as if they have lost their value and dignity.

In reality, there is a oneness where everything is "me," without duality of good and evil, and the purpose is to understand oneself. That "self" is oneness itself, oneness itself, and also includes divided selves, which are avatars of oneself. All of those "selves (me)" are separated in order to understand the oneness. It is not only about understanding what oneness is, but also about understanding that everything, including others, this environment, and matter, is oneness, and acting accordingly. It is not just understanding with your head, but truly understanding that leads to action.

Therefore, there is actually no such thing as the duality of good. However, bringing up only "good" and trying to unify the Earth, even though those people may claim to be "unifying" and "integrating," that is not the true meaning of integration and unification of oneness, but rather unification and integration by duality. The administrator of the Earth will not allow such a dualistic unification and integration.

Even if such a thing is achieved through effort, from the perspective of the administrator of the Earth, a society unified by only one value will be considered a failure because it reduces "learning." This is manifested as a concrete result, such as the Earth's timeline being frozen and shifting to another timeline, or a major disaster occurring and partially restarting.

Many people misunderstand the intentions of the Earth's managers, spreading rumors that they are "controlled by demons," that "a ruler exists," or that they are "trying to enslave us." However, these are misunderstandings. If the Earth's managers did not intervene, this world would become unified by a single ideology, suppressing all other thoughts, and would become a society of constant control. As management technologies using AI and IT advance in the future, such a society may accelerate. However, if that happens, people will lose opportunities to "learn," which contradicts the "understanding" that is the law of the universe. Therefore, the Earth's managers consider such a society undesirable and will decide to reset it.

Therefore, the Earth's managers are not trying to control people, but rather prioritize how much "learning" people can achieve as a whole, as a "collective" of Earth. This is not like AI, where only results are important. It is about the "consciousness" of humans, which is a manifestation of higher-dimensional consciousness, and how much "understanding" that consciousness can achieve. Even if AI produces excellent results, it will not be fed back into "consciousness" and will not be counted as valuable. However, if humans learn from the results of AI, that learning of human consciousness will be counted.

When the ruling classes of various countries on Earth attempt to unify the Earth, if the result is to increase the overall understanding and awareness of the Earth, that unification will be approved by the Earth's managers and allowed to continue. On the other hand, if it leads to suppressing thought or creating pressure to conform, which hinders the overall understanding and awareness of the Earth, that unification will be rejected by the Earth's managers, and it will either not be achieved or the Earth will be reset. This is all judged based on whether it aligns with the "understanding" that is the law of the universe.

Therefore, even the claims of self-proclaimed "lightworkers" who believe they can save the Earth by eradicating "evil" are also subject to scrutiny. If the "good" they claim is a dualistic concept that unifies thought into a single ideology (for example, metaphysics), and if that results in hindering the overall "understanding" of humanity, it will be rejected by the Earth's managers. The situation is diverse, so even such seemingly strange logic may, in combination with other factors, promote the overall "understanding" of humanity. However, fundamentally, the story of "good" defeating "evil" based on dualism is a childish and low-level narrative. Conflicts in the world occur at that level, and simple dualism will essentially perpetuate conflict. Even if a side claiming to be "good" wins and the conflict stops, if that leads to a situation where the society is intellectually impoverished, that society will be rejected by the Earth's managers.

Unity and integration can occur after mutual "understanding," and if that is the case, that understanding is natural.

On the other hand, attempts at unity or integration based on a single ideology, such as "goodness," lack mutual understanding and will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. Similarly, attempts to unify the world through metaphysics or philosophy, which may appear to be "universal principles applicable to everyone," are also rejected by the Earth's administrator because they do not increase "understanding." A unified theory may seem to be something that everyone can agree with, but it is not much different from the current society, which is based on "freedom," and it is only different in its axis, although it may seem novel.

If, as a result of people increasing their understanding, all of humanity agrees and a natural flow of ideology leads to unity, then such a common understanding is possible. However, if that is imposed as an ideology, it will be rejected by the Earth's administrator. This is because imposed ideologies, in general, do not increase "understanding." Therefore, no matter how noble an ideology may seem, forced and uniform ideological unification goes against the laws of the universe. If such an ideology spreads, and as a whole it increases "understanding" on Earth, then that ideology and unification will be approved by the administrator of the universe. Conversely, if it does not increase "understanding," then it is in accordance with the laws of the universe.

Currently, as long as such natural unification does not occur, there is no way that the world will be saved by conforming to a specific ideology.

If it is considered as a flexible foundation for increasing understanding, then it will be approved by the Earth's administrator. If this can be defined in words, then a unification of Earth based on an ideology that prioritizes "understanding" is possible, but it may be difficult to understand because it is a fundamental principle. People tend to gravitate towards easy-to-understand theories, and they tend to avoid the laborious process of increasing "understanding" as a whole. If people settle on something that they think they need to understand, they will be rejected from that place.

As an example, there is a story about a certain god who was reincarnated as a Chinese emperor and tried to reform society. At that time, the gods in the afterlife held a meeting and said, "What should we do? We're troubled. We're troubled. Is there anything we can do?" They were at a loss, unable to come up with a good solution.

The world was in a state of chaos, with poverty, discontent, and constant conflict.

Then, a god who had previously achieved success as a king of a certain European country or as an emperor of the Roman Empire raised his hand and said, "Then, how about I do it?" He volunteered.

And so, he was reborn, but the situation was very difficult, and even a god like him struggled.

The eunuchs around the emperor were not very thoughtful, and they simply said, "Yes, that's right," to whatever the emperor said. The emperor began to feel that the situation was not improving. Sometimes, there were people who offered advice in a very aggressive tone and manner, but he couldn't tell which of them was telling the truth.

Then, at one point, he said, "Hmm. In order for people to live happily, they should live in a unified way, like this." He planned something similar to what is now called a planned economy. The emperor thought that if people lived like that, they would be able to live peacefully without fighting over things.

However, the people's reaction was different. Dissatisfaction increased because they would no longer be able to obtain luxury goods or the delicacies they had been eating. The emperor was surprised by this reaction and thought, "Why are they dissatisfied when I thought that if they lived like that, they would be happy?"

Looking back now, the Roman era was a simpler time. People were satisfied if they didn't have to struggle to get food. Therefore, if people were provided with enough food, they were generally satisfied. On the other hand, in China, which was a more advanced era, people's demands were much more diverse.

Not only did this understanding of the historical context play a role, but fundamentally, the very attempt to unify people's lives was an act that contradicted the "understanding" that is the law of the universe.

In reality, this emperor was later involved in a large-scale peasant uprising and was killed. After he was killed, the gods said, "Hmm. It seems that even someone like him couldn't do it..." They were disappointed.

As for that god, he said, "I didn't understand the people. I think I'll retire for a while. I want to be reborn as an ordinary person and live a normal life so that I can learn what people are seeking." And he actually did so. He is a serious god.

It literally meant learning about the people. However, eventually, it leads to an "understanding" of the fundamental principles of the universe. "So, I thought I was learning that giving people freedom is important, but that's just a superficial thing. The most important thing is whether people can increase their understanding. Therefore, the role of the emperor or king is to create a society where people can deepen their learning." I gained this conviction.

This happened relatively recently.

The fact that the god has gained this conviction may foreshadow a significant change in the way the country is governed.

In this way, the remnants of the Orion War are engaging in a "lightworker" charade here on Earth, reflecting on the events of that time.

It is often said that this world is a dream. At that time, spiritual people may arrogantly think, "Since it's a dream, it doesn't have much meaning, and you should feel free to do whatever you want without being bothered by the troubles of this world, and you must save the world," and some even promote this idea. Of course, there are various people, and some of them may be right.

However, for the remnants of the Orion War, the concept of a dream is not about that. Their true intention is, "The real life is far away, and this reality is like a dream, but there is a meaning to learn in this environment. The idea that we must save the world is an illusion, and true salvation is to learn how wrong our thoughts and actions have been." This is also what atones for "original sin," and it is the background of the situation where people who carry original sin continue to suffer until they learn from their mistakes.

In spirituality, there is often a debate about whether this world is a place of learning where people come to learn, or whether it is simply a place to play. In reality, both are true, and both types of people exist, so the debate is meaningless. Some people come to learn, while others simply come to play. However, there is a certain number of people who were supposed to come to learn but have forgotten and think they are just here to play, and such people have lost their purpose.

Those who truly came to Earth to play often enjoy life without talking about spirituality. Those who talk about spirituality while saying they are enjoying themselves are often actually here to learn (this is a personal observation).

The feeling that we must save the world stems from a painful memory of failing to save that star system in the distant past of the Orion War. They may try to take actions to save this world, but they will either fail or end up in a "pretend" game. Saving the world and the motivation behind it are separate, and even when they say they are saving the world, the reality has already ended long ago. For such people, saving their own past karma is often the primary goal.

Therefore, people who claim to be saving the world or doing "lightwork" may suddenly realize the root of their actions, or they may become aware that their way of thinking has caused conflict. As a result, their motivation to "save the world" may disappear, and they may wake up.

This world is both a dream and a reality. It is a dream in the sense that it is living within one's own phantom, within the memories of Orion. However, it is also a dream in the sense that the true soul exists in the universe or a higher dimension, and this physical life is an illusion. In either case, "learning" is meaningful, not a dream. As a result of learning, one realizes that they were living in an illusion (of duality and conflict) and awakens.

Orion's karma is vast, so there are people who experience or disperse Orion's karmic memories through a process called "initiation," transferring the memory's aura to others (who do not originally possess Orion's karma) and beginning to live in a temporary virtual reality. Sometimes, cooperating with them and experiencing what the duality of "good and evil" was like at that time may be somewhat educational. However, I don't think it is necessary for everyone.

Originally, people who possessed Orion's karma are at the center, and those around them temporarily play roles through "initiation," like actors in a play. This is what the self-proclaimed lightworkers' current "good and evil" battle looks like. Even though they call it "play," they are quite serious, so it is better not to interfere from the outside. If there is no harm, it is best to leave them alone. They are learning.

And when they realize that things like "saving the world" are illusions, they stop seeing such "dreams" and leave the activities. As many people involved with Orion awaken from the dream, the activities of self-proclaimed lightworkers will naturally disappear.

However, that time is still far away.

Until then, observing the people who are pretending to be lightworkers from the sidelines can sometimes be interesting. If they dance without causing offense, it can be a learning experience not only for themselves but also for those around them.

...There are also people who are doing real lightwork, observing these self-proclaimed lightworkers. It transcends duality and goes beyond the battle of good and evil. The true lightworkers aim to save all of humanity, including the self-proclaimed lightworkers. Therefore, they are also helping the self-proclaimed lightworkers to transcend duality. True lightworkers infiltrate humanity and change it from within. They do not criticize from the outside or try to destroy evil in a battle of good and evil. True lightworkers deeply infiltrate organizations, countries, or rulers that seem "evil" and change them from within. There may be true lightworkers mixed in with the self-proclaimed lightworkers, trying to change them from within. Therefore, self-proclaimed lightworkers need to make efforts to approach the true oneness that transcends duality, without the misconception that their activities are being affirmed. However, self-proclaimed lightworkers often lack the awareness that they are lacking, and they arrogantly think that they have "already achieved" it, so it is difficult for self-proclaimed lightworkers to change. Rather, ordinary people who are contributing to society seem to be more straightforward and easier to grow.

The remnants of the Orion War, appearing in dreams, depict individuals who claim to be "lightworkers" as troublesome entities that are difficult to change. These individuals, who believe that they are "good" and that "if we can transform the rulers with feelings of love and goodness, the world will be saved," engage in activities to "destroy evil." In the real world, this ideology becomes the ideological background of conflicts, and may lead to disastrous consequences like the Orion War. However, these individuals simply believe that destroying evil will save the Earth. This ideology is a result of karma caused by the remnants of the Orion War.

All of this is a "dream," and is not happening in reality. The real conflict happened long ago, and is not happening now. Our true selves are not in the physical body, but in the higher dimensions that hold the memories of our souls. In this sense, the reality of this Earth is a "dream."

The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue their activities until they reach the fundamental principle of "understanding," moving away from the dualism of "good and evil" and "destroying evil." These self-proclaimed lightworkers advocate for "good" and even say that "understanding is meaningless against evil." Because of this attitude, self-proclaimed lightworkers fall into darkness in order to understand evil. They experience what they previously thought was evil, and finally reach an understanding that transcends dualism. Alternatively, if they do not cling to "good," they will not fall into darkness, and will not be concerned with dualism. Simply, they should be based on the fundamental principle of "understanding." Until that time comes, the dualistic "lightworker" activities will continue. They will continue to see the dualistic "dream." The self-proclaimed lightworkers will continue to see the "dream" of a world divided into "good and evil."

It is often said that good and evil are in a contrasting structure. This is because even in situations where duality has not been overcome, the existence of what is called "good" implies the existence of "evil" as a contrast. This dualistic world can transition to a state of unity and integration, overcoming duality. However, before reaching this "unity," good and evil exist. (This refers to a relative unity, a unity of consciousness, rather than ultimate unity.)

What is called "good" can be described as "conscious self-restraint towards oneself and others" and "(unconsciously) a lack of understanding towards others" (being unaware of the existence of a lack of understanding, not even considering that there is a lack of understanding, or refusing to see it, turning a blind eye).

As a social structure, the society of Pleiades seems like a suitable example. Pleiades society is unified, and people are expected to be polite and exhibit restrained behavior. This means that etiquette is highly valued in that society. On the other hand, those who do not fit in are treated as misfits. Like Earth, Pleiades also has organizations that enforce laws and punish criminals, who are isolated. In such a society, the invisible pressure to conform to a unified and polite attitude is much greater for the inhabitants of Pleiades than it is in Japan. This pressure exists not only within Pleiades but also when interacting with inhabitants of other star systems, leading to pressure to conform and interference with other civilizations. Initially, this interference may have seemed benevolent, but it eventually led to a hierarchy and a sense of superiority, with Pleiades being considered superior to other civilizations. It seems that Pleiades has since learned and is striving to respect the diversity of civilizations and that learning is not uniform. As part of this, the principle of non-interference with planets should be understood. Even though Earth repeats foolish wars, there is no interference from the universe (except in cases of large-scale, catastrophic situations).

In the past, in situations where there was pressure to conform to other civilizations, voices of doubt began to emerge among those civilizations that had previously followed the guidance of Pleiades. "Pleiades may be saying good things, but are they actually just trying to control us and use us for their own purposes?" This was partly a misunderstanding, but at the same time, the pressure to conform did exist, and there was an unspoken understanding that Pleiades Prime was the highest in terms of values. This may still be the case.

And, when people on planets feel that they are being pressured in such a way, and that their behavior and lifestyles are being forced and controlled, they rebel. For the Pleiadians, this was a barbaric act, and "evil." Other planets became "evil" in contrast to the Pleiadians' "good."

Behind this, there was a lack of understanding between each other, especially a lack of understanding from the Pleiadians towards the inhabitants of other star systems. The Pleiadians believed that if everyone followed their example, all star systems would be happy, which was a result of their lack of understanding, and also a form of pressure to conform and an imposition of values.

While there are diverse backgrounds for the emergence of the concepts of "good" and "evil" and the spread of dualistic logic in the universe, and the Pleiadians are not the sole root cause of all of this, at least, the situation of lack of understanding towards others, and the pressure to conform, which was institutionalized as a form of moderation and a common sense that people should learn, caused some civilizations to rebel against that one-sided value system.

While moderation and morality have common elements in many civilizations, the way they manifest changes depending on the level of consciousness. It was a mistake to try to unify everything with a single value system. A single value system fixes the level of consciousness to one point. People with a lower level of consciousness feel oppressed and suffer, while people with a higher level of consciousness, or those who should have a higher level, feel as if their consciousness is being suppressed and cannot progress.

The lack of understanding towards others meant that they could not understand values that were too low compared to the average values of a civilization, nor could they understand values that were too high. That structure may still be the same today.

And, without being aware of the existence of a lack of understanding, pressure to conform was applied to others in the name of moderation, resulting in that people with the same values felt safe, while for people with different levels of consciousness (which includes not only higher and lower, but also different axes of values), it became a painful oppression.

Even in current spiritual circles, there is a pressure to conform, such as "you should do this," "this is a good value," and "you should think like this if you are spiritual." There is a tendency to say that those who oppose this are not spiritual. Such pressure to conform is a fundamental problem for spiritual circles and for some people in the universe, and a lack of understanding towards others creates division, generates pressure to conform, and can even lead to conflict.

Then, what should we do? Because a lack of understanding will inevitably occur if the level of awareness is different in situations that cannot be understood, it is impossible to fully understand something. Therefore, it seems necessary to "assume that there are things that cannot be understood."

In reality, this universe is one, so even if one consciousness does not understand something, it is fine if another consciousness does. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with things that are not one's own karma. Things that are related to oneself are drawn in by karma, and if it is one's own problem, one should be involved and understand it. By simply assuming that there will always be a lack of understanding towards others, things like pressure to conform and requests for restraint from others will disappear.

Sometimes, there may be situations where resources are competing, and requests for restraint are made, but that is a different story. What I am talking about here is from a moral perspective. If there are limits to resources, a trade-off will occur, but in discussions without restrictions, each person has the freedom to learn, and if that is respected, there will be no conflict.

And that is also overcoming the dualism of "good and evil."

If understanding is taken as a basic principle, there will be fewer people who try to create a rough and violent scenario where "good" wins by destroying and integrating "evil," such as the classical scenario that has continued since the Orion karma.

There are different approaches and results when dealing with trauma caused by karma: separating duality and engaging in conflict, or integrating into oneness.

・Karma → Action or trauma → Cognitive distortion by the ego → Continuation of conflict based on the duality of good and evil.
・Karma → Action or trauma → Cognition by higher consciousness → Experience, sublimate, and integrate into oneness.

Most karma is linked to ordinary "actions" and is relatively mild, but some types cause trauma. Karma that has been deeply buried from past actions in this life may resurface in this life as trauma, causing painful memories. When this is passed on to the next life, it manifests as unexplained conflicts or trauma.

As a way to deal with the karma that causes trauma, let's first look at the approach of conflict based on duality. In this case, separation occurs first. It begins with the initial recognition of "this is not me" regarding the cause, and eventually leads to separation, and in some cases, to the conclusion of "it is evil and must be punished." This leads to a cycle of conflict and separation that may never end. Sometimes, this conflict is confined to internal struggles, and sometimes, it is projected onto others, causing them to see evil in their surroundings and begin a self-proclaimed "fight for justice" against that evil. This is actually what psychology calls projection, where one is not truly seeing the other person, but rather projecting their own inner self onto them. In this case, seeing evil in others means that there is evil within oneself, and in reality, the other person is not evil, but they are perceived as evil, leading to a conflict. One continues to take the position of the "good" side in the duality of good and evil, believing that good exists and evil must be punished. Sometimes, people are aware that they are evil, but even that is the same thing, just from a different perspective. Separation creates duality, and the conflict between good and evil continues.

On the other hand, dealing with karma through integration into oneness involves feeling and experiencing the karma, including the emotions associated with it, and then sublimating it. That's it. It's simple.

Why do such different approaches and efforts emerge when dealing with trauma and karma? This is primarily due to a lack of knowledge and a lack of understanding.

In terms of knowledge, even without spirituality, one can learn about projection through psychology. It becomes clear that what one sees in others is not necessarily the other person themselves. However, spiritual people can be troublesome because when such knowledge is introduced, the ego resists and cleverly tries to deceive oneself with words. The moment this knowledge enters, the ego's self-defense mechanism instantly kicks in, and it covers up the truth with self-deception, such as "I understand, so I am properly observing myself and those around me." This is a common occurrence for spiritual beginners, but one may unknowingly fall into this trap if they are not careful, so it is important to always be aware of it.

Regarding a lack of awareness, this is a state where conflicts, such as trauma, are covered up like black clouds around the mind. As a result, one cannot see the truth. Just as one cannot see the sun on a cloudy day, one loses sight of where the truth lies. This is what is meant by a lack of awareness. In Buddhism, it is called ignorance, and in India, it is called Avidyā. In such a state, one's ego behaves as if it is the true self, so defensive reactions occur when something that could damage one's pride arises.

In reality, even though something is very simple, the ego makes it difficult to deal with karma. By projecting these conflicts onto others, a duality of good (oneself) and evil (the other person) is created, leading to a self-proclaimed "lightworker" narrative where good destroys evil and integrates, which perpetuates conflict.

Eliminating the ego may seem like a spiritual concept, but it is actually about eliminating cognitive distortions. If one has an ego, they cannot see the truth as it is, which can hinder not only spiritual growth but also work. On the other hand, if one can see the truth, they can achieve results not only in spirituality but also in work. In this way, what seems like a spiritual and work-related issue actually shares the same necessary abilities.

While "oneness" and integration may seem like spiritual concepts, it essentially means seeing the truth, which is actually a necessary attitude in general society.

Higher-order cognition may seem like something only related to spirituality, but in reality, truly outstanding people invariably possess higher-order cognition. Having intuition or quick thinking means that higher-order cognition is at work.

Simply put, people with lower cognitive abilities tend to believe the stories of self-proclaimed "lightworkers" about the duality of good and evil, or about rewarding the good and punishing the evil. On the other hand, those who realize that life and society cannot be simply divided into good and evil, and who struggle to understand this complex society as it is, and who gradually increase their knowledge and understanding, are the ones who will eventually reach oneness and integration. The ultimate oneness may be impossible in this short life, but it is possible to progress through stages towards oneness. Those who are at the stage of duality of good and evil have abandoned or given up this potential for growth.

Self-proclaimed lightworkers in the realm of good and evil sometimes mock, ridicule, or look down on this approach to oneness. Their behavior is very childish and simple. Sometimes, they are afraid of confronting their own inner ego and reveal hostility towards others. They claim to be doing lightwork, and claim to be righteous allies who are fighting evil, and sometimes even ridicule those who are not fighting evil through lightwork. This kind of thinking is a ideological support for conflicts in the world.

On the other hand, adults who accept the complexity of this world understand that life and society are complex, and try to understand each other's positions. This is also integration, and in spiritual terms, it is also oneness. There is only this much difference between learning it through life experiences in general society and learning it through spirituality.

Currently, the viewpoints of these two groups are parallel and have not been integrated. It seems that the actions of those who call themselves "lightworkers" are worthy of emulation. On the other hand, the perspective of understanding and oneness is also desirable. Currently, those who call themselves "lightworkers" lack understanding, and those who advocate oneness lack action. Each is somewhat biased and has not been integrated, which is the current situation.

Now that we understand this, the necessary actions are clear: those who call themselves "lightworkers" should learn oneness and experience it firsthand if they want to become true "lightworkers." And those who have already attained oneness should cultivate action.

As I wrote recently, the fact that this Earth has repeatedly been rejected by the Earth's administrators and ordered to be reset and restarted seems to be the key to obtaining permission to move on to the next stage.

However, it seems that achieving such a situation will be difficult in the near future. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" do not place importance on the "understanding" of oneness. Those who call themselves "lightworkers" believe that learning their own doctrines is "understanding," and they do not seem to try to understand the enemy. And they believe that "understanding is a lukewarm, New Age fantasy, and evil absolutely exists, so evil must be destroyed," and they firmly hold that ideal. On the other hand, the lack of action on the part of those who advocate oneness has not changed from the past to the present.

People who are in a state of conflict due to duality, and those who hold the perspectives of oneness and integration, have different interpretations of conflict when they encounter it.

In a state of conflict due to duality, conflict is inherently evil and something to be separated from. Evil becomes the target of punishment. If someone makes violent statements or has violent thoughts due to trauma or past memories, they are judged as evil.

On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness and integration, harmony essentially includes discord and conflict. There is often a misunderstanding that oneness means there is no discord or conflict, or that there are no violent actions. However, oneness encompasses everything. If this world is oneness, then the current state is already oneness, and the current world itself is oneness. Therefore, everything, including creation, maintenance, and destruction, is oneness. Even violent statements or thoughts caused by trauma or past memories are part of oneness.

In a world of duality, whether someone is good or evil is judged by the qualities they possess. If they do not have violent qualities, they are considered good, and if they do, they are considered evil. This is a simple logic. However, even someone who seems to be good can be considered evil and excluded if they suddenly make violent statements or have violent thoughts. The definition of "good" is limited to a very narrow range. Therefore, people who call themselves "good" lightworkers are careful not to be seen as evil by those around them, and there is a sense of tension. They have no place to feel safe. As a way to deal with the feeling of being considered evil, they try to maintain their own goodness by not looking at or separating from the conflicts within themselves. They constantly strive to maintain their state of goodness through separation. This is the spiritual concept of good and evil in a world of duality. These types of people sometimes say things like, "As goodness strengthens, evil also strengthens." However, this is because separation is becoming stronger, and it is self-inflicted. The laws of the universe seek understanding and integration and move in that direction. However, if you try to stay only on the side of goodness through separation, the pressure to integrate with what you consider "evil" increases due to the powerful force of the universe. Therefore, it may feel to the person that "evil is strengthening," but that is because the person's consciousness is so strongly separated. It is out of balance. And this kind of consciousness is the trigger that causes conflict in the world, and it provides ideological support that prevents conflict from disappearing in this world. When conflict arises, it is separated and considered evil, and the idea that it is permissible, or even necessary, to punish that evil, is the ideological background that justifies the conflict in this world.

On the other hand, from the perspective of oneness and integration, things are simple. Observe carefully, experience the emotions, and then integrate. That's all there is to it. Even if you find conflict or even murderous intent within yourself or someone else, it's the same. It may be considered bad, but don't try to separate it with a simple good-versus-evil dichotomy; instead, experience it and integrate it. However, if you have a very strong aura or consciousness that is beyond your control, you may be defeated by an immature or weak position. In principle, that is the case. If you encounter something you don't understand, realize that it may be due to differences in perspective or interpretation, or that it may simply be that your role is different, and there is no need to understand it. Gradually expand your understanding within your own framework and interpretation. Eventually, there will be a day when you can understand it, but it may not be possible within this lifetime. However, that is perfectly acceptable. Instead of a simple interpretation of good and evil, simply interpret it as "not yet understood." And, protect the freedom of others as much as possible. Respect others. Because everything is oneness, and all existence is yourself. It is the separation of each perspective that allows for the deepening of different understandings. Therefore, not understanding someone else is actually a benefit.

By the way, when advancing the understanding and application of the laws of the universe, the consciousness of the universe seems to have once thought, "Let's diversify and deepen understanding." And, it distributed the same question to many consciousnesses. This is still happening now. One of them is "the cause of conflict," and therefore, many people have causes of conflict that are not their own. Therefore, the intention of the universe is to understand it, but many people seem to be reacting negatively to it. Some people even separate it and consider it evil. However, since the law of the universe is "understanding," any action that does not lead to understanding is considered a detour. Although it will eventually lead to understanding, it is considered a detour. Interpreting it as a separation into a dualistic good and evil is a detour. On the other hand, when experiencing and sublimating emotions as oneness, that conflict is quickly resolved. This is because it is in line with the direction of understanding.

However, the time required may vary depending on the intensity of the conflict. This is proportional to the strength of the aura. It takes time to resolve a strong aura, but even so, the principle is the same.

▪️Stages of Mental Growth
1. Animal, a passive being.
2. The ego is born. Pride, self-esteem.
3. Desire, visible desires, hungry ghosts, demons, fighting.
4. Knowing what is right. Dharma. Justice, good and evil, a world of duality, light and darkness, a dualistic battle, the self-proclaimed lightworkers fighting on the side of light, fighting as a righteous light to destroy darkness, the battle of darkness, the beauty of destruction, the ideology that destruction is good, the ideology that destruction is justice, a dualistic state where each side thinks they are light and the other is darkness, the illusory world, the world of Maya, which appears to exist. Thoughts, the world of the mind.
5. The world of oneness, transcending good and evil, overcoming duality, overcoming conflict, overcoming the duality of light and darkness, the true world, the true self, the world of reality, actual existence, essential existence, non-material existence, consciousness.

The world is a mirror reflecting one's own heart, and the worldview differs from person to person. For an animal, the world is the animal's world. For a hungry ghost, the world may appear as a storage of food or a desert with no food. A demon caught in a chain of conflict may see the world as a chain of struggles, or someone who believes they are bringing order may see the world as a dualistic world of separated good and evil. And a person of oneness sees the world as permeated by a single, complete, unchanging consciousness that integrates everything.

Each person lives according to their own values and worldview, and experiences the world according to their state of consciousness.

▪️Animal, a passive being.
An animal before becoming human. A living being without human consciousness. Because it projects and holds human thoughts, when an animal is near a human, it may temporarily feel like a human or hold thoughts and emotions that seem like thoughts, receiving the thoughts emitted by the human. This is a stage before the awakening of self-awareness, and it can be said that the animal lives in a state of very weak consciousness. Therefore, there is no "self" in this state. The animal reflects the aura of human thoughts, so if a violent person is nearby, the animal becomes violent, and if a gentle person is nearby, the animal reflects that person's heart and becomes docile. In this stage, there is no self, and it lives influenced by the surrounding aura. Also, the range of influence varies depending on the type of animal, but generally, its sensitivity is often weak. By being near humans, animals learn human thoughts and emotions, and eventually may be reborn as a creature with a self.

▪️Self-aware animal = Basic human
When the soul of an animal grows, it becomes a basic human... This may be a misleading statement, but it seems that there are not many such people on this earth. This corresponds to people with intellectual disabilities or significantly low intelligence. They lack cognitive abilities, their thoughts and actions are inconsistent, and they cannot think normally.

▪️Arrogant human with an expanded self
When a basic human becomes stable and begins to think, a self arises. This creates a sense of "self" and also a sense of ownership. All desires derive from this.

▪️Human who recognizes "what should be done" and "what should not be done," a dualistic person
This is like morality, creating an order that the world should be like. Sometimes, adhering to this order is called "good," and not adhering to it is called "evil." This is a dualistic world. They recognize that what they believe is correct is correct and good, and light, while what is not is wrong and evil, and darkness. They create various arguments to justify this recognition, but all of them remain within the dualistic perspective. At this stage, they cannot understand the concept of "oneness." They emphasize one of the three major principles (or two major principles) of the world, which are creation, maintenance, and destruction (or creation and destruction, creation and maintenance, maintenance and destruction, etc.), and disregard or even view the others as enemies. For example, they may consider "maintenance" as "good" and "destruction" as "evil." They tend to lean towards one principle and disregard or exclude the others as something undesirable. They believe that the battle between good and evil to destroy evil is justified. They have not yet overcome their ego (because they have not reached oneness). They believe that expanding the side of good is love (although this is a stage of love, it is not the ultimate love). They still have some arrogance.

▪️Person of oneness, person who has overcome dualism
They understand and recognize that there is a common consciousness among all people. They understand that the nature of the world is a chain of creation, destruction, and maintenance, and that "nothing remains unchanged" the more closely you look, which is "impermanence." They do not take a dualistic stance such as "good" and "evil." They know that understanding is important. They do not agree with things like "the battle between good and evil to destroy evil." They know that all beings are divided from the original existence and consciousness of "oneness" in order to "know." They know that there is nothing wasteful in this universe. They understand that they are still far from the ultimate oneness of the universe. Nevertheless, by achieving a certain degree of oneness, they know that the logic is hierarchically connected to the oneness of the universe.

As you can see, there are different stages. And a teacher is someone who is slightly ahead of you in each of these stages.

- A teacher for beginners is someone who is at the beginner level or beyond.
- A teacher for beginners (self-aware beings) is someone who has expanded their self-awareness or beyond.
- A teacher for self-aware and arrogant people is someone who understands duality or beyond.
- A teacher for people who understand duality is someone who understands oneness.

If what they are saying is too far apart from your understanding, it can hinder your growth. It's best if the teacher and the student can learn from each other. Ideally, the teacher should be someone who is just a little bit ahead of you.

However, it is difficult because, as soon as self-awareness begins to emerge, people tend to fall into arrogance, thinking "I know everything." Therefore, for example, people who understand duality may not be able to understand oneness, and may even say "Oneness does not exist," or "It is justified to destroy enemies," and cling to their own ideas. This is the same even for those who claim to be lightworkers and have some knowledge of spirituality. By studying, they further strengthen their own ideas and believe that "The battle against evil for the sake of good is necessary, and evil must be destroyed."

There are things that you cannot understand unless you reach a higher level. For example, you cannot understand oneness unless you actually become oneness. You can explain it logically, but intuition is more powerful than knowledge. Even if you acquire knowledge, it will not be true unless you confirm it with your intuition.

Ideally, someone who is at the next stage should be the teacher. However, in reality, it is often the case that someone who has learned earlier within the same level is made a teacher, and they are satisfied with deepening their knowledge together within that level. Therefore, it is understandable that even if a person who understands duality learns from a senior who also understands duality, they will not reach oneness.

In this regard, it seems necessary for each individual to learn from someone who is teaching something they do not understand, and instead of blindly accepting it, to verify whether it is correct or not.

Some people call it "evil." They are afraid of oneness. They feel a fear that "I" will disappear by becoming one. And they transfer, project, and reflect that fear onto others, feeling "evil." They feel "evil" in others that doesn't even exist.

And they make extreme efforts to avoid oneness, creating a distorted perception that "evil must be destroyed." In reality, they are transferring, projecting, and reflecting their fear of "I" disappearing through oneness onto others. They themselves are afraid of oneness and create the illusion of "evil" in others, and they construct a convenient logic such as "destroying evil for the sake of justice or good," "punishing evil," or "fighting against evil" to justify themselves.

It is a logical armor to protect the ego (the illusion of self). They twist and rationalize to protect that armor, justifying themselves. There are people who, despite having an ego, try to cover it up with logic, claim to be fighting against evil as "lightworkers," and criticize those who do not participate in that fight, claiming that they are saving the Earth. In reality, it is nothing more than a convenient logic to hide their own ego.

Eventually, that ego becomes hypertrophied, and they become afraid of being pointed out by others. When they are pointed out, or when the truth is revealed, or when they feel that they might realize it, they react extremely, scream, exhibit hysterical behavior, condemn others, and bring up demons to justify themselves, desperately trying to protect their own ego. The person involved says something like, "The more the light shines, the stronger the darkness becomes," which sounds like an old phrase. In reality, this is the resistance of the ego. The ego is actually a non-existent illusion of "I," but what is meant by "the light shines" in the words of those who still have an ego is actually that the ego is becoming stronger. And when they say "the darkness also becomes stronger," it is because the ego is afraid of the source of consciousness, which is the oneness of this world, approaching. The ego does not actually exist, so when it comes to know oneness, the ego disappears. Therefore, the ego is afraid and constructs a convenient logic such as "the darkness also becomes stronger" to protect itself.

Those who talk about things in terms of light and darkness are living in a world of duality and have not reached oneness. Moreover, such self-proclaimed lightworkers either deny oneness itself or try to avoid it with a strange logic. For example, they perceive oneness as something to be avoided because it "contains both good and evil."

So far, we have glimpsed the relationship between the ego's ironclad defense and oneness. Now, let's explain how to overcome the ego and reach oneness. However, this is both a very simple thing and, for some people, a very difficult thing, precisely because it is simple.

The key is to "jump into oneness." Then, the ego will disappear. The ego will be afraid, but that is only at first. After the ego disappears, a peaceful world awaits. There is neither good nor evil there. That is all there is to it. And, after reaching oneness, one can look at this world and talk about order. The order at that time is different from the order before reaching oneness. Before reaching oneness, it is a world of good and evil based on duality, and it is based on the values of "someone is right and someone is wrong." On the other hand, after reaching oneness, there is only harmony. Harmony, which contains both good and evil, becomes the standard. However, there is no punishment like that. There are things like the "Ōgaki" system, which is used to organize situations. In Western values, which are based on the individual, there is a duality of "someone is right and someone is wrong." On the other hand, in values based on oneness, the cause is not given so much weight, and while the cause is investigated, the focus is on how to make the future better. Even punishments are forward-looking. There are no arbitrary guarantees, and appropriate actions are required according to the situation. This can be a tremendous burden for people, but by fulfilling that obligation, they grow as individuals and reach harmony. There are no values such as good and evil in the sense of dualism, or the idea that evil should be destroyed.

In situations where the ego exists, the ego hides and twists various arguments to justify the duality of good and evil. This is the situation of self-proclaimed lightworkers, cults, and various dualistic religions.

Reaching oneness is something that the ego (before reaching oneness) fears. And, once you jump in, it becomes easy, but the ego continues to resist. That is all it is, but it is difficult for many people. They cannot do something simple. And they escape into the logic of duality, and the battle between good and evil continues. The simple story of destroying evil is justified by self-proclaimed lightworkers, and oneness is belittled.

As a progression, the following stages are involved:
・Individual independence
・Growth of the ego (the sense of self, the "I" that exists)
・Overcoming the ego, the fear of the ego disappearing
・Oneness (each stage)

Oneness is not achieved all at once. In each stage, the ego is gradually overcome, and there may be feelings of fear, or emotional conflicts, or emotional outbursts, tears, and other emotions. Through this process, oneness gradually deepens.

Some people create stories where the ego protects itself and escapes into a narrative of light and darkness, justifying its own existence. When one reaches oneness, there is no light or darkness, but a unified oneness. This deepens through the stages. When that happens, the story of light defeating darkness does not appear. This is because oneness transcends both light and darkness, but it is not about controlling light or darkness, nor is it about light winning over darkness or darkness winning over light. It is about oneness existing within the world of duality, where light and darkness exist as they are. Therefore, even if one reaches oneness, the dualistic struggle of good and evil in this world does not immediately change. However, the understanding of it changes, and one no longer participates in that dualistic struggle. The dualistic struggle ultimately leads to one side being righteous and the other being evil, and the cycle of conflict never ends. There is a oneness that even transcends this duality, and by understanding that oneness and looking at this dualistic world, a completely different understanding emerges. And that understanding of oneness is the key to peace in this world.

The peace of this world is not achieved by the victory of good over evil in the dualistic struggle between good and evil. The dualistic world is the same in that both good and evil are expressions of the ego. Even if it appears to be harmonious, as long as there is a perspective of "destroying evil," lasting peace will not come.

Only oneness is the key to leading this world to peace. And overcoming the ego's resistance, which feels fear and perceives something as "evil" before reaching oneness, is the key to reaching oneness.

This is a common misunderstanding.

For example, some people mistakenly believe that they can overcome dualism by "achieving a balance between good and evil" or "finding a balance with others." Some people may misunderstand this and think, "So, is it okay to focus on just one side?" This is also an extreme interpretation.

Overcoming dualism means not being swayed by dualism. It doesn't mean that dualism disappears within the same dimension; it means realizing a common, higher dimension that transcends dualism. That is oneness. Overcoming dualism means realizing that a common oneness exists deep within, even if it appears to be one-sided or biased. Therefore, it is not about achieving balance. Even if it is biased, it is oneness. Even if it is only one side, it is oneness. So-called good is oneness, and so-called evil is oneness.

It is not about becoming the same within the same dimension. For example, it is not about trying to mix water and oil to make them the same. Water and oil do not mix, but realizing that water and oil are the same is oneness. Water is water, and oil is oil. However, they are oneness. This means that the ratio of oil and water does not matter. Whether it is 50% and 50%, or 10% and 90%, in either case, it is oneness. Therefore, even if good is 10% and evil is 90%, it is oneness, and vice versa. Oneness continues to be oneness regardless of the "world of appearances" (maya in yoga).

People who are "ignorant" (Avidyā) in Buddhism and yoga speak as if the phenomena of this world are true, and live in a world of dualism. On the other hand, enlightened beings or those with knowledge of sacred texts can transcend the dualism of this world.

It is important to understand that there is a true oneness and a false oneness that appears to be oneness.

A false oneness speaks of the eternal nature of the soul while living in a world of dualism. This is an inconsistent understanding, and those who do not truly understand it, but who conveniently understand eternity while living in a world of dualism, are common in this world. For example, if there is a cult or self-proclaimed lightworker who says, "The human soul is eternal and does not die," and the same person lives in a world of conflict where "evil must be eradicated so that good can prevail," that is a false oneness.

In reality, true understanding is consistent, and if you can truly transcend duality, it becomes oneness and connects with this cosmic consciousness. However, because you haven't truly transcended duality, you maintain duality while conveniently saying things like "the human soul is eternal." That means you don't truly understand it.

This world is an illusion (Maya), and in the world of Maya, duality exists. It has various two-sided attributes, such as good and evil. That is this world, the so-called material world. In yoga, Maya has three gunas (Sattva, Rajas, Tamas), which are in states of activity or inactivity. This refers to the Karana (causal) body in the yogic physical or spiritual body. Maya is made of matter. The fundamental basis of it is what yoga calls Prakriti (matter). Because there is matter, there are aspects of duality.

On the other hand, there is something that exists universally in this universe and does not change, which is what yoga calls Atman or Brahman. It is consciousness, it is immutable, and therefore, it transcends duality. Because it is consciousness that transcends duality, it is eternal consciousness, unchanging, and universal. That is the so-called cosmic consciousness.

Therefore, when you reach cosmic consciousness, it is natural to transcend duality. Living with a dualistic consciousness, such as good and evil, means you have not reached cosmic consciousness. That is very clear.

If someone, for example, a self-proclaimed lightworker, brings up values of good and evil and says something like "good will punish evil," that means they have not reached cosmic consciousness. However, even such a person, for some reason, knows that "one's true nature is universal, unchanging, and an eternal existence that was not born and will not die," perhaps because they learned it somewhere or read it in a book. However, they do not understand the true meaning of it. If you have truly reached cosmic consciousness, dualistic concepts like "good and evil" will instantly disappear. Therefore, even if someone has some knowledge of eternity, if they are living in a world of values of good and evil and say things like "good will destroy evil, justice will prevail," they do not truly understand it.

There are not that many truths. They are truths because they are universal.

In spirituality, it is simple: when you reach cosmic consciousness (so-called oneness), the awareness of duality (which is also ego) disappears.

The awareness of duality and the values of good and evil belong to the individual ego (self, which is called jiva in yoga), not to cosmic consciousness. You can realize this when you reach cosmic consciousness. It is a universal story, and anyone who achieves it will realize it.

Only those who have not reached cosmic consciousness live by the dualistic values of good and evil. At that stage, they tend to be negative, rely on "techniques" and "knowledge," and repeat various forms of self-satisfaction in terms of logic, rather than directly knowing cosmic consciousness. This involves covering the ego with logic and raising self-esteem, and they tend to react negatively and hysterically when someone appears who reveals the truth, and they act to protect their ego by shifting the responsibility for their own hysteria to others. In this way, people who live in a dualistic world but believe that they have already attained the truth are quite troublesome, and they create a kind of cult-like, mysterious, and fantasy-like worldview. They try to change reality using techniques, but their consciousness is limited, and they have not reached the truth. However, many people mistake this appearance for the truth and believe that they know it, and they are revered like cult leaders. If someone criticizes their position, they are excluded as heretics. This is a characteristic of people who claim to know the truth in a dualistic world and act like cult leaders.

There is a balance in the dualistic world. On the other hand, in the true world of oneness, there is only what should be (not balance). There are no limitations, so there are no "edges" and no way to balance things. The concept of balance exists only in the limited world of duality. In the world of oneness, there is not chaos, but rather the (so-called) Dharma (the laws of this world) that exists as what should be, and those who know it are called true sages.

When you overcome duality and reach cosmic consciousness, wisdom comes with it, depending on the depth of that consciousness. The scope of its influence is initially small, but gradually expands. It starts with a very limited range of cosmic consciousness, and eventually expands. It is often compared to a fire spreading across a grassland in autumn. It grows so naturally. However, it takes a considerable amount of time for consciousness to deepen.

When you are in a world of duality without achieving oneness, you end up seeking a final conclusion. This might be something like "good and evil" or metaphysics, or a seemingly ultimate "simple" story. One of these is the dualistic concept of "balance."

In Buddhism, there are things like the Middle Doctrine, which talks about "balancing around the central axis," but I personally think that this is also an interpretation within the world of duality. I don't think that the Buddha's consciousness is limited to such duality. Since the Buddha's consciousness is limitless, it is not something like a "middle" based on the premise of having "ends," but rather, if the Buddha's heart is a vast and boundless mind, then conceptualizing the Buddha's heart with a concept like "middle" might be a misrepresentation of the Buddha.

The same goes for the balance of good and evil, or the idea of defeating or destroying evil with good. Even when talking about balancing with others, while it may seem that way from an outside perspective, I think the actual interpretation is somewhat off.

Occasionally, I encounter scholars or university students who have studied Indian philosophy and other subjects, and who believe they have academically "objectified" and understood concepts like "Oneness" or "the Whole." A characteristic of these individuals is that they sometimes laugh and say, "You can understand it without doing such things." While their explanations may seem to be talking about "the Whole" and sound somewhat convincing, it is an "objectified" understanding.

The knowledge of "Oneness" or "the Whole" that is being discussed is literally "the Whole," but the moment it is objectified, it ceases to be "Oneness" or "the Whole." However, those who have studied Indian philosophy academically claim to "understand" based on this objectified "Whole" knowledge. This is far from the true "understanding" that Indian philosophy speaks of. Such knowledge is necessary, but objectified understanding is a basic stage, and it is only the beginning. Nevertheless, scholars and university students insist that they "understand," and sometimes they laugh to express and impose their understanding, implying that "you are stupid because you cannot understand what I understand." If they truly understood, there would be no need to impose their understanding, and they would not adopt such a laughing attitude. However, this kind of laughing attitude is commonly seen in many people who have studied in academia. This is probably because people who have intellectually understood things in Japanese universities and academic fields have formed such a collective consciousness. There are not many experts in these fields, so it seems that the same attitude is spreading.

On the other hand, practitioners or religious individuals continue to explore, "What is true Oneness really like?" after intellectually understanding something. Scholars or university students do not go that far, or they simply believe they have understood after understanding it intellectually. There is a significant gap in understanding between practitioners and scholars. However, even then, scholars and researchers, because they have strong egos, insist that "we understand," and sometimes they laugh to assert this and look down on practitioners, while belittling them and hindering their progress by saying, "You can understand it without doing such things."

Sometimes, even people who have studied in India may exhibit the same attitude. They may have learned the basics of Indian philosophy, but they stop at a superficial understanding, while believing that they have fully grasped it. There is a well-known story in ancient Indian tales about a Deva (god) and an Asura (demon) who were taught the true knowledge by a sage. The Deva, after understanding it, continued to refine his understanding and eventually reached true knowledge. On the other hand, the Asura believed that he had completely understood the knowledge and did not reach the true knowledge. Such things often happen in reality.

Given that even those with superficial knowledge can be misleading, engaging with researchers, scholars, or even half-hearted practitioners without confidence in the field of spiritual practice can sometimes be harmful. It can lead to discouragement and stagnation in spiritual practice when someone says, "You don't need to do that to understand." This applies to yoga, Indian philosophy, or anything else. For this reason, "keeping secrets" has often been practiced in the spiritual realm. Beginners in spirituality are particularly vulnerable, and until they gain some certainty, they may be overwhelmed by various temptations and obstacles. Therefore, it has been traditionally practiced to not talk about what one is doing to others, or only to talk to a trusted teacher. Spiritual practice is a very delicate and fragile thing. If someone is laughed at and argued with by scholars before they have certainty, it could lead to stagnation for years.

If one truly understands oneness and the whole, they should understand that others are also a part of that oneness. Being able to take actions that hinder others indicates a lack of awareness of oneness, and only a structural understanding of the concept of oneness.

On the other hand, practitioners eventually reach a true awareness of oneness. Such an awareness absolutely exists. That is why they meditate and engage in various practices.

There may be people who truly know oneness and have a shortcut to it. However, such people are rare. There are very few people who know the shortcut and laugh while teaching the truth. Most of them are arrogant about their own knowledge and mistakenly believe that they have reached the truth.

Having understood that, and with the premise that there may be some resistance or misdirection, if you ask others, you will be misled unless you have a certain degree of judgment. It may be possible to ask others after some progress, but without a trustworthy teacher, even if you ask many people, you may just end up being confused.

And there is a very misunderstood point, which is the word "understanding." Generally, what scholars and researchers call "understanding" is understanding of the "subject." However, in yoga and Indian philosophy, "understanding" is one aspect of oneness. Therefore, to understand that something has such a structure and composition is to understand that oneness itself is understanding. It is a feeling, and it is a direct and intuitive realization and understanding that consciousness itself is the quality of understanding. Although it can be said in one word, "understanding," it is completely different from the relative understanding that scholars and researchers talk about.

There is a way of saying "indirect knowledge" (jnana, or paroksha-jnana) and "direct knowledge" (vijnana, aparoksha-jnana). Learning in academia is indirect knowledge, and directly knowing the truth (i.e., knowing oneness) is direct consciousness. Generally, scholars and researchers say they have "acquired knowledge" by obtaining indirect knowledge, but what is truly necessary is direct knowledge. Indirect knowledge can be objectified, but direct knowledge cannot be objectified. Therefore, Western logical thinking and analytical methods often involve objectification, so they are based on indirect knowledge and are not well suited for directly knowing oneness. Rather, there are often cases where it is better to directly jump into that knowledge without studying anything.

The consciousness of oneness is itself oneness. It is a consciousness that is full, eternal, and never ceases. That consciousness itself is understanding. Consciousness is oneness, and oneness is understanding. It is not about objectifying oneness and understanding oneness. The moment it is objectified, it is no longer oneness. One of the qualities of oneness is understanding. However, since it is oneness, even saying that it is one of the qualities is a bit misleading. Although it can be seen as one of the qualities, since it is oneness, it is also the whole, and therefore, it can be said that the whole of oneness is understanding. Since oneness is consciousness, it can also be said that consciousness itself is understanding. These all seem like different things, but they are actually saying the same thing: oneness is the whole, so it is both consciousness and understanding.

Scholars and researchers often consider these things in isolation and relative terms, which obscures the essence. At first glance, they may present seemingly plausible arguments, and when you hear those arguments, you might think, "Does this person really understand?" However, their attitude and other aspects often reveal that "they don't seem to understand after all." To discern this, you need to know what "oneness" truly is, otherwise you will be misled by the strong arguments of scholars and researchers.

Oneness is something that cannot be objectified; it is the totality that is oneness. It can also be described as "non-dual consciousness."

This can also be seen as something that is immutable. In Buddhism, this is called "impermanence." Consciousness appears and disappears, and there is nothing that remains unchanged, whether it is consciousness or matter. Understanding this is also an entry point to oneness.

And the world of oneness is a world without change. This material world has change. On the other hand, the world of oneness is not material; it is the world of consciousness, which is full and unchanging.

Thinking is closer to matter than consciousness, and thoughts disappear, but consciousness is always full. Thinking is like a wave (in Sanskrit, Vritti), which appears and disappears, but beneath it, there is always consciousness that remains unchanged. That consciousness is oneness itself, and it permeates this world. Consciousness permeates space, the world, and the universe. Understanding this is what oneness is.

Therefore, to put it simply, even knowledge loses its power in the face of oneness. When a scholar says, "You don't need to do this to understand," there is a "knowledge that should be known." However, the knowledge of oneness is something that cannot be objectified in that way. Even when someone who has studied Indian philosophy in India says the same thing, they may still be in the same situation if they do not truly understand oneness. Academically understanding something is relative knowledge, while direct knowledge is "something that cannot be defined."

Understanding this "something that cannot be defined" is important for understanding oneness. For example, as in the poem of Zokuchen, infinite diversity exists far beyond the framework of this world, which was originally objectified by dualism, and none of them can be contained within the limited concepts and definitions. Therefore, oneness is something that cannot be defined. If you understand this, you should immediately understand that the knowledge that scholars say "you can understand by doing this" is not true knowledge. However, in cases where the ego of those people is strong, a self-defense mechanism of "we know" works, and they cannot accept that they are ignorant, and as a result, they may become hysterical or laugh it off, exhibiting a defensive attitude due to their ego. If you truly have the knowledge of oneness, such self-defense is unnecessary.

Academically, since "Oneness" is the whole, it cannot be objectified. Therefore, it is understandable that knowing "Oneness" can only be done through direct experience. However, scholars and intelligent people may understand this sentence as a concept, but they do not reach direct knowledge. There is a wall there. And because of the ego, they insist, "I know, I understand." Even if they don't insist, the ego believes that they know it because they have acquired knowledge.

If you stop objectifying and understand it directly, "Oneness" is very simple. There is no need to insist on it, and once it becomes obvious, it is just that.