Recently, I happened to come across research on such classifications and reactions.

In that context, it was stated that people first tend to reject, with rejection being a reaction (automatic), while acceptance is an action (conscious). The author (perhaps because of their own experience) argued that rejection is an automatic reaction, while acceptance is an intentional action. And this was written as if it were a matter of course (for the author). It was a story from someone in the spiritual realm.

However, I personally felt a sense of unease, because in my case, it's the opposite. First, acceptance occurs as a reaction (automatic), but if you accept everything, you end up taking in unnecessary emotions and logic, so I intentionally choose to reject.

I wondered about this difference, and I looked into it separately from the literature. It seems that this kind of topic is often studied in psychology, and prominent researchers such as Freud have also mentioned it. From these, I picked out some interesting points:

Example 1:
- Rejection comes first in people who are intellectually developed and rational.
- Acceptance comes first in children who are experiencing identification.

Example 2:
- There is an "initial filter" where people, when they receive information, either "open" (accept) or "close" (reject), and there are people who tend to reject first and those who tend to accept first.

There were various studies like these.

Also, these can be different in terms of "innate nature" and "behavior," so it seems that these two classifications, combined with the original two, can be divided into four (or three) types.

		(Behavior resulting from) training and experience.
		Rejection comes first (Reaction), acceptance comes later (Action).	Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).
One's own tendencies (nature).	Rejection comes first (Reaction), acceptance comes later (Action).	The inside and outside are consistent. Straightforward. If you are intelligent, you are a type who prioritizes intellect. If you are stupid, you are simply ignorant. (There are times when it is good, and times when it is bad.)	The inside and outside are inconsistent. Social niceties. The goodness of the top part. Cleverness.
	Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).	Conscious living. Spiritual life.	The inside and outside are consistent. Straightforward. Childishness.

If that is the case, we can also deduce based on characteristics.

▪️When the inside and outside are consistent, straightforward:
- Rejection comes first (Reaction), acceptance comes later (Action).
- Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).
Either is possible.

▪️Social niceties, the goodness of superiors:
One's own tendencies (nature): Rejection comes first (Reaction), acceptance comes later (Action).
Behavior (through training and experience): Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).

▪️Conscious living, spiritual behavior:
One's own tendencies (nature): Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).
Behavior (through training and experience): Acceptance comes first (Reaction), rejection comes later (Action).

When we deduce things in this way, it is quite interesting.

There are simply straightforward people, and there are also people who show the opposite through social niceties.

On the other hand, when acceptance comes first, even if the person is basically good, if they simply accept too much, they may end up accepting other people's troubles (that are not related to themselves) and become confused. Because they are arbitrarily forced to accept emotions that are unnecessary for themselves, and in a sense, they "pick them up," there is a certain number of people who need to consciously reject them.

Especially in childhood, these people are weak to this kind of "forced acceptance," and many people are troubled by things that are not originally related to themselves. This is because they lack the ability to reject, but they don't understand the situation well and think "maybe," and accept based on the atmosphere, but as a result, they end up taking on other people's foolishness.

This kind of story is also related to karma. It can happen that bad karma is passed on to others, and the person does not take responsibility for their actions. The karma for one's own unethical behavior should normally be borne by oneself, but if there are people around who "accept first," such straightforward people may be unconsciously chosen as a place to discard karma.

In this way, people who only experience misfortune in their lives appear.

On the other hand, there are people who do unethical things but never receive their due punishment. This is because, through this kind of karma transfer, they are passing on the karma to those around them. However, if you do such things, everyone around you will be caught up in misfortune, so in the end, you yourself will become unhappy, but in the short term, you can avoid the karma's retribution in this way.

This last type (including myself) is often misunderstood, and people of the first or second type seem to think that we are "stupid" or "easy to deceive." I have been ridiculed many times. It's better to just be ridiculed, but it's really annoying to be forced to conform and agree with the other person's distorted perception. Forcing others to accept such distorted views is actually passing on karma.

When you combine these classifications with the psychological concept of "projection," something interesting emerges.

Projection is when something that is actually about oneself is seen in others. For example, it is often said that "others seem stupid and foolish," which may be true in some cases, but in many cases, it is a projection. In the case of projection, the person is not actually looking at the other person, but the person themselves is foolish, so they see it that way.

Therefore, this projection leads to "mounteering" and causing trouble to others. The order is as follows:

- The person is foolish, so they "project" their own foolishness onto those around them, and someone seems foolish. The person is foolish, so they think it is true. Because they think it is true, they foolishly say that to the other person. This becomes "mounteering" (or so they think).
- At this point, the reaction of the person who was told varies depending on which type they are.

- If the person who was told is "reaction: rejection first, action: acceptance later," they will get angry at what they were told, and that is probably the end of it. This is probably a common case. It is a case where the person who tried to "mounteer" gets angry and argues back.

- On the other hand, if the person who was told is "reaction: acceptance first, rejection later," they will take in a reality that does not exist. It is completely unnecessary because it is not reality, but if you trace it back, the person who says it is foolish, and not only that, but they "mounteer" others to satisfy their petty ego, so the person who was told must carefully "reject" it, otherwise they will end up with unnecessary emotions and untruths.

That is an emotion, but there is karma at the bottom of it. Therefore, people may end up taking on the other person's unfortunate karma. Few people may understand this.

It is a bad karma, and the bad consequences manifest in the person who receives it, rather than the person who holds the distorted view. Unfortunate things happen to the person who is forced to accept it, rather than the person who holds the distorted view. The person who initially held the distorted view escapes the trouble.

It seems that the villain does not take responsibility for their own actions. What appears to be a villain to one person becomes a "good person" to many people around them. A distorted view is a villain to one person, but when that perception is imposed on someone else, and that person accepts it, it becomes karma and manifests in someone else. When a perception becomes reality, it means that the perception is recognized as correct, even temporarily, and the person who initially created the distorted perception is affirmed. Thus, a person who was once a villain to someone transforms into a charismatic figure, a hero, or a "good person" in the eyes of many.

When people around someone affirm them through pressure or logic, it is an imposition by the villain from the perspective of the person involved, but from the perspective of those around them, that person appears to be a good person or an amazing person, rather than a villain. This can also be said to be a reversal of karma. This is an interesting phenomenon. By imposing a distorted perception on someone else, karma is exchanged, and a kind of "charisma" or "hero" is born. A distorted perception becomes charisma through the sacrifice of someone else. This explains why charisma and heroes are often "simple" and "easy to understand," "accessible to the masses," and "agreed upon by the masses." Charismatic figures usually possess these qualities. Although the origin of this is a distorted perception, it is affirmed by the people around them, and the troublesome karma is taken on by those around them, and they reinforce and affirm the distorted perception of the person who initially expressed it, and repeat actions and words to justify that distorted perception. Thus, they pass on their karma to others, and in the end, draw others into their own karmic vortex.

Even if someone simply imposes a selfish and incorrect view on others, that is already troublesome. In addition to that, the consequences of that person's karma are taken on by others. The person in question continues to be affirmed without receiving any retribution, so their foolishness continues, and as a result, the misfortune of those around them also continues and expands. The person in question continues to believe that their incorrect view is correct, with a blank expression on their face.

It is very troublesome, but there are times when, due to differences in position, one must behave as if accepting a wrong view. There are often situations where, when a superior or senior manager at a company makes an arbitrary claim, one must accept it without rejecting it.

In ancient Chinese, there is a story that says, "When the emperor said that a deer was a horse, the subordinate agreed that it was a horse to survive, and the subordinate who honestly said that it was a deer was punished." It is said that this is the origin of the word "horse deer" (a word used to describe someone foolish or easily deceived). In reality, similar things happen in various situations where one cannot object, such as in companies, local communities, and even among siblings and relatives.

In reality, even if one accepts something as a matter of politeness, it is dangerous. Incorrect ideas can seep into one's mind, and this can have an impact on one's body over decades. As a result, many people develop mental problems.

Originally, a foolish person does not understand themselves and tries to attack others with distorted emotions in order to protect their ego, and they believe that what they are doing is the truth. Those who accept things readily and reject them later do not accept such incorrect views.

This story is often told, but the guilt is deep, and it can mentally harm others for decades. While it may be tolerable if it is only one or two people, when many people are sacrificed, that small sin accumulates and becomes a crime worthy of the death penalty.

However, people who "accept first (Reaction), and reject later (Action)" do not object, so the foolish person survives.

In such situations, people who exploit others are often perceived as "important" or "great" figures in mainstream society (although not everyone thinks so). However, the reality is often hidden unless you look closely.

In reality, people who tend to "react" before "acting" often don't even know the emotion of "anger."

Therefore, they often struggle to refuse.

As adults, we have the option to "not associate" with someone. However, children cannot escape. How many children can escape the situation where they are forced to accept a reality and associate with foolish friends or acquaintances? I pray to God that many good people can avoid interacting with such ridiculous people. And that foolish people, regardless of how good they are, will only interact with other foolish people and drag each other down.

In such cases, people who don't know anger often try to refuse (by imitating others) or act angry, but because they haven't truly experienced anger, they don't appear angry at all. Foolish people will likely laugh at them. Therefore, even if you try your best to act angry, imitating the foolish people around you, it will have no effect. Instead, those foolish people will likely make fun of you even more for such behavior. Foolish people will arrogantly think of you as "someone who can't refuse, is weak, and is just a fool."

In such situations, foolish people will use the excuse of "not refusing" to persistently harass others and exploit them. It's a terrible situation.

This is the structure of so-called social pressure. As mentioned above, the side that exerts social pressure is originally foolish and based on illusions. However, when someone "accepts" it, that illusion temporarily appears as something real. It's like a "dream," but since it's originally an illusion, it's unreal. However, when someone accepts it, regardless of whether it's pressure or anything else, that original illusion enters the other person's mind.

Once that happens, even people who were not originally related can become (somewhat) involved in that illusory reality.

Although it's just an illusion, those who are involved may feel troubled. In reality, this kind of illusion has a certain amount of power in this world. This is because it's like a virtual reality, so this world is sometimes said to be "like a dream." The fact that this world is a fantasy or a dream is because it is originally based on low-level emotions such as illusions, desires, and foolishness. (The original meaning of the Vedic dream (Maya) is different, but please understand it within the context of this discussion.)

To mentally accept something means to accept the other person's aura, to incorporate it. Even if it is a form of social pressure, or even if it is a temporary measure, a social nicety, or a way to deal with a troublesome person, if even a small amount of acceptance is shown, a corresponding aura contact and movement occurs. As a result, you become involved in the other person's trivial reality. It's a nuisance.

Moreover, the person who is imposing something often thinks it is "good intentions." Accepting these low-level good intentions means accepting karma. What a trap. And low-level good intentions are actions that impose karma on the other person in order to make oneself feel better. Therefore, they say things like "Let's do something good," and in reality, they are passing on their own karma to the other person in order to feel better. This world is somehow crazy. It's a nuisance, to put it mildly. It's better to refuse low-level good intentions. Even while saying "good intentions," if they are forcing their own subjective "good intentions" on the other person, it means they are trying to draw the other person into their own karma. In the end, the person may think that it is a good thing, but it is still a nuisance. It is a word that suits the term "meddlesome."

This world is a world where multiple layers of these "nuisance" realities and interactions are intertwined.

In spiritual teachings and the law of karma, it is said that this occurs not only on an individual level but also on the level of groups, families, countries, and even stars. This kind of foolish karma affects not only the individual but also the region and the collective of social life. If there are foolish people nearby, you will inevitably be affected to some extent.

In order to resolve or escape from such a chain of karma, it is necessary to shed things that are not your true self. You need to escape from the situation where you are taking on too many of the other person's foolish emotions, and you should return the other person's foolish thoughts to them. Please intend to do so. If you intend to do so, the foolish emotions that you have taken on will return to the other person, and the corresponding results will occur. If you wish for it, it will happen.

Some people are using these kinds of things as "laws of success" or in some other form, and are making money from it. The basic method is to impose one's own opinions on the other person. The most effective way is to directly transmit the aura, but another way is to spread the same vibration to many people through people who agree with that opinion. This is very effective from the perspective of making money or achieving success, but the person who is subjected to it is swayed by opinions that are not their own, and as a result, they accept unnecessary karma by agreeing to that action. For example, if you market something in order to sell it, the responsibility for the sale is borne by the seller to some extent, but the person who bought it will bear most of the karma.

This is because, in general society, manufacturing responsibility is questioned, and if there is a problem with what is sold, the responsibility lies with the seller. However, from the perspective of karma or aura transmission, the buyer takes on a large part of the responsibility because they agreed to that karma. In modern society, even if there is a strange product, people may say, "The seller is at fault," or "The manufacturer is at fault." Or, they may bring up the logic of a "well-intentioned third party" and say, "I didn't know." This may have some effect in blocking the aura, and it certainly has a protective effect. However, if, after knowing, they say, "Well, it's convenient," or "It's cheap," or "It's useful," they are taking on additional karma or sharing the karma.

This applies not only to individuals but also to nations, and it overlaps with the history of treaties concluded through coercion, threats, or deception. Such karma may be tolerated in the short term, but in the long term, the person will receive the fruits of that karma.

In this visible world, even if someone sells something and achieves social success, people who are creating bad karma in the long run will not be respected in the long term. This is because the values and evaluations in the present world and the evaluations in the afterlife or spiritual world are different. It is not uncommon for people who have achieved great prosperity in this world to be severely scolded and re-educated in the afterlife, or for people who led many subordinates in this world to have most of their subordinates leave them after being freed from their shackles, and almost no one remained. People rarely die at the same time, but in the age of war, for example, many people died, and it was common for rulers and subordinates to die at the same time. At such times, even if the ruler and subordinate are together as before, the subordinates eventually realize that they are free and begin to leave one after another.

At that time, only those who truly understand each other remain. Even if many subordinates seem to have a good relationship, whether they truly want to be together after being freed from their shackles is another matter. The relationship that people still want to be together even at that time is a long-term relationship, and it is a relationship with a spiritual connection. On the other hand, relationships that are bound by worldly ties or coercion do not have a long-term spiritual connection. Even if a relationship seems good on the surface, if there is no true respect or trust, it is a short-term relationship, not a long-term relationship. So, what is a long-term relationship? What does it mean to be trusted? People who simply think of others as tools to serve them or as ATMs do not understand this. If the relationship between people is based on self-interest, it is not a long-term relationship. I am not saying that such relationships are bad, but even in this world where trust is not possible, such relationships are necessary, but whether you are seeking a long-term relationship, whether you know that there is a long-term relationship, or at least whether you believe that there is one, is important. When looking at others, it is important to know whether they know these things, what they trust in, whether it is only self-interest, or whether they are aiming for a long-term relationship.

It is something that those who observe can understand. It is common for something to seem good at first, but actually not be so. There are people who appear to be thinking long-term, but are actually only seeking their own benefit, and such hypocrisy is what is damaging this society.

This pattern is difficult to distinguish. Of the patterns mentioned earlier, it is important to be wary of the clever person who "initially rejects, but the upper level accepts it as a social nicety." People who "accept initially, but then reject based on reason" are at even greater risk of being misunderstood, so even more caution is needed. When someone's nature is "acceptance," they are likely to be perceived by others as "someone who accepts," and if they later carefully consider and reject, the other person may think, "This is someone who says they accept initially, but then changes their opinion later, so they are not trustworthy." This is a complete misunderstanding, but because of the nature of "initially accepting," even before the other person is judged, they may be misunderstood by the other person as "accepting." While being aware of these initial reactions, it is important to be wary of those who prioritize their own interests and try to exploit others. These are the people who "initially reject, and then try to take from the other person." It is crucial to understand that people who "initially accept, but then reject after careful consideration" are not necessarily untrustworthy, but simply have different initial reactions.

Now, with that in mind, here we will focus only on those who "initially reject and then try to take from the other person." This idea that "if it's good for me, then it's good" forces karma onto others and only seeks one's own peace of mind. However, that karma will return to them as an "invisible voice" and will erode their minds. In order to stabilize that mind, they will try to force karma onto others with even greater force, but as fewer and fewer people will deal with those who are too forceful and greedy, there will be fewer and fewer people to whom they can successfully force karma. All of this is an ego's self-defense reaction for self-preservation, and something that needs to be learned somewhere. Some people will learn with a weak ego, while others will not learn until their ego becomes stronger.

The current society is one where echo chambers and filter bubbles cause one's own statements (no matter how foolish they may be) to be reflected back as if they were excellent. In reality, this mechanism is the same as the voice of the ego. The ego, which makes excuses for everything, always seeks to justify itself. If these structures are reproduced on the internet, then wise people should aim to get outside of these invisible walls, which means breaking or overcoming the invisible barriers created by one's own ego. Spiritually speaking, this is "eliminating the ego," but since the ego is originally an illusion, it is simply a matter of recognizing that it does not exist. However, even that can be painful.

In order to overcome the ego, meditation and various spiritual practices are important. However, it is useless to tell that to foolish people, and if they do not change, there is nothing we can do but leave them alone. Alternatively, perhaps it is necessary to trick them by focusing their attention on their "desires," and then revealing that the truth lies beyond them.

It is often said that this world is crazy. This is because a system has been created where people can assert their own opinions as correct and shift the responsibility for their statements onto others. In essence, there is no self or other, only oneness, so this is the natural consequence. However, I personally believe that extremely foolish people should take responsibility for their own actions, but the system does not work that way, and others are taking on the karma.

Distorted healing or distorted qigong.

This kind of situation also applies to unskilled healing and blind faith in qigong. Some people claim to be healers, but they are actually sending their own negative karma to the recipient as an aura. The recipient may mistakenly feel energized due to a temporary increase in their aura, but in reality, they are receiving the healer's karma. Similarly, in qigong, some people casually say things like "borrowing energy from others" or "exchanging energy." For example, someone practicing qigong might say, "When I'm not feeling well, I sometimes borrow a little energy from others." However, in such cases, they are actually receiving the karma along with the energy. In healing practices like qigong or Reiki, it is often said that "the healer themselves become energized by the healing process." This is because of the situation described above. In severe cases, the healer may drain the recipient's aura, leaving the recipient exhausted while the healer feels full of energy. This kind of energy exchange is like the flow of water; energy flows from a higher level to a lower level. If a person claims to be a healer but has a low energy level, they may end up receiving energy from the recipient. However, the healer may not be aware of the situation and become self-satisfied. And, they may try to explain it away by saying something like, "I somehow made them feel better, so I guess I healed them."

The situation is different depending on whether the healing is "proactive" or "receptive." A proactive approach can be seen as "imposing energy on the recipient," while a receptive approach is "drawing out or attracting negative energy." However, it may be difficult to tell which is which from the outside.

True healing involves providing high-level energy, but even if someone claims to be a healer, very few people can actually do that. In reality, most people end up practicing one of the approaches described above. Therefore, it is probably better to avoid seeking healing unless absolutely necessary.

Cult and karma imposition.

Cults often try to impose their own views, which is essentially imposing karma. The same principle applies here.

Sometimes, cults may engage in what they call "healing" to draw people into their dogma, which is a form of imposing karma. It's something to be careful about.

The so-called "law of attraction."

The true "law of attraction" is about creating reality in accordance with one's own blueprint. However, in cults or spiritual contexts, the "law of attraction" involves catching and throwing back the "ideal" reality that someone else is promoting, resulting in a structure where other people realize the reality that others have created. And because it is the karma of others, its effect diminishes over time.

It is necessary to first understand this structure of imposing karma. And not only personal matters, but also the state of society and the world moves according to the law of karma.

Yayoi and Jomon.

Now, let's shift the topic slightly. This kind of situation might actually be a key to understanding the Jomon and Yayoi periods. In the Jomon period, acceptance came first, while in the Yayoi period, rejection came first. If that's the case, it becomes clear why the dominant power in the Yayoi period couldn't trust the Jomon people. On the other hand, from the perspective of the Jomon people, the Yayoi people might feel presumptuous. Understanding this kind of difference might be one factor that can reduce misunderstandings between each other in a coexisting society.

And this kind of difference can also help us understand the gap between white society and other societies, not just in the Jomon period, but also in modern times.

Countries and ethnic groups that were oppressed by unequal treaties.

In the past, and even now, there is a prevalent method of concluding treaties through coercion or deception, and then portraying the local residents as "evil" for either fulfilling or breaking the treaty, while presenting oneself as "justice" to conquer the world. I believe this fundamental approach has not changed much. In the past, it was the way of the white people, but now, under the banner of capitalism, this method seems to be spreading throughout the world.

Society is shifting from one of sharing to one of taking. And entire ethnic groups are losing their ancestral lands.

In reality, when one exploits others through such methods, the ethnic group that has lost its place may have its world reset by the will of its gods.

Apparently, in various timelines, the Earth being blown up by nuclear bombs is also a result of the ethnic groups that have suffered disadvantages complaining, and God destroying and resetting the Earth to start over. In such cases, the countries that usually use nuclear bombs are mostly white countries, particularly those in Europe. However, while these countries are directly responsible for the disaster, the ethnic groups that have been exploited and lost their place often complain, leading to a situation where European countries trigger a nuclear explosion, destroying and resetting the Earth.

Therefore, even if one oppresses other ethnic groups through unequal treaties, ultimately, misfortune will return to oneself.

Reasons why a region that was previously prosperous suddenly experiences a deterioration in security.

This reason, in fact, is also due to a similar mechanism that creates inequality. As a result of becoming rich by exploiting others, if the number of those who are exploited increases, the area will experience a deterioration in security and become a slum. There is a reason why you should make those around you happy if you want to be happy yourself, and it is related to this point.

Even if Japan is oppressed, only the world will end.

As I mentioned earlier, there is a plan for the massacre of Japanese people. If that plan is carried out, the Earth will end in two ways.

1. The overall (average) vibration of the Earth will decrease, leading to widespread killings and looting, endless regional conflicts, and a hellish situation. Ultimately, the Earth will end with nuclear bombs.
2. The gods of the Japanese people will sue, and the higher-level gods who manage the Earth will agree that such a timeline has no value. As a result, the Earth will be destroyed (in a way that European countries use nuclear bombs), and all of humanity will be destroyed.

If the majority of Japanese people are eliminated, or if Japan's territory is oppressed by foreigners, such a reality will be realized quickly. In that case, the Earth will be embroiled in conflict for a while, and it will continue until the Armageddon described in the Bible. Even then, there will be no "savior" as described in the Bible, and no one will be saved. Because, in a sense, the Japanese people, who are the saviors, have killed themselves, so that timeline will not be saved, and it will go back in time to start over.

If there is no way to stop the desires of white people, the "world after Europe is destroyed by nuclear bombs," a world called the "Co-Prosperity Sphere" located along the Pacific coast, which has been sealed, may be revived. In that case, white people will no longer be dominant in many countries. This possibility also exists.

However, the current plan is moving in a direction to save this timeline. Whether it succeeds or not depends on the efforts and actions of each and every one of you. To that end, we must stop the imposition of karma to dominate others. Each individual must stop it, and at the national and ethnic levels, we must stop the imposition of karma, otherwise the conflict will not end.

Some ethnicities place the highest value on "keeping promises." While this is serious and basically good, even if the other party initially agrees, there will never be complete agreement with others. Therefore, it is inherently impossible to apply one's own convenience and logic "seriously" (sarcastically) to others. Even if you do it to yourself, it will deceive yourself or restrict your actions. There are ethnicities that are bound by the constraints of a contract, even though they should constantly update their understanding. They are essentially acting with a "sense of justice" within their own karma, which means they are imposing their own karma on others. Because it is karma, there are individual circumstances, and it cannot be a universal principle for all things. Such logic creates a temporary "sense of justice," and eventually, if you change your perspective, it will no longer be justice.

Therefore, while upholding "contracts" and "promises" is a basic attitude for gaining trust, it is important to actively disagree when there are discrepancies in understanding. That is what having "free will" means. Being forced to take actions that one does not want simply because one has made a contract or promise is being bound by the karma of others, and that is not something a person with free will would do. The ultimate consequence of this is that one is being enslaved, even if it is not explicitly stated. If someone blames others and does not take responsibility for their actions, then such a person would inevitably be replaced by AI.

So, what kind of social system should we create? The answer may be shown in Jerusalem.

To change the way the world works.

The current world is a system where one must obey the commands of those in power. When this world becomes one where, instead of commands, there are symbols that point the way, and each individual makes their own judgment about whether to follow them, then peace will come to this world. This may be something that is difficult to understand. This is because modern society has become too accustomed to being dominated by power.

As I mentioned before, the integration of the three religions in Jerusalem cannot be achieved unless it follows this principle. If one sect refuses to follow another, it becomes a matter of power, and the world will head towards destruction. Instead, in integration, the leader must show a "symbol that points the way," and each individual, based on their own judgment, will follow it if they think it is good. This applies to all religions, countries, and so on. Similarly, each individual must act and cooperate based on their own free will, agreeing with what the symbol points to, rather than simply following what a country or leader says. This is a very big change. It may not be achievable immediately, but without it, peace will not come to the world. First, this change will be demonstrated in Jerusalem. And when a world government is created based on this principle, the world will move towards peace.

In the beginning, the world goes astray from the basic attitude of imposing one's own karma, which is one's own rules, onto others. Through policies and treaties, one forces others to agree to their own rules, and once they are placed within those rules, good and evil become based on the individual's judgment. Because it is one's own karma, what is bad and what is good are all created by one's own karma. Therefore, for example, when Anglo-Saxons forced a treaty on others and then witnessed them breaking it, they proclaimed, "This is a violation of the treaty, it is evil," and under the banner of justice, they openly invaded other countries. However, this began with the initial act of imposing one's own arbitrary rules onto others, which is a nuisance. It is not just a nuisance, but it is itself a sin. The rule of the universe is that one must take responsibility for one's own karma. Those who involve others in their karma and cause misfortune to many, or who invade others, will receive long-term consequences. In fact, in other timelines, Europe was destroyed by its own nuclear bombs, so in that sense, it may be self-inflicted. In this timeline as well, there are countries that have changed the rules to use nuclear bombs not as a last resort but as a normal weapon. This is a very dangerous act, and it has increased the possibility that the Earth will end, as it did in other timelines. While it can be said that those who possess karma and are destroyed by it are reaping what they sow, many people will be caught in the crossfire, and the Earth will be destroyed, leading to the end of their lives.

The karma of domination has, in the short term, enriched itself, enslaved others, and made it possible to seize the resources and land of others. This karma, once imposed on others, eventually returns to itself. In many timelines, various parts of Europe are blown away by nuclear bombs, and even if the climate changes, it is a better outcome. If large-scale nuclear bombs are used, there is a 50% chance that the Earth's rotation will change. After earthquakes are observed worldwide, people first notice the strange phenomenon of the sky darkening. Gradually, gravity weakens, and objects and people begin to float in the air. As the air becomes thinner, people lose consciousness, and all life on Earth perishes.

Will the day come when this kind of karma is resolved? To do so, each individual must stop trying to impose their own karma on others in order to gain benefits. This applies to both individuals and nations.

This may be a difficult concept to understand at first. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and change the rules regarding this kind of issue in the integration of the three religions in Jerusalem. At its core, it is karma, but even if we talk about it, people may not understand. Therefore, as a guide for "action," we will base it on free will. Whether to follow or not is a matter of free will.

In some schools of thought, the relationship with God is described as a "contract," but in reality, the relationship with God is not a contract, so there is no obligation or responsibility to follow it. This is because it is guidance. Whether to follow or not is a matter of free will, but if you do not follow, you will usually be unhappy. Leaders should show the direction, and if it seems good, people can freely choose to follow, and if it seems bad, they can choose not to follow. Even leaders sometimes make mistakes, so in such cases, it is okay not to follow.

As a result, leaders will need to lead people not through commands or force, but through charisma and persuasion. On the other hand, each individual will need to choose whether to follow the leader based on their own judgment, rather than blindly following. As a result, it becomes impossible to blame others. Previously, it was possible to transfer responsibility to the leader or the person who gave the instructions. However, if you can freely choose whether or not to do something, and that choice is respected, it becomes impossible to transfer responsibility.

It is important to be careful of situations where you experience disadvantages as soon as you express your free will. If you are in a situation where you are openly encouraged to exercise free will, but you experience disadvantages if you actually exercise it, you will not be able to exercise your free will. It is important to be aware of this point. This is because it happens because people are using free will as an excuse, and there are people who use free will as a pretext to manipulate and impose karma on others, while claiming that the other person has chosen freely, but in reality, they are hindering the other person's free will. By intervening with karma, it is possible to determine whether the free will is truly free will or whether it is a hindrance to free will disguised as free will.

Therefore, while the explanation of "free will" is simple, it is only superficial. What is more important is to base everything on karma, and to avoid involving others in one's own karma, and to avoid having karma imposed on oneself. Using "free will" as an excuse to force others to comply with something that offers benefits is ultimately an attempt to draw them into karma. That is what evil people do. Participating as one's own choice is free will, but the prerequisite for that is not taking on the bad karma of others.

If people selectively create harmonious karma and cooperate with harmonious karma, this world will quickly become peaceful. On the other hand, if people try to manipulate others by imposing their own karma on them (while using "free will" as a justification) in order to enslave them, this world will become a hell. In the current world, it may not be that everything is 100% one way or the other, but perhaps the latter is more prevalent.

Therefore, in a sense, people who "refuse" things may be able to live more easily in this world. That is a way of life that is far from "oneness," but in the sense that they are not involved in the karma of others, they may be able to live well in this world.

On the other hand, the more one becomes "one," the more one tends to accept others, and as a result, one becomes involved in the karma of others.

However, in reality, being involved in karma is a temporary state. After a certain point, the involvement in karma decreases significantly. This is because of the law of vibration. I will also talk about that.

For now, I think it is sufficient to mention the acceptance and rejection, and the chain of karma that they cause.