In society, the concepts of good and evil are discussed, and there is debate about whether evil should be destroyed or not.
Recently, bears have been appearing more frequently in residential areas, threatening rural life. When we consider these bears, perhaps we can gain a better understanding of the discussion about good and evil.
First, let's talk about the bears. As animals, they naturally live according to their instincts. Whether there is good or evil in that instinct is a matter of perspective. For the bear itself, it is simply instinct. However, from a human perspective, it can appear to be evil, or it might be difficult to consider it evil since it is simply instinct.
In this way, there are situations where something has an instinctive aspect, and from the perspective of those affected, it can be seen as evil.
* Bears: From the bear's perspective, it is instinct (neither good nor evil).
* From the human perspective, if we understand the bear, it is neither good nor evil, but from the human perspective, it can also be seen as evil.
This situation is clear with animals, but when we apply the same situation to humans, the structure is surprisingly consistent. Therefore, the bears can be seen as a good opportunity to learn how to deal with evil in the world.
The logic that "evil must be destroyed" can be equated with the logic that "bears must be destroyed" in this context. And the view that "evil should not be destroyed but understood" leads to coexistence with bears (and a certain degree of self-defense).
While the behavior of bears can be predicted to some extent, human behavior is more complex.
In yoga, the nature of humans and the origin of this world are explained using three gunas.
* Sattva: purity
* Rajas: activity
* Tamas: inactivity
And while this is generally described as a fixed concept (an absolute measure), if we expand this concept and consider it a relative measure, it becomes hierarchical.
Let's take the average person on Earth or in Japan as an example and define which guna is dominant. Even though it appears to be an absolute measure, it is actually relative.
Let's assume we define it as follows:
* The average guna of Japanese people (Sattva dominant)
Then, there will be a hierarchical order of high and low vibrations above and below this.
1. Vibrations are significantly high
2. Vibrations are slightly high
3. The average guna of Japanese people (Sattva dominant)
4. Vibrations are slightly low
5. Vibrations are significantly low
Now, when we look at this, the hierarchy of gunas becomes the basis for good and evil. The perspective from point 3 is as follows:
3 from the perspective of 1: Good
3 from the perspective of 2: Slightly good
3 from the perspective of 4: Slightly bad
3 from the perspective of 5: Bad
On the other hand, from the perspective of 4, it is as follows:
4 from the perspective of 1: Great good
4 from the perspective of 2: Good
4 from the perspective of 3: Slightly good
4 from the perspective of 5: Slightly bad
Of course, from the perspective of 2, it is as follows:
2 from the perspective of 1: Slightly good
2 from the perspective of 3: Slightly bad
2 from the perspective of 4: Bad
2 from the perspective of 5: Great bad
Therefore, even an average Japanese person who thinks they are normal can be seen as bad from the perspective of 1 or 2.
If you understand this structure, you will see that the logic of "we must eliminate evil" is flawed. If that is permissible, then even if someone with a higher vibration than you comes to destroy you using the same logic, you must willingly accept it. In reality, no one would accept such a thing, so conflict arises. It is either self-defense or, perhaps, an attempt to destroy others in the name of justice.
So, what should we do?
First, understand that there is a hierarchy. And order is created by the upper and lower levels of that hierarchy. That order must be a structure where those with higher vibrations follow those with lower vibrations. This is the correct way, where those who know a better order govern the world. This is freedom. Here, freedom does not mean doing whatever you want, but the freedom to choose within the framework of the correct order. This is goodness.
The opposite of this, where those with lower vibrations control those with higher vibrations, is slavery. It is a state of non-freedom, leading to enslavement, the transfer of one's soul to others, exploitation, abuse, and all kinds of evil.
And we should create societies by sharing similar values within similar hierarchies. It may be somewhat uneven, but we should adjust the interactions to be between the upper and lower levels of the hierarchy. Conflicts arise because the hierarchies are too far apart.
This is a simple concept to understand.
Let's go back to the story of the bear. The bear's life is free and unrestrained, and it is driven by instinct. Just as it is useless to tell a bear anything, it is also useless to talk about high ethics to people with low vibrations. People with low vibrations can only understand logic that is slightly higher than their own. For them, a slightly more ordered and chaotic state is the ideal, and that slightly higher order (4) is the ideal for people with low vibrations (5). In this way, 5 aims for 4, and 4 aims for 3. Everyone has a desire to improve, but without guidance, they remain in the same level.
People who talk about various reasons such as "Evil must be destroyed" do not understand the situation where they themselves can become evil.
Just as the bear lives according to its instincts, people who say "Evil must be destroyed" live according to their own logic and feelings, and their (relatively) low vibrations prevent them from understanding "Oneness." Therefore, they publicly declare that "There is no Oneness, good and evil exist," and devote themselves to cult activities that claim to "destroy evil."
In reality, what is needed is not "destruction" but a better "wisdom." It is necessary for people to interact with others at a similar vibrational level and to be guided by those who are slightly above them.
If such a hierarchical structure is created, this world will become a place where people with better morality and order guide those who are slightly below them, which is the correct form.
Just as there are always beings like the bear that transcend those boundaries, wisdom is also needed to prevent them. It is necessary to take measures to prevent the bear from approaching people's living areas, and to deal with situations where it threatens people's lives. Similarly, in human society, it is sometimes necessary to take a firm stance against people who live brazenly and threaten people's living areas (for example, illegal foreign residents).
Just as we would not leave a bear unattended and allow it to attack us, it is necessary to deal properly with arrogant foreigners who are greedy, brazen, have an inflated sense of self-worth, and think that they are not doing anything wrong.
In the New Age and spiritual circles, it was often said that "borders are not necessary," but this has caused confusion and misdirection in the world, and has been used as a clever excuse to assert superiority over others. Because there are differences in consciousness levels, borders are always necessary. If you simply mix everything together, it will only become a zoo. If you are eaten by a bear, that's the end of it.
Therefore, the establishment of a world government is necessary. These policies, the establishment of a world government and the maintenance of borders, are not contradictory. Order is based on hierarchy, and at the same time, interaction between these hierarchies is also necessary. They must be separated and governed, and the power of integration is also necessary. Currently, this is mainly based on power, but when it is integrated by direction such as ethics and correctness, the world will move in a good direction.
When the world is ordered by the hierarchy of vibrations, peace will come to the world.