▪️Energy vampires persistently attack to break through the aura's defense.
Everyone is basically protected by their aura's defense, and has a certain degree of resistance to external attacks. This is because, even without doing anything, a certain core is formed at birth, which serves as a barrier between oneself and others, and also as a defense.
When this defensive barrier of the aura is broken, energy begins to spread outward from that point. Energy vampires then absorb that energy.
Energy vampires have a weak ability to generate their own light (energy), so they constantly need to replenish their energy by taking it from others or food. However, humans have a higher energy level than food. Therefore, in order to efficiently replenish energy, they persistently attack others psychologically to break through the aura's defense.
The first targets are often family members, and sometimes siblings, parents, or children may be energy vampires. In reality, the purpose of bullying is to break through the aura's defense and steal energy, even if the perpetrator is not aware of it. The direct causes of bullying can be habits, jealousy, or envy, but bullying itself is something that occurs due to an inflated ego, and the result is that energy is stolen.
When frustration builds up due to jealousy, anger, or envy, the aura becomes distorted, and dark clouds begin to appear within the aura. Gradually, these clouds become thick and block the light (energy). In reality, energy is always present around us and can be replenished, but it becomes impossible to replenish it, leading to energy depletion. If it gets worse, the aura becomes so heavy and black that it becomes impossible to survive without stealing a large amount of energy from others.
It's still relatively harmless if the ego is inflated and the aura becomes distorted. However, when the aura becomes completely black, it is quite dangerous.
Even if it doesn't go that far, bullying and energy vampires can occur in intermediate stages. This is due to the difference in energy levels between people. The desire to take energy from those with higher energy levels manifests as bullying, and as a result, they try to break through the aura's defense.
▪️What happens when one's aura defense is broken?
When one's aura defense is broken, the person whose defense is broken experiences significant difficulties.
- They become much weaker against the psychological attacks of others.
- It usually takes decades to repair the aura defense. Many people cannot repair it in their lifetime.
- Because energy is diffused to the surroundings, they become very tired (people around them become energetic).
- They become a medium for spirits, and not only are they possessed by evil spirits, but the spirits also enter their body. Something like the aura's tentacles enters the chakras, and energy is continuously stolen directly from the chakras.
In the case of others, this often does not happen to the same extent, but the most important thing to be aware of is the people who are always close to you, such as family and colleagues. Next, it is important to be aware of relatives and neighbors.
If you are constantly attacked by your family, your aura defense will be broken, and while your family may become energetic, you will become tired and become a medium for evil spirits, leading to a life of being possessed and having your energy stolen. And to restore your aura defense, you need to move away from those energy vampires and be in a safe environment, and then it usually takes decades.
In reality, there are many such people in the world, and many people who are tired at work have their aura defenses broken, and they are constantly having their aura drained by their superiors or colleagues. They are simply unaware of it. Those who are draining the aura are not even aware of it, and they may say, "What a useless person," when they see someone who is not energetic. However, in reality, those who drain the aura are dependent on the aura of others, so when the person they thought was a "useless person" moves to a different department or retires, the energy vampire's energy becomes depleted, and they begin to look for other prey. Perhaps you have noticed someone like that at your workplace.
▪️Do not associate with energy vampires, even if they are family.
If a family member is an energy vampire, the basic principle, as said in Buddhism and yoga, is "do not associate with immoral people." It may not always be possible in families or at work, but it is important to recognize abuse and harassment early on, and to minimize contact with family members as much as possible. They may laugh at trivial things, making you irritated, or they may take your food and laugh, or they may repeatedly tell you things and try to make you follow their words. Because they are family, they will gradually break down your defenses over time. The same applies to persistent neighbors.
You might think that what I'm saying is, "What a terrible person to not get along with their family," but it's not always wrong to distance yourself from people who are energy vampires and have a heavy aura that makes you feel tired just by being near them. In such cases, the person should ideally be protected by institutions or organizations, as being drained of energy by their family can cause them decades of suffering.
Normally, the energy vampire should be the one being scolded, but the victim is often told, "What a terrible person," and ends up feeling like they are the ones at fault. This situation is wrong, so people who are being drained of energy should try to "escape" and change their environment. It may be difficult to take that first step, but it's essential to take that first step on your own, and then you can seek help from others. You need to make the judgment, even if it's just a vague feeling, that "this is wrong," and then take action. Sometimes, you may be subjected to mind control, which can make you question your actions and wonder if they are right. In such cases, you need to think carefully. In reality, if you are going to take action, it's important to record what others say and do, either by writing it down in a notebook or recording it. This will create objective facts.
What is right and what is wrong? Sometimes, "incorrect upbringing" from others can restrict your actions, and in those cases, you need to correct it with "proper upbringing." Even if the mechanism of energy vampires is being justified by mind control, if you decide to escape, you need to take action. By doing so, people can be freed from their bonds, and once they are freed, they finally realize, "Ah, I was indeed being bound." It is only then that they can see the reality.
▪️Two Loops of Self-Affirmation
There are people who live with love and people who live with ego.
Each of them has a self-affirmation loop, but the way it works seems completely different. In general, "self-affirmation" is considered a good thing in terms of morality and education, but the ego's self-affirmation loop tends to become a vicious cycle.
For people who live with love, self-affirmation naturally leads to the affirmation of others. Because there is no distinction between self and others (or the distinction is blurred), they can affirm others.
On the other hand, people who live by ego define self-affirmation as a distinction from others. Especially recently, this loop is prominent on television and YouTube, and it seems that the self-affirmation loop, which says, "Even if there is just one thing that allows you to feel affirmed, you can break through," through "exaggerated interpretation (or misinterpretation of Japanese)," is noticeable.
People who live by love can see the truth.
On the other hand, people who live by ego live in their own "imaginary" world. Therefore, they are satisfied if they can find something, anything, that affirms them in their imaginary world, even if it is not the truth.
In the past, such people would not have been taken seriously. However, initially, they are considered "interesting" on television due to their eloquent speech, which confuses people. Then, YouTubers who emphasize this approach repeatedly assert what they believe to be correct, highlighting it, and viewers think, "Yes, yes," leading the general public to believe that they are correct.
When living by love, there is no need to seek self-affirmation through eloquent speech. Moreover, winning or losing is not important, and the truth is what matters, not winning or losing.
The self-affirmation loop of love is that the more you affirm yourself, the more love deepens, and self-affirmation increases. Since the self is almost the same as others, self-affirmation and affirmation of others increase together, and love also increases. This loop continues, and love grows stronger. This is the loop of love.
▪️The self-affirmation loop based on ego
On the other hand, the self-affirmation loop based on ego acts to deepen the distinction and gap with others, reducing love, strengthening the separation from others, and using exaggerated interpretations and twisted interpretations to prioritize imagination over truth in order to establish superiority over others, distorting perception, increasing tension, and as a result, the expression of superiority becomes extreme (sometimes vulgar), deepening the ego's self-affirmation, and strengthening the ego, repeating this negative loop. Some people might call such people "outstanding," but that is a matter of personal preference, so feel free to do what you like. This is what is called the "career advancement" type. If the ego expands, you can achieve career advancement, so that is also a life.
I am not denying this kind of life, because everything is a choice. If you want to live such a life, you must continue to separate yourself from others, and your ego will expand, your self-esteem will deepen, and you can live a life that is considered "outstanding" by the world. If you want to do that, you can do it, and in this universe where freedom is guaranteed, everyone can become what they aspire to be.
However, it's different from what I'm aiming for, but if you think it's good, you can do whatever you want.
In the business world, some people who are somewhat boastful and exaggerating become rich. However, that has little to do with whether they are spiritually growing, or it might even be the opposite.
About 20 years ago, I talked to a reporter from NHK, and when I said something like, "There are people in NHK who fabricate reports or are pro-China and Korea," the reporter said, "You are a strange person to say that everyone in NHK fabricates reports or that everyone is pro-China and Korea." The NHK reporter should be a professional in Japanese language, and I was only talking about a part of the people when I said, "There are people like that in NHK," but they misinterpreted or twisted my words and turned it into a story of "people who say that everyone is pro-China and Korea are strange," which served to inflate their ego. Their perception was distorted.
Even if they are amateurs, they are industry insiders in the media, and they work at NHK, so they should be "professionals" in language. However, this reporter, who is a professional in language, is twisting and distorting the meaning in this way. They probably went to a prestigious school, have a strong sense of self-esteem, and must maintain their self-affirmation by distorting reality, or their ego would collapse.
Well, I was young at that time, and there are some things I don't remember clearly. My attitude may have irritated the other person, and I may have had some biases against NHK, and I cannot deny that I was expressing such nuances in various ways at that time, but the other person also twisted the story accordingly.
Stories like this are somewhat common, and everyone probably has a certain degree of confirmation bias. I now interpret that I may have had my own biases projected onto others, leading to this experience.
The more I meditate, the less distorted my perception becomes, and things like confirmation bias decrease, allowing me to perceive things "as they are." This also means that the ego is decreasing.
▪️People who inflate and boast to affirm their ego.
Recently, YouTube and bulletin boards have become even worse. There are many people who, when discussing or giving feedback, suddenly say something that the other person has not said at all, and then boastfully and aggressively push their opinions or posts.
Ultimately, it's just a way to seek self-affirmation.
For example, if someone says, "I often shop at Don Quijote," the response might be something like, "Don Quijote's bentos are dangerous, so you should avoid them" (said in a condescending tone). It's unclear why the topic shifts to bentos just because someone mentioned Don Quijote, and the person saying this seems to be a big fan of Gyomu Super's frozen hamburgers, so they probably think Don Quijote bentos and Gyomu Super frozen hamburgers are similar. Yet, there are people who use the Don Quijote bento topic to feel superior. I can't deal with that.
In a company or organization, such conversations could lead to lower evaluations, being banned from certain areas, or being ignored. However, for some reason, these types of discussions are popular in the media industry and on YouTube.
This happens because, of course, there's a focus on viewership, but I also think it's because people are trapped in a self-affirmation loop. Even if it's a misconception, the person speaking feels affirmed, and the viewers feel affirmed as well. Therefore, for those who don't understand, they might see them as "geniuses of speech" or "geniuses of debate." However, in reality, they are simply "exaggerating" and "looking for loopholes" to feel good about themselves.
For people who don't need to solve actual problems in their work, this kind of behavior is often sufficient. They can easily and vaguely feel affirmed, even if they don't solve actual problems. In a business setting, they might be suitable for sales, but the people who actually carry out the work often struggle, so such individuals should not be hired, even in sales. This is especially true recently.
In a well-functioning society, company, or community, these types of people are not accepted. However, on platforms like YouTube, many viewers don't understand this, and because it's entertainment-driven, they are constantly caught in the trap and "amazing people" are fabricated.
I feel like people who haven't thought for themselves much and have only received rote memorization education are more likely to be drawn to this kind of content. What do you think?
About people who distort their perception to protect their ego:
Such people seek positive perspectives in order to prevent their self (ego) from collapsing. In this process, it is important to find situations where they can feel proud of themselves, rather than whether the logic is true.
1. **Seeking positivity within a topic:** Finding stories that allow them to feel proud based on their own opinions or experiences.
2. **Positivity through exaggeration:** If the topic does not allow for feeling proud, they expand the scope to find new examples to feel proud of.
Regarding the other person, it is necessary to understand this process and respond as follows:
1. **Understanding the exaggeration:** Grasping to what extent the other person is expanding the topic for self-affirmation.
2. **Analyzing the basis for feeling proud:** Understanding what they are feeling proud of based on that exaggeration.
3. **Judging the validity:** Evaluating whether the exaggeration and the feeling of pride are correct.
These steps are complex and tiring, but it is important to respect the other person's self-affirmation and avoid unnecessary arguments. If possible, it is better not to engage in dialogue with such people from the beginning. However, if it is unavoidable, problems can be resolved by consistently and calmly conveying your own claims without wavering.
In other words, ignoring the exaggeration that is carried out for the other person's self-affirmation and re-presenting the original position is effective.
However, even that can be troublesome, so if possible, it's better not to engage with them from the beginning.
Alternatively, you can simply respond with general moral principles. The result of over-interpreting things will always be a moral issue, and if you want to feel a sense of self-affirmation, morality is a good fit. It's clear that the other person isn't seeking a precise discussion; they just want to feel superior and self-affirm themselves. If you talk about morality, they might self-affirm themselves. Responding to specific points can actually lead to resentment, so it's probably better to avoid engaging seriously and simply talk about general morality before moving on. If they accept the morality, that's fine. However, if they argue against it with logical fallacies and try to feel superior, they're likely trying to find loopholes through over-interpretation and special cases. In that case, don't strongly refute their opinion, just ignore it and say something like, "That might be the case sometimes," and praise one aspect of their argument. The goal isn't to solve problems or complete tasks like in a job; the goal itself is self-affirmation, so you can do whatever it takes to affirm the other person.
When I was a child, I was often annoyed by these pointless displays of superiority, but the people who say them seem to never get tired of it. They simply enjoy belittling others. There might be people like that on YouTube. Ultimately, their purpose is (ego-driven) self-affirmation.
If you have a choice, don't watch videos of such people.
If you have a choice, don't interact with such people from the beginning.
If some level of interaction is necessary, stick to your initial position and don't waver. Be consistent with a moral attitude. Don't engage with their arguments. As yoga and Buddhism say, "Don't interact with immoral people."
And if you have to interact with them, follow the general social norms and be strictly moral, and don't have any further interactions. Ignore whatever they say or tease you about. This is the basic approach, although it doesn't apply to persistent cases.
Also, don't stop thinking. Immoral people will come with vulgar laughter and try to induce you to stop thinking, so it's best to avoid interacting with them in the first place. However, even if you do interact with them, it's important not to stop thinking.
▪️The impulse from past lives to understand people who are twisted.
According to my past memories (through Group Soul), I have been wondering for many lives, "Why are some people, especially some of the poor, so twisted in their cognition?" This was mainly in Europe, where my Group Soul's fragment lived, and many of the poor there seemed to be twisted. This is not to say that it is the same in this life, but there are similar aspects.
Until this life, I was aware that, in almost every life, the spiritual state at the time of birth was probably "about the same" as it is now. That is to say, I (of the entire Group Soul) could not understand symptoms such as ordinary people (especially the poor) being troubled by distractions, having distorted cognition, or having an inflated ego and entering a self-affirmation loop. This is because I had no such experience.
The main purpose of this life is to resolve karma and verify the steps to enlightenment. To that end, I have tried to understand each step by putting myself in a bottom-level environment and working my way up from the ordinary people's level. However, for me in this life, I am simply living my own life. However, the intention of the Group Soul in creating and sending me as a fragment seems to have been to understand why people in the lower spiritual levels are so twisted.
Therefore, I deliberately left unpurified auras that would normally be discarded or purified, and materialized them, and sent them as a fragment to the earthly realm. Originally, my soul was a collection of impure auras that were supposed to be purified in a fire ritual and returned to nothingness. However, suddenly, a being performing the ritual sensed a kind of awakening in the aura and stopped the ritual. And, because the aura alone was not bright enough, a being added their own aura to create the basis of my fragment, which is now my soul. And, because they did something unusual, the other beings were surprised. Thus, the prototype of my soul consists of the impure auras that were separated for the fire ritual and the auras that were additionally given for the awakening of consciousness.
▪️People who are twisted have distorted cognition.
In order to understand poor people, I was born into a family with little money, and I was born into a family of parents, siblings, and relatives who were twisted. I tried to learn why the cognition of poor people is distorted and twisted.
At first, I didn't understand it well, and only conflict grew, and I even started to conform, but I knew that "my true self" was not like that.
After that, I left my family and relatives, and after reflecting on things and learning various things in other places, I finally understood it.
Until then, I could say that I could understand it in theory, and I somehow knew it, but it didn't quite resonate with me.
However, now that I have lived this life, I finally understand it.
People who are twisted have distorted cognition because their ego is magnified and they are caught in a self-affirmation loop. That's a fairly simple story.
Because of that, I tried to get along with and imitate people who, in retrospect, were not interesting, but in the end, it turned out to be such a simple story. Because their ego is magnified, they search for various things and topics to distinguish themselves from others, and they get caught in a self-affirmation loop. Because ego is never satisfied, they move on to the next topic after one topic ends, or sometimes they exaggerate or distort their cognition to find more places where their ego can be affirmed.
Once you understand it, you think, "What a boring story." However, for people who are comparing themselves to others and trying to show off, it is probably a big deal. They are trying to create "differences" to distinguish themselves from others, but all of those things are rooted in a boring impulse.
In terms of "understanding," I'm glad that my long-standing questions have been answered. However, what I gained from it was only "Oh, that's what it is..." I think that distinguishing oneself from others by appearance or behavior, or showing off, is so ridiculous and boring, but for people who are caught in the ego expansion loop, that is important and a big deal.
From a spiritual perspective, there is nothing to deny, and the purpose of life is various, so you become what you seek, and it is a matter of individual freedom how you live your life. However, I personally think that a life that spends time distorting cognition or expanding ego is boring. This is my personal opinion, so I think others should do as they please. However, if ego is an obstacle to achieving one's true purpose, then that obstacle should be removed. In my opinion, almost no one lives a life where ego expansion itself is the purpose, but in most cases, they are caught in an ego expansion loop, and they mistakenly think that it is the purpose of life. What do you think?
The person may not be aware of it at all.
▪️Speech patterns of immoral people
As for the "showing off" patterns of immoral people, first, as I mentioned before, they use exaggeration (or logical leaps) to bring up specific cases, confusing or silencing the other person.
Then, if the other person falls for that logical leap, they only deal with the specific case and argue how correct that specific case is. Since it's a specific case, there's not much objection to it.
Alternatively, if the other person points out the logical leap itself, they ignore that statement. Even in this case, they argue how correct their specific case is, or "show off."
When topics like "connection of the conversation" or "logical leap" come up, they try to cover it up somehow. For example, one pattern is to make fun of the other person by saying, "(laughing) what nonsensical things are you saying?" Another pattern is to say, "Don't you understand something as simple as this?" while making fun of the other person and trying to get them to only discuss the specific case. Another pattern is to talk at length about general principles (even if the conversation doesn't connect), trying to make the other person understand how correct they are.
In other words, when you see something that seems like a correct argument but feels strange or uncomfortable, you can often see a pattern of conversation that unfolds as follows:
- Premise of the topic → Negation or affirmation based on a specific case (based on one's own position) → Generalization
When the conversation becomes general, the premise of the topic has already been forgotten and is no longer relevant, and since the topic has already become a general discussion, it is difficult to deny the specific case (which is why it is a specific case), and it is also difficult to deny the general discussion.
When you hear such a conversation, especially young people may think, "What a brilliant person." However, this kind of pattern is often used by scammers.
After all, the initial topic is not resolved at all.
You somehow feel like you've understood something, but in the end, the problem is postponed or not resolved at all.
Yet, it gives the impression that "something amazing was discussed." You feel like you're witnessing that amazingness, and you feel like you've learned some special knowledge. That's why such "showing off" programs are popular on YouTube.
However, as I've said repeatedly, the problem is often not resolved at all.
Ultimately, in situations where you must solve problems and address issues directly, these kinds of techniques are completely useless and only applicable in entertainment venues like YouTube (or in deceptive negotiation tactics).
People who talk about these things in a work environment will eventually either try to gloss over the issue and escape, or they'll say something like, "That's already been resolved" (even if it hasn't), and try to sweep it under the rug. It's the kind of talk that could easily get you banned from a job. A normal company wouldn't tolerate that.
Discussions are meant to solve problems, but on YouTube, the topics are often presented in a strange way. It's more about choosing what you like rather than solving a problem. Some YouTubers even say things like, "Life is just killing time." If that's the case, they should just avoid having discussions altogether, as it's more likely to mislead people. People who physically harm others will bear the consequences of their actions, but those who manipulate and confuse others mentally will bear a much deeper and more profound karmic burden. They may be carefree and not worry about it, but that's the reality.
So, what can we do about such unethical people? The only solution is to treat them the same way: "Don't associate with unethical people," and "Ignore unethical people." That's the simple truth.
▪️If there is no problem, there is no good or bad.
Spiritually speaking, if there is no problem, then things are fine either way. Even if there is a topic, whether one side is "right" or the other is essentially irrelevant, and the distinction between good and bad changes depending on the time and circumstances. If there is no problem, then either side is acceptable. However, some people deliberately create a distinction between good and bad, and then cite other people's arguments to elevate themselves above others. It's best not to associate with such people.
There are discussions about which approach leads to fewer problems and a smoother functioning society, but there are always special cases. Just because there are special cases doesn't mean that the basic rules and morals are wrong. However, people who point out that the basic rules are wrong by citing special cases are often doing so to boost their own self-esteem, or they are unethical people themselves. Therefore, it's best not to engage with them.
▪️Environmental problems are also a pattern of broad interpretation (a side note).
I have seen a pattern where ego uses broad interpretation to feel good about itself. Actually, environmental problems are also a pattern of broad interpretation.
- Global warming → Some specific cases are highlighted (sea level rise in Tuvalu, the disappearance of coral reefs in the Great Barrier Reef, abnormal weather, etc.) → It is generalized that CO2 is the cause of global warming.
- Waste problem → Some specific cases are highlighted (mountains of garbage in developing countries, the problem of microplastics in the ocean) → It is generalized that it is the cause of global warming.
It perfectly matches the pattern of a scammer.
Global warming is a story about global warming, and sea level rise is a story about sea level rise. The disappearance of coral reefs is said to be caused by global warming, and that is its story. They are talking about abnormal weather, but in reality, the Earth's climate has changed significantly over hundreds or thousands of years. It can change significantly in just 100 years. To simply generalize the cause as "global warming" is what a scammer would do.
Reality is reality. Accepting reality is a prerequisite. There may be a rise in temperature, but that is a fact. The story of that fact and the story of the "cause and effect" relationship are different. Even if reality is correct, the logical relationship is not necessarily correct.
There are many stories about pseudo-correlation, where there appears to be a correlation, but in reality, there is no relationship at all.
Perhaps global warming is actually caused by carbon dioxide. That possibility cannot be excluded. However, it is not necessarily the cause. For unclear things, they are promoting it, and people are perceiving it as if it were reality. How different are the people in the Middle Ages who thought the sun revolved around the Earth, and the modern carbon dioxide and global warming believers?
Even with the waste problem, waste is a waste problem. Recycling is a recycling problem. The microplastic problem is its problem. For some reason, it is generalized from the story of waste as "the cause of global warming."
I don't think that even the people who are promoting it in this modern age are genuinely believing it. If that is the case, then there are scammers who want to promote global warming. There are people who benefit from global warming, and they want to promote global warming. It is more comfortable to hypothesize that there are people who are promoting it for profit, even if they do not genuinely believe that carbon dioxide is the cause. This is just a hypothesis.
In reality, there are many scammers like those on YouTube, and "easy-to-understand" stories like those about global warming often have no logical coherence. The fact that they are promoted globally suggests that some organization is behind it. That is my speculation.
Emission trading is ridiculous. Attaching a monetary value to something that cannot even produce a proper evaluation is what scammers do.
Of course, recycling is necessary in itself, and it functions normally. What I'm saying is that scammers distort the logic and forcibly connect it to things like global warming.
Such stories are rampant in society.
Social activists would probably try to improve this situation, but from a spiritual perspective, the basic principle is "don't associate with immoral people." Unless it causes significant harm to oneself, it's best to ignore it.
▪️Cognitive distortion, anger, and depression are often linked.
When one enters a pattern of ego and self-affirmation, cognitive distortion occurs. When this distorted cognition further reinforces the distortion, it becomes a kind of illusion for the person, as if it were the truth. However, when this distorted cognition, which is the person's own truth, is denied by others, it is actually not a denial, but simply the transmission of truth. However, for the person, this transmission of truth is perceived as a denial of their distorted cognition.
Sometimes, the person may be aware of their own cognitive distortions. However, in severe cases, the distortion is significant, and they believe it to be the truth.
When this distorted cognition is pointed out by others, a rejection response manifests in the body in order to continue affirming the distorted cognition.
This rejection response manifests differently depending on the relationship with the other person. If the person feels they are in a stronger position than the other person, they may lash out and yell. If the other person is stronger, they may become depressed.
In either case, they may play the victim, claiming that they are yelling because they were told something terrible, or that they are depressed because the other person is a terrible person. In reality, they truly believe that they are the victim, and that the other person who is denying their cognition is a very terrible person. It's troublesome.
For people like this, it is often useless to say anything, and even if you point something out, they may get angry and you may end up being the victim, so you end up failing to help them.
Here, the solution is the same. Do not have any dealings with immoral people. That is all.
If they get angry or depressed when you try to correct their distorted perceptions, and claim to be victims, then there is nothing you can do to help them. Or rather, it is sometimes unnecessary for others to point out their distorted perceptions and tell them the truth. As a result of such unnecessary interference, you may be treated as a victim and become the target of their attacks, so it is better not to have dealings with such immoral people.
People with distorted perceptions sometimes get angry and sometimes become depressed. It may be said that they are caught in a self-affirmation loop, but there is no particular order, and they may suddenly get angry or depressed.
They may get angry if you say something that is different from their perceptions, but their threshold for anger is generally very low, and it is often difficult for others to understand what triggers their anger. Since others cannot easily understand where the distortion lies in the other person's perceptions, it is difficult to deal with them unless you are familiar with them.
The best thing is not to have dealings with such people, but if there are social obligations, it is better to just use polite phrases that will not provoke them. Such people sometimes have everything completely affirmed and indulged, which further distorts their perceptions and lowers their threshold for anger, so it is better not to have dealings with them from the beginning.
Sometimes, when someone gets angry or depressed like this, they may act as a victim, and conversely, the other person who caused it may be treated as the perpetrator. If the person who was supposed to tell the truth is treated as the perpetrator, there are not many people who want to play such a losing role, and they are disliked, and the distortion of perception is left unattended.
These examples exist everywhere, but there may be regional differences.
▪️Slightly yelling, generally praising, alcohol, and human kindness are all in the middle.
Even if they don't completely lose it, slightly yelling, alcohol, or human kindness are actually in the middle. Even while following social conventions to some extent, in reality, they are often the same at their core. At this level, it is common in workplace relationships, and it may be better to just use polite phrases without getting too close.
When we talk about "humanity," it might give a positive impression, but from a spiritual perspective, "emotions" are the next stage after the physical body, belonging to what is called the astral realm, and are not at a very high level. However, it is one step ahead of purely physical and materialistic discussions, so it is a higher level of discussion than that. Therefore, it is not so bad compared to physical materialism, but the next stage is the causal (cause, karma) stage (or even the Purusha stage), which is more filled with light and love, so the expression of "emotions" is still just the first step.
From the stage where only physical things are visible, distorting perception and causing a distorted understanding of the truth, people are trying to see the truth, albeit slightly, through "humanity." While some people get angry and completely fall into darkness, there are times when they somehow like stories about "humanity." In reality, it is something like this. Therefore, for the person involved, "humanity" is not useless, but if you are not at that stage, there is no need to waste time listening to other people's stories about "humanity."
For people who live spiritually, it is important not to completely trust someone just because they are talking about "humanity." The next stage has a certain amount of total oneness and love, but "humanity" is based on emotions and is an incomplete form of love.
Getting angry is relatively easy to understand, but this is a different variation.
Another variation is patterns such as "(temporarily) agreeing with the other person," "(temporarily) praising the other person," or "(temporarily) acknowledging the other person." This varies depending on the situation, but ultimately, it is used as a method to protect one's own ego by not changing one's own distorted perception and to temporarily distance oneself from the other person. Therefore, do not be lulled into a false sense of security by someone who seems to have "praised" you, even if you feel a slight sense of discomfort. Similarly, do not be lulled into a false sense of security just because you have been "acknowledged." Even if it seems like you have "agreed" with their opinion, do not be lulled into a false sense of security. This is because they may have "temporarily" agreed in order to protect their own ego. Ultimately, the conversation lacks consistency, so even if you are praised or agreed with, the conversation may go around in circles and not progress. Therefore, it is better not to associate with people who make you feel uncomfortable.
The order of actions is generally the same: "Expand the interpretation and deny the opponent's claim in a specific case," then "Affirm your own claim through generalization." However, if you are successfully refuted and cannot respond, you choose one of the options mentioned above. This is not a genuine agreement, but simply a way to continue your own ego and self-affirmation loop by excluding the opponent's claim from the "scope." You may also adopt an attitude of "I don't know" to deny the opponent's claim, but you may also simply agree and then subtly indicate "I don't understand" through your actions, effectively excluding them.
If you truly need to solve a problem, these statements are not effective. However, if you are just playing with words on YouTube, it can create an illusion of a "remarkable discussion" or "genius of debate," while protecting the person's ego and continuing the self-affirmation loop. In such cases, the person does not remember the opponent's claim, and there is no "agreement" there; they simply choose the above options to avoid the discussion. Ultimately, there is no "result" or "conclusion." However, it can create a seemingly impressive impression, making the person feel satisfied. People around them praise the person, unaware that this is a deceptive technique, which further strengthens the person's ego. This can lead to the creation of "successful" people who believe they are "perfect" with 300% confidence.
It is a waste of time to deal with such people. The basic principle of "not associating with immoral people" is also applicable here. You can also call them "people you cannot communicate with."
Ultimately, it's about discernment. Discernment is essential in everything. Especially, a lack of discernment in judging people can ruin your life.
Alternatively, if someone is not very intelligent, they may simply laugh uncontrollably and dismiss them as irrelevant. This is easy to understand, so you can avoid worrying too much. However, in environments where it is difficult to escape, such as in a school classroom or a rural community, this can be the most troublesome. People who shout "Shut up!" because they don't understand logic are the same. The best thing is to avoid them.
▪️Never agree to being forced to agree with distorted perceptions.
Be careful of these types of people, as they try to involve others in their distorted world of perception. Mind control is also a similar thing, as it forces distorted perceptions onto others. This is not just about emotions, but is imposed at a higher level, the causal realm (cause, karma), and it becomes difficult to escape from that distorted perception. If it's just about emotions, it's often a temporary agreement. However, the higher causal level is generally considered a good thing in spirituality, but be careful of people who have these distorted perceptions. When they persistently try to get you to agree, if "agreement" is achieved through the causal realm, the distorted perception flows to others, and others become involved in the world of distorted perception.
When this happens, those who are involved will suffer from that distorted perception for decades. On the other hand, those who originally have a distorted perception and are "infused" with a "normal perception" through that "consent" may become "a little more energetic" and "a little better" through the actions of the energy vampire. Those who are involved suffer greatly, as they are persistently pressured and forced to agree to the distorted perception, and even made to take care of the dirty aura, with absolutely no good consequences.
Even if you are persistently pressured, it is best to refuse or, even better, not to associate with them at all.
For example, they repeat a loop of "shouting" or "getting angry" → "(seemingly) showing compassion" (which is often hypocrisy) → "persistently demanding consent," and they will persistently cling to you until you agree.
Ultimately, even if someone seems like a good person based on their apparent compassion, if you see signs of anger or a precursor to depression, it is best not to have a deep relationship with them. The rule of "not associating with immoral people" applies here. If possible, the best option is to not associate with them at all.
When you are persistently pressured and gradually become tired, you may inadvertently "agree," which creates an "energy route" like a thin line or pipe, and dirty aura flows in from there, while your aura is passed on to them.
As a result, your perception becomes distorted, and you may start to think that what the other person says is correct (even if it is actually a distorted perception), or you may suddenly become angry or depressed about things you had no prior knowledge of. Your aura and the other person's aura are partially exchanged. Energy vampires push their dirty aura onto others when they absorb energy, so you not only have your energy stolen, but also the aftermath of their conflicts and traumas is imposed on you.
Considering that being victimized by an energy vampire can cause suffering for decades, it is important to "escape" as soon as you realize it. Energy vampires cannot live without constantly stealing energy or a "good person aura" from others. If they are constantly evaded by their targets, they will run out of energy and be destroyed. Therefore, such people should be left alone.
You might think that not saving those who are lost is terrible, but this world guarantees "freedom," and there is no need to help those who do not want to spiritually improve themselves. Often, these energy vampires are hypocrites, and there is absolutely no good that comes from helping hypocrites.
If someone had a love as strong as Christ's, they might be able to help, but normally, it's impossible to help such people, so it's best to escape and avoid them. Those who run away and criticize are likely either the energy vampire themselves or people bound by old values, so there's no need to worry about them.
▪️Purifying people with distorted perceptions
Recently, when I meditate, I receive the message that there are people with distorted perceptions who abuse others throughout Japan. It doesn't seem so prevalent in the area where I live, but I suspect there are many such cases hidden.
In my daily life, I rarely encounter people with such distorted perceptions; at most, I see them on YouTube, but I hide those channels, so it doesn't really affect me. However, when I meditate, I feel that there are people throughout Japan who are bullying and harassing others due to their distorted perceptions.
Given this situation, recently, I've been visualizing the Japanese archipelago and pouring light into it, as if creating a purification barrier.
Then, as I saw in a detergent commercial, I feel like black, oily substances are seeping out from the ground in various parts of Japan and rising into the air. It seems that the land is tainted with resentment. It keeps coming out even after I purify it repeatedly, so I wonder if it will be difficult to purify it completely. However, I hope that I can gradually purify the entire Japanese archipelago.
When I meditate, I receive the message that by purifying the entire Japanese archipelago through meditation, people with distorted perceptions, including politicians, will become uncomfortable, and that reaction will appear. I also received the message that from an overseas perspective, the Japanese archipelago will become transparent and less visible.
This purification of the Japanese archipelago is a difficult task. Apparently, the barrier becomes stronger by rebuilding shrines and erecting "pillars of light" at each one. I haven't heard anything about temples; it seems the target is shrines. I wonder if I might be instructed to do something.
There is a project called the "Iyashirochi Plan" to erect pillars of light, and the Japanese archipelago is the primary target, and then the scope may be expanded to the Pacific Ocean. What do you think? The Japanese archipelago should be the priority.
I think that by purifying, the number of people with distorted perceptions will decrease.
As the Japanese archipelago is purified, people whose egos are expanding and twisted will find it difficult to live in Japan. A certain number of people who say things like "It's easier overseas" are likely those people. People live in places that align with their aura and spiritual levels.
The silent invasion of the Japanese archipelago through land sales is fundamentally due to the fact that the purification of the Japanese archipelago is not complete, and therefore, unpurified land is being targeted and bought. This is because people with expanded egos can only live in unpurified, polluted land. It's like a fish that would die if it entered a clean river; some people cannot live in clean water.
I wonder if it will take about 30 years for Japan to change, but what do you think?
▪️Be grateful and do not hate.
This may seem like morality, but it seems like a quality that automatically appears when one's spiritual level has progressed. Therefore, regardless of whether one behaves in this way out of morality, one suddenly reaches a certain level and exhibits this state.
It's a state where gratitude for something that has helped you remains in your heart.
Even if you have been subjected to something very painful, you may not worry too much about it, thinking "Well, that's just the way it is," but you will pass it by without dwelling on it. Of course, you will not hate.
This quality is the opposite in people whose spirituality is not very advanced. In that case, they may ignore things that have helped them and relentlessly hate anything painful. This is a characteristic of people with low vibrations.
People with different vibrational levels cannot understand each other.
Therefore, people with low vibrations may say, "Why aren't you angry? It's normal to be angry. It's strange that you're not angry." However, it is important not to accept such comments and, if necessary, try to get angry. Even if it's just for the sake of trying, anger belongs to a low vibration, and that will destroy your spirituality.
As your vibration becomes higher, the proportion of gratitude increases, leading to a doubling of thanks, a tenfold increase in thanks, and so on.
Conversely, as your vibration becomes lower, the payback becomes a doubling of revenge, a tenfold revenge, and so on.
The cycle of gratitude and thanks deepens repeatedly, and the act of returning the favor is repeated, leading to mutual enrichment, which is a common occurrence.
Of course, there are also cycles of reciprocal actions that go in the opposite direction.
In today's society, there are all sorts of people mixed together, but ideally, one should only associate with people who are on the same spiritual level. Otherwise, people with higher vibrations may be inconvenienced and become unhappy.
A classic principle applies here, and the principle of "not associating with immoral people" is also relevant in such cases.