In general, there are often stories about "sharing through love," but the more spiritual one is, the better it is to avoid such stories.

This is because, while such places often start with noble ideas and philosophies, they tend to become "systems" and "organizations," which then create opportunities for "free riders."

In the first place, the idea that "gratitude and love do not require reasons, objects, or actions" is fundamentally unrelated to stories like "sharing." Whether or not one shares, that state is still love, and similarly, whether or not one shares, there is gratitude in that state.

Therefore, it is not inherently true to make "sharing" a "condition," such as only feeling gratitude when there is sharing, or to say that love only exists when there is sharing.

Love and gratitude exist regardless of whether or not one shares.

Therefore, whether or not one shares is inherently based on the point of "whether one needs it." If an organization or group is created to functionally share, then love is always present there, but even without that function, organization, or group, love is always present.

Once love and gratitude are made "conditions," love and gratitude disappear when those conditions are removed. However, in general society, love and gratitude are often treated as "conditions," and stories about "giving" or "sharing" often come up in order to create love and gratitude. It seems that the general understanding is that by showing acts of giving or sharing, and then judging that love and gratitude have disappeared when those actions stop.

It is truly important to share when one has a lot and should share, but there is no need to give in order to show love and gratitude when one is in trouble. Love and gratitude exist regardless of such actions.

The reason this is important is that people involved in the "universe" or "lightworkers" tend to attract "free riders." While such spiritually advanced people often have many supporters around them and are not financially troubled, they are often naive and can be deceived, have their property stolen, or allow unfair people to take advantage of them.

In this area, people who identify as cosmic beings or lightworkers often need to learn more about life. There are many unscrupulous people in the world, and if you see someone in distress and readily offer help or give something, it will escalate, and they will not stop until they take everything. Furthermore, if you stop giving, they may attack you by saying, "What a terrible person." In short, there are "shameless" people everywhere. However, if you continue to give to someone who is not even on an equal footing, and then that giving stops, the person who has been given will likely blame and harshly criticize the person who has been giving. Therefore, it is better not to give anything at all and not to interact with them. Even though it may be a difficult situation for cosmic beings or lightworkers, who should naturally be able to share, there are many people with whom it is better not to interact in the long run. Therefore, it is better not to readily "give" things.

For example, South Korea is a good example, although it is not a person, but a country, in relation to Japan. As a result of Japan continuing to give to South Korea, South Korea has misunderstood, and South Korea will not be satisfied unless it continues to receive from Japan. Even if Japan says, "I'm tired of you, go away," South Korea will say, "Why isn't Japan taking care of us like it used to? What a terrible country Japan is." This is because South Korea is attached to Japan because it should have become independent, but it has not. In human relationships, there may be times when, because you readily give, a relationship of giving becomes the norm, and you cannot have an independent relationship. You cannot continue a relationship of slavery forever. Just as South Korea needs to become independent, in human relationships, it is not appropriate to have a relationship like that of God and a devoted human being, but rather to strive for a relatively equal relationship between two individuals. Or, even if it is a relationship between God and a subordinate, it is still better than being strangely attached, or if you are cleverly used by systems such as stock options, you may allow free-riding, which will consume the resources of people or organizations, and you will not be able to achieve results that are much smaller than what you could have contributed. Ultimately, people who take advantage of others or aim for free-riding will end up taking on the burden themselves, so that resources will not reach the end. Even so, other people may continue to approach you, saying, "Give," or they may criticize you, saying, "What a terrible person," even though they are only free-riding, or they may even imagine contributions that they have not made and boast about their achievements, and as that imagination expands, it may explode, and they may eventually become angry or intensely curse. In order to avoid such unnecessary curses, it is better not to have a long and troublesome relationship with someone who is mistaken, and it is better not to have a relationship with them from the beginning. In order not to be misunderstood or taken advantage of, it is necessary to have a way of dealing with the world, such as not readily giving or sharing. By doing so, you can avoid dealing with troublesome people from the beginning.

In this world, capitalism, while having aspects of distribution that are hindered by the act of taking, also has the aspect that, to a certain extent, distribution is possible by following capitalism. However, if simply sharing unconditionally leads to free riding, servitude, or a curse in the modern era, then it seems that we must transition to a society where a small number give to the majority, while still adhering to the form of capitalism. Although this is not yet fully realized, this kind of change can happen relatively quickly if a majority of those who hold capital decide to do so, so I am not overly pessimistic.