This article was partially created using AI. The content has been reviewed and revised by editors
Here, we will discuss cases where God is worshipped as something separate from oneself, and cases where God is worshipped as one's own self.
Previously, you mentioned that regardless of which form one worships God in, the result is the same. However, a question arises from this.
For those who worship God as something separate from themselves, the Lord reveals His own divine form, and after that person leaves their body, they ascend to the highest abode of the Lord. On the other hand, for those who worship God as oneself, there is unity with Brahman, which is the absolute reality. There is no change in location for that person.
Then, how can we say that these two fruits are the same?
The form in which divine realization manifests varies depending on the emotions and beliefs held by a devotee during their practice.
A person who worships God as being identical with oneself realizes God in the form of identity. For a person who worships God as something separate from themselves, God reveals Himself to the worshiper as something other than himself.
God manifests in different forms, depending on the conviction of each seeker.
Worship based on identity, and worship based on diversity, both are worship of God.
Because God is both absolute and also possesses attributes, and He is both form and without form, and He is both manifested and unmanifested.
For those who view God as an absolute and intangible being, God has no attributes or form. For those who view God as a qualified but intangible being, God does not have a form but possesses attributes.
For those who see God as omnipotent, supporting everything, pervading all things, transcending everything, and adorned with every excellent virtue, God is the embodiment of all noble virtues. For those who see God encompassing all things, God encompasses all things. For those who recognize God as having both form and attributes, God reveals Himself in that way.
What has been mentioned so far is indeed correct. However, that alone does not solve the initial question.
The question was: If God is realized in different ways by different people, how can the results of various practices be said to be one?
The answer to this is that, in the initial stage, a seeker's realization of God corresponds to their own conception of God and their feelings towards God.
However, the realization of God's true nature that follows transcends words. Words cannot describe what it is like.
Ultimately, the fruit of all forms of worship is one and the same. It does not matter whether God is worshipped in a form of unity or in a form of diversity.
In order to clarify this point, the text states that those who worship God in the form of identity realize God Himself. Furthermore, it also mentions that those who worship God in the form of diversity achieve the same truth through various expressions, such as becoming one with Brahman, attaining lasting peace, and reaching an eternal and imperishable abode.
In order to impress upon Arjuna's mind that the fruits of two forms of worship are the same, the Lord is expressing the same truth directly and indirectly, in various ways.
The goal to be achieved, and the truth that the two types of worshippers should realize, are one and the same.
It is described in some places as "the highest peace" or "an eternal state," and in other places, it is called "the ultimate dwelling." It is also expressed as "immortal bliss," "the supreme condition," or "perfect completion."
In Gita, many words are used to indicate this ultimate fruit. However, all that can be said about it is that it is the fruit of all disciplines. It transcends words.
Only those who have reached that state know it. However, even they cannot explain it in words.
However, you can only use words and expressions that are similar to it to point at something. For example, if you want to teach a friend about the new moon, it's like pointing at a branch that seems to be touching it.
Therefore, it is most logical to conclude that the ultimate reality, which is the "fruit" of all spiritual practices, is one.
The reality of this divine being possesses transcendental qualities and is the ultimate mystery, a secret within secrets. Only those who have realized it know it.
However, even with this phrasing, it only serves to point to its existence. Logically speaking, even this expression is still missing the mark.