The average person might envy those who can remember past timelines. It's sometimes no exaggeration to say they can live their current life "happily" without knowing what happened in the previous timeline.

On the other hand, for those who do remember, even if they meet someone they were close to or family with in the previous timeline, they don't remember them. This, so to speak, creates sadness.

I mean, isn't that sad?

You remember the other person. And you have memories. This is especially true for family and loved ones. But the other person doesn't remember. It's not amnesia; they just don't remember. Only you remember. If that were you, wouldn't you be sad? Don't you agree?

But for some reason, in spiritual circles, there's a tendency to envy those who remember other timelines or who understand multiple worlds. It would certainly be great if we could recognize the multiple worlds of various timelines. But that's rare. Most of the time, we only know about the world we're in now. Also, even if there are people who occasionally remember such things or who still have remnants of their memories, in most cases they process it as future precognition or a premonition that didn't come true. They think, "I had a feeling it would turn out that way, but it didn't," or "It's possible that something like that might happen in the future."

It seems rare for people to recognize that it was an event in another timeline.

Though there is such thing as future precognition, there is a clear difference between this and memories of another timeline from the past. In most cases, I think that people don't perceive it as future precognition, but rather as memories of a past timeline or telepathy conveyed by another person.

From what I've seen, very few people remember other timelines from the past. Or perhaps the world is designed in such a way that it happens that way for everyone except for themselves.

Another possibility is that even if people are aware of the possibility, very few people talk about it with others. This is also possible.

They are first divided into those who are aware of the other person.

Those who are not aware of the other person.

Then they are divided into those who are aware of the other person but don't tell others.

Those who are aware of the other person but tell others.

Those who interpret it as a premonition or prediction.

Those who are not aware of the other person.

For example, even if you became family in another timeline, the other person may not remember you. Furthermore, in this timeline, circumstances mean you can't reunite and you have to live apart for a while. The sadness of being separated like that is unimaginable.

Life is quite long. Many things happen during that time.

In human relationships, we may be treated kindly, deceived, or whatever. And if you do that to someone who retains their memories of that timeline, those memories will be preserved. Then, in the next timeline, the relationship may change from the beginning. For example, suppose you were defamed through a conspiracy in a previous timeline and later found out about it. In the replayed timeline, you have that memory, so you deal with it from the beginning. If you still have the memory, you avoid the problem from the beginning.

For these reasons, it is not good to deceive or belittle others, but since most people in this world do not remember their memories from the previous timeline, this may not be of much concern.

Basically, the way a normal person (those who do not retain memories) and other people (those who retain memories) deal with and make decisions the first time around is not that different. It depends on their knowledge and judgment, so it's up to the individual.

On the other hand, if you were deceived the first time and were able to understand the person who deceived you well, you could just leave them in the next timeline and be done with it, but if you don't understand them, you might start by getting to know them better before dealing with it. In the second timeline, you get deep into the other person's heart and confirm what kind of person they really are. You first try to get to know their way of thinking, their behavior, etc. Then, after you understand the person who deceived you the first time, you decide that enough is enough and leave them.

- If you already understand the first time, deal with it immediately the second time.

- If you didn't understand the person the first time, try to get to know them better the second time, and then let go.

In spiritual circles, you often hear things like, "We associate with someone for a reason, and when that reason disappears, we let go," but the situation is more complicated than that. It's not something we do simply because we like or dislike someone or because we're interested in them; it's a way to understand the person who deceived us. It's a learning experience.

In the end, it may not be a big deal, but this kind of process is necessary because we don't understand what it means to "deceive others." Because we don't understand the fundamental issue of how someone can deceive others, we end up being deceived. And from the perspective of the deceiver's perspective, they often say things like, "You agreed to it, didn't you?" This is related to the discussion of karma and treaties I wrote about earlier. Scammers get others to agree to something and then impose karma on them. They then use that imposed karma as a key to extract benefits.

Therefore, even if your heart is oneness, your first priority should be to wisely reject it as your attitude.

People who remember their past timelines will deal with things like this based on their memories of the previous timeline.

They may deal with people who tricked them and extracted benefits from them in the previous timeline, or they may be sad when they meet up with someone they were close to in the previous timeline but don't remember them.

So, it may be a blessing in itself that many people are living happily without remembering their previous timeline.