In reality, in a situation where many people have not yet achieved oneness, a controlled society is necessary. Resources are actually sufficient, but they are controlled as if they are insufficient, or situations are created where it seems like there is not enough money, and society is made such that people cannot freely enjoy themselves. This is because, for people who have not achieved oneness, such restrictions are inevitably necessary.

If one has not achieved oneness, they do not know "moderation" and will reach out to grab anything in front of them and immediately consume things. In such a situation, the Earth's resources will undoubtedly become insufficient, and they will perpetually be lacking. This is a condition like a disease where everything available is used up, so it is necessary to control it to some extent.

People who talk about economic revitalization through neoliberalism are essentially saying that they can use as many resources as they want if their ego expands, and that they will profit from it. This leads to the self-destruction of society.

However, as the number of people with a sense of oneness increases, even if there is freedom, they will have moderation and, because they are already full, they will not consume everything. As a result, resources will not be consumed as much, and the situation will become one where "there are enough" resources.

Therefore, neoliberalism itself is a system, so it is neither good nor bad. However, if the consciousness of people living in the world has not reached oneness, it will lead to destruction. If the number of people with a sense of oneness increases significantly, things will go well.

However, in a situation where many people have not achieved oneness, control is necessary, otherwise, unscrupulous people will continue to take resources and things, causing trouble for the majority.

We are currently in a transitional period, and there are people with inflated egos who say that freedom is good, and there are people who advocate freedom from the perspective of oneness. In reality, these are different things.

If the number of people who have achieved oneness increases, control will become unnecessary, and such a controlled society will self-destruct. However, if that happens, the activities of some people with inflated egos will run rampant, so a framework to suppress the activities of those with inflated egos may also be necessary.

Overall, I think that a sense of oneness will make a controlled society unnecessary.

However, that is still far in the future, and it may be a story for the next generation or later.

For the time being, the proportion of people who have achieved oneness will likely remain low. Therefore, it is necessary to create a society that, for the time being, prevents unlimited consumption and waste under control. People may complain, but this is simply the selfishness of those who have not achieved oneness.

When one achieves oneness, one also achieves "knowing what is sufficient." Naturally, one becomes content, has less desire for material possessions, and lives through sharing with love and gratitude. Therefore, control and imposition are no longer necessary, and the mechanisms of society become more free. The mechanisms of that society will be determined by the proportion of people who have achieved oneness within the population.