Not intervening means that the entities in the universe are watching the terrible situation on Earth without intervening. Why is that? It is because if they intervene, the people of Earth will lose their autonomy, and the loss of freedom will diminish their humanity, and as a result, there is a risk of hindering the spiritual growth of the people of the planet.

Sometimes, in spiritual circles, you hear condescending remarks like, "Aliens are adults, so they don't interfere in the squabbles of Earth's children." However, aliens do not think of humans as children. They respect them as adults. If it were a one-on-one relationship, they would not treat them like children. It is a relationship between adults. However, they do think that humans are barbaric. Therefore, they are not looking down on them, but they believe that because they are barbaric, appropriate courtesy and adult behavior are necessary. Since they cannot understand love and peace at the same level, they are allowing the Earth to be as the people of Earth want it to be, until they can understand love.

This is not just about Trump's invasion of Venezuela. People like Trump should be allowed to do as they please. That is the lesson in this world. This is because in this world, things operate with the same barbaric level of vibration and logic.

Currently, countries like China and Russia that attempt to invade other countries may appear. From the perspective of Japan, there are reports that the United States is above Russia and China, and that these are barbaric countries. However, there is not much difference between them, and they are not on a different level. Simply put, the United States is relatively stronger and more suitable for governing the world, and it has some morality and a certain degree of ethics.

Based on that, the goal is not to divide this world into good and evil, but to guide those who have power towards a better direction based on good principles. It is not to eliminate barbaric people, but to guide such people in a better direction.

And it is to prevent this from happening repeatedly and falling into a loop.

That loop is as follows:

Initially, conflict arises due to power, and then peace is achieved. After enjoying a period of peace, the country becomes chaotic due to the corruption of civilian leaders and politicians, the people suffer from hunger, and eventually, someone will stand up and try to change the situation through power, leading to war. This has been repeated many times in this world.

To break this loop, we need to stop the loop somewhere. So, should we stop the war? If we do, the injustice and corruption of politicians and civilians will continue indefinitely. Do we want to call that situation "peace," and do we want to enjoy such a painful peace indefinitely? If people are outwardly proclaiming heaven while injustice and corruption are rampant behind the scenes, that might be a situation even worse than North Korea. In terms of cause and effect, if the injustice and corruption that cause the war continue, and we still stop the war, how do we plan to eliminate that injustice and corruption? If we eliminate it without going to war, we need to find other ways to do so. If we cannot eliminate injustice and corruption through other means, then people will continue to suffer like in North Korea, or someone with power will emerge, and we will re-enter the loop of war. If we say that the only way to change the current situation is through war, then war is the only option. Or, is it that continuing in a world of injustice and corruption and enjoying its sweet honey is actually the hidden purpose of those who desire peace? Some people might think that way, but most people probably don't.

Therefore, while we can briefly consider whether to accept a change in the status quo through force, like Trump, in the long term, we need to eliminate the injustice and corruption of politicians and civilians, and the sense of inequality (in terms of burden) among the people.

Basically, wars and revolutions, and civil wars, are caused by the hunger and dissatisfaction of the people.

In the world, it is often explained that wars are carried out by the schemes of politicians, arms dealers, and financiers, and there is even a tendency, especially in liberal circles, to think that this might be true. While there is some truth to that aspect, the hunger and dissatisfaction of the people cannot be the justification for war. If there is交流 between countries at the national level and between people, and if there is peace, then there is no reason to start a war. While there are countries like Britain that try to create a situation of conflict, Trump is not that smart, and besides, such conspiracies take a long time to carry out, so it is impossible to carry out such a conspiracy within the term of a president, which is only 4 or 8 years.

Conspiracy theories are being whispered, but perhaps, if such a conspiracy actually existed, it would be better because it would only require resolving that specific issue. It would offer hope for the future change of heart of the people involved in the conspiracy. On the other hand, even if something like a "deep state" exists, if it doesn't have that much power, and if the poverty and dissatisfaction of the people are the root cause of conflict, then resolving that would take a long time and be difficult.

When a war occurs, attention is immediately focused on the immediate war, and discussions arise about which side is right or where the legitimacy lies. In reality, it is more about domestic affairs and the governance of one's own country. If a country is governed properly and the people are satisfied, there will be no war. The occurrence of war indicates that there is a problem in one or both countries.

Therefore, basically, we do not intervene in the actions of people like Trump, and we let them do as they please, because the military action itself is not the essence of the problem.

Military actions can lead to the collapse of a regime and the exposure of internal affairs. This allows us to understand the current situation. In the essence of war, the validity of the reasons given is often discussed. However, from a cosmic perspective, what is more interesting is "what is the internal situation?" This emphasizes "understanding," and when a regime is shaken, hidden internal affairs are revealed, allowing many people to learn from it and avoid future problems, injustices, and corruption. Otherwise, the situation will never be understood, and injustice and dissatisfaction will continue indefinitely, causing the people to suffer.

From that perspective, if war leads to the disclosure of information and deepens people's understanding, then war can be seen as positive. On the other hand, there are wars that achieve nothing, and such futile wars are completely rejected from a cosmic perspective.

Assuming that the Earth will not be blown up by nuclear bombs, war can be viewed positively to some extent. The fact that war occurs when there are no other options means that there are other causes, and wars that reveal the situation where those causes are hidden are considered positive.

Therefore, wars and information control that spread false information through propaganda and confuse people's understanding are rejected.

- Wars that lead to a deeper understanding among people are affirmed.
- Wars that create nothing are denied.
- Wars that confuse or mislead people through propaganda are denied.

Every war includes multiple factors, and while there may be aspects that are acceptable, it is not solely based on one element.

Eventually, the world will unite around the most powerful country, and a world government and a global president will be elected. In that case, the global president will be responsible for peace throughout the world, and conflicts on Earth will end. An era of peace will arrive.

As a preliminary step, an event will occur in Jerusalem that resolves the conflicts between three religions. After that, an opportunity will arise for all countries in the world to unite. However, that is still a little further in the future.

At that time, the logic of wars like the ones mentioned above will no longer be necessary, because wars will simply no longer occur.

In order for that era to arrive, the people must eliminate injustice, dissatisfaction, and corruption. This is because if war cannot change the current situation, it will be necessary to do so through civil administration and the judicial system. Although it will take time to eradicate injustice and corruption, the seeds of change are already emerging.

Eventually, people around the world will awaken and fight against injustice and corruption. This will become an even greater movement than it is now, including countries where injustice and corruption are currently rampant.

Even after the major wars end, the individual struggles will continue.