It's more of a revelation or a warning... I can't do anything about what I saw. Please consider it a fantasy. It's a somewhat scary story. It feels like something I've always known, rather than a dream. When I see it, I'm looking from a distant past perspective.

Jerusalem should be an independent nation, not part of Israel, according to God's will.
God does not want Jerusalem to be governed by a single religion.
Currently, Israel has de facto control, and Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are fighting over its ownership, but God does not want this situation to continue.

The goal is to aim for independence within approximately 10 years. In reality, it will likely be around 2031, plus or minus a few years. The timing may vary, but the target is roughly 10 years, around 2030, with a few years leeway.
The territory will encompass an area within a radius of approximately 30km from Jerusalem. The borders will respect the will of the residents living in that area.
It will be a republic, governed by representatives from Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Religious governance, similar to the Vatican City.
It is desirable, but not mandatory, for other religions to participate as observers with no voting rights. This could include Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, etc.
Dual citizenship is not allowed for citizens.
Citizenship should be granted to those who believe in the future of Jerusalem as a nation and are willing to entrust it to future generations.
Anyone who desires it should be welcomed as a citizen. However, citizens must be residents. Residents are those who live in Jerusalem for more than 2/3 of the year, and residents have the right to vote and can become members of parliament.
Each religion will hold elections to nominate one representative, for a total of three representatives who will operate through a majority vote. The number of parliament members will be based on the population ratio, but can be adjusted.
As a nation, a nominal head of state is needed, but someone like a religious leader will rotate the position without any real power, similar to the Emperor. The country will not participate in the United Nations as a regular member, but may participate as an observer, similar to the Vatican City.
The power will be equally distributed among the religions. That is, the power of each representative from each religion will be equal.
This system will last for 50 years.
Around 2080, after 50 years, the system will transition to a democratic system with voting.
After 50 years, a new generation will emerge, and it will be the era of "Jerusalem citizens." This 50-year period is not strict. It's more of a general timeframe.
It will be the first time that democratic voting will be possible. Before that, it will be impossible due to religious conflicts.
The nation will be created by those who entrust Jerusalem to future generations. It will be a nation created by those who become "Jerusalem citizens."
Jerusalem will be a demilitarized zone. There will be no military, only police. (Or, it could be guarded by a military force with police powers, like the Vatican, but the country will not have its own military.)

If God's will is not fulfilled, that is, if an independent nation is not created within approximately 10 years, or if there is no prospect of it happening, a warning will be issued. First, as a warning, a meteor shower will fall on the Dead Sea, causing a rain of salt to awaken the people. If the people do not awaken, a meteor shower (approximately 100m in diameter) will fall on Jerusalem, and the Old City of Jerusalem will be destroyed by God, like Sodom and Gomorrah, or major buildings will be destroyed. God cannot execute this alone, and the future will depend on whether the collective consciousness (collective unconscious) of the people chooses one path or another. Nothing can be accomplished without the consent of human will. This cannot be achieved by God's will alone, nor can it be achieved by human will alone. These things will only happen with the consent of both God's and human will. Choosing destruction or creating the future is based on the will of both God and humanity. God has shown the will. It is up to people to choose which path to take.

If an independent nation is not established and the current situation continues, there is a very high risk that Jerusalem and religious conflicts will become a trigger for a third world war. God is concerned about the potential outbreak of such a conflict, which could be the final war. As an alternative, it is possible to eliminate Jerusalem from this world before it becomes a cause of war, rather than as a human-made disaster, but by the power of meteors sent by God. Alternatively, major buildings could be destroyed by meteors. However, the destruction of Jerusalem is not the goal; the goal is for humans to solve their own problems in the world by creating an independent nation of Jerusalem.

Again, this cannot be carried out by God's will alone, and the consent of human will is necessary. If neither is desired, these plans will not be implemented. In that case, history will move in unexpected directions like a pendulum that has come off its string. God has shown the two major choices in the flow of history. If neither is chosen, the results will be unpredictable due to the free will of humans. What the final choice will be is something even God cannot predict.

In summary, the options are as follows:

- Establishment of an independent state of Jerusalem. This requires human will and action. God desires this. God's help will be available.
- Destruction of the Old City of Jerusalem or major buildings. This would involve divine intervention, so the consent of human will (collective unconscious) is required.
- Unpredictable results. It depends on humans. There is a high possibility that it could become a trigger for the Third World War. God would prefer to avoid this option, but if there is no consent from human will, neither of the above two options will be realized.

...Is this a dream? Please consider it a fantasy. However, it has a "certain" feel to it.

■Similarly for Kashmir
The method for resolving conflicts in this type of conflict zone can be applied to other regions on Earth. For example, the Kashmir conflict should be resolved by establishing an independent state of Kashmir, rather than India, Pakistan, and China competing for Kashmir. ...This is what is said. There is no specific content for the case of Kashmir. There are currently no instructions regarding deadlines or other details.

Jerusalem is a place I traveled to in the past, and it is a nostalgic place.
Related: Israel (Jerusalem) travel during a world tour.

This is a story I had in a meditation or dream, so I don't know if it's true.

It seems like there's a plan by God to forcibly eliminate only those who directly fired Hamas rockets and are directly responsible. It's difficult to determine the guilt of Hamas leaders who indirectly instructed terrorism, but at least, those who directly fired rockets are clearly guilty. By punishing them, the goal is to make people realize that "if you fire a rocket, you will die," which would significantly reduce the number of people who want to fire rockets, and bring peace to the Palestinian territories.

Here's how it works, step by step.

Originally, there were misunderstandings about the Palestinian territories and Israel, and the Japanese media has been promoting Hamas's public relations. Hamas intentionally repeats terrorist acts to provoke Israel's retaliation and then publicizes its brutality to the world. However, God has begun to realize that Hamas is actually the one committing the atrocities.

Even though God is all-knowing, human intentions, such as these, can sometimes be difficult to understand. Moreover, decades are fleeting for God, so it could be said that God took some time to grasp the situation, even though Hamas was inciting fear in the 20th century.

And now, the understanding that Hamas and extremist Islamic organizations are the problem is spreading to God.

In the Ottoman era, Arabs and Jews could coexist in the same land. God believes that there is no reason why they cannot coexist now.

There are stories that the reason they are fighting now is because Britain practiced double-dealing, and there are stories that Israel was forcibly established. However, it seems that the understanding is settling in that the Arabs were the most greedy, and that they still are.

During the Ottoman era, Arabs and Jews could coexist, and there were Palestinian residents who sold land to the Jews at that time. Before the establishment of Israel, about 6% of the land in the Palestinian territories was owned by Jews. Generally, it is said that the remaining 90% of the land was owned by Arabs, but in reality, only 10-20% was owned by Arabs, and the remaining 70% was public land. Moreover, the southern part was almost desert, so this can be considered a statistical trick.

Moreover, in terms of population, Arabs claimed that there were 1 million Arabs, far more than Jews. However, this number includes the population of Palestinians in Jordan, and the actual population in the Palestinian territories was less than that of Jews. If the land were divided equally, and the fertile land were given to the Arabs, was that not actually fair? Israel includes the southern desert, so even though it seems like a lot of land, it wasn't that much.

Originally, the land was under British administration and entrusted to the United Nations. In 1947, when the United Nations proposed a two-state solution for Israel, the Jewish side accepted it, while the Arab side rejected it, saying that Israel should not exist and should be eliminated. The Arabs attacked Israel. Which side was truly greedy? The land allocated to the Arabs was fertile land, so the division plan was quite fair. Israel had to live in a desert and develop the land, while the Arab countries would not allow Israel to exist, saying that Israel should leave and should not exist. At that time, the Jews were quite disliked by the Arab countries, and not only that, but the Arabs were also very greedy.

After that, realizing that they could not defeat Israel militarily, the Arabs tried to rally world public opinion by using the Gaza region. This is how the "poor Palestinians" were fabricated, and Israel was made the villain. However, the Arabs are the ones who are greedy, cunning, and stubborn.

Although I say "Arabs," there are countries like Egypt and Jordan that have made peace with Israel and had land returned. Therefore, Israel can be considered a reliable negotiating partner. If Israel makes peace, it returns land, and Israel has continued to abide by that treaty. The Palestinians should do the same. However, Hamas advocates for the extermination of Israel and is repeatedly committing terrorism out of greed.

At one point, Hamas was advocating for the elimination of Israel. Originally, during the Ottoman Empire, coexistence was possible, but Hamas rejects coexistence and dialogue, aiming for the elimination of Israel. It is becoming increasingly understood, even among some, that Hamas and Islamist fundamentalists, with their rigid ideologies, are obstacles to peace. While there are various perspectives and levels of understanding, this is a growing trend.

Of course, there are those who support Hamas, and their views differ. However, this understanding is becoming increasingly mainstream. While some may defend Hamas, based on my observations, this is my perspective.

Hamas has realized that by highlighting the plight of residents in the Gaza Strip and creating a tragic narrative, they can attract attention and collect funds and supplies under the guise of humanitarian aid. As a result, the lives of people in the Gaza Strip have been exploited by Hamas for propaganda purposes, and Hamas has justified its actions (including fabricating atrocities committed by Israel) through the inhumane practice of using "human shields." However, it seems that even some are beginning to realize that Hamas is the problem.

Humanitarian aid workers, while understanding the situation, often say, "But we must help the people of Palestine, who are innocent." This is precisely what Hamas intends. They are exploiting this sentiment.

About 20 years ago, I spoke with an activist from an NGO supporting Palestine. He said, "If we go to Palestine and form a human chain, holding flags, Israel will not attack us. We will become human shields and protect Palestine." I wonder what he is doing now. Perhaps now is the time for those with such noble intentions to go to northern Gaza, join hands, raise flags, and demonstrate their resolve. However, the reality is that they would likely be shot by both Hamas and Israel, or become hostages used for negotiation. Even with the best intentions, such actions have not solved anything in decades. By engaging in activities that resemble Hamas's public relations, they are only being used and discarded by Hamas. Despite this, they believe they are doing good, as they have been effectively brainwashed.

Naive individuals, often with significant resources, attract attention through their activities, causing confusion. It is best to simply ignore them and avoid supporting organizations like Hamas.

In the past, I was overwhelmed by the constant and one-sided flow of information from activists supporting Palestine. They insisted that it was "important," regardless of my inconvenience, and I was treated as a bad person for not responding. They would become hysterical, staring at me with wide eyes, and their self-righteous attitude was frustrating. I don't know what they are doing now, but many of the activists I knew who were involved in the Palestinian cause had questionable aspects (this is my personal opinion).

They shared common characteristics: they would exaggerate the situation and become hysterical, creating the illusion that they were involved in something important. They would become irritated if others did not agree, their voices would become louder, their eyes would widen, and they would make strange faces.

In retrospect, I realized that I did not want to associate with the hysterical and self-righteous activists from Palestinian NGOs. I haven't had any contact with them for decades, so I don't know what they are doing now.

Japanese environmental activists seem to genuinely believe Hamas's propaganda, defending Hamas and claiming that "Hamas is unfairly labeled as cruel for retaliating against Israel, which has been bullying them." However, the reality is that Israel is often the one who is first attacked with rockets. When Israel retaliates, it is labeled as cruel. The situation is the opposite of what they claim. Bullies often play the victim, but in this case, Hamas, the bully, is pretending to be the victim and making nonsensical claims.

In reality, people with mental illnesses who cannot distinguish between themselves and others often repeat nonsensical claims by reversing the roles of self and others. The claims made by Hamas supporters (or their representatives) are of this kind. In reality, Israel is the one being bullied, and Hamas is the bully, but they can boldly and loudly claim the opposite. It is best not to engage with people who are mentally ill like that.

Furthermore, it was the Arab side that initiated the first Middle East war. When challenged on this, they often make claims like, "It's actually the Israelis who are forcing Hamas to attack," which may or may not be true. Such statements could be propaganda designed to obscure the fact that Hamas is truly responsible, or they may simply reflect a state of confusion and a distorted understanding of the facts.

In any case, the underlying truth is much simpler: the Arabs are greedy, and they are exploiting the Palestinian humanitarian issue. The more attention the Palestinian humanitarian issue receives, the more Hamas profits, and they believe that the public's anger directed at Israel could lead to a French Revolution-like situation, where the Israeli government is overthrown by its own people.

However, it's also possible that I am misinterpreting Hamas, and that they are simply incredibly stupid and have no real agenda, only acting out of anger and benefiting from the current situation. Perhaps that is the truth. Even if we call them "Hamas," they are not a monolithic group. If they are simply stupid, it will be difficult for them to understand the fundamental issues and find solutions without external intervention.

Instead, the world should ignore Hamas and the Palestinian humanitarian issue. We should not take their dubious claims at face value. It's possible that what appears to be a complex issue is simply due to their extreme stupidity. In any case, dealing with greedy and violent terrorists like Hamas is futile, so the media should avoid promoting their propaganda. People should not be swayed by the narrative of Palestinian humanitarian aid and should not provide financial or material assistance.

Some people might think that I am a cruel person for suggesting this, but there are countless people living in poverty around the world, and there are many conflicts. For example, why does the Palestinian issue receive so much attention compared to the lives of people in slums, who are often in even worse conditions, and receive little to no assistance? This is because of the media coverage and the presence of attention-grabbing terrorist acts and counterattacks. People are caught up in the immediate tragedy.

Some people from NGOs and support organizations may become hysterical and shout, "Why don't you try being in their position!" However, these people should first put themselves in that position before making such statements. If they cannot do that, their criticisms are merely empty rhetoric, and they are not willing to experience the same things themselves. They are simply proving that their support is based on emotional and superficial sentiments. Hamas receives support from such emotionally driven people, while largely ignoring the Palestinians, providing only token assistance, and allowing Hamas leaders to live comfortably in safe places abroad.

As long as people continue to believe the propaganda that portraying Palestinians as "helpless" and providing aid will benefit the world, Hamas' exploitation of the Palestinians will continue. While the public perceives the situation as "Israeli exploitation" of the Palestinians, the reality is that Hamas leaders are exploiting the Palestinians. This is becoming increasingly well-known, and that is why Hamas should not be supported.

Some people say that Hamas is doing some good deeds, but that is not necessarily due to Hamas itself. There are people everywhere who want to help others, and there is no need to take credit for that as "Hamas' achievement." People will help others regardless of whether Hamas exists. Helping others is not related to Hamas. It is not surprising that there are people within Hamas who want to help others, but even so, Hamas' strategy is inhumane.

Hamas uses inhumane tactics such as "human shields," which is a violation of human rights. While Israel is criticized for its response when Hamas fires rockets, the truly reprehensible party is Hamas. However, there is also a possibility that this is simply due to Hamas' extreme stupidity. The truth is likely a combination of both, with some intelligent and some stupid individuals, and the ratio is unknown. However, the overall tendency is that they are simply stupid. Even God might find it difficult to understand the actions of such confused and incomprehensible people.

In any case, it seems that among those who claim to be acting on behalf of a higher power, there is a growing opinion that Hamas, which controls the Gaza region, should not be helped because it uses the people of Palestine as tools for its own purposes.

This could also be said in terms of Machiavellianism. A ruler must consider the happiness of the people in terms of numbers. Even if humanitarian aid provides temporary relief and a sense of well-being, if it prolongs the conflict and leads to an increase in victims, it is more humane not to provide aid. If, on the other hand, aid is withheld, Hamas may be unable to continue the conflict and may eventually surrender, leading to a governance under the control of Israel or the United Nations, which could ultimately result in fewer victims.

Although there is no certainty, and opinions are still divided, it seems that such an opinion is gaining prominence among those who claim to be acting on behalf of a higher power. Of course, even among those who claim to be acting on behalf of a higher power, there are diverse opinions and it is not a monolithic entity.

It seems that the current situation is a result of prioritizing immediate relief, which has prolonged the conflict. This is extremely inhumane. I have thought this for many years, and while I may not be the only one who has held this view, the fact that the situation continues suggests that there are people who continue to provide aid, believing that it is the right thing to do. Perhaps the people of Palestine and Hamas are unaware of this, or are aware of it but are exploiting the conflict for their own benefit. It is likely that Hamas is aware of this and is exploiting the conflict for its own benefit. Alternatively, it could be a case of "false flag," where Hamas is not even aware of this, but the leaders are aware and are exploiting the conflict for their own gain.

Since internal reform is difficult, creating a situation that cannot be sustained from the outside is also a possible approach. However, the blind and unthinking aid provided by those who prioritize "feel-good" emotions over the actual situation, and who believe they are doing something wonderful, will eventually disappear. This is one way to end the conflict in Palestine, but there will always be a certain number of wealthy and unthinking people in the world, so it is unlikely that this problem will be solved from this direction.

I learned about this strange relationship about 20 years ago, and since then, and even now, there is a structure that keeps the people of Palestine in a tragic situation through international "aid." It is possible that they are simply unaware of the current situation and are acting on it without realizing it. However, as long as Hamas wants to maintain the status quo and uses Israel as a scapegoat to gain public support and enrich itself under the guise of international aid, the people of the world will not realize this until Hamas wants to maintain the status quo, or at least believes that the current situation is acceptable. Of course, Hamas does not openly say this, but uses Israel as a scapegoat. The lack of deep thought may be due to a lack of intelligence.

About 20 years ago, when I was involved in environmental and NGO activities, I was repeatedly invited by NGO activists who claimed to be protecting Palestine to "join us and become a human shield." I wonder what those activists are doing now? Do they regret their past actions? It is likely that they were simply used by Hamas for its own purposes.

Recently, someone asked a direct question to a Hamas leader in an interview: "If you have the funds to dig a tunnel, why don't you use them to help the people of Palestine?" The response was something like, "Why should we, Hamas, help the people of Palestine." On the other hand, when there are attacks and casualties in Palestine, Hamas often promotes the idea that they are protecting the people of Palestine.

As I said, Hamas is not a monolithic entity, and doctors in hospitals naturally help patients. However, this is separate from the policies of Hamas leaders. The fact that doctors in Palestinian hospitals are helping patients does not mean that Hamas leaders are genuinely trying to protect the people of Palestine. There are those who pretend to be protecting the people of Palestine, and their true nature can be seen in their actions and sometimes in their words. It takes life experience and a certain level of intelligence to see through this.

Internationally, the easy aid provided to those with low intelligence will not end. These aid providers are not only unintelligent but often hysterical, so they rarely listen to other people's opinions and continue their aid in a self-righteous manner. Even if someone realizes this, someone else with low intelligence will inevitably join and continue the aid, creating a structure where this continues. There is a system in place where broadcasting tragic images of bombings leads to a certain number of people becoming emotionally invested and providing financial aid.

Therefore, even if images of bombings are shown, we should leave that region untouched until the terrorists release the hostages in Pal⚪︎⚪︎⚪︎. We should provide no aid.

This is something that should be considered with small examples. For example, consider a situation where a few dozen terrorists are holding dozens of hostages. In that case, the police would prioritize eliminating the terrorists. Pal⚪︎⚪︎⚪︎ and Ha⚪︎⚪︎ are essentially the same. When terrorists take hostages and the occupation continues, and the hostages are in distress due to a lack of food, if someone says, "We should help the hostages," it will only prolong the occupation.

What should be done is to eliminate the terrorists and release the hostages, not to regularly send ransom money. Even if people in Pal⚪︎⚪︎⚪︎ experience hardship temporarily, all aid should be stopped. Because while the leaders of Ha⚪︎⚪︎ think, "We can make money by broadcasting tragic images," this approach will continue. Therefore, from an external perspective, stopping the aid is the correct solution. This will bring stability and peace to that region in the long run.

When I say this, there are always people who say, "Then, you should experience it yourself. You wouldn't like it if you were hit by a missile." I am not talking about that. I am talking about making choices that minimize overall sadness and anger. It is better to have a large number of people suffer in the short term, but then achieve stability and peace, than to prolong the conflict for decades. That is the current situation in Pal⚪︎⚪︎.

Everyone dislikes being hit by a missile. That is natural. The problem is that people are not understanding the point. I am talking about how to reduce the total amount of sadness and anger, not about whether a particular incident is terrible or not. In order to stop Ha⚪︎⚪︎, which has continued terrorism for decades by causing endless suffering to save a few, it is necessary to provide no aid and ignore them. However, there are always many unintelligent and shortsighted people in the world who become hysterical and complain based on "personal sadness," so they will not understand this "total" approach. Therefore, people who provide aid to alleviate "visible sadness" will continue to exist, and Ha⚪︎⚪︎'s strategy will succeed, with Pal⚪︎⚪︎ becoming a "propaganda tool" to collect materials and financial support from all over the world, benefiting Ha⚪︎⚪︎. This is exactly what Ha⚪︎⚪︎ wants.

The reason I bring up this region in a spiritual discussion is because if lightworkers do not actively intervene in this region, the possibility of the Earth ending will increase. More lightworkers need to pay attention to this region. From what I have seen, if this region does not become peaceful, there is a high probability that the Earth will be reset. The way to intervene is not simply by providing aid, which is not the way NGOs currently helping Palestine are doing.

If it is impossible for the current human ruling class to bring about peace, a divine intervention and proposal will be made as a last resort. However, the choice is still with the humans on this earth. God's intervention is of that nature. Even so, if it is impossible to achieve peace, if humans continue to fight and follow their own path, even if a messenger of God shows the direction of the future, what will happen if the ruling class is not interested in it...? I leave that to your imagination.

The proposal is literally a verbal proposal, but to make the ruling class understand it realistically, some degree of intervention involving the use of power will be carried out beforehand. Lightworkers need to be involved in that. The use of power does not refer to the use of weapons like those used today, but requires the involvement of lightworkers who transcend human intelligence.

Ideally, the problem should be solved through normal means. However, if it is difficult to solve the problem through the approach of people realizing the situation and stopping the aid, other solutions are necessary.

One possibility is that, just as Robespierre incited hatred among the people during the French Revolution and had the French king condemned and executed by the people, if Hamas were to exterminate the Palestinians and unify the state, Hamas's goals would be achieved, and a new government similar to France would be established, which would achieve Hamas's goals and provide a certain level of stability. However, it is almost impossible for Hamas to defeat the Palestinians with its current military strength, so this approach is unlikely to succeed.

A more realistic scenario would be for the Palestinians to exterminate Hamas and unify the entire territory. However, the Palestinians likely do not want this, as they probably want to form their own countries based on Arab identity, and that would lead to regional stability.

Options:
- Internally, Hamas realizes this and chooses a path towards peace.
- Externally, the world stops providing aid to the Palestinians, isolating them and forcing Hamas to change its direction.
- Hamas exterminates the Palestinians and unifies the state.
- The Palestinians exterminate Hamas and unify the state.

As of October 2023, Hamas had effective control only in the northern Gaza region. However, news reports in April 2024 suggest that the Palestinians are effectively controlling the Gaza region. Nevertheless, I foresee continued chaos and unrest in the region. Therefore, I believe that none of the above options are feasible.

Ideally, in the current situation, wealthy Arabs or Hamas officials with personal assets worth billions of dollars should provide assistance to the Palestinians. News reports often mention humanitarian aid worth billions of dollars, but that amount of money and supplies is easily available to Arab individuals and Hamas officials. If they do not provide such assistance, it suggests that Hamas is benefiting from the situation. Therefore, it is best to leave the Palestinians alone, as the situation will naturally resolve itself if the world ignores them. This is because terrorism will no longer be profitable in the Palestinian territories. Since it costs money to launch rockets, they will stop doing so if it does not bring them profit. Hamas is not attacking the Palestinians as much as it is trying to gain sympathy from the world and make money. Therefore, the world should ignore them.

However, if that does not happen, even if the world condemns the Palestinians, it would be more peaceful if the Palestinians temporarily control the entire Gaza Strip and eliminate Hamas's terrorist forces from the region. This is what I believe to be the truth, and I think God feels the same way.

Hamas is appealing to the world for help by highlighting the tragic consequences of its actions. God believes that this should be stopped directly. God is considering other ways to change the situation and improve it, which is to stop the terrorism directly. Since God cannot directly intervene in the world, lightworkers need to be involved.

Hatred is increasing in the Middle East, including between the Palestinians and the Palestinians. This is a concern for God, and while money-making may have been Hamas's initial motivation, hatred lingers in the land and dominates people's emotions. This hatred can bring misfortune to the Palestinians and the Palestinians. Therefore, God believes that it is necessary to break this cycle and purify the region.

The consent of the Palestinian people is also necessary for peace in the region. Without mutual understanding, the conflict will not end. Lightworkers can act as mediators. As a preliminary step, invisible forces will use extraordinary power to make the Palestinians listen to the lightworkers. No matter how much they talk, most people in the world will not pay attention unless they see the power. This is especially true for the ruling class.

Specifically, there is a plan to quickly remove the souls of those who commit acts of terrorism, for example, within 24 hours, such as on the night they commit the act. This would result in a "silent death," where the person appears to be asleep and does not wake up.

For example, if a person in the Gaza region launches a rocket at the Palestinians, their soul will be forcibly removed from their body within 24 hours, usually on the night they are sleeping. The body will then stop functioning. The person will not experience much suffering. Initially, they will be in a state of out-of-body experience, and then, in reality, they are simply out of their body, but if the connection between the body and the astral body is forcibly severed, they will not be able to return to their body the next day, and eventually, the body will naturally stop functioning (without pain). It may initially appear as brain death, but if this happens to many people in the Gaza region, people will quickly realize that it is not a simple death but an unusual event. This will initially be suspected as a new weapon of the Palestinians (such as the Mossad's secret forces), but in reality, it is a punishment by God who does not allow the cycle of hatred caused by terrorism. If someone participates in a terrorist act by launching a rocket, that person will end their life within 24 hours, according to this plan.

It seems that solving the problem from within the Hamas area, as mentioned above, is also difficult (whether intentionally or simply due to a lack of understanding), and external assistance is also impossible to completely cut off, as there are some people in the world who provide support based on the short-sighted notion of alleviating suffering, and there are a certain number of wealthy people (including those who have acquired their wealth through questionable means). Therefore, as a drastic measure, I believe it is best to directly eliminate those who carried out the terrorist acts by firing rockets with their own hands.

In reality, "God" (the execution team that moves according to God's will, the unseen presence) will confirm this one by one, so not everyone who fired a rocket will be affected. However, during the period when God's mission is being carried out, those who fire rockets will be under surveillance, and if a normal man is seen by God in that situation, he will be dealt with without question. If God (the unseen presence of the division of God's spirit) does not see it, it may be lucky, but if he is witnessed, there will be no leniency. In the case of children, there is a kind of suspended sentence, but if the fired bullet hits something and causes casualties, they will be considered guilty, and if it only slightly damages a building or road, the child may be let go. As a certain number of people die in this unusual way, people will realize that "something is wrong," and there will be no more terrorists. Then, peace will come to Palestine

This is not something that God directly dictates, but rather, lightworkers use not only physical observation but also spiritual vision and remote viewing to act as "eyes," and along with them, unseen people (a special unit of spirits) monitor and identify specific targets. Finally, unseen entities (so-called spirits, special mission-bearing spirit groups) with special missions will act to achieve this. This is a possibility, although it is not yet confirmed.

There are plans to deter terrorism through such drastic measures.

Once terrorist acts cease and peace comes to Palestine God seems to desire the independence of Jerusalem The three religions will become a single nation, and that will become a model for the world, leading to the establishment of a nation based on "promises" and a world unified government in the future. The independence of Jerusalem and the establishment of a world unified government are God's true purpose, and as a preliminary step, the plan is to forcibly achieve peace in Palestine

God's messengers will propose this.

As a stepping stone to world peace, Jerusalem will first unite, and a model of a nation based on "promises" will be shown. Then, a world president will be elected using the same mechanism. Currently, in the world's national system, a candidate can say anything until they are elected, but after being elected, "a person" can decide everything. However, the key difference here is that the policies (manifesto) that a candidate puts forward before being elected are equivalent to a "promise" to God, and the elected person's authority is limited to the scope of that promise. Disasters, wars, and conflicts that occur urgently are exceptions, but in general daily operations, the scope is limited to the "promises" made initially.

This basic mechanism will be applied to the president of the world unified government and the president of the Earth, and the president of the Earth will have power only within the scope of "promises." However, this power is not absolute, and whether each individual chooses to follow it is left to their free will. In practice, the principle can be "if you don't agree, you can refuse." In the Jerusalem nation, if the prime minister can decide everything, the three religions will become divided and fragmented, but the principle is to operate based on the "promises," and each sect is given the free will to choose whether or not to follow them. Therefore, it is possible to refuse. If that is the case, the president of Jerusalem cannot do whatever they want, and they will need to have a thorough dialogue with each sect. That is the goal.

The same principle applies to the president of the world, and even if the president gives orders or instructions, each country has the free will to choose whether or not to follow them. These principles will first be demonstrated in Jerusalem and then the Earth government will follow the same mechanism.

As a step towards world peace and world unification, it is necessary for Jerusalem to unite first, but as a further preliminary step, it is necessary to end the conflict in Palestine If that is not possible, God may abandon or freeze the current timeline and switch to a world where a former sphere of influence existed (a world where Europe was destroyed by nuclear bombs). While there is much sadness in that world, God believes that it may be better than continuing the current world (in a state where God's proposal is rejected). However, there are several options available now, and it is possible to make this world even better.

This is not just a problem of conflict, but a matter of whether the world will continue to exist, and furthermore, lightworkers need to intervene more actively in that region for that reason.